Stanislav Fomichev sdf@fomichev.me writes:
On 08/01, Petr Machata wrote:
Stanislav Fomichev sdf@fomichev.me writes:
On 07/31, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
On Wed, 31 Jul 2024 13:34:58 +0200 Petr Machata wrote:
qstat = netfam.qstats_get({"ifindex": cfg.ifindex}, dump=True)- except NlError as e:
if e.error == 95:Could you do this as if e.error == errno.ENOTSUP?
just to be clear EOPNOTSUPP ..
That might be the reason it's coded explicitly as 95? :-D
Both exist, I just didn't notice the latter.
import errno errno.ENOTSUP
95
errno.EOPNOTSUPP
95
I believe Jakub was talking about kernel's ENOTSUPP (524) vs EOPNOTSUPP (95):
$ grep ENOTSUPP include/linux/errno.h #define ENOTSUPP 524 /* Operation is not supported */
$ grep EOPNOTSUPP include/uapi/asm-generic/errno.h #define EOPNOTSUPP 95 /* Operation not supported on transport endpoint */
These two are frequently confused.
OTOH, ENOTSUP looks like a userspace/libc invention:
$ grep -w ENOTSUP /usr/include/bits/errno.h # ifndef ENOTSUP # define ENOTSUP EOPNOTSUPP
I'm gonna stick to kernel's EOPNOTSUPP to make it look similar to what we have on the kernel side.
Yep, sounds good.