November 2023 - Linux-kselftest-mirror

[PATCH v1 0/3] KVM: selftests: aarch64: Introduce pmu_event_filter_test

by Shaoqin Huang

The test is inspired by the pmu_event_filter_test which implemented by x86. On the arm64 platform, there is the same ability to set the pmu_event_filter through the KVM_ARM_VCPU_PMU_V3_FILTER attribute. So add the test for arm64. The series first move some pmu common code from vpmu_counter_access to lib/ which can be used by pmu_event_filter_test. Then implements the test itself. Shaoqin Huang (3): KVM: selftests: aarch64: Make the [create|destroy]_vpmu_vm() can be reused KVM: selftests: aarch64: Move the pmu helper function into lib/ KVM: selftests: aarch64: Introduce pmu_event_filter_test tools/testing/selftests/kvm/Makefile | 2 + .../kvm/aarch64/pmu_event_filter_test.c | 227 ++++++++++++++++++ .../kvm/aarch64/vpmu_counter_access.c | 218 ++--------------- .../selftests/kvm/include/aarch64/vpmu.h | 139 +++++++++++ .../testing/selftests/kvm/lib/aarch64/vpmu.c | 74 ++++++ 5 files changed, 466 insertions(+), 194 deletions(-) create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/kvm/aarch64/pmu_event_filter_test.c create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/kvm/include/aarch64/vpmu.h create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/kvm/lib/aarch64/vpmu.c -- 2.40.1

1 year

4
12
0 0

[PATCH bpf-next v5 0/3] selftests/bpf: Use pkg-config to determine ld flags

by Akihiko Odaki

When linking statically, libraries may require other dependencies to be included to ld flags. In particular, libelf may require libzstd. Use pkg-config to determine such dependencies. V4 -> V5: Introduced variables LIBELF_CFLAGS and LIBELF_LIBS. (Daniel Borkmann) Added patch "selftests/bpf: Choose pkg-config for the target". V3 -> V4: Added "2> /dev/null". V2 -> V3: Added missing "echo". V1 -> V2: Implemented fallback, referring to HOSTPKG_CONFIG. Akihiko Odaki (3): selftests/bpf: Choose pkg-config for the target selftests/bpf: Override PKG_CONFIG for static builds selftests/bpf: Use pkg-config for libelf tools/testing/selftests/bpf/Makefile | 14 +++++++++----- tools/testing/selftests/bpf/README.rst | 2 +- 2 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) -- 2.43.0

1 year

2
4
0 0

[PATCH] selftests:x86: Fix Format String Warnings in lam.c

by angquan yu

From: angquan yu <angquan21(a)gmail.com> This commit addresses compiler warnings in lam.c related to the usage of non-literal format strings without format arguments in the 'run_test' function. Warnings fixed: - Resolved warnings indicating that 'ksft_test_result_skip' and 'ksft_test_result' were called with 't->msg' as a format string without accompanying format arguments. Changes made: - Modified the calls to 'ksft_test_result_skip' and 'ksft_test_result' to explicitly include a format specifier ("%s") for 't->msg'. - This ensures that the string is safely treated as a format argument, adhering to safer coding practices and resolving the compiler warnings. Signed-off-by: angquan yu <angquan21(a)gmail.com> --- tools/testing/selftests/x86/lam.c | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/x86/lam.c b/tools/testing/selftests/x86/lam.c index 8f9b06d9c..215b8150b 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/x86/lam.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/x86/lam.c @@ -817,7 +817,7 @@ static void run_test(struct testcases *test, int count) /* return 3 is not support LA57, the case should be skipped */ if (ret == 3) { - ksft_test_result_skip(t->msg); + ksft_test_result_skip("%s", t->msg); continue; } @@ -826,7 +826,7 @@ static void run_test(struct testcases *test, int count) else ret = !(t->expected); - ksft_test_result(ret, t->msg); + ksft_test_result(ret, "%s", t->msg); } } -- 2.39.2

1 year

1
0
0 0

[PATCH] Resolve Macro Expansion Warning in nx_huge_pages_test.c

by angquan yu

From: angquan yu <angquan21(a)gmail.com> This commit fixes a compiler warning in the file x86_64/nx_huge_pages_test.c, which was caused by improper macro expansion of '__TEST_REQUIRE'. Warning addressed: - The warning was triggered by the expansion of the '__TEST_REQUIRE' macro, indicating a potential issue in how the macro was being used or expanded. Changes made: - Modified the usage of the '__TEST_REQUIRE' macro to ensure proper expansion. This involved explicitly passing the expected magic token (MAGIC_TOKEN) and a descriptive error message to the macro. - The fix enhances clarity in the macro usage and ensures that the compiler correctly interprets the intended logic, thereby resolving the warning. Signed-off-by: angquan yu <angquan21(a)gmail.com> --- tools/testing/selftests/kvm/x86_64/nx_huge_pages_test.c | 3 ++- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/x86_64/nx_huge_pages_test.c b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/x86_64/nx_huge_pages_test.c index 18ac5c195..323ede6b6 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/x86_64/nx_huge_pages_test.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/x86_64/nx_huge_pages_test.c @@ -259,7 +259,8 @@ int main(int argc, char **argv) __TEST_REQUIRE(token == MAGIC_TOKEN, "This test must be run with the magic token %d.\n" "This is done by nx_huge_pages_test.sh, which\n" - "also handles environment setup for the test."); + "also handles environment setup for the test.", + MAGIC_TOKEN); run_test(reclaim_period_ms, false, reboot_permissions); run_test(reclaim_period_ms, true, reboot_permissions); -- 2.39.2

1 year

2
1
0 0

[PATCH] Fix Format String Warnings in lam.c

by angquan yu

From: angquan yu <angquan21(a)gmail.com> This commit addresses compiler warnings in lam.c related to the usage of non-literal format strings without format arguments in the 'run_test' function. Warnings fixed: - Resolved warnings indicating that 'ksft_test_result_skip' and 'ksft_test_result' were called with 't->msg' as a format string without accompanying format arguments. Changes made: - Modified the calls to 'ksft_test_result_skip' and 'ksft_test_result' to explicitly include a format specifier ("%s") for 't->msg'. - This ensures that the string is safely treated as a format argument, adhering to safer coding practices and resolving the compiler warnings. Signed-off-by: angquan yu <angquan21(a)gmail.com> --- tools/testing/selftests/x86/lam.c | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/x86/lam.c b/tools/testing/selftests/x86/lam.c index 8f9b06d9c..215b8150b 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/x86/lam.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/x86/lam.c @@ -817,7 +817,7 @@ static void run_test(struct testcases *test, int count) /* return 3 is not support LA57, the case should be skipped */ if (ret == 3) { - ksft_test_result_skip(t->msg); + ksft_test_result_skip("%s", t->msg); continue; } @@ -826,7 +826,7 @@ static void run_test(struct testcases *test, int count) else ret = !(t->expected); - ksft_test_result(ret, t->msg); + ksft_test_result(ret, "%s", t->msg); } } -- 2.39.2

1 year

1
0
0 0

[PATCH] Fix Format String Warning in breakpoint_test

by angquan yu

From: angquan yu <angquan21(a)gmail.com> This commit resolves a compiler warning regardingthe use of non-literal format strings in breakpoint_test.c. The functions `ksft_test_result_pass` and `ksft_test_result_fail` were previously called with a variable `msg` directly, which could potentially lead to format string vulnerabilities. Changes made: - Modified the calls to `ksft_test_result_pass` and `ksft_test_result_fail` by adding a "%s" format specifier. This explicitly declares `msg` as a string argument, adhering to safer coding practices and resolving the compiler warning. This change does not affect the functional behavior of the code but ensures better code safety and compliance with recommended C programming standards. The previous warning is "breakpoint_test.c:287:17: warning: format not a string literal and no format arguments [-Wformat-security] 287 | ksft_test_result_pass(msg); | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ breakpoint_test.c:289:17: warning: format not a string literal and no format arguments [-Wformat-security] 289 | ksft_test_result_fail(msg); | " Signed-off-by: angquan yu <angquan21(a)gmail.com> --- tools/testing/selftests/breakpoints/breakpoint_test.c | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/breakpoints/breakpoint_test.c b/tools/testing/selftests/breakpoints/breakpoint_test.c index 3266cc929..d46962a24 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/breakpoints/breakpoint_test.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/breakpoints/breakpoint_test.c @@ -284,9 +284,9 @@ static void check_success(const char *msg) nr_tests++; if (ret) - ksft_test_result_pass(msg); + ksft_test_result_pass("%s", msg); else - ksft_test_result_fail(msg); + ksft_test_result_fail("%s", msg); } static void launch_instruction_breakpoints(char *buf, int local, int global) -- 2.39.2

1 year

1
0
0 0

[PATCH] Resolve 'Unused Result' Warning from proc-empty-vm.c

by angquan yu

From: angquan yu <angquan21(a)gmail.com> In tools/testing/selftests/proc/proc-empty->because the return value of a write call was being ignored. This call was partof a conditional debugging block (if (0) { ... }), which meant it would neveractually execute. This patch removes the unused debug write call. This cleanup resolves the compi>warning about ignoring the result of write declared with the warn_unused_resultattribute. Removing this code also improves the clarity and maintainability of the function, as it eliminates a non-functional block of code. This is original warning: proc-empty-vm.c: In function ‘test_proc_pid_statm’ :proc-empty-vm.c:385:17: warning: ignoring return value of ‘write’ declared with>385 | write(1, buf, rv);| Signed-off-by: angquan yu <angquan21(a)gmail.com> --- tools/testing/selftests/proc/proc-empty-vm.c | 2 ++ 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+) diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/proc/proc-empty-vm.c b/tools/testing/selftests/proc/proc-empty-vm.c index 5e7020630..d231e61e4 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/proc/proc-empty-vm.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/proc/proc-empty-vm.c @@ -383,8 +383,10 @@ static int test_proc_pid_statm(pid_t pid) assert(rv <= sizeof(buf)); if (0) { ssize_t written = write(1, buf, rv); + if (written == -1) { perror("write failed to /proc/${pid}"); + return EXIT_FAILURE; } } -- 2.39.2

1 year

1
0
0 0

[PATCH AUTOSEL 6.1 14/25] selftests/bpf: fix bpf_loop_bench for new callback verification scheme

by Sasha Levin

From: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87(a)gmail.com> [ Upstream commit f40bfd1679446b22d321e64a1fa98b7d07d2be08 ] This is a preparatory change. A follow-up patch "bpf: verify callbacks as if they are called unknown number of times" changes logic for callbacks handling. While previously callbacks were verified as a single function call, new scheme takes into account that callbacks could be executed unknown number of times. This has dire implications for bpf_loop_bench: SEC("fentry/" SYS_PREFIX "sys_getpgid") int benchmark(void *ctx) { for (int i = 0; i < 1000; i++) { bpf_loop(nr_loops, empty_callback, NULL, 0); __sync_add_and_fetch(&hits, nr_loops); } return 0; } W/o callbacks change verifier sees it as a 1000 calls to empty_callback(). However, with callbacks change things become exponential: - i=0: state exploring empty_callback is scheduled with i=0 (a); - i=1: state exploring empty_callback is scheduled with i=1; ... - i=999: state exploring empty_callback is scheduled with i=999; - state (a) is popped from stack; - i=1: state exploring empty_callback is scheduled with i=1; ... Avoid this issue by rewriting outer loop as bpf_loop(). Unfortunately, this adds a function call to a loop at runtime, which negatively affects performance: throughput latency before: 149.919 ± 0.168 M ops/s, 6.670 ns/op after : 137.040 ± 0.187 M ops/s, 7.297 ns/op Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii(a)kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87(a)gmail.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231121020701.26440-4-eddyz87@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast(a)kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal(a)kernel.org> --- tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/bpf_loop_bench.c | 13 ++++++++----- 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/bpf_loop_bench.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/bpf_loop_bench.c index 4ce76eb064c41..d461746fd3c1e 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/bpf_loop_bench.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/bpf_loop_bench.c @@ -15,13 +15,16 @@ static int empty_callback(__u32 index, void *data) return 0; } +static int outer_loop(__u32 index, void *data) +{ + bpf_loop(nr_loops, empty_callback, NULL, 0); + __sync_add_and_fetch(&hits, nr_loops); + return 0; +} + SEC("fentry/" SYS_PREFIX "sys_getpgid") int benchmark(void *ctx) { - for (int i = 0; i < 1000; i++) { - bpf_loop(nr_loops, empty_callback, NULL, 0); - - __sync_add_and_fetch(&hits, nr_loops); - } + bpf_loop(1000, outer_loop, NULL, 0); return 0; } -- 2.42.0

1 year

1
0
0 0

[RFC PATCH v2 0/2] Add test to verify probe of devices from discoverable busses

by Nícolas F. R. A. Prado

Hi, v1 [1] was discussed during Plumbers [2], where a lot of feedback was given. I hope to justify the changes in v2 and address the feedback here. One feedback from Shuah was that keeping per-platform files with the USB/PCI devices to test as part of the kselftest tree wasn't maintainable. One proposed alternative was to generate a list of probed devices on a known-good kernel and use that as a reference. However you need someone to look at that generated reference to be able to say it is a good one, and you need to save it to ensure it will be reproducible later anyway, so that wouldn't actually solve the problem. It is a matter of hand-crafting vs generating the test definitions, but they will need to be vouched by someone and stored somewhere in both cases. So for this v2, in patch 2 I just have a sample test definition, and the per-platform test definitions would be added to a separate repository. The other feedback received was that the BIOS might reconfigure the PCI topology (at least on x86), meaning that relying on a sequence of device and function numbers (eg 1d.0/02.0/0.0) as a stable description of a device on the platform is not possible. I couldn't verify whether this is really the case (if you have any more insight into this, please let me know), but with that in mind, here in v2 I have taken a different approach. Here I'm using the device's properties which are used for driver matching (the same that show on modalias) to identify a device in a stable way. This approach has some drawbacks compared to the one on v1. For one it doesn't uniquely identify a device, so if there are multiple of the same device on a platform they have to be checked as a group. Also the test definition isn't as human-readable. I'm adding in CC the people I recognized at the Plumbers session that were interested in this work. Feel free to add anyone missing. Thanks, Nícolas [1] https://lore.kernel.org/all/20231024211818.365844-1-nfraprado@collabora.com [2] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oE73eVSyFXQ&t=9377s Original cover letter: This is part of an effort to improve detection of regressions impacting device probe on all platforms. The recently merged DT kselftest [3] detects probe issues for all devices described statically in the DT. That leaves out devices discovered at run-time from discoverable busses. This is where this test comes in. All of the devices that are connected through discoverable busses (ie USB and PCI), and which are internal and therefore always present, can be described in a per-platform file so they can be checked for. The test will check that the device has been instantiated and bound to a driver. Patch 1 introduces the test. Patch 2 adds the test definitions for the google,spherion machine (Acer Chromebook 514) as an example. This is the sample output from the test running on Spherion: TAP version 13 Using board file: boards/google,spherion 1..3 ok 1 usb.camera ok 2 usb.bluetooth ok 3 pci.wifi Totals: pass:3 fail:0 xfail:0 xpass:0 skip:0 error:0 [3] https://lore.kernel.org/all/20230828211424.2964562-1-nfraprado@collabora.co… Changes in v2: - Changed approach of encoding stable device reference in test file from HW topology to device match fields (the ones from modalias) - Better documented test format Nícolas F. R. A. Prado (2): kselftest: Add test to verify probe of devices from discoverable busses kselftest: devices: Add sample board file for google,spherion tools/testing/selftests/Makefile | 1 + tools/testing/selftests/devices/.gitignore | 1 + tools/testing/selftests/devices/Makefile | 8 + .../selftests/devices/boards/google,spherion | 12 ++ .../devices/test_discoverable_devices.sh | 160 ++++++++++++++++++ 5 files changed, 182 insertions(+) create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/devices/.gitignore create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/devices/Makefile create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/devices/boards/google,spherion create mode 100755 tools/testing/selftests/devices/test_discoverable_devices.sh -- 2.42.1

1 year

4
10
0 0

[PATCH AUTOSEL 6.6 17/40] selftests/bpf: fix bpf_loop_bench for new callback verification scheme

by Sasha Levin

From: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87(a)gmail.com> [ Upstream commit f40bfd1679446b22d321e64a1fa98b7d07d2be08 ] This is a preparatory change. A follow-up patch "bpf: verify callbacks as if they are called unknown number of times" changes logic for callbacks handling. While previously callbacks were verified as a single function call, new scheme takes into account that callbacks could be executed unknown number of times. This has dire implications for bpf_loop_bench: SEC("fentry/" SYS_PREFIX "sys_getpgid") int benchmark(void *ctx) { for (int i = 0; i < 1000; i++) { bpf_loop(nr_loops, empty_callback, NULL, 0); __sync_add_and_fetch(&hits, nr_loops); } return 0; } W/o callbacks change verifier sees it as a 1000 calls to empty_callback(). However, with callbacks change things become exponential: - i=0: state exploring empty_callback is scheduled with i=0 (a); - i=1: state exploring empty_callback is scheduled with i=1; ... - i=999: state exploring empty_callback is scheduled with i=999; - state (a) is popped from stack; - i=1: state exploring empty_callback is scheduled with i=1; ... Avoid this issue by rewriting outer loop as bpf_loop(). Unfortunately, this adds a function call to a loop at runtime, which negatively affects performance: throughput latency before: 149.919 ± 0.168 M ops/s, 6.670 ns/op after : 137.040 ± 0.187 M ops/s, 7.297 ns/op Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii(a)kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87(a)gmail.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231121020701.26440-4-eddyz87@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast(a)kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal(a)kernel.org> --- tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/bpf_loop_bench.c | 13 ++++++++----- 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/bpf_loop_bench.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/bpf_loop_bench.c index 4ce76eb064c41..d461746fd3c1e 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/bpf_loop_bench.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/bpf_loop_bench.c @@ -15,13 +15,16 @@ static int empty_callback(__u32 index, void *data) return 0; } +static int outer_loop(__u32 index, void *data) +{ + bpf_loop(nr_loops, empty_callback, NULL, 0); + __sync_add_and_fetch(&hits, nr_loops); + return 0; +} + SEC("fentry/" SYS_PREFIX "sys_getpgid") int benchmark(void *ctx) { - for (int i = 0; i < 1000; i++) { - bpf_loop(nr_loops, empty_callback, NULL, 0); - - __sync_add_and_fetch(&hits, nr_loops); - } + bpf_loop(1000, outer_loop, NULL, 0); return 0; } -- 2.42.0

1 year

1
0
0 0

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

Linux-kselftest-mirror November 2023