September 2024 - Linux-kselftest-mirror

[crng-random:jd/arm64-vdso] [selftests] f68b079b1d: kernel-selftests.vDSO.vdso_standalone_test_x86.fail

by kernel test robot

Hello, kernel test robot noticed "kernel-selftests.vDSO.vdso_standalone_test_x86.fail" on: commit: f68b079b1d5ec46687a097347303b616927eb9ff ("selftests: vDSO: build tests with O2 optimization") https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/crng/random.git jd/arm64-vdso in testcase: kernel-selftests version: kernel-selftests-x86_64-977d51cf-1_20240508 with following parameters: group: group-03 compiler: gcc-12 test machine: 36 threads 1 sockets Intel(R) Core(TM) i9-10980XE CPU @ 3.00GHz (Cascade Lake) with 32G memory (please refer to attached dmesg/kmsg for entire log/backtrace) If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags | Reported-by: kernel test robot <oliver.sang(a)intel.com> | Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-lkp/202409082121.553d4c89-oliver.sang@intel.com # timeout set to 300 # selftests: vDSO: vdso_standalone_test_x86 # Segmentation fault not ok 5 selftests: vDSO: vdso_standalone_test_x86 # exit=139 The kernel config and materials to reproduce are available at: https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20240908/202409082121.553d4c89-oliv… -- 0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki

9 months

1
0
0 0

[PATCH v2] selftests/futex: Create test for robust list

by André Almeida

Create a test for the robust list mechanism. Signed-off-by: André Almeida <andrealmeid(a)igalia.com> --- Changes from v1: - Change futex type from int to _Atomic(unsigned int) - Use old futex(FUTEX_WAIT) instead of the new sys_futex_wait() --- .../selftests/futex/functional/.gitignore | 1 + .../selftests/futex/functional/Makefile | 3 +- .../selftests/futex/functional/robust_list.c | 448 ++++++++++++++++++ 3 files changed, 451 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/futex/functional/robust_list.c diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/futex/functional/.gitignore b/tools/testing/selftests/futex/functional/.gitignore index fbcbdb6963b3..4726e1be7497 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/futex/functional/.gitignore +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/futex/functional/.gitignore @@ -9,3 +9,4 @@ futex_wait_wouldblock futex_wait futex_requeue futex_waitv +robust_list diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/futex/functional/Makefile b/tools/testing/selftests/futex/functional/Makefile index f79f9bac7918..b8635a1ac7f6 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/futex/functional/Makefile +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/futex/functional/Makefile @@ -17,7 +17,8 @@ TEST_GEN_PROGS := \ futex_wait_private_mapped_file \ futex_wait \ futex_requeue \ - futex_waitv + futex_waitv \ + robust_list TEST_PROGS := run.sh diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/futex/functional/robust_list.c b/tools/testing/selftests/futex/functional/robust_list.c new file mode 100644 index 000000000000..9308eb189d48 --- /dev/null +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/futex/functional/robust_list.c @@ -0,0 +1,448 @@ +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-or-later +/* + * Copyright (C) 2024 Igalia S.L. + * + * Robust list test by André Almeida <andrealmeid(a)igalia.com> + * + * The robust list uAPI allows userspace to create "robust" locks, in the sense + * that if the lock holder thread dies, the remaining threads that are waiting + * for the lock won't block forever, waiting for a lock that will never be + * released. + * + * This is achieve by userspace setting a list where a thread can enter all the + * locks (futexes) that it is holding. The robust list is a linked list, and + * userspace register the start of the list with the syscall set_robust_list(). + * If such thread eventually dies, the kernel will walk this list, waking up one + * thread waiting for each futex and marking the futex word with the flag + * FUTEX_OWNER_DIED. + * + * See also + * man set_robust_list + * Documententation/locking/robust-futex-ABI.rst + * Documententation/locking/robust-futexes.rst + */ + +#define _GNU_SOURCE + +#include "../../kselftest_harness.h" + +#include "futextest.h" + +#include <pthread.h> +#include <stdatomic.h> +#include <stddef.h> + +#define STACK_SIZE (1024 * 1024) + +#define FUTEX_TIMEOUT 3 + +static pthread_barrier_t barrier, barrier2; + +int set_robust_list(struct robust_list_head *head, size_t len) +{ + return syscall(SYS_set_robust_list, head, len); +} + +int get_robust_list(int pid, struct robust_list_head **head, size_t *len_ptr) +{ + return syscall(SYS_get_robust_list, pid, head, len_ptr); +} + +/* + * Basic lock struct, contains just the futex word and the robust list element + * Real implementations have also a *prev to easily walk in the list + */ +struct lock_struct { + _Atomic(unsigned int) futex; + struct robust_list list; +}; + +/* + * Helper function to spawn a child thread. Returns -1 on error, pid on success + */ +static int create_child(int (*fn)(void *arg), void *arg) +{ + char *stack; + pid_t pid; + + stack = mmap(NULL, STACK_SIZE, PROT_READ | PROT_WRITE, + MAP_PRIVATE | MAP_ANONYMOUS | MAP_STACK, -1, 0); + if (stack == MAP_FAILED) + return -1; + + stack += STACK_SIZE; + + pid = clone(fn, stack, CLONE_VM | SIGCHLD, arg); + + if (pid == -1) + return -1; + + return pid; +} + +/* + * Helper function to prepare and register a robust list + */ +static int set_list(struct robust_list_head *head) +{ + int ret; + + ret = set_robust_list(head, sizeof(struct robust_list_head)); + if (ret) + return ret; + + head->futex_offset = (size_t) offsetof(struct lock_struct, futex) - + (size_t) offsetof(struct lock_struct, list); + head->list.next = &head->list; + head->list_op_pending = NULL; + + return 0; +} + +/* + * A basic (and incomplete) mutex lock function with robustness + */ +static int mutex_lock(struct lock_struct *lock, struct robust_list_head *head, bool error_inject) +{ + _Atomic(unsigned int) *futex = &lock->futex; + int zero = 0, ret = -1; + pid_t tid = gettid(); + + /* + * Set list_op_pending before starting the lock, so the kernel can catch + * the case where the thread died during the lock operation + */ + head->list_op_pending = &lock->list; + + if (atomic_compare_exchange_strong(futex, &zero, tid)) { + /* + * We took the lock, insert it in the robust list + */ + struct robust_list *list = &head->list; + + /* Error injection to test list_op_pending */ + if (error_inject) + return 0; + + while (list->next != &head->list) + list = list->next; + + list->next = &lock->list; + lock->list.next = &head->list; + + ret = 0; + } else { + /* + * We didn't take the lock, wait until the owner wakes (or dies) + */ + struct timespec to; + + clock_gettime(CLOCK_MONOTONIC, &to); + to.tv_sec = to.tv_sec + FUTEX_TIMEOUT; + + tid = atomic_load(futex); + /* Kernel ignores futexes without the waiters flag */ + tid |= FUTEX_WAITERS; + atomic_store(futex, tid); + + ret = futex_wait((futex_t *) futex, tid, &to, 0); + + /* + * A real mutex_lock() implementation would loop here to finally + * take the lock. We don't care about that, so we stop here. + */ + } + + head->list_op_pending = NULL; + + return ret; +} + +/* + * This child thread will succeed taking the lock, and then will exit holding it + */ +static int child_fn_lock(void *arg) +{ + struct lock_struct *lock = (struct lock_struct *) arg; + struct robust_list_head head; + int ret; + + ret = set_list(&head); + if (ret) + ksft_test_result_fail("set_robust_list error\n"); + + ret = mutex_lock(lock, &head, false); + if (ret) + ksft_test_result_fail("mutex_lock error\n"); + + pthread_barrier_wait(&barrier); + + /* + * There's a race here: the parent thread needs to be inside + * futex_wait() before the child thread dies, otherwise it will miss the + * wakeup from handle_futex_death() that this child will emit. We wait a + * little bit just to make sure that this happens. + */ + sleep(1); + + return 0; +} + +/* + * Spawns a child thread that will set a robust list, take the lock, register it + * in the robust list and die. The parent thread will wait on this futex, and + * should be waken up when the child exits. + */ +TEST(robustness) +{ + struct lock_struct lock = { .futex = 0 }; + struct robust_list_head head; + _Atomic(unsigned int) *futex = &lock.futex; + int ret; + + ret = set_list(&head); + ASSERT_EQ(ret, 0); + + /* + * Lets use a barrier to ensure that the child thread takes the lock + * before the parent + */ + ret = pthread_barrier_init(&barrier, NULL, 2); + ASSERT_EQ(ret, 0); + + ret = create_child(&child_fn_lock, &lock); + ASSERT_NE(ret, -1); + + pthread_barrier_wait(&barrier); + ret = mutex_lock(&lock, &head, false); + + /* + * futex_wait() should return 0 and the futex word should be marked with + * FUTEX_OWNER_DIED + */ + ASSERT_EQ(ret, 0) TH_LOG("futex wait returned %d", errno); + ASSERT_TRUE(*futex | FUTEX_OWNER_DIED); + + pthread_barrier_destroy(&barrier); +} + +/* + * The only valid value for len is sizeof(*head) + */ +TEST(set_robust_list_invalid_size) +{ + struct robust_list_head head; + size_t head_size = sizeof(struct robust_list_head); + int ret; + + ret = set_robust_list(&head, head_size); + ASSERT_EQ(ret, 0); + + ret = set_robust_list(&head, head_size * 2); + ASSERT_EQ(ret, -1); + ASSERT_EQ(errno, EINVAL); + + ret = set_robust_list(&head, head_size - 1); + ASSERT_EQ(ret, -1); + ASSERT_EQ(errno, EINVAL); + + ret = set_robust_list(&head, 0); + ASSERT_EQ(ret, -1); + ASSERT_EQ(errno, EINVAL); +} + +/* + * Test get_robust_list with pid = 0, getting the list of the running thread + */ +TEST(get_robust_list_self) +{ + struct robust_list_head head, head2, *get_head; + size_t head_size = sizeof(struct robust_list_head), len_ptr; + int ret; + + ret = set_robust_list(&head, head_size); + ASSERT_EQ(ret, 0); + + ret = get_robust_list(0, &get_head, &len_ptr); + ASSERT_EQ(ret, 0); + ASSERT_EQ(get_head, &head); + ASSERT_EQ(head_size, len_ptr); + + ret = set_robust_list(&head2, head_size); + ASSERT_EQ(ret, 0); + + ret = get_robust_list(0, &get_head, &len_ptr); + ASSERT_EQ(ret, 0); + ASSERT_EQ(get_head, &head2); + ASSERT_EQ(head_size, len_ptr); +} + +static int child_list(void *arg) +{ + struct robust_list_head *head = (struct robust_list_head *) arg; + int ret; + + ret = set_robust_list(head, sizeof(struct robust_list_head)); + if (ret) + ksft_test_result_fail("set_robust_list error\n"); + + pthread_barrier_wait(&barrier); + pthread_barrier_wait(&barrier2); + + return 0; +} + +/* + * Test get_robust_list from another thread. We use two barriers here to ensure + * that: + * 1) the child thread set the list before we try to get it from the + * parent + * 2) the child thread still alive when we try to get the list from it + */ +TEST(get_robust_list_child) +{ + pid_t tid; + int ret; + struct robust_list_head head, *get_head; + size_t len_ptr; + + ret = pthread_barrier_init(&barrier, NULL, 2); + ret = pthread_barrier_init(&barrier2, NULL, 2); + ASSERT_EQ(ret, 0); + + tid = create_child(&child_list, &head); + ASSERT_NE(tid, -1); + + pthread_barrier_wait(&barrier); + + ret = get_robust_list(tid, &get_head, &len_ptr); + ASSERT_EQ(ret, 0); + ASSERT_EQ(&head, get_head); + + pthread_barrier_wait(&barrier2); + + pthread_barrier_destroy(&barrier); + pthread_barrier_destroy(&barrier2); +} + +static int child_fn_lock_with_error(void *arg) +{ + struct lock_struct *lock = (struct lock_struct *) arg; + struct robust_list_head head; + int ret; + + ret = set_list(&head); + if (ret) + ksft_test_result_fail("set_robust_list error\n"); + + ret = mutex_lock(lock, &head, true); + if (ret) + ksft_test_result_fail("mutex_lock error\n"); + + pthread_barrier_wait(&barrier); + + sleep(1); + + return 0; +} + +/* + * Same as robustness test, but inject an error where the mutex_lock() exits + * earlier, just after setting list_op_pending and taking the lock, to test the + * list_op_pending mechanism + */ +TEST(set_list_op_pending) +{ + struct lock_struct lock = { .futex = 0 }; + struct robust_list_head head; + _Atomic(unsigned int) *futex = &lock.futex; + int ret; + + ret = set_list(&head); + ASSERT_EQ(ret, 0); + + ret = pthread_barrier_init(&barrier, NULL, 2); + ASSERT_EQ(ret, 0); + + ret = create_child(&child_fn_lock_with_error, &lock); + ASSERT_NE(ret, -1); + + pthread_barrier_wait(&barrier); + ret = mutex_lock(&lock, &head, false); + + ASSERT_EQ(ret, 0) TH_LOG("futex wait returned %d", errno); + ASSERT_TRUE(*futex | FUTEX_OWNER_DIED); + + pthread_barrier_destroy(&barrier); +} + +#define CHILD_NR 10 + +static int child_lock_holder(void *arg) +{ + struct lock_struct *locks = (struct lock_struct *) arg; + struct robust_list_head head; + int i; + + set_list(&head); + + for (i = 0; i < CHILD_NR; i++) { + locks[i].futex = 0; + mutex_lock(&locks[i], &head, false); + } + + pthread_barrier_wait(&barrier); + pthread_barrier_wait(&barrier2); + + sleep(1); + return 0; +} + +static int child_wait_lock(void *arg) +{ + struct lock_struct *lock = (struct lock_struct *) arg; + struct robust_list_head head; + int ret; + + pthread_barrier_wait(&barrier2); + ret = mutex_lock(lock, &head, false); + + if (ret) + ksft_test_result_fail("mutex_lock error\n"); + + if (!(lock->futex | FUTEX_OWNER_DIED)) + ksft_test_result_fail("futex not marked with FUTEX_OWNER_DIED\n"); + + return 0; +} + +/* + * Test a robust list of more than one element. All the waiters should wake when + * the holder dies + */ +TEST(robust_list_multiple_elements) +{ + struct lock_struct locks[CHILD_NR]; + int i, ret; + + ret = pthread_barrier_init(&barrier, NULL, 2); + ASSERT_EQ(ret, 0); + ret = pthread_barrier_init(&barrier2, NULL, CHILD_NR + 1); + ASSERT_EQ(ret, 0); + + create_child(&child_lock_holder, &locks); + + /* Wait until the locker thread takes the look */ + pthread_barrier_wait(&barrier); + + for (i = 0; i < CHILD_NR; i++) + create_child(&child_wait_lock, &locks[i]); + + /* Wait for all children to return */ + while (wait(NULL) > 0); + + pthread_barrier_destroy(&barrier); + pthread_barrier_destroy(&barrier2); +} + +TEST_HARNESS_MAIN -- 2.46.0

9 months

3
2
0 0

[PATCH v2] kselftest/cgroup: Add missing newline in test_zswap.c

by Mohammed Anees

Thank you for the review, I have added the changelog as requested. Changelog: - Added missing newline to the `ksft_print_msg` in `test_zswap_writeback` function. Signed-off-by: Mohammed Anees <pvmohammedanees2003(a)gmail.com> --- tools/testing/selftests/cgroup/test_zswap.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/cgroup/test_zswap.c b/tools/testing/selftests/cgroup/test_zswap.c index 190096017..7c849d836 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/cgroup/test_zswap.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/cgroup/test_zswap.c @@ -351,7 +351,7 @@ static int test_zswap_writeback(const char *root, bool wb) goto out; if (wb != !!zswpwb_after) { - ksft_print_msg("zswpwb_after is %ld while wb is %s", + ksft_print_msg("zswpwb_after is %ld while wb is %s\n", zswpwb_after, wb ? "enabled" : "disabled"); goto out; } -- 2.43.0

9 months

1
0
0 0

[GIT PULL] KUnit fixes second update for Linux 6.11-rc7

by Shuah Khan

Hi Linus, Please pull the following KUnit fixes second update for Linux 6.11-rc7. This KUnit fixes update for Linux 6.11-rc7 consists of a fix to missing function parameter warning found during documentation build in linux-next. diff is attached. thanks, -- Shuah ---------------------------------------------------------------- The following changes since commit f2c6dbd220170c2396fb019ead67fbada1e23ebd: kunit: Device wrappers should also manage driver name (2024-08-26 07:03:46 -0600) are available in the Git repository at: git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/shuah/linux-kselftest tags/linux_kselftest-kunit-fixes-6.11-rc7-2 for you to fetch changes up to 12cb32a52eb607dc4d0e45fe6f4cf946d08da0fd: kunit: Fix missing kerneldoc comment (2024-09-05 14:29:10 -0600) ---------------------------------------------------------------- linux_kselftest-kunit-fixes-6.11-rc7-2 This KUnit fixes update for Linux 6.11-rc7 consists of a fix to missing function parameter warning found during documentation build in linux-next. ---------------------------------------------------------------- David Gow (1): kunit: Fix missing kerneldoc comment include/kunit/test.h | 1 + 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) ----------------------------------------------------------------

9 months

2
1
0 0

kselftest/next kselftest-seccomp: 2 runs, 1 regressions (v6.11-rc1-20-gaf1ec38c6ccc3)

by kernelci.org bot

kselftest/next kselftest-seccomp: 2 runs, 1 regressions (v6.11-rc1-20-gaf1ec38c6ccc3) Regressions Summary ------------------- platform | arch | lab | compiler | defconfig | regressions ----------------------------+------+-------------+----------+------------------------------+------------ stm32mp157a-dhcor-avenger96 | arm | lab-broonie | gcc-12 | multi_v7_defconfig+kselftest | 1 Details: https://kernelci.org/test/job/kselftest/branch/next/kernel/v6.11-rc1-20-gaf… Test: kselftest-seccomp Tree: kselftest Branch: next Describe: v6.11-rc1-20-gaf1ec38c6ccc3 URL: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/shuah/linux-kselftest.git SHA: af1ec38c6ccc31ec963ac4bcf8f6a7d8f44d210a Test Regressions ---------------- platform | arch | lab | compiler | defconfig | regressions ----------------------------+------+-------------+----------+------------------------------+------------ stm32mp157a-dhcor-avenger96 | arm | lab-broonie | gcc-12 | multi_v7_defconfig+kselftest | 1 Details: https://kernelci.org/test/plan/id/66db7cf3c977f0093dc86855 Results: 0 PASS, 1 FAIL, 0 SKIP Full config: multi_v7_defconfig+kselftest Compiler: gcc-12 (arm-linux-gnueabihf-gcc (Debian 12.2.0-14) 12.2.0) Plain log: https://storage.kernelci.org//kselftest/next/v6.11-rc1-20-gaf1ec38c6ccc3/ar… HTML log: https://storage.kernelci.org//kselftest/next/v6.11-rc1-20-gaf1ec38c6ccc3/ar… Rootfs: http://storage.kernelci.org/images/rootfs/debian/bookworm-kselftest/2024031… * kselftest-seccomp.login: https://kernelci.org/test/case/id/66db7cf3c977f0093dc86856 failing since 38 days (last pass: v6.10-rc7-29-gdf09b0bb09ea, first fail: v6.11-rc1)

9 months

1
0
0 0

kselftest/next kselftest-lib: 2 runs, 1 regressions (v6.11-rc1-20-gaf1ec38c6ccc3)

by kernelci.org bot

kselftest/next kselftest-lib: 2 runs, 1 regressions (v6.11-rc1-20-gaf1ec38c6ccc3) Regressions Summary ------------------- platform | arch | lab | compiler | defconfig | regressions ----------------------------+------+-------------+----------+------------------------------+------------ stm32mp157a-dhcor-avenger96 | arm | lab-broonie | gcc-12 | multi_v7_defconfig+kselftest | 1 Details: https://kernelci.org/test/job/kselftest/branch/next/kernel/v6.11-rc1-20-gaf… Test: kselftest-lib Tree: kselftest Branch: next Describe: v6.11-rc1-20-gaf1ec38c6ccc3 URL: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/shuah/linux-kselftest.git SHA: af1ec38c6ccc31ec963ac4bcf8f6a7d8f44d210a Test Regressions ---------------- platform | arch | lab | compiler | defconfig | regressions ----------------------------+------+-------------+----------+------------------------------+------------ stm32mp157a-dhcor-avenger96 | arm | lab-broonie | gcc-12 | multi_v7_defconfig+kselftest | 1 Details: https://kernelci.org/test/plan/id/66db7fc38d2f0d735dc86865 Results: 0 PASS, 1 FAIL, 0 SKIP Full config: multi_v7_defconfig+kselftest Compiler: gcc-12 (arm-linux-gnueabihf-gcc (Debian 12.2.0-14) 12.2.0) Plain log: https://storage.kernelci.org//kselftest/next/v6.11-rc1-20-gaf1ec38c6ccc3/ar… HTML log: https://storage.kernelci.org//kselftest/next/v6.11-rc1-20-gaf1ec38c6ccc3/ar… Rootfs: http://storage.kernelci.org/images/rootfs/debian/bookworm-kselftest/2024031… * kselftest-lib.login: https://kernelci.org/test/case/id/66db7fc38d2f0d735dc86866 failing since 38 days (last pass: v6.10-rc7-29-gdf09b0bb09ea, first fail: v6.11-rc1)

9 months

1
0
0 0

kselftest/next kselftest-lkdtm: 2 runs, 1 regressions (v6.11-rc1-20-gaf1ec38c6ccc3)

by kernelci.org bot

kselftest/next kselftest-lkdtm: 2 runs, 1 regressions (v6.11-rc1-20-gaf1ec38c6ccc3) Regressions Summary ------------------- platform | arch | lab | compiler | defconfig | regressions ----------------------------+------+-------------+----------+------------------------------+------------ stm32mp157a-dhcor-avenger96 | arm | lab-broonie | gcc-12 | multi_v7_defconfig+kselftest | 1 Details: https://kernelci.org/test/job/kselftest/branch/next/kernel/v6.11-rc1-20-gaf… Test: kselftest-lkdtm Tree: kselftest Branch: next Describe: v6.11-rc1-20-gaf1ec38c6ccc3 URL: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/shuah/linux-kselftest.git SHA: af1ec38c6ccc31ec963ac4bcf8f6a7d8f44d210a Test Regressions ---------------- platform | arch | lab | compiler | defconfig | regressions ----------------------------+------+-------------+----------+------------------------------+------------ stm32mp157a-dhcor-avenger96 | arm | lab-broonie | gcc-12 | multi_v7_defconfig+kselftest | 1 Details: https://kernelci.org/test/plan/id/66db812c906848735ec8689d Results: 0 PASS, 1 FAIL, 0 SKIP Full config: multi_v7_defconfig+kselftest Compiler: gcc-12 (arm-linux-gnueabihf-gcc (Debian 12.2.0-14) 12.2.0) Plain log: https://storage.kernelci.org//kselftest/next/v6.11-rc1-20-gaf1ec38c6ccc3/ar… HTML log: https://storage.kernelci.org//kselftest/next/v6.11-rc1-20-gaf1ec38c6ccc3/ar… Rootfs: http://storage.kernelci.org/images/rootfs/debian/bookworm-kselftest/2024031… * kselftest-lkdtm.login: https://kernelci.org/test/case/id/66db812c906848735ec8689e failing since 38 days (last pass: v6.10-rc7-29-gdf09b0bb09ea, first fail: v6.11-rc1)

9 months

1
0
0 0

kselftest/next build: 7 builds: 2 failed, 5 passed, 1 warning (v6.11-rc1-20-gaf1ec38c6ccc3)

by kernelci.org bot

kselftest/next build: 7 builds: 2 failed, 5 passed, 1 warning (v6.11-rc1-20-gaf1ec38c6ccc3) Full Build Summary: https://kernelci.org/build/kselftest/branch/next/kernel/v6.11-rc1-20-gaf1ec… Tree: kselftest Branch: next Git Describe: v6.11-rc1-20-gaf1ec38c6ccc3 Git Commit: af1ec38c6ccc31ec963ac4bcf8f6a7d8f44d210a Git URL: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/shuah/linux-kselftest.git Built: 4 unique architectures Build Failures Detected: arm64: defconfig+kselftest+arm64-chromebook: (clang-16) FAIL defconfig+kselftest+arm64-chromebook: (gcc-12) FAIL Warnings Detected: arm64: arm: i386: x86_64: x86_64_defconfig+kselftest (clang-16): 1 warning Warnings summary: 1 vmlinux.o: warning: objtool: set_ftrace_ops_ro+0x39: relocation to !ENDBR: .text+0x14ef94 ================================================================================ Detailed per-defconfig build reports: -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- defconfig+kselftest (arm64, gcc-12) — PASS, 0 errors, 0 warnings, 0 section mismatches -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- defconfig+kselftest+arm64-chromebook (arm64, gcc-12) — FAIL, 0 errors, 0 warnings, 0 section mismatches -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- defconfig+kselftest+arm64-chromebook (arm64, clang-16) — FAIL, 0 errors, 0 warnings, 0 section mismatches -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- i386_defconfig+kselftest (i386, gcc-12) — PASS, 0 errors, 0 warnings, 0 section mismatches -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- multi_v7_defconfig+kselftest (arm, gcc-12) — PASS, 0 errors, 0 warnings, 0 section mismatches -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- x86_64_defconfig+kselftest (x86_64, clang-16) — PASS, 0 errors, 1 warning, 0 section mismatches Warnings: vmlinux.o: warning: objtool: set_ftrace_ops_ro+0x39: relocation to !ENDBR: .text+0x14ef94 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- x86_64_defconfig+kselftest (x86_64, gcc-12) — PASS, 0 errors, 0 warnings, 0 section mismatches --- For more info write to <info(a)kernelci.org>

9 months

1
0
0 0

[PATCH net v2 0/2] bpf: devmap: provide rxq after redirect

by Florian Kauer

rxq contains a pointer to the device from where the redirect happened. Currently, the BPF program that was executed after a redirect via BPF_MAP_TYPE_DEVMAP* does not have it set. Add bugfix and related selftest. Signed-off-by: Florian Kauer <florian.kauer(a)linutronix.de> --- Changes in v2: - changed fixes tag - added selftest - Link to v1: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240905-devel-koalo-fix-ingress-ifindex-v1-1-d12… --- Florian Kauer (2): bpf: devmap: provide rxq after redirect bpf: selftests: send packet to devmap redirect XDP kernel/bpf/devmap.c | 11 +- .../selftests/bpf/prog_tests/xdp_devmap_attach.c | 114 +++++++++++++++++++-- 2 files changed, 115 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-) --- base-commit: 8e69c96df771ab469cec278edb47009351de4da6 change-id: 20240905-devel-koalo-fix-ingress-ifindex-b9293d471db6 Best regards, -- Florian Kauer <florian.kauer(a)linutronix.de>

9 months

3
4
0 0

[PATCH] kunit: Fix kernel-doc for EXPORT_SYMBOL_IF_KUNIT

by Michal Wajdeczko

While kunit/visibility.h is today not included in any generated kernel documentation, also likely due to the fact that none of the existing comments are correctly recognized as kernel-doc, but once we decide to add this header and fix the tool, there will be: ../include/kunit/visibility.h:61: warning: Function parameter or struct member 'symbol' not described in 'EXPORT_SYMBOL_IF_KUNIT' Signed-off-by: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko(a)intel.com> --- Cc: Rae Moar <rmoar(a)google.com> Cc: David Gow <davidgow(a)google.com> --- include/kunit/visibility.h | 1 + 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) diff --git a/include/kunit/visibility.h b/include/kunit/visibility.h index 0dfe35feeec6..efff77b58dd6 100644 --- a/include/kunit/visibility.h +++ b/include/kunit/visibility.h @@ -22,6 +22,7 @@ * EXPORTED_FOR_KUNIT_TESTING namespace only if CONFIG_KUNIT is * enabled. Must use MODULE_IMPORT_NS(EXPORTED_FOR_KUNIT_TESTING) * in test file in order to use symbols. + * @symbol: the symbol identifier to export */ #define EXPORT_SYMBOL_IF_KUNIT(symbol) EXPORT_SYMBOL_NS(symbol, \ EXPORTED_FOR_KUNIT_TESTING) -- 2.43.0

9 months

3
5
0 0

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

Linux-kselftest-mirror September 2024