October 2023 - Linux-kselftest-mirror

Re: [RFC PATCH 1/7] net: skbuff: Add tun_vnet_hash flag

by Willem de Bruijn

On Sun, Oct 8, 2023 at 7:22 AM Akihiko Odaki <akihiko.odaki(a)daynix.com> wrote: > > tun_vnet_hash can use this flag to indicate it stored virtio-net hash > cache to cb. > > Signed-off-by: Akihiko Odaki <akihiko.odaki(a)daynix.com> > --- > include/linux/skbuff.h | 2 ++ > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/include/linux/skbuff.h b/include/linux/skbuff.h > index 4174c4b82d13..e638f157c13c 100644 > --- a/include/linux/skbuff.h > +++ b/include/linux/skbuff.h > @@ -837,6 +837,7 @@ typedef unsigned char *sk_buff_data_t; > * @truesize: Buffer size > * @users: User count - see {datagram,tcp}.c > * @extensions: allocated extensions, valid if active_extensions is nonzero > + * @tun_vnet_hash: tun stored virtio-net hash cache to cb > */ > > struct sk_buff { > @@ -989,6 +990,7 @@ struct sk_buff { > #if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_IP_SCTP) > __u8 csum_not_inet:1; > #endif > + __u8 tun_vnet_hash:1; sk_buff space is very limited. No need to extend it, especially for code that stays within a single subsystem (tun). To a lesser extent the same point applies to the qdisc_skb_cb.

2 years

2
1
0 0

Re: [RFC PATCH 0/7] tun: Introduce virtio-net hashing feature

by Willem de Bruijn

On Sun, Oct 8, 2023 at 7:21 AM Akihiko Odaki <akihiko.odaki(a)daynix.com> wrote: > > virtio-net have two usage of hashes: one is RSS and another is hash > reporting. Conventionally the hash calculation was done by the VMM. > However, computing the hash after the queue was chosen defeats the > purpose of RSS. > > Another approach is to use eBPF steering program. This approach has > another downside: it cannot report the calculated hash due to the > restrictive nature of eBPF. > > Introduce the code to compute hashes to the kernel in order to overcome > thse challenges. > > An alternative solution is to extend the eBPF steering program so that it > will be able to report to the userspace, but it makes little sense to > allow to implement different hashing algorithms with eBPF since the hash > value reported by virtio-net is strictly defined by the specification. But using the existing BPF steering may have the benefit of requiring a lot less new code. There is ample precedence for BPF programs that work this way. The flow dissector comes to mind.

2 years

1
0
0 0

[PATCH] tools/nolibc: drop test for getauxval(AT_PAGESZ)

by Thomas Weißschuh

The test will not work for systems with pagesize != 4096 like aarch64 and some others. Other testcases are already testing the same functionality: * auxv_AT_UID tests getauxval() in general. * test_getpagesize() tests pagesize() which directly calls getauxval(AT_PAGESZ). Fixes: 48967b73f8fe ("selftests/nolibc: add testcases for startup code") Cc: stable(a)vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Thomas Weißschuh <linux(a)weissschuh.net> --- Note: This should probably also make it into 6.6. --- tools/testing/selftests/nolibc/nolibc-test.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/nolibc/nolibc-test.c b/tools/testing/selftests/nolibc/nolibc-test.c index a3ee4496bf0a..7e3936c182dc 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/nolibc/nolibc-test.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/nolibc/nolibc-test.c @@ -630,7 +630,6 @@ int run_startup(int min, int max) CASE_TEST(environ_HOME); EXPECT_PTRNZ(1, getenv("HOME")); break; CASE_TEST(auxv_addr); EXPECT_PTRGT(test_auxv != (void *)-1, test_auxv, brk); break; CASE_TEST(auxv_AT_UID); EXPECT_EQ(1, getauxval(AT_UID), getuid()); break; - CASE_TEST(auxv_AT_PAGESZ); EXPECT_GE(1, getauxval(AT_PAGESZ), 4096); break; case __LINE__: return ret; /* must be last */ /* note: do not set any defaults so as to permit holes above */ --- base-commit: ab663cc32912914258bc8a2fbd0e753f552ee9d8 change-id: 20231007-nolibc-auxval-pagesz-05f5ff79c4c4 Best regards, -- Thomas Weißschuh <linux(a)weissschuh.net>

2 years

3
4
0 0

[PATCH v2] tools/nolibc: add support for constructors and destructors

by Thomas Weißschuh

With the startup code moved to C, implementing support for constructors and deconstructors is fairly easy to implement. Examples for code size impact: text data bss dec hex filename 21837 104 88 22029 560d nolibc-test.before 22135 120 88 22343 5747 nolibc-test.after 21970 104 88 22162 5692 nolibc-test.after-only-crt.h-changes The sections are defined by [0]. [0] https://refspecs.linuxfoundation.org/elf/gabi4+/ch5.dynamic.html Signed-off-by: Thomas Weißschuh <linux(a)weissschuh.net> --- Changes in v2: - Drop RFC status. - Add comment to constructor test that execution in definition-order is expected. (Willy) - Rework destructor loop to avoid underflow if __fini_array_end is not provided by the linker. - Link to v1: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231005-nolibc-constructors-v1-1-776d56bbe917@we… --- tools/include/nolibc/crt.h | 23 ++++++++++++++++++++++- tools/testing/selftests/nolibc/nolibc-test.c | 17 +++++++++++++++++ 2 files changed, 39 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/tools/include/nolibc/crt.h b/tools/include/nolibc/crt.h index a5f33fef1672..b84f5fbb7b58 100644 --- a/tools/include/nolibc/crt.h +++ b/tools/include/nolibc/crt.h @@ -13,11 +13,22 @@ const unsigned long *_auxv __attribute__((weak)); static void __stack_chk_init(void); static void exit(int); +extern void (*const __preinit_array_start[])(void) __attribute__((weak)); +extern void (*const __preinit_array_end[])(void) __attribute__((weak)); + +extern void (*const __init_array_start[])(void) __attribute__((weak)); +extern void (*const __init_array_end[])(void) __attribute__((weak)); + +extern void (*const __fini_array_start[])(void) __attribute__((weak)); +extern void (*const __fini_array_end[])(void) __attribute__((weak)); + void _start_c(long *sp) { long argc; char **argv; char **envp; + int exitcode; + void (* const *func)(void); const unsigned long *auxv; /* silence potential warning: conflicting types for 'main' */ int _nolibc_main(int, char **, char **) __asm__ ("main"); @@ -54,8 +65,18 @@ void _start_c(long *sp) ; _auxv = auxv; + for (func = __preinit_array_start; func < __preinit_array_end; func++) + (*func)(); + for (func = __init_array_start; func < __init_array_end; func++) + (*func)(); + /* go to application */ - exit(_nolibc_main(argc, argv, envp)); + exitcode = _nolibc_main(argc, argv, envp); + + for (func = __fini_array_end; func > __fini_array_start;) + (*--func)(); + + exit(exitcode); } #endif /* _NOLIBC_CRT_H */ diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/nolibc/nolibc-test.c b/tools/testing/selftests/nolibc/nolibc-test.c index a3ee4496bf0a..88ea8e06e596 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/nolibc/nolibc-test.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/nolibc/nolibc-test.c @@ -57,6 +57,9 @@ static int test_argc; /* will be used by some test cases as readable file, please don't write it */ static const char *argv0; +/* will be used by constructor tests */ +static int constructor_test_value; + /* definition of a series of tests */ struct test { const char *name; /* test name */ @@ -594,6 +597,19 @@ int expect_strne(const char *expr, int llen, const char *cmp) #define CASE_TEST(name) \ case __LINE__: llen += printf("%d %s", test, #name); +/* constructors validate that they are executed in definition order */ +__attribute__((constructor)) +static void constructor1(void) +{ + constructor_test_value = 1; +} + +__attribute__((constructor)) +static void constructor2(void) +{ + constructor_test_value *= 2; +} + int run_startup(int min, int max) { int test; @@ -631,6 +647,7 @@ int run_startup(int min, int max) CASE_TEST(auxv_addr); EXPECT_PTRGT(test_auxv != (void *)-1, test_auxv, brk); break; CASE_TEST(auxv_AT_UID); EXPECT_EQ(1, getauxval(AT_UID), getuid()); break; CASE_TEST(auxv_AT_PAGESZ); EXPECT_GE(1, getauxval(AT_PAGESZ), 4096); break; + CASE_TEST(constructor); EXPECT_EQ(1, constructor_test_value, 2); break; case __LINE__: return ret; /* must be last */ /* note: do not set any defaults so as to permit holes above */ --- base-commit: ab663cc32912914258bc8a2fbd0e753f552ee9d8 change-id: 20231005-nolibc-constructors-b2aebffe9b65 Best regards, -- Thomas Weißschuh <linux(a)weissschuh.net>

2 years

2
1
0 0

[PATCH 0/4] kunit: Fix indentation of parameterized tests messages

by Michal Wajdeczko

The indentation of parameterized tests messages is currently broken in kunit. Try to fix that by introducing a test level attribute, that will be increased during nested parameterized tests execution, and use it to generate correct indent at the runtime when printing message or writing them to the log. Also improve kunit by providing test plan for the parameterized tests. Cc: David Gow <davidgow(a)google.com> Cc: Rae Moar <rmoar(a)google.com> Michal Wajdeczko (4): kunit: Drop redundant text from suite init failure message kunit: Fix indentation level of suite messages kunit: Fix indentation of parameterized tests messages kunit: Prepare test plan for parameterized subtests include/kunit/test.h | 25 ++++++++++++-- lib/kunit/test.c | 79 +++++++++++++++++++++++--------------------- 2 files changed, 65 insertions(+), 39 deletions(-) -- 2.25.1

2 years

3
16
0 0

[PATCH] kunit: Reset suite counter right before running tests

by Michal Wajdeczko

Today we reset the suite counter as part of the suite cleanup, called from the module exit callback, but it might not work that well as one can try to collect results without unloading a previous test (either unintentionally or due to dependencies). For easy reproduction try to load the kunit-test.ko and then collect and parse results from the kunit-example-test.ko load. Parser will complain about mismatch of expected test number: [ ] KTAP version 1 [ ] 1..1 [ ] # example: initializing suite [ ] KTAP version 1 [ ] # Subtest: example .. [ ] # example: pass:5 fail:0 skip:4 total:9 [ ] # Totals: pass:6 fail:0 skip:6 total:12 [ ] ok 7 example [ ] [ERROR] Test: example: Expected test number 1 but found 7 [ ] ===================== [PASSED] example ===================== [ ] ============================================================ [ ] Testing complete. Ran 12 tests: passed: 6, skipped: 6, errors: 1 Since we are now printing suite test plan on every module load, right before running suite tests, we should make sure that suite counter will also start from 1. Easiest solution seems to be move counter reset to the __kunit_test_suites_init() function. Signed-off-by: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko(a)intel.com> Cc: David Gow <davidgow(a)google.com> Cc: Rae Moar <rmoar(a)google.com> --- lib/kunit/test.c | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/lib/kunit/test.c b/lib/kunit/test.c index f2eb71f1a66c..9325d309ed82 100644 --- a/lib/kunit/test.c +++ b/lib/kunit/test.c @@ -670,6 +670,8 @@ int __kunit_test_suites_init(struct kunit_suite * const * const suites, int num_ return 0; } + kunit_suite_counter = 1; + static_branch_inc(&kunit_running); for (i = 0; i < num_suites; i++) { @@ -696,8 +698,6 @@ void __kunit_test_suites_exit(struct kunit_suite **suites, int num_suites) for (i = 0; i < num_suites; i++) kunit_exit_suite(suites[i]); - - kunit_suite_counter = 1; } EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(__kunit_test_suites_exit); -- 2.25.1

2 years

2
1
0 0

[PATCH RFC] tools/nolibc: add support for constructors and destructors

by Thomas Weißschuh

With the startup code moved to C, implementing support for constructors and deconstructors is fairly easy to implement. Examples for code size impact: text data bss dec hex filename 21837 104 88 22029 560d nolibc-test.before 22135 120 88 22343 5747 nolibc-test.after 21970 104 88 22162 5692 nolibc-test.after-only-crt.h-changes The sections are defined by [0]. [0] https://refspecs.linuxfoundation.org/elf/gabi4+/ch5.dynamic.html Signed-off-by: Thomas Weißschuh <linux(a)weissschuh.net> --- Note: This is only an RFC as I'm not 100% sure it belong into nolibc. But at least the code is visible as an example. Also it is one prerequisite for full ksefltest_harness.h support in nolibc, should we want that. --- tools/include/nolibc/crt.h | 23 ++++++++++++++++++++++- tools/testing/selftests/nolibc/nolibc-test.c | 16 ++++++++++++++++ 2 files changed, 38 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/tools/include/nolibc/crt.h b/tools/include/nolibc/crt.h index a5f33fef1672..c1176611d9a9 100644 --- a/tools/include/nolibc/crt.h +++ b/tools/include/nolibc/crt.h @@ -13,11 +13,22 @@ const unsigned long *_auxv __attribute__((weak)); static void __stack_chk_init(void); static void exit(int); +extern void (*const __preinit_array_start[])(void) __attribute__((weak)); +extern void (*const __preinit_array_end[])(void) __attribute__((weak)); + +extern void (*const __init_array_start[])(void) __attribute__((weak)); +extern void (*const __init_array_end[])(void) __attribute__((weak)); + +extern void (*const __fini_array_start[])(void) __attribute__((weak)); +extern void (*const __fini_array_end[])(void) __attribute__((weak)); + void _start_c(long *sp) { long argc; char **argv; char **envp; + int exitcode; + void (* const *func)(void); const unsigned long *auxv; /* silence potential warning: conflicting types for 'main' */ int _nolibc_main(int, char **, char **) __asm__ ("main"); @@ -54,8 +65,18 @@ void _start_c(long *sp) ; _auxv = auxv; + for (func = __preinit_array_start; func < __preinit_array_end; func++) + (*func)(); + for (func = __init_array_start; func < __init_array_end; func++) + (*func)(); + /* go to application */ - exit(_nolibc_main(argc, argv, envp)); + exitcode = _nolibc_main(argc, argv, envp); + + for (func = __fini_array_end - 1; func >= __fini_array_start; func--) + (*func)(); + + exit(exitcode); } #endif /* _NOLIBC_CRT_H */ diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/nolibc/nolibc-test.c b/tools/testing/selftests/nolibc/nolibc-test.c index a3ee4496bf0a..f166b425613a 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/nolibc/nolibc-test.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/nolibc/nolibc-test.c @@ -57,6 +57,9 @@ static int test_argc; /* will be used by some test cases as readable file, please don't write it */ static const char *argv0; +/* will be used by constructor tests */ +static int constructor_test_value; + /* definition of a series of tests */ struct test { const char *name; /* test name */ @@ -594,6 +597,18 @@ int expect_strne(const char *expr, int llen, const char *cmp) #define CASE_TEST(name) \ case __LINE__: llen += printf("%d %s", test, #name); +__attribute__((constructor)) +static void constructor1(void) +{ + constructor_test_value = 1; +} + +__attribute__((constructor)) +static void constructor2(void) +{ + constructor_test_value *= 2; +} + int run_startup(int min, int max) { int test; @@ -631,6 +646,7 @@ int run_startup(int min, int max) CASE_TEST(auxv_addr); EXPECT_PTRGT(test_auxv != (void *)-1, test_auxv, brk); break; CASE_TEST(auxv_AT_UID); EXPECT_EQ(1, getauxval(AT_UID), getuid()); break; CASE_TEST(auxv_AT_PAGESZ); EXPECT_GE(1, getauxval(AT_PAGESZ), 4096); break; + CASE_TEST(constructor); EXPECT_EQ(1, constructor_test_value, 2); break; case __LINE__: return ret; /* must be last */ /* note: do not set any defaults so as to permit holes above */ --- base-commit: ab663cc32912914258bc8a2fbd0e753f552ee9d8 change-id: 20231005-nolibc-constructors-b2aebffe9b65 Best regards, -- Thomas Weißschuh <linux(a)weissschuh.net>

2 years

2
4
0 0

[PATCH RESEND 0/3] kunit: Init and run test suites in the right state

by Jinjie Ruan

The original order of cases in kunit_module_notify() is confusing and misleading. And the best practice is return the err code from MODULE_STATE_COMING func. And the test suits should be executed when notify MODULE_STATE_LIVE. Jinjie Ruan (3): kunit: Make the cases sequence more reasonable for kunit_module_notify() kunit: Return error from kunit_module_init() kunit: Init and run test suites in the right state lib/kunit/test.c | 37 +++++++++++++++++++++++-------------- 1 file changed, 23 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-) -- 2.34.1

2 years

3
5
0 0

[PATCH 1/6] selftests: capabilities: remove duplicate unneeded defines

by Muhammad Usama Anjum

These duplicate defines should automatically be picked up from kernel headers. Use KHDR_INCLUDES to add kernel header files. Signed-off-by: Muhammad Usama Anjum <usama.anjum(a)collabora.com> --- tools/testing/selftests/capabilities/Makefile | 2 +- tools/testing/selftests/capabilities/test_execve.c | 8 -------- tools/testing/selftests/capabilities/validate_cap.c | 8 -------- 3 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 17 deletions(-) diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/capabilities/Makefile b/tools/testing/selftests/capabilities/Makefile index 6e9d98d457d5b..411ac098308f1 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/capabilities/Makefile +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/capabilities/Makefile @@ -2,7 +2,7 @@ TEST_GEN_FILES := validate_cap TEST_GEN_PROGS := test_execve -CFLAGS += -O2 -g -std=gnu99 -Wall +CFLAGS += -O2 -g -std=gnu99 -Wall $(KHDR_INCLUDES) LDLIBS += -lcap-ng -lrt -ldl include ../lib.mk diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/capabilities/test_execve.c b/tools/testing/selftests/capabilities/test_execve.c index df0ef02b40367..e3a352b020a79 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/capabilities/test_execve.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/capabilities/test_execve.c @@ -20,14 +20,6 @@ #include "../kselftest.h" -#ifndef PR_CAP_AMBIENT -#define PR_CAP_AMBIENT 47 -# define PR_CAP_AMBIENT_IS_SET 1 -# define PR_CAP_AMBIENT_RAISE 2 -# define PR_CAP_AMBIENT_LOWER 3 -# define PR_CAP_AMBIENT_CLEAR_ALL 4 -#endif - static int nerrs; static pid_t mpid; /* main() pid is used to avoid duplicate test counts */ diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/capabilities/validate_cap.c b/tools/testing/selftests/capabilities/validate_cap.c index cdfc94268fe6e..60b4e7b716a75 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/capabilities/validate_cap.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/capabilities/validate_cap.c @@ -9,14 +9,6 @@ #include "../kselftest.h" -#ifndef PR_CAP_AMBIENT -#define PR_CAP_AMBIENT 47 -# define PR_CAP_AMBIENT_IS_SET 1 -# define PR_CAP_AMBIENT_RAISE 2 -# define PR_CAP_AMBIENT_LOWER 3 -# define PR_CAP_AMBIENT_CLEAR_ALL 4 -#endif - #if __GLIBC__ > 2 || (__GLIBC__ == 2 && __GLIBC_MINOR__ >= 19) # define HAVE_GETAUXVAL #endif -- 2.39.2

2 years

4
16
0 0

Letter of Intent (LOI) (03-10-2023)

by Ahmad R Deeb

Attn: linux-kselftest(a)vger.kernel.org Date: 03-10-2023 Subject: Letter of Intent (LOI) (03-10-2023) This is a Letter of Intent concerning my Board of investors intent to fund some of your available investment projects. If this is of any interest to you then kindly advise. Yours Faithfully, Ahmad R. Deeb Head of Investment Team

2 years

1
0
0 0

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

Linux-kselftest-mirror October 2023