March 2022 - Linux-kselftest-mirror

[PATCH] Documentation: kunit: Fix cross-referencing warnings

by David Gow

The Architecture chapter of the KUnit documentation tried to include copies of the kernel-doc for a couple of things, despite these already existing in the API documentation. This lead to some warnings: architecture:31: ./include/kunit/test.h:3: WARNING: Duplicate C declaration, also defined at dev-tools/kunit/api/test:66. Declaration is '.. c:struct:: kunit_case'. architecture:163: ./include/kunit/test.h:1217: WARNING: Duplicate C declaration, also defined at dev-tools/kunit/api/test:1217. Declaration is '.. c:macro:: KUNIT_ARRAY_PARAM'. architecture.rst:3: WARNING: Duplicate C declaration, also defined at dev-tools/kunit/api/test:66. Declaration is '.. c:struct:: kunit_case'. architecture.rst:1217: WARNING: Duplicate C declaration, also defined at dev-tools/kunit/api/test:1217. Declaration is '.. c:macro:: KUNIT_ARRAY_PARAM'. Get rid of these, and cleanup the mentions of the struct and macro in question so that sphinx generates a link to the existing copy of the documentation in the api/test document. Fixes: bc145b370c ("Documentation: KUnit: Added KUnit Architecture") Signed-off-by: David Gow <davidgow(a)google.com> --- Documentation/dev-tools/kunit/architecture.rst | 13 ++----------- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-) diff --git a/Documentation/dev-tools/kunit/architecture.rst b/Documentation/dev-tools/kunit/architecture.rst index aa2cea821e25..ff9c85a0bff2 100644 --- a/Documentation/dev-tools/kunit/architecture.rst +++ b/Documentation/dev-tools/kunit/architecture.rst @@ -26,10 +26,7 @@ The fundamental unit in KUnit is the test case. The KUnit test cases are grouped into KUnit suites. A KUnit test case is a function with type signature ``void (*)(struct kunit *test)``. These test case functions are wrapped in a struct called -``struct kunit_case``. For code, see: - -.. kernel-doc:: include/kunit/test.h - :identifiers: kunit_case +struct kunit_case. .. note: ``generate_params`` is optional for non-parameterized tests. @@ -152,18 +149,12 @@ Parameterized Tests Each KUnit parameterized test is associated with a collection of parameters. The test is invoked multiple times, once for each parameter value and the parameter is stored in the ``param_value`` field. -The test case includes a ``KUNIT_CASE_PARAM()`` macro that accepts a +The test case includes a KUNIT_CASE_PARAM() macro that accepts a generator function. The generator function is passed the previous parameter and returns the next parameter. It also provides a macro to generate common-case generators based on arrays. -For code, see: - -.. kernel-doc:: include/kunit/test.h - :identifiers: KUNIT_ARRAY_PARAM - - kunit_tool (Command Line Test Harness) ====================================== -- 2.35.1.1021.g381101b075-goog

2 years, 9 months

3
2
0 0

[PATCH] Documentation: kunit: update kconfig options needed for UML coverage

by Daniel Latypov

Recent changes have made it so the current set is not sufficient. Namely, CONFIG_DEBUG_INFO is not being set even when explicitly asked. Specifying a version of the debug info fixes this. Pick CONFIG_DEBUG_INFO_DWARF_TOOLCHAIN_DEFAULT as an option that's hopefully less fragile (esp. given we're tied to GCC 6 and lower). Signed-off-by: Daniel Latypov <dlatypov(a)google.com> --- Documentation/dev-tools/kunit/running_tips.rst | 3 ++- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/Documentation/dev-tools/kunit/running_tips.rst b/Documentation/dev-tools/kunit/running_tips.rst index 7b6d26a25959..c36f6760087d 100644 --- a/Documentation/dev-tools/kunit/running_tips.rst +++ b/Documentation/dev-tools/kunit/running_tips.rst @@ -114,6 +114,7 @@ Instead of enabling ``CONFIG_GCOV_KERNEL=y``, we can set these options: CONFIG_DEBUG_KERNEL=y CONFIG_DEBUG_INFO=y + CONFIG_DEBUG_INFO_DWARF_TOOLCHAIN_DEFAULT=y CONFIG_GCOV=y @@ -122,7 +123,7 @@ Putting it together into a copy-pastable sequence of commands: .. code-block:: bash # Append coverage options to the current config - $ echo -e "CONFIG_DEBUG_KERNEL=y\nCONFIG_DEBUG_INFO=y\nCONFIG_GCOV=y" >> .kunit/.kunitconfig + $ echo -e "CONFIG_DEBUG_KERNEL=y\nCONFIG_DEBUG_INFO=y\nCONFIG_DEBUG_INFO_DWARF_TOOLCHAIN_DEFAULT=y\nCONFIG_GCOV=y" >> .kunit/.kunitconfig $ ./tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run # Extract the coverage information from the build dir (.kunit/) $ lcov -t "my_kunit_tests" -o coverage.info -c -d .kunit/ base-commit: b14ffae378aa1db993e62b01392e70d1e585fb23 -- 2.35.1.1021.g381101b075-goog

2 years, 9 months

4
7
0 0

[PATCH v3 1/2] kunit: split resource API from test.h into new resource.h

by Daniel Latypov

Background: Currently, a reader looking at kunit/test.h will find the file is quite long, and the first meaty comment is a doc comment about struct kunit_resource. Most users will not ever use the KUnit resource API directly. They'll use kunit_kmalloc() and friends, or decide it's simpler to do cleanups via labels (it often can be) instead of figuring out how to use the API. It's also logically separate from everything else in test.h. Removing it from the file doesn't cause any compilation errors (since struct kunit has `struct list_head resources` to store them). This commit: Let's move it into a kunit/resource.h file and give it a separate page in the docs, kunit/api/resource.rst. We include resource.h at the bottom of test.h since * don't want to force existing users to add a new include if they use the API * it accesses `lock` inside `struct kunit` in a inline func * so we can't just forward declare, and the alternatives require uninlining the func, adding hepers to lock/unlock, or other more invasive changes. Now the first big comment in test.h is about kunit_case, which is a lot more relevant to what a new user wants to know. A side effect of this is git blame won't properly track history by default, users need to run $ git blame -L ,1 -C17 include/kunit/resource.h Signed-off-by: Daniel Latypov <dlatypov(a)google.com> Reviewed-by: David Gow <davidgow(a)google.com> Reviewed-by: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins(a)google.com> --- v1 -> v2: add TODO to make users #include resource.h, drop redundant fwd decl of struct kunit in resource.h v2 -> v3: no change. --- Documentation/dev-tools/kunit/api/index.rst | 5 + .../dev-tools/kunit/api/resource.rst | 13 + include/kunit/resource.h | 318 ++++++++++++++++++ include/kunit/test.h | 303 +---------------- 4 files changed, 340 insertions(+), 299 deletions(-) create mode 100644 Documentation/dev-tools/kunit/api/resource.rst create mode 100644 include/kunit/resource.h diff --git a/Documentation/dev-tools/kunit/api/index.rst b/Documentation/dev-tools/kunit/api/index.rst index 3006cadcf44a..45ce04823f9f 100644 --- a/Documentation/dev-tools/kunit/api/index.rst +++ b/Documentation/dev-tools/kunit/api/index.rst @@ -6,6 +6,7 @@ API Reference .. toctree:: test + resource This section documents the KUnit kernel testing API. It is divided into the following sections: @@ -13,3 +14,7 @@ following sections: Documentation/dev-tools/kunit/api/test.rst - documents all of the standard testing API + +Documentation/dev-tools/kunit/api/resource.rst + + - documents the KUnit resource API diff --git a/Documentation/dev-tools/kunit/api/resource.rst b/Documentation/dev-tools/kunit/api/resource.rst new file mode 100644 index 000000000000..0a94f831259e --- /dev/null +++ b/Documentation/dev-tools/kunit/api/resource.rst @@ -0,0 +1,13 @@ +.. SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 + +============ +Resource API +============ + +This file documents the KUnit resource API. + +Most users won't need to use this API directly, power users can use it to store +state on a per-test basis, register custom cleanup actions, and more. + +.. kernel-doc:: include/kunit/resource.h + :internal: diff --git a/include/kunit/resource.h b/include/kunit/resource.h new file mode 100644 index 000000000000..7ab1fd83972b --- /dev/null +++ b/include/kunit/resource.h @@ -0,0 +1,318 @@ +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 */ +/* + * KUnit resource API for test managed resources (allocations, etc.). + * + * Copyright (C) 2022, Google LLC. + * Author: Daniel Latypov <dlatypov(a)google.com> + */ + +#ifndef _KUNIT_RESOURCE_H +#define _KUNIT_RESOURCE_H + +#include <kunit/test.h> + +#include <linux/kref.h> +#include <linux/list.h> +#include <linux/slab.h> +#include <linux/spinlock.h> + +struct kunit_resource; + +typedef int (*kunit_resource_init_t)(struct kunit_resource *, void *); +typedef void (*kunit_resource_free_t)(struct kunit_resource *); + +/** + * struct kunit_resource - represents a *test managed resource* + * @data: for the user to store arbitrary data. + * @name: optional name + * @free: a user supplied function to free the resource. Populated by + * kunit_resource_alloc(). + * + * Represents a *test managed resource*, a resource which will automatically be + * cleaned up at the end of a test case. + * + * Resources are reference counted so if a resource is retrieved via + * kunit_alloc_and_get_resource() or kunit_find_resource(), we need + * to call kunit_put_resource() to reduce the resource reference count + * when finished with it. Note that kunit_alloc_resource() does not require a + * kunit_resource_put() because it does not retrieve the resource itself. + * + * Example: + * + * .. code-block:: c + * + * struct kunit_kmalloc_params { + * size_t size; + * gfp_t gfp; + * }; + * + * static int kunit_kmalloc_init(struct kunit_resource *res, void *context) + * { + * struct kunit_kmalloc_params *params = context; + * res->data = kmalloc(params->size, params->gfp); + * + * if (!res->data) + * return -ENOMEM; + * + * return 0; + * } + * + * static void kunit_kmalloc_free(struct kunit_resource *res) + * { + * kfree(res->data); + * } + * + * void *kunit_kmalloc(struct kunit *test, size_t size, gfp_t gfp) + * { + * struct kunit_kmalloc_params params; + * + * params.size = size; + * params.gfp = gfp; + * + * return kunit_alloc_resource(test, kunit_kmalloc_init, + * kunit_kmalloc_free, &params); + * } + * + * Resources can also be named, with lookup/removal done on a name + * basis also. kunit_add_named_resource(), kunit_find_named_resource() + * and kunit_destroy_named_resource(). Resource names must be + * unique within the test instance. + */ +struct kunit_resource { + void *data; + const char *name; + kunit_resource_free_t free; + + /* private: internal use only. */ + struct kref refcount; + struct list_head node; +}; + +/* + * Like kunit_alloc_resource() below, but returns the struct kunit_resource + * object that contains the allocation. This is mostly for testing purposes. + */ +struct kunit_resource *kunit_alloc_and_get_resource(struct kunit *test, + kunit_resource_init_t init, + kunit_resource_free_t free, + gfp_t internal_gfp, + void *context); + +/** + * kunit_get_resource() - Hold resource for use. Should not need to be used + * by most users as we automatically get resources + * retrieved by kunit_find_resource*(). + * @res: resource + */ +static inline void kunit_get_resource(struct kunit_resource *res) +{ + kref_get(&res->refcount); +} + +/* + * Called when refcount reaches zero via kunit_put_resource(); + * should not be called directly. + */ +static inline void kunit_release_resource(struct kref *kref) +{ + struct kunit_resource *res = container_of(kref, struct kunit_resource, + refcount); + + /* If free function is defined, resource was dynamically allocated. */ + if (res->free) { + res->free(res); + kfree(res); + } +} + +/** + * kunit_put_resource() - When caller is done with retrieved resource, + * kunit_put_resource() should be called to drop + * reference count. The resource list maintains + * a reference count on resources, so if no users + * are utilizing a resource and it is removed from + * the resource list, it will be freed via the + * associated free function (if any). Only + * needs to be used if we alloc_and_get() or + * find() resource. + * @res: resource + */ +static inline void kunit_put_resource(struct kunit_resource *res) +{ + kref_put(&res->refcount, kunit_release_resource); +} + +/** + * kunit_add_resource() - Add a *test managed resource*. + * @test: The test context object. + * @init: a user-supplied function to initialize the result (if needed). If + * none is supplied, the resource data value is simply set to @data. + * If an init function is supplied, @data is passed to it instead. + * @free: a user-supplied function to free the resource (if needed). + * @res: The resource. + * @data: value to pass to init function or set in resource data field. + */ +int kunit_add_resource(struct kunit *test, + kunit_resource_init_t init, + kunit_resource_free_t free, + struct kunit_resource *res, + void *data); + +/** + * kunit_add_named_resource() - Add a named *test managed resource*. + * @test: The test context object. + * @init: a user-supplied function to initialize the resource data, if needed. + * @free: a user-supplied function to free the resource data, if needed. + * @res: The resource. + * @name: name to be set for resource. + * @data: value to pass to init function or set in resource data field. + */ +int kunit_add_named_resource(struct kunit *test, + kunit_resource_init_t init, + kunit_resource_free_t free, + struct kunit_resource *res, + const char *name, + void *data); + +/** + * kunit_alloc_resource() - Allocates a *test managed resource*. + * @test: The test context object. + * @init: a user supplied function to initialize the resource. + * @free: a user supplied function to free the resource. + * @internal_gfp: gfp to use for internal allocations, if unsure, use GFP_KERNEL + * @context: for the user to pass in arbitrary data to the init function. + * + * Allocates a *test managed resource*, a resource which will automatically be + * cleaned up at the end of a test case. See &struct kunit_resource for an + * example. + * + * Note: KUnit needs to allocate memory for a kunit_resource object. You must + * specify an @internal_gfp that is compatible with the use context of your + * resource. + */ +static inline void *kunit_alloc_resource(struct kunit *test, + kunit_resource_init_t init, + kunit_resource_free_t free, + gfp_t internal_gfp, + void *context) +{ + struct kunit_resource *res; + + res = kzalloc(sizeof(*res), internal_gfp); + if (!res) + return NULL; + + if (!kunit_add_resource(test, init, free, res, context)) + return res->data; + + return NULL; +} + +typedef bool (*kunit_resource_match_t)(struct kunit *test, + struct kunit_resource *res, + void *match_data); + +/** + * kunit_resource_instance_match() - Match a resource with the same instance. + * @test: Test case to which the resource belongs. + * @res: The resource. + * @match_data: The resource pointer to match against. + * + * An instance of kunit_resource_match_t that matches a resource whose + * allocation matches @match_data. + */ +static inline bool kunit_resource_instance_match(struct kunit *test, + struct kunit_resource *res, + void *match_data) +{ + return res->data == match_data; +} + +/** + * kunit_resource_name_match() - Match a resource with the same name. + * @test: Test case to which the resource belongs. + * @res: The resource. + * @match_name: The name to match against. + */ +static inline bool kunit_resource_name_match(struct kunit *test, + struct kunit_resource *res, + void *match_name) +{ + return res->name && strcmp(res->name, match_name) == 0; +} + +/** + * kunit_find_resource() - Find a resource using match function/data. + * @test: Test case to which the resource belongs. + * @match: match function to be applied to resources/match data. + * @match_data: data to be used in matching. + */ +static inline struct kunit_resource * +kunit_find_resource(struct kunit *test, + kunit_resource_match_t match, + void *match_data) +{ + struct kunit_resource *res, *found = NULL; + unsigned long flags; + + spin_lock_irqsave(&test->lock, flags); + + list_for_each_entry_reverse(res, &test->resources, node) { + if (match(test, res, (void *)match_data)) { + found = res; + kunit_get_resource(found); + break; + } + } + + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&test->lock, flags); + + return found; +} + +/** + * kunit_find_named_resource() - Find a resource using match name. + * @test: Test case to which the resource belongs. + * @name: match name. + */ +static inline struct kunit_resource * +kunit_find_named_resource(struct kunit *test, + const char *name) +{ + return kunit_find_resource(test, kunit_resource_name_match, + (void *)name); +} + +/** + * kunit_destroy_resource() - Find a kunit_resource and destroy it. + * @test: Test case to which the resource belongs. + * @match: Match function. Returns whether a given resource matches @match_data. + * @match_data: Data passed into @match. + * + * RETURNS: + * 0 if kunit_resource is found and freed, -ENOENT if not found. + */ +int kunit_destroy_resource(struct kunit *test, + kunit_resource_match_t match, + void *match_data); + +static inline int kunit_destroy_named_resource(struct kunit *test, + const char *name) +{ + return kunit_destroy_resource(test, kunit_resource_name_match, + (void *)name); +} + +/** + * kunit_remove_resource() - remove resource from resource list associated with + * test. + * @test: The test context object. + * @res: The resource to be removed. + * + * Note that the resource will not be immediately freed since it is likely + * the caller has a reference to it via alloc_and_get() or find(); + * in this case a final call to kunit_put_resource() is required. + */ +void kunit_remove_resource(struct kunit *test, struct kunit_resource *res); + +#endif /* _KUNIT_RESOURCE_H */ diff --git a/include/kunit/test.h b/include/kunit/test.h index 00b9ff7783ab..d04f9e2fd5e7 100644 --- a/include/kunit/test.h +++ b/include/kunit/test.h @@ -27,78 +27,6 @@ #include <asm/rwonce.h> -struct kunit_resource; - -typedef int (*kunit_resource_init_t)(struct kunit_resource *, void *); -typedef void (*kunit_resource_free_t)(struct kunit_resource *); - -/** - * struct kunit_resource - represents a *test managed resource* - * @data: for the user to store arbitrary data. - * @name: optional name - * @free: a user supplied function to free the resource. Populated by - * kunit_resource_alloc(). - * - * Represents a *test managed resource*, a resource which will automatically be - * cleaned up at the end of a test case. - * - * Resources are reference counted so if a resource is retrieved via - * kunit_alloc_and_get_resource() or kunit_find_resource(), we need - * to call kunit_put_resource() to reduce the resource reference count - * when finished with it. Note that kunit_alloc_resource() does not require a - * kunit_resource_put() because it does not retrieve the resource itself. - * - * Example: - * - * .. code-block:: c - * - * struct kunit_kmalloc_params { - * size_t size; - * gfp_t gfp; - * }; - * - * static int kunit_kmalloc_init(struct kunit_resource *res, void *context) - * { - * struct kunit_kmalloc_params *params = context; - * res->data = kmalloc(params->size, params->gfp); - * - * if (!res->data) - * return -ENOMEM; - * - * return 0; - * } - * - * static void kunit_kmalloc_free(struct kunit_resource *res) - * { - * kfree(res->data); - * } - * - * void *kunit_kmalloc(struct kunit *test, size_t size, gfp_t gfp) - * { - * struct kunit_kmalloc_params params; - * - * params.size = size; - * params.gfp = gfp; - * - * return kunit_alloc_resource(test, kunit_kmalloc_init, - * kunit_kmalloc_free, &params); - * } - * - * Resources can also be named, with lookup/removal done on a name - * basis also. kunit_add_named_resource(), kunit_find_named_resource() - * and kunit_destroy_named_resource(). Resource names must be - * unique within the test instance. - */ -struct kunit_resource { - void *data; - const char *name; - kunit_resource_free_t free; - - /* private: internal use only. */ - struct kref refcount; - struct list_head node; -}; - struct kunit; /* Size of log associated with test. */ @@ -385,233 +313,6 @@ static inline int kunit_run_all_tests(void) enum kunit_status kunit_suite_has_succeeded(struct kunit_suite *suite); -/* - * Like kunit_alloc_resource() below, but returns the struct kunit_resource - * object that contains the allocation. This is mostly for testing purposes. - */ -struct kunit_resource *kunit_alloc_and_get_resource(struct kunit *test, - kunit_resource_init_t init, - kunit_resource_free_t free, - gfp_t internal_gfp, - void *context); - -/** - * kunit_get_resource() - Hold resource for use. Should not need to be used - * by most users as we automatically get resources - * retrieved by kunit_find_resource*(). - * @res: resource - */ -static inline void kunit_get_resource(struct kunit_resource *res) -{ - kref_get(&res->refcount); -} - -/* - * Called when refcount reaches zero via kunit_put_resources(); - * should not be called directly. - */ -static inline void kunit_release_resource(struct kref *kref) -{ - struct kunit_resource *res = container_of(kref, struct kunit_resource, - refcount); - - /* If free function is defined, resource was dynamically allocated. */ - if (res->free) { - res->free(res); - kfree(res); - } -} - -/** - * kunit_put_resource() - When caller is done with retrieved resource, - * kunit_put_resource() should be called to drop - * reference count. The resource list maintains - * a reference count on resources, so if no users - * are utilizing a resource and it is removed from - * the resource list, it will be freed via the - * associated free function (if any). Only - * needs to be used if we alloc_and_get() or - * find() resource. - * @res: resource - */ -static inline void kunit_put_resource(struct kunit_resource *res) -{ - kref_put(&res->refcount, kunit_release_resource); -} - -/** - * kunit_add_resource() - Add a *test managed resource*. - * @test: The test context object. - * @init: a user-supplied function to initialize the result (if needed). If - * none is supplied, the resource data value is simply set to @data. - * If an init function is supplied, @data is passed to it instead. - * @free: a user-supplied function to free the resource (if needed). - * @res: The resource. - * @data: value to pass to init function or set in resource data field. - */ -int kunit_add_resource(struct kunit *test, - kunit_resource_init_t init, - kunit_resource_free_t free, - struct kunit_resource *res, - void *data); - -/** - * kunit_add_named_resource() - Add a named *test managed resource*. - * @test: The test context object. - * @init: a user-supplied function to initialize the resource data, if needed. - * @free: a user-supplied function to free the resource data, if needed. - * @res: The resource. - * @name: name to be set for resource. - * @data: value to pass to init function or set in resource data field. - */ -int kunit_add_named_resource(struct kunit *test, - kunit_resource_init_t init, - kunit_resource_free_t free, - struct kunit_resource *res, - const char *name, - void *data); - -/** - * kunit_alloc_resource() - Allocates a *test managed resource*. - * @test: The test context object. - * @init: a user supplied function to initialize the resource. - * @free: a user supplied function to free the resource. - * @internal_gfp: gfp to use for internal allocations, if unsure, use GFP_KERNEL - * @context: for the user to pass in arbitrary data to the init function. - * - * Allocates a *test managed resource*, a resource which will automatically be - * cleaned up at the end of a test case. See &struct kunit_resource for an - * example. - * - * Note: KUnit needs to allocate memory for a kunit_resource object. You must - * specify an @internal_gfp that is compatible with the use context of your - * resource. - */ -static inline void *kunit_alloc_resource(struct kunit *test, - kunit_resource_init_t init, - kunit_resource_free_t free, - gfp_t internal_gfp, - void *context) -{ - struct kunit_resource *res; - - res = kzalloc(sizeof(*res), internal_gfp); - if (!res) - return NULL; - - if (!kunit_add_resource(test, init, free, res, context)) - return res->data; - - return NULL; -} - -typedef bool (*kunit_resource_match_t)(struct kunit *test, - struct kunit_resource *res, - void *match_data); - -/** - * kunit_resource_instance_match() - Match a resource with the same instance. - * @test: Test case to which the resource belongs. - * @res: The resource. - * @match_data: The resource pointer to match against. - * - * An instance of kunit_resource_match_t that matches a resource whose - * allocation matches @match_data. - */ -static inline bool kunit_resource_instance_match(struct kunit *test, - struct kunit_resource *res, - void *match_data) -{ - return res->data == match_data; -} - -/** - * kunit_resource_name_match() - Match a resource with the same name. - * @test: Test case to which the resource belongs. - * @res: The resource. - * @match_name: The name to match against. - */ -static inline bool kunit_resource_name_match(struct kunit *test, - struct kunit_resource *res, - void *match_name) -{ - return res->name && strcmp(res->name, match_name) == 0; -} - -/** - * kunit_find_resource() - Find a resource using match function/data. - * @test: Test case to which the resource belongs. - * @match: match function to be applied to resources/match data. - * @match_data: data to be used in matching. - */ -static inline struct kunit_resource * -kunit_find_resource(struct kunit *test, - kunit_resource_match_t match, - void *match_data) -{ - struct kunit_resource *res, *found = NULL; - unsigned long flags; - - spin_lock_irqsave(&test->lock, flags); - - list_for_each_entry_reverse(res, &test->resources, node) { - if (match(test, res, (void *)match_data)) { - found = res; - kunit_get_resource(found); - break; - } - } - - spin_unlock_irqrestore(&test->lock, flags); - - return found; -} - -/** - * kunit_find_named_resource() - Find a resource using match name. - * @test: Test case to which the resource belongs. - * @name: match name. - */ -static inline struct kunit_resource * -kunit_find_named_resource(struct kunit *test, - const char *name) -{ - return kunit_find_resource(test, kunit_resource_name_match, - (void *)name); -} - -/** - * kunit_destroy_resource() - Find a kunit_resource and destroy it. - * @test: Test case to which the resource belongs. - * @match: Match function. Returns whether a given resource matches @match_data. - * @match_data: Data passed into @match. - * - * RETURNS: - * 0 if kunit_resource is found and freed, -ENOENT if not found. - */ -int kunit_destroy_resource(struct kunit *test, - kunit_resource_match_t match, - void *match_data); - -static inline int kunit_destroy_named_resource(struct kunit *test, - const char *name) -{ - return kunit_destroy_resource(test, kunit_resource_name_match, - (void *)name); -} - -/** - * kunit_remove_resource() - remove resource from resource list associated with - * test. - * @test: The test context object. - * @res: The resource to be removed. - * - * Note that the resource will not be immediately freed since it is likely - * the caller has a reference to it via alloc_and_get() or find(); - * in this case a final call to kunit_put_resource() is required. - */ -void kunit_remove_resource(struct kunit *test, struct kunit_resource *res); - /** * kunit_kmalloc_array() - Like kmalloc_array() except the allocation is *test managed*. * @test: The test context object. @@ -1526,4 +1227,8 @@ do { \ return NULL; \ } +// TODO(dlatypov(a)google.com): consider eventually migrating users to explicitly +// include resource.h themselves if they need it. +#include <kunit/resource.h> + #endif /* _KUNIT_TEST_H */ base-commit: b14ffae378aa1db993e62b01392e70d1e585fb23 -- 2.35.1.1021.g381101b075-goog

2 years, 9 months

1
1
0 0

[PATCH v2 1/2] kunit: split resource API from test.h into new resource.h

by Daniel Latypov

Background: Currently, a reader looking at kunit/test.h will find the file is quite long, and the first meaty comment is a doc comment about struct kunit_resource. Most users will not ever use the KUnit resource API directly. They'll use kunit_kmalloc() and friends, or decide it's simpler to do cleanups via labels (it often can be) instead of figuring out how to use the API. It's also logically separate from everything else in test.h. Removing it from the file doesn't cause any compilation errors (since struct kunit has `struct list_head resources` to store them). This commit: Let's move it into a kunit/resource.h file and give it a separate page in the docs, kunit/api/resource.rst. We include resource.h at the bottom of test.h since * don't want to force existing users to add a new include if they use the API * it accesses `lock` inside `struct kunit` in a inline func * so we can't just forward declare, and the alternatives require uninlining the func, adding hepers to lock/unlock, or other more invasive changes. Now the first big comment in test.h is about kunit_case, which is a lot more relevant to what a new user wants to know. A side effect of this is git blame won't properly track history by default, users need to run $ git blame -L ,1 -C17 include/kunit/resource.h Signed-off-by: Daniel Latypov <dlatypov(a)google.com> Reviewed-by: David Gow <davidgow(a)google.com> Reviewed-by: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins(a)google.com> --- v1 -> v2: add TODO to make users #include resource.h, drop redundant fwd decl of struct kunit in resource.h --- Documentation/dev-tools/kunit/api/index.rst | 5 + .../dev-tools/kunit/api/resource.rst | 13 + include/kunit/resource.h | 318 ++++++++++++++++++ include/kunit/test.h | 303 +---------------- 4 files changed, 340 insertions(+), 299 deletions(-) create mode 100644 Documentation/dev-tools/kunit/api/resource.rst create mode 100644 include/kunit/resource.h diff --git a/Documentation/dev-tools/kunit/api/index.rst b/Documentation/dev-tools/kunit/api/index.rst index 3006cadcf44a..45ce04823f9f 100644 --- a/Documentation/dev-tools/kunit/api/index.rst +++ b/Documentation/dev-tools/kunit/api/index.rst @@ -6,6 +6,7 @@ API Reference .. toctree:: test + resource This section documents the KUnit kernel testing API. It is divided into the following sections: @@ -13,3 +14,7 @@ following sections: Documentation/dev-tools/kunit/api/test.rst - documents all of the standard testing API + +Documentation/dev-tools/kunit/api/resource.rst + + - documents the KUnit resource API diff --git a/Documentation/dev-tools/kunit/api/resource.rst b/Documentation/dev-tools/kunit/api/resource.rst new file mode 100644 index 000000000000..0a94f831259e --- /dev/null +++ b/Documentation/dev-tools/kunit/api/resource.rst @@ -0,0 +1,13 @@ +.. SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 + +============ +Resource API +============ + +This file documents the KUnit resource API. + +Most users won't need to use this API directly, power users can use it to store +state on a per-test basis, register custom cleanup actions, and more. + +.. kernel-doc:: include/kunit/resource.h + :internal: diff --git a/include/kunit/resource.h b/include/kunit/resource.h new file mode 100644 index 000000000000..7ab1fd83972b --- /dev/null +++ b/include/kunit/resource.h @@ -0,0 +1,318 @@ +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 */ +/* + * KUnit resource API for test managed resources (allocations, etc.). + * + * Copyright (C) 2022, Google LLC. + * Author: Daniel Latypov <dlatypov(a)google.com> + */ + +#ifndef _KUNIT_RESOURCE_H +#define _KUNIT_RESOURCE_H + +#include <kunit/test.h> + +#include <linux/kref.h> +#include <linux/list.h> +#include <linux/slab.h> +#include <linux/spinlock.h> + +struct kunit_resource; + +typedef int (*kunit_resource_init_t)(struct kunit_resource *, void *); +typedef void (*kunit_resource_free_t)(struct kunit_resource *); + +/** + * struct kunit_resource - represents a *test managed resource* + * @data: for the user to store arbitrary data. + * @name: optional name + * @free: a user supplied function to free the resource. Populated by + * kunit_resource_alloc(). + * + * Represents a *test managed resource*, a resource which will automatically be + * cleaned up at the end of a test case. + * + * Resources are reference counted so if a resource is retrieved via + * kunit_alloc_and_get_resource() or kunit_find_resource(), we need + * to call kunit_put_resource() to reduce the resource reference count + * when finished with it. Note that kunit_alloc_resource() does not require a + * kunit_resource_put() because it does not retrieve the resource itself. + * + * Example: + * + * .. code-block:: c + * + * struct kunit_kmalloc_params { + * size_t size; + * gfp_t gfp; + * }; + * + * static int kunit_kmalloc_init(struct kunit_resource *res, void *context) + * { + * struct kunit_kmalloc_params *params = context; + * res->data = kmalloc(params->size, params->gfp); + * + * if (!res->data) + * return -ENOMEM; + * + * return 0; + * } + * + * static void kunit_kmalloc_free(struct kunit_resource *res) + * { + * kfree(res->data); + * } + * + * void *kunit_kmalloc(struct kunit *test, size_t size, gfp_t gfp) + * { + * struct kunit_kmalloc_params params; + * + * params.size = size; + * params.gfp = gfp; + * + * return kunit_alloc_resource(test, kunit_kmalloc_init, + * kunit_kmalloc_free, &params); + * } + * + * Resources can also be named, with lookup/removal done on a name + * basis also. kunit_add_named_resource(), kunit_find_named_resource() + * and kunit_destroy_named_resource(). Resource names must be + * unique within the test instance. + */ +struct kunit_resource { + void *data; + const char *name; + kunit_resource_free_t free; + + /* private: internal use only. */ + struct kref refcount; + struct list_head node; +}; + +/* + * Like kunit_alloc_resource() below, but returns the struct kunit_resource + * object that contains the allocation. This is mostly for testing purposes. + */ +struct kunit_resource *kunit_alloc_and_get_resource(struct kunit *test, + kunit_resource_init_t init, + kunit_resource_free_t free, + gfp_t internal_gfp, + void *context); + +/** + * kunit_get_resource() - Hold resource for use. Should not need to be used + * by most users as we automatically get resources + * retrieved by kunit_find_resource*(). + * @res: resource + */ +static inline void kunit_get_resource(struct kunit_resource *res) +{ + kref_get(&res->refcount); +} + +/* + * Called when refcount reaches zero via kunit_put_resource(); + * should not be called directly. + */ +static inline void kunit_release_resource(struct kref *kref) +{ + struct kunit_resource *res = container_of(kref, struct kunit_resource, + refcount); + + /* If free function is defined, resource was dynamically allocated. */ + if (res->free) { + res->free(res); + kfree(res); + } +} + +/** + * kunit_put_resource() - When caller is done with retrieved resource, + * kunit_put_resource() should be called to drop + * reference count. The resource list maintains + * a reference count on resources, so if no users + * are utilizing a resource and it is removed from + * the resource list, it will be freed via the + * associated free function (if any). Only + * needs to be used if we alloc_and_get() or + * find() resource. + * @res: resource + */ +static inline void kunit_put_resource(struct kunit_resource *res) +{ + kref_put(&res->refcount, kunit_release_resource); +} + +/** + * kunit_add_resource() - Add a *test managed resource*. + * @test: The test context object. + * @init: a user-supplied function to initialize the result (if needed). If + * none is supplied, the resource data value is simply set to @data. + * If an init function is supplied, @data is passed to it instead. + * @free: a user-supplied function to free the resource (if needed). + * @res: The resource. + * @data: value to pass to init function or set in resource data field. + */ +int kunit_add_resource(struct kunit *test, + kunit_resource_init_t init, + kunit_resource_free_t free, + struct kunit_resource *res, + void *data); + +/** + * kunit_add_named_resource() - Add a named *test managed resource*. + * @test: The test context object. + * @init: a user-supplied function to initialize the resource data, if needed. + * @free: a user-supplied function to free the resource data, if needed. + * @res: The resource. + * @name: name to be set for resource. + * @data: value to pass to init function or set in resource data field. + */ +int kunit_add_named_resource(struct kunit *test, + kunit_resource_init_t init, + kunit_resource_free_t free, + struct kunit_resource *res, + const char *name, + void *data); + +/** + * kunit_alloc_resource() - Allocates a *test managed resource*. + * @test: The test context object. + * @init: a user supplied function to initialize the resource. + * @free: a user supplied function to free the resource. + * @internal_gfp: gfp to use for internal allocations, if unsure, use GFP_KERNEL + * @context: for the user to pass in arbitrary data to the init function. + * + * Allocates a *test managed resource*, a resource which will automatically be + * cleaned up at the end of a test case. See &struct kunit_resource for an + * example. + * + * Note: KUnit needs to allocate memory for a kunit_resource object. You must + * specify an @internal_gfp that is compatible with the use context of your + * resource. + */ +static inline void *kunit_alloc_resource(struct kunit *test, + kunit_resource_init_t init, + kunit_resource_free_t free, + gfp_t internal_gfp, + void *context) +{ + struct kunit_resource *res; + + res = kzalloc(sizeof(*res), internal_gfp); + if (!res) + return NULL; + + if (!kunit_add_resource(test, init, free, res, context)) + return res->data; + + return NULL; +} + +typedef bool (*kunit_resource_match_t)(struct kunit *test, + struct kunit_resource *res, + void *match_data); + +/** + * kunit_resource_instance_match() - Match a resource with the same instance. + * @test: Test case to which the resource belongs. + * @res: The resource. + * @match_data: The resource pointer to match against. + * + * An instance of kunit_resource_match_t that matches a resource whose + * allocation matches @match_data. + */ +static inline bool kunit_resource_instance_match(struct kunit *test, + struct kunit_resource *res, + void *match_data) +{ + return res->data == match_data; +} + +/** + * kunit_resource_name_match() - Match a resource with the same name. + * @test: Test case to which the resource belongs. + * @res: The resource. + * @match_name: The name to match against. + */ +static inline bool kunit_resource_name_match(struct kunit *test, + struct kunit_resource *res, + void *match_name) +{ + return res->name && strcmp(res->name, match_name) == 0; +} + +/** + * kunit_find_resource() - Find a resource using match function/data. + * @test: Test case to which the resource belongs. + * @match: match function to be applied to resources/match data. + * @match_data: data to be used in matching. + */ +static inline struct kunit_resource * +kunit_find_resource(struct kunit *test, + kunit_resource_match_t match, + void *match_data) +{ + struct kunit_resource *res, *found = NULL; + unsigned long flags; + + spin_lock_irqsave(&test->lock, flags); + + list_for_each_entry_reverse(res, &test->resources, node) { + if (match(test, res, (void *)match_data)) { + found = res; + kunit_get_resource(found); + break; + } + } + + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&test->lock, flags); + + return found; +} + +/** + * kunit_find_named_resource() - Find a resource using match name. + * @test: Test case to which the resource belongs. + * @name: match name. + */ +static inline struct kunit_resource * +kunit_find_named_resource(struct kunit *test, + const char *name) +{ + return kunit_find_resource(test, kunit_resource_name_match, + (void *)name); +} + +/** + * kunit_destroy_resource() - Find a kunit_resource and destroy it. + * @test: Test case to which the resource belongs. + * @match: Match function. Returns whether a given resource matches @match_data. + * @match_data: Data passed into @match. + * + * RETURNS: + * 0 if kunit_resource is found and freed, -ENOENT if not found. + */ +int kunit_destroy_resource(struct kunit *test, + kunit_resource_match_t match, + void *match_data); + +static inline int kunit_destroy_named_resource(struct kunit *test, + const char *name) +{ + return kunit_destroy_resource(test, kunit_resource_name_match, + (void *)name); +} + +/** + * kunit_remove_resource() - remove resource from resource list associated with + * test. + * @test: The test context object. + * @res: The resource to be removed. + * + * Note that the resource will not be immediately freed since it is likely + * the caller has a reference to it via alloc_and_get() or find(); + * in this case a final call to kunit_put_resource() is required. + */ +void kunit_remove_resource(struct kunit *test, struct kunit_resource *res); + +#endif /* _KUNIT_RESOURCE_H */ diff --git a/include/kunit/test.h b/include/kunit/test.h index 00b9ff7783ab..d04f9e2fd5e7 100644 --- a/include/kunit/test.h +++ b/include/kunit/test.h @@ -27,78 +27,6 @@ #include <asm/rwonce.h> -struct kunit_resource; - -typedef int (*kunit_resource_init_t)(struct kunit_resource *, void *); -typedef void (*kunit_resource_free_t)(struct kunit_resource *); - -/** - * struct kunit_resource - represents a *test managed resource* - * @data: for the user to store arbitrary data. - * @name: optional name - * @free: a user supplied function to free the resource. Populated by - * kunit_resource_alloc(). - * - * Represents a *test managed resource*, a resource which will automatically be - * cleaned up at the end of a test case. - * - * Resources are reference counted so if a resource is retrieved via - * kunit_alloc_and_get_resource() or kunit_find_resource(), we need - * to call kunit_put_resource() to reduce the resource reference count - * when finished with it. Note that kunit_alloc_resource() does not require a - * kunit_resource_put() because it does not retrieve the resource itself. - * - * Example: - * - * .. code-block:: c - * - * struct kunit_kmalloc_params { - * size_t size; - * gfp_t gfp; - * }; - * - * static int kunit_kmalloc_init(struct kunit_resource *res, void *context) - * { - * struct kunit_kmalloc_params *params = context; - * res->data = kmalloc(params->size, params->gfp); - * - * if (!res->data) - * return -ENOMEM; - * - * return 0; - * } - * - * static void kunit_kmalloc_free(struct kunit_resource *res) - * { - * kfree(res->data); - * } - * - * void *kunit_kmalloc(struct kunit *test, size_t size, gfp_t gfp) - * { - * struct kunit_kmalloc_params params; - * - * params.size = size; - * params.gfp = gfp; - * - * return kunit_alloc_resource(test, kunit_kmalloc_init, - * kunit_kmalloc_free, &params); - * } - * - * Resources can also be named, with lookup/removal done on a name - * basis also. kunit_add_named_resource(), kunit_find_named_resource() - * and kunit_destroy_named_resource(). Resource names must be - * unique within the test instance. - */ -struct kunit_resource { - void *data; - const char *name; - kunit_resource_free_t free; - - /* private: internal use only. */ - struct kref refcount; - struct list_head node; -}; - struct kunit; /* Size of log associated with test. */ @@ -385,233 +313,6 @@ static inline int kunit_run_all_tests(void) enum kunit_status kunit_suite_has_succeeded(struct kunit_suite *suite); -/* - * Like kunit_alloc_resource() below, but returns the struct kunit_resource - * object that contains the allocation. This is mostly for testing purposes. - */ -struct kunit_resource *kunit_alloc_and_get_resource(struct kunit *test, - kunit_resource_init_t init, - kunit_resource_free_t free, - gfp_t internal_gfp, - void *context); - -/** - * kunit_get_resource() - Hold resource for use. Should not need to be used - * by most users as we automatically get resources - * retrieved by kunit_find_resource*(). - * @res: resource - */ -static inline void kunit_get_resource(struct kunit_resource *res) -{ - kref_get(&res->refcount); -} - -/* - * Called when refcount reaches zero via kunit_put_resources(); - * should not be called directly. - */ -static inline void kunit_release_resource(struct kref *kref) -{ - struct kunit_resource *res = container_of(kref, struct kunit_resource, - refcount); - - /* If free function is defined, resource was dynamically allocated. */ - if (res->free) { - res->free(res); - kfree(res); - } -} - -/** - * kunit_put_resource() - When caller is done with retrieved resource, - * kunit_put_resource() should be called to drop - * reference count. The resource list maintains - * a reference count on resources, so if no users - * are utilizing a resource and it is removed from - * the resource list, it will be freed via the - * associated free function (if any). Only - * needs to be used if we alloc_and_get() or - * find() resource. - * @res: resource - */ -static inline void kunit_put_resource(struct kunit_resource *res) -{ - kref_put(&res->refcount, kunit_release_resource); -} - -/** - * kunit_add_resource() - Add a *test managed resource*. - * @test: The test context object. - * @init: a user-supplied function to initialize the result (if needed). If - * none is supplied, the resource data value is simply set to @data. - * If an init function is supplied, @data is passed to it instead. - * @free: a user-supplied function to free the resource (if needed). - * @res: The resource. - * @data: value to pass to init function or set in resource data field. - */ -int kunit_add_resource(struct kunit *test, - kunit_resource_init_t init, - kunit_resource_free_t free, - struct kunit_resource *res, - void *data); - -/** - * kunit_add_named_resource() - Add a named *test managed resource*. - * @test: The test context object. - * @init: a user-supplied function to initialize the resource data, if needed. - * @free: a user-supplied function to free the resource data, if needed. - * @res: The resource. - * @name: name to be set for resource. - * @data: value to pass to init function or set in resource data field. - */ -int kunit_add_named_resource(struct kunit *test, - kunit_resource_init_t init, - kunit_resource_free_t free, - struct kunit_resource *res, - const char *name, - void *data); - -/** - * kunit_alloc_resource() - Allocates a *test managed resource*. - * @test: The test context object. - * @init: a user supplied function to initialize the resource. - * @free: a user supplied function to free the resource. - * @internal_gfp: gfp to use for internal allocations, if unsure, use GFP_KERNEL - * @context: for the user to pass in arbitrary data to the init function. - * - * Allocates a *test managed resource*, a resource which will automatically be - * cleaned up at the end of a test case. See &struct kunit_resource for an - * example. - * - * Note: KUnit needs to allocate memory for a kunit_resource object. You must - * specify an @internal_gfp that is compatible with the use context of your - * resource. - */ -static inline void *kunit_alloc_resource(struct kunit *test, - kunit_resource_init_t init, - kunit_resource_free_t free, - gfp_t internal_gfp, - void *context) -{ - struct kunit_resource *res; - - res = kzalloc(sizeof(*res), internal_gfp); - if (!res) - return NULL; - - if (!kunit_add_resource(test, init, free, res, context)) - return res->data; - - return NULL; -} - -typedef bool (*kunit_resource_match_t)(struct kunit *test, - struct kunit_resource *res, - void *match_data); - -/** - * kunit_resource_instance_match() - Match a resource with the same instance. - * @test: Test case to which the resource belongs. - * @res: The resource. - * @match_data: The resource pointer to match against. - * - * An instance of kunit_resource_match_t that matches a resource whose - * allocation matches @match_data. - */ -static inline bool kunit_resource_instance_match(struct kunit *test, - struct kunit_resource *res, - void *match_data) -{ - return res->data == match_data; -} - -/** - * kunit_resource_name_match() - Match a resource with the same name. - * @test: Test case to which the resource belongs. - * @res: The resource. - * @match_name: The name to match against. - */ -static inline bool kunit_resource_name_match(struct kunit *test, - struct kunit_resource *res, - void *match_name) -{ - return res->name && strcmp(res->name, match_name) == 0; -} - -/** - * kunit_find_resource() - Find a resource using match function/data. - * @test: Test case to which the resource belongs. - * @match: match function to be applied to resources/match data. - * @match_data: data to be used in matching. - */ -static inline struct kunit_resource * -kunit_find_resource(struct kunit *test, - kunit_resource_match_t match, - void *match_data) -{ - struct kunit_resource *res, *found = NULL; - unsigned long flags; - - spin_lock_irqsave(&test->lock, flags); - - list_for_each_entry_reverse(res, &test->resources, node) { - if (match(test, res, (void *)match_data)) { - found = res; - kunit_get_resource(found); - break; - } - } - - spin_unlock_irqrestore(&test->lock, flags); - - return found; -} - -/** - * kunit_find_named_resource() - Find a resource using match name. - * @test: Test case to which the resource belongs. - * @name: match name. - */ -static inline struct kunit_resource * -kunit_find_named_resource(struct kunit *test, - const char *name) -{ - return kunit_find_resource(test, kunit_resource_name_match, - (void *)name); -} - -/** - * kunit_destroy_resource() - Find a kunit_resource and destroy it. - * @test: Test case to which the resource belongs. - * @match: Match function. Returns whether a given resource matches @match_data. - * @match_data: Data passed into @match. - * - * RETURNS: - * 0 if kunit_resource is found and freed, -ENOENT if not found. - */ -int kunit_destroy_resource(struct kunit *test, - kunit_resource_match_t match, - void *match_data); - -static inline int kunit_destroy_named_resource(struct kunit *test, - const char *name) -{ - return kunit_destroy_resource(test, kunit_resource_name_match, - (void *)name); -} - -/** - * kunit_remove_resource() - remove resource from resource list associated with - * test. - * @test: The test context object. - * @res: The resource to be removed. - * - * Note that the resource will not be immediately freed since it is likely - * the caller has a reference to it via alloc_and_get() or find(); - * in this case a final call to kunit_put_resource() is required. - */ -void kunit_remove_resource(struct kunit *test, struct kunit_resource *res); - /** * kunit_kmalloc_array() - Like kmalloc_array() except the allocation is *test managed*. * @test: The test context object. @@ -1526,4 +1227,8 @@ do { \ return NULL; \ } +// TODO(dlatypov(a)google.com): consider eventually migrating users to explicitly +// include resource.h themselves if they need it. +#include <kunit/resource.h> + #endif /* _KUNIT_TEST_H */ base-commit: b14ffae378aa1db993e62b01392e70d1e585fb23 -- 2.35.1.1021.g381101b075-goog

2 years, 9 months

3
4
0 0

Re: [RFC v1] kunit: add support for kunit_suites that reference init code

by Daniel Latypov

On Fri, Mar 11, 2022 at 4:14 AM Daniel Gutson <daniel.gutson(a)eclypsium.com> wrote: > > > > El vie., 11 mar. 2022 4:02 a. m., David Gow <davidgow(a)google.com> escribió: >> >> On Thu, Mar 10, 2022 at 01:02:10PM -0800, Brendan Higgins wrote: >> > Add support for a new kind of kunit_suite registration macro called >> > kunit_test_init_suite(); this new registration macro allows the >> > registration of kunit_suites that reference functions marked __init and >> > data marked __initdata. >> > >> > Signed-off-by: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins(a)google.com> >> > --- >> > >> > This patch is in response to a KUnit user issue[1] in which the user was >> > attempting to test some init functions; although this is a functional >> > solution as long as KUnit tests only run during the init phase, we will >> > need to do more work if we ever allow tests to run after the init phase >> > is over; it is for this reason that this patch adds a new registration >> > macro rather than simply modifying the existing macros. >> > >> > [1] https://groups.google.com/g/kunit-dev/c/XDjieRHEneg/m/D0rFCwVABgAJ >> > >> > --- >> >> I'm a little concerned that this is just removing the warnings, but do >> agree that this is safe enough for the moment. At least the information >> about which tests need __init is preserved by the use of a different >> macro. >> >> I guess one day we'll need a second list of 'init' tests or something... > > > Hi, could you please detail about this? Why a second list? > I assume this is referring to a future where we want to run tests _after_ the init phase. In that case, we'd need to be able to separately register tests that run during and those that run after. (Or we could have one list and just tag each suite as init/post-init. If we ever had >2 "phases" where we run tests, this might be the more scalable option) Is it likely we'd have tests run after? Not in the near future, I don't think. But it could be asked for. For context, here's where built-in KUnit tests currently run: https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v5.17-rc7/source/init/main.c#L1615 That'd probably become kunit_run_init_tests() and then we'd have another kunit_run_post_init_tests() called later, or something.

2 years, 9 months

3
3
0 0

[PATCH v2 net-next 0/4] Extend locked port feature with FDB locked flag (MAC-Auth/MAB)

by Hans Schultz

This patch set extends the locked port feature for devices that are behind a locked port, but do not have the ability to authorize themselves as a supplicant using IEEE 802.1X. Such devices can be printers, meters or anything related to fixed installations. Instead of 802.1X authorization, devices can get access based on their MAC addresses being whitelisted. For an authorization daemon to detect that a device is trying to get access through a locked port, the bridge will add the MAC address of the device to the FDB with a locked flag to it. Thus the authorization daemon can catch the FDB add event and check if the MAC address is in the whitelist and if so replace the FDB entry without the locked flag enabled, and thus open the port for the device. This feature is known as MAC-Auth or MAC Authentication Bypass (MAB) in Cisco terminology, where the full MAB concept involves additional Cisco infrastructure for authorization. There is no real authentication process, as the MAC address of the device is the only input the authorization daemon, in the general case, has to base the decision if to unlock the port or not. With this patch set, an implementation of the offloaded case is supplied for the mv88e6xxx driver. When a packet ingresses on a locked port, an ATU miss violation event will occur. When handling such ATU miss violation interrupts, the MAC address of the device is added to the FDB with a zero destination port vector (DPV) and the MAC address is communicated through the switchdev layer to the bridge, so that a FDB entry with the locked flag enabled can be added. Hans Schultz (4): net: bridge: add fdb flag to extent locked port feature net: switchdev: add support for offloading of fdb locked flag net: dsa: mv88e6xxx: mac-auth/MAB implementation selftests: forwarding: add test of MAC-Auth Bypass to locked port tests drivers/net/dsa/mv88e6xxx/Makefile | 1 + drivers/net/dsa/mv88e6xxx/chip.c | 10 +-- drivers/net/dsa/mv88e6xxx/chip.h | 5 ++ drivers/net/dsa/mv88e6xxx/global1.h | 1 + drivers/net/dsa/mv88e6xxx/global1_atu.c | 29 ++++++- .../net/dsa/mv88e6xxx/mv88e6xxx_switchdev.c | 75 +++++++++++++++++++ .../net/dsa/mv88e6xxx/mv88e6xxx_switchdev.h | 20 +++++ drivers/net/dsa/mv88e6xxx/port.c | 17 ++++- drivers/net/dsa/mv88e6xxx/port.h | 1 + include/net/switchdev.h | 3 +- include/uapi/linux/neighbour.h | 1 + net/bridge/br.c | 3 +- net/bridge/br_fdb.c | 13 +++- net/bridge/br_input.c | 10 ++- net/bridge/br_private.h | 5 +- .../net/forwarding/bridge_locked_port.sh | 29 ++++++- 16 files changed, 206 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-) create mode 100644 drivers/net/dsa/mv88e6xxx/mv88e6xxx_switchdev.c create mode 100644 drivers/net/dsa/mv88e6xxx/mv88e6xxx_switchdev.h -- 2.30.2

2 years, 9 months

5
35
0 0

Koszty instalacji fotowoltaicznej

by "Arkadiusz Sokołowski"

Dzień dobry, stworzyliśmy specjalną ofertę dla firm, na kompleksową obsługę inwestycji w fotowoltaikę. Specjalizujemy się w zakresie doboru, montażu i serwisie instalacji fotowoltaicznych, dysponujemy najnowocześniejszymi rozwiązania, które zapewnią Państwu oczekiwane rezultaty. Możemy przygotować dla Państwa wstępną kalkulację i przeanalizować efekty możliwe do osiągnięcia. Czy są Państwo otwarci na wstępną rozmowę w tym temacie? Pozdrawiam Arkadiusz Sokołowski

2 years, 9 months

1
0
0 0

[PATCH] selftests: x86: add 32bit build warnings for SUSE

by Geliang Tang

In order to successfully build all these 32bit tests, these 32bit gcc and glibc packages, named gcc-32bit and glibc-devel-static-32bit on SUSE, need to be installed. This patch added this information in warn_32bit_failure. Signed-off-by: Geliang Tang <geliang.tang(a)suse.com> --- tools/testing/selftests/x86/Makefile | 4 ++++ 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+) diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/x86/Makefile b/tools/testing/selftests/x86/Makefile index 8a1f62ab3c8e..ffd7c1fa2c9e 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/x86/Makefile +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/x86/Makefile @@ -92,6 +92,10 @@ warn_32bit_failure: echo "If you are using a Fedora-like distribution, try:"; \ echo ""; \ echo " yum install glibc-devel.*i686"; \ + echo ""; \ + echo "If you are using a SUSE-like distribution, try:"; \ + echo ""; \ + echo " zypper install gcc-32bit glibc-devel-static-32bit"; \ exit 0; endif -- 2.34.1

2 years, 9 months

2
2
0 0

[PATCH net] selftests: tls: skip cmsg_to_pipe tests with TLS=n

by Jakub Kicinski

These are negative tests, testing TLS code rejects certain operations. They won't pass without TLS enabled, pure TCP accepts those operations. Reported-by: Linux Kernel Functional Testing <lkft(a)linaro.org> Fixes: d87d67fd61ef ("selftests: tls: test splicing cmsgs") Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba(a)kernel.org> --- tools/testing/selftests/net/tls.c | 6 ++++++ 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+) diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/net/tls.c b/tools/testing/selftests/net/tls.c index 6e468e0f42f7..5d70b04c482c 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/net/tls.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/net/tls.c @@ -683,6 +683,9 @@ TEST_F(tls, splice_cmsg_to_pipe) char buf[10]; int p[2]; + if (self->notls) + SKIP(return, "no TLS support"); + ASSERT_GE(pipe(p), 0); EXPECT_EQ(tls_send_cmsg(self->fd, 100, test_str, send_len, 0), 10); EXPECT_EQ(splice(self->cfd, NULL, p[1], NULL, send_len, 0), -1); @@ -703,6 +706,9 @@ TEST_F(tls, splice_dec_cmsg_to_pipe) char buf[10]; int p[2]; + if (self->notls) + SKIP(return, "no TLS support"); + ASSERT_GE(pipe(p), 0); EXPECT_EQ(tls_send_cmsg(self->fd, 100, test_str, send_len, 0), 10); EXPECT_EQ(recv(self->cfd, buf, send_len, 0), -1); -- 2.34.1

2 years, 9 months

3
2
0 0

[PATCH 0/2] selftests/harness: Run TEARDOWN for ASSERT failures

by Kees Cook

Hi, I've needed TEARDOWN for ASSERT tests for a while now. It just took me a while to figure out how to do it. Also included is a patch from Willem de Bruijn that got lost, which makes sure that variants are passed to TEARDOWN, since they may be needed there too. Thanks! -Kees Kees Cook (1): selftests/harness: Run TEARDOWN for ASSERT failures Willem de Bruijn (1): selftests/harness: Pass variant to teardown tools/testing/selftests/kselftest_harness.h | 59 ++++++++++++++------- 1 file changed, 40 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-) -- 2.32.0

2 years, 9 months

2
5
0 0

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

Linux-kselftest-mirror March 2022