October 2019 - Linux-kselftest-mirror

[PATCH v2] selftests: Add kselftest-all and kselftest-install targets

by Shuah Khan

Add kselftest-all target to build tests from the top level Makefile. This is to simplify kselftest use-cases for CI and distributions where build and test systems are different. Current kselftest target builds and runs tests on a development system which is a developer use-case. Add kselftest-install target to install tests from the top level Makefile. This is to simplify kselftest use-cases for CI and distributions where build and test systems are different. This change addresses requests from developers and testers to add support for installing kselftest from the main Makefile. In addition, make the install directory the same when install is run using "make kselftest-install" or by running kselftest_install.sh. Also fix the INSTALL_PATH variable conflict between main Makefile and selftests Makefile. Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan(a)linuxfoundation.org> --- Changes since v1: - Collpased two patches that added separate targets to build and install into one patch using pattern rule to invoke all, install, and clean targets from main Makefile. Makefile | 5 ++--- tools/testing/selftests/Makefile | 8 ++++++-- tools/testing/selftests/kselftest_install.sh | 4 ++-- 3 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-) diff --git a/Makefile b/Makefile index d456746da347..ec296c60c1af 100644 --- a/Makefile +++ b/Makefile @@ -1237,9 +1237,8 @@ PHONY += kselftest kselftest: $(Q)$(MAKE) -C $(srctree)/tools/testing/selftests run_tests -PHONY += kselftest-clean -kselftest-clean: - $(Q)$(MAKE) -C $(srctree)/tools/testing/selftests clean +kselftest-%: FORCE + $(Q)$(MAKE) -C $(srctree)/tools/testing/selftests $* PHONY += kselftest-merge kselftest-merge: diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/Makefile b/tools/testing/selftests/Makefile index c3feccb99ff5..bad18145ed1a 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/Makefile +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/Makefile @@ -171,9 +171,12 @@ run_pstore_crash: # 1. output_dir=kernel_src # 2. a separate output directory is specified using O= KBUILD_OUTPUT # 3. a separate output directory is specified using KBUILD_OUTPUT +# Avoid conflict with INSTALL_PATH set by the main Makefile # -INSTALL_PATH ?= $(BUILD)/install -INSTALL_PATH := $(abspath $(INSTALL_PATH)) +KSFT_INSTALL_PATH ?= $(BUILD)/kselftest_install +KSFT_INSTALL_PATH := $(abspath $(KSFT_INSTALL_PATH)) +# Avoid changing the rest of the logic here and lib.mk. +INSTALL_PATH := $(KSFT_INSTALL_PATH) ALL_SCRIPT := $(INSTALL_PATH)/run_kselftest.sh install: all @@ -203,6 +206,7 @@ ifdef INSTALL_PATH echo "[ -w /dev/kmsg ] && echo \"kselftest: Running tests in $$TARGET\" >> /dev/kmsg" >> $(ALL_SCRIPT); \ echo "cd $$TARGET" >> $(ALL_SCRIPT); \ echo -n "run_many" >> $(ALL_SCRIPT); \ + echo -n "Emit Tests for $$TARGET\n"; \ $(MAKE) -s --no-print-directory OUTPUT=$$BUILD_TARGET -C $$TARGET emit_tests >> $(ALL_SCRIPT); \ echo "" >> $(ALL_SCRIPT); \ echo "cd \$$ROOT" >> $(ALL_SCRIPT); \ diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kselftest_install.sh b/tools/testing/selftests/kselftest_install.sh index ec304463883c..e2e1911d62d5 100755 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/kselftest_install.sh +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kselftest_install.sh @@ -24,12 +24,12 @@ main() echo "$0: Installing in specified location - $install_loc ..." fi - install_dir=$install_loc/kselftest + install_dir=$install_loc/kselftest_install # Create install directory mkdir -p $install_dir # Build tests - INSTALL_PATH=$install_dir make install + KSFT_INSTALL_PATH=$install_dir make install } main "$@" -- 2.20.1

6 years

3
4
0 0

[PATCH linux-kselftest/test v6] ext4: add kunit test for decoding extended timestamps

by Iurii Zaikin

KUnit tests for decoding extended 64 bit timestamps that verify the seconds part of [a/c/m] timestamps in ext4 inode structs are decoded correctly. Test data is derived from the table in the Inode Timestamps section of Documentation/filesystems/ext4/inodes.rst. KUnit tests run during boot and output the results to the debug log in TAP format (http://testanything.org/). Only useful for kernel devs running KUnit test harness and are not for inclusion into a production build. Signed-off-by: Iurii Zaikin <yzaikin(a)google.com> Reviewed-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso(a)mit.edu> Reviewed-by: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins(a)google.com> Tested-by: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins(a)google.com> --- fs/ext4/Kconfig | 17 +++ fs/ext4/Makefile | 1 + fs/ext4/inode-test.c | 272 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 3 files changed, 290 insertions(+) create mode 100644 fs/ext4/inode-test.c diff --git a/fs/ext4/Kconfig b/fs/ext4/Kconfig index cbb5ca830e57..ef42ab040905 100644 --- a/fs/ext4/Kconfig +++ b/fs/ext4/Kconfig @@ -106,3 +106,20 @@ config EXT4_DEBUG If you select Y here, then you will be able to turn on debugging with a command such as: echo 1 > /sys/module/ext4/parameters/mballoc_debug + +config EXT4_KUNIT_TESTS + bool "KUnit tests for ext4" + select EXT4_FS + depends on KUNIT + help + This builds the ext4 KUnit tests. + + KUnit tests run during boot and output the results to the debug log + in TAP format (http://testanything.org/). Only useful for kernel devs + running KUnit test harness and are not for inclusion into a production + build. + + For more information on KUnit and unit tests in general please refer + to the KUnit documentation in Documentation/dev-tools/kunit/. + + If unsure, say N. diff --git a/fs/ext4/Makefile b/fs/ext4/Makefile index b17ddc229ac5..840b91d040f1 100644 --- a/fs/ext4/Makefile +++ b/fs/ext4/Makefile @@ -13,4 +13,5 @@ ext4-y := balloc.o bitmap.o block_validity.o dir.o ext4_jbd2.o extents.o \ ext4-$(CONFIG_EXT4_FS_POSIX_ACL) += acl.o ext4-$(CONFIG_EXT4_FS_SECURITY) += xattr_security.o +ext4-$(CONFIG_EXT4_KUNIT_TESTS) += inode-test.o ext4-$(CONFIG_FS_VERITY) += verity.o diff --git a/fs/ext4/inode-test.c b/fs/ext4/inode-test.c new file mode 100644 index 000000000000..92a9da1774aa --- /dev/null +++ b/fs/ext4/inode-test.c @@ -0,0 +1,272 @@ +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 +/* + * KUnit test of ext4 inode that verify the seconds part of [a/c/m] + * timestamps in ext4 inode structs are decoded correctly. + */ + +#include <kunit/test.h> +#include <linux/kernel.h> +#include <linux/time64.h> + +#include "ext4.h" + +/* + * For constructing the nonnegative timestamp lower bound value. + * binary: 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 + */ +#define LOWER_MSB_0 0L +/* + * For constructing the nonnegative timestamp upper bound value. + * binary: 01111111 11111111 11111111 11111111 + * + */ +#define UPPER_MSB_0 0x7fffffffL +/* + * For constructing the negative timestamp lower bound value. + * binary: 10000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 + */ +#define LOWER_MSB_1 (-0x80000000L) +/* + * For constructing the negative timestamp upper bound value. + * binary: 11111111 11111111 11111111 11111111 + */ +#define UPPER_MSB_1 (-1L) +/* + * Upper bound for nanoseconds value supported by the encoding. + * binary: 00111111 11111111 11111111 11111111 + */ +#define MAX_NANOSECONDS ((1L << 30) - 1) + +#define CASE_NAME_FORMAT "%s: msb:%x lower_bound:%x extra_bits: %x" + +#define LOWER_BOUND_NEG_NO_EXTRA_BITS_CASE\ + "1901-12-13 Lower bound of 32bit < 0 timestamp, no extra bits" +#define UPPER_BOUND_NEG_NO_EXTRA_BITS_CASE\ + "1969-12-31 Upper bound of 32bit < 0 timestamp, no extra bits" +#define LOWER_BOUND_NONNEG_NO_EXTRA_BITS_CASE\ + "1970-01-01 Lower bound of 32bit >=0 timestamp, no extra bits" +#define UPPER_BOUND_NONNEG_NO_EXTRA_BITS_CASE\ + "2038-01-19 Upper bound of 32bit >=0 timestamp, no extra bits" +#define LOWER_BOUND_NEG_LO_1_CASE\ + "2038-01-19 Lower bound of 32bit <0 timestamp, lo extra sec bit on" +#define UPPER_BOUND_NEG_LO_1_CASE\ + "2106-02-07 Upper bound of 32bit <0 timestamp, lo extra sec bit on" +#define LOWER_BOUND_NONNEG_LO_1_CASE\ + "2106-02-07 Lower bound of 32bit >=0 timestamp, lo extra sec bit on" +#define UPPER_BOUND_NONNEG_LO_1_CASE\ + "2174-02-25 Upper bound of 32bit >=0 timestamp, lo extra sec bit on" +#define LOWER_BOUND_NEG_HI_1_CASE\ + "2174-02-25 Lower bound of 32bit <0 timestamp, hi extra sec bit on" +#define UPPER_BOUND_NEG_HI_1_CASE\ + "2242-03-16 Upper bound of 32bit <0 timestamp, hi extra sec bit on" +#define LOWER_BOUND_NONNEG_HI_1_CASE\ + "2242-03-16 Lower bound of 32bit >=0 timestamp, hi extra sec bit on" +#define UPPER_BOUND_NONNEG_HI_1_CASE\ + "2310-04-04 Upper bound of 32bit >=0 timestamp, hi extra sec bit on" +#define UPPER_BOUND_NONNEG_HI_1_NS_1_CASE\ + "2310-04-04 Upper bound of 32bit>=0 timestamp, hi extra sec bit 1. 1 ns" +#define LOWER_BOUND_NONNEG_HI_1_NS_MAX_CASE\ + "2378-04-22 Lower bound of 32bit>= timestamp. Extra sec bits 1. Max ns" +#define LOWER_BOUND_NONNEG_EXTRA_BITS_1_CASE\ + "2378-04-22 Lower bound of 32bit >=0 timestamp. All extra sec bits on" +#define UPPER_BOUND_NONNEG_EXTRA_BITS_1_CASE\ + "2446-05-10 Upper bound of 32bit >=0 timestamp. All extra sec bits on" + +struct timestamp_expectation { + const char *test_case_name; + struct timespec64 expected; + u32 extra_bits; + bool msb_set; + bool lower_bound; +}; + +static time64_t get_32bit_time(const struct timestamp_expectation * const test) +{ + if (test->msb_set) { + if (test->lower_bound) + return LOWER_MSB_1; + + return UPPER_MSB_1; + } + + if (test->lower_bound) + return LOWER_MSB_0; + return UPPER_MSB_0; +} + + +/* + * Test data is derived from the table in the Inode Timestamps section of + * Documentation/filesystems/ext4/inodes.rst. + */ +static void inode_test_xtimestamp_decoding(struct kunit *test) +{ + const struct timestamp_expectation test_data[] = { + { + .test_case_name = LOWER_BOUND_NEG_NO_EXTRA_BITS_CASE, + .msb_set = true, + .lower_bound = true, + .extra_bits = 0, + .expected = {.tv_sec = -0x80000000LL, .tv_nsec = 0L}, + }, + + { + .test_case_name = UPPER_BOUND_NEG_NO_EXTRA_BITS_CASE, + .msb_set = true, + .lower_bound = false, + .extra_bits = 0, + .expected = {.tv_sec = -1LL, .tv_nsec = 0L}, + }, + + { + .test_case_name = LOWER_BOUND_NONNEG_NO_EXTRA_BITS_CASE, + .msb_set = false, + .lower_bound = true, + .extra_bits = 0, + .expected = {0LL, 0L}, + }, + + { + .test_case_name = UPPER_BOUND_NONNEG_NO_EXTRA_BITS_CASE, + .msb_set = false, + .lower_bound = false, + .extra_bits = 0, + .expected = {.tv_sec = 0x7fffffffLL, .tv_nsec = 0L}, + }, + + { + .test_case_name = LOWER_BOUND_NEG_LO_1_CASE, + .msb_set = true, + .lower_bound = true, + .extra_bits = 1, + .expected = {.tv_sec = 0x80000000LL, .tv_nsec = 0L}, + }, + + { + .test_case_name = UPPER_BOUND_NEG_LO_1_CASE, + .msb_set = true, + .lower_bound = false, + .extra_bits = 1, + .expected = {.tv_sec = 0xffffffffLL, .tv_nsec = 0L}, + }, + + { + .test_case_name = LOWER_BOUND_NONNEG_LO_1_CASE, + .msb_set = false, + .lower_bound = true, + .extra_bits = 1, + .expected = {.tv_sec = 0x100000000LL, .tv_nsec = 0L}, + }, + + { + .test_case_name = UPPER_BOUND_NONNEG_LO_1_CASE, + .msb_set = false, + .lower_bound = false, + .extra_bits = 1, + .expected = {.tv_sec = 0x17fffffffLL, .tv_nsec = 0L}, + }, + + { + .test_case_name = LOWER_BOUND_NEG_HI_1_CASE, + .msb_set = true, + .lower_bound = true, + .extra_bits = 2, + .expected = {.tv_sec = 0x180000000LL, .tv_nsec = 0L}, + }, + + { + .test_case_name = UPPER_BOUND_NEG_HI_1_CASE, + .msb_set = true, + .lower_bound = false, + .extra_bits = 2, + .expected = {.tv_sec = 0x1ffffffffLL, .tv_nsec = 0L}, + }, + + { + .test_case_name = LOWER_BOUND_NONNEG_HI_1_CASE, + .msb_set = false, + .lower_bound = true, + .extra_bits = 2, + .expected = {.tv_sec = 0x200000000LL, .tv_nsec = 0L}, + }, + + { + .test_case_name = UPPER_BOUND_NONNEG_HI_1_CASE, + .msb_set = false, + .lower_bound = false, + .extra_bits = 2, + .expected = {.tv_sec = 0x27fffffffLL, .tv_nsec = 0L}, + }, + + { + .test_case_name = UPPER_BOUND_NONNEG_HI_1_NS_1_CASE, + .msb_set = false, + .lower_bound = false, + .extra_bits = 6, + .expected = {.tv_sec = 0x27fffffffLL, .tv_nsec = 1L}, + }, + + { + .test_case_name = LOWER_BOUND_NONNEG_HI_1_NS_MAX_CASE, + .msb_set = false, + .lower_bound = true, + .extra_bits = 0xFFFFFFFF, + .expected = {.tv_sec = 0x300000000LL, + .tv_nsec = MAX_NANOSECONDS}, + }, + + { + .test_case_name = LOWER_BOUND_NONNEG_EXTRA_BITS_1_CASE, + .msb_set = false, + .lower_bound = true, + .extra_bits = 3, + .expected = {.tv_sec = 0x300000000LL, .tv_nsec = 0L}, + }, + + { + .test_case_name = UPPER_BOUND_NONNEG_EXTRA_BITS_1_CASE, + .msb_set = false, + .lower_bound = false, + .extra_bits = 3, + .expected = {.tv_sec = 0x37fffffffLL, .tv_nsec = 0L}, + } + }; + + struct timespec64 timestamp; + int i; + + for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(test_data); ++i) { + timestamp.tv_sec = get_32bit_time(&test_data[i]); + ext4_decode_extra_time(&timestamp, + cpu_to_le32(test_data[i].extra_bits)); + + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ_MSG(test, + test_data[i].expected.tv_sec, + timestamp.tv_sec, + CASE_NAME_FORMAT, + test_data[i].test_case_name, + test_data[i].msb_set, + test_data[i].lower_bound, + test_data[i].extra_bits); + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ_MSG(test, + test_data[i].expected.tv_nsec, + timestamp.tv_nsec, + CASE_NAME_FORMAT, + test_data[i].test_case_name, + test_data[i].msb_set, + test_data[i].lower_bound, + test_data[i].extra_bits); + } +} + +static struct kunit_case ext4_inode_test_cases[] = { + KUNIT_CASE(inode_test_xtimestamp_decoding), + {} +}; + +static struct kunit_suite ext4_inode_test_suite = { + .name = "ext4_inode_test", + .test_cases = ext4_inode_test_cases, +}; + +kunit_test_suite(ext4_inode_test_suite); -- 2.23.0.866.gb869b98d4c-goog

6 years

2
1
0 0

[PATCH linux-kselftest/test v5] ext4: add kunit test for decoding extended timestamps

by Iurii Zaikin

KUnit tests for decoding extended 64 bit timestamps that verify the seconds part of [a/c/m] timestamps in ext4 inode structs are decoded correctly. KUnit tests, which run on boot and output the results to the debug log in TAP format (http://testanything.org/). are only useful for kernel devs running KUnit test harness. Not for inclusion into a production build. Test data is derived from the table under Documentation/filesystems/ext4/inodes.rst Inode Timestamps. Signed-off-by: Iurii Zaikin <yzaikin(a)google.com> Reviewed-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso(a)mit.edu> Reviewed-by: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins(a)google.com> Tested-by: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins(a)google.com> --- fs/ext4/Kconfig | 14 +++ fs/ext4/Makefile | 1 + fs/ext4/inode-test.c | 239 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 3 files changed, 254 insertions(+) create mode 100644 fs/ext4/inode-test.c diff --git a/fs/ext4/Kconfig b/fs/ext4/Kconfig index cbb5ca830e57..f13dde8ed92b 100644 --- a/fs/ext4/Kconfig +++ b/fs/ext4/Kconfig @@ -106,3 +106,17 @@ config EXT4_DEBUG If you select Y here, then you will be able to turn on debugging with a command such as: echo 1 > /sys/module/ext4/parameters/mballoc_debug + +config EXT4_KUNIT_TESTS + bool "KUnit tests for ext4" + select EXT4_FS + depends on KUNIT + help + This builds the ext4 KUnit tests, which run on boot and output + the results to the debug log in TAP format (http://testanything.org/). + Only useful for kernel devs running KUnit test harness. Not for + inclusion into a production build. + For more information on KUnit and unit tests in general please refer + to the KUnit documentation in Documentation/dev-tools/kunit/. + + If unsure, say N. diff --git a/fs/ext4/Makefile b/fs/ext4/Makefile index b17ddc229ac5..840b91d040f1 100644 --- a/fs/ext4/Makefile +++ b/fs/ext4/Makefile @@ -13,4 +13,5 @@ ext4-y := balloc.o bitmap.o block_validity.o dir.o ext4_jbd2.o extents.o \ ext4-$(CONFIG_EXT4_FS_POSIX_ACL) += acl.o ext4-$(CONFIG_EXT4_FS_SECURITY) += xattr_security.o +ext4-$(CONFIG_EXT4_KUNIT_TESTS) += inode-test.o ext4-$(CONFIG_FS_VERITY) += verity.o diff --git a/fs/ext4/inode-test.c b/fs/ext4/inode-test.c new file mode 100644 index 000000000000..1f2c486bc1c2 --- /dev/null +++ b/fs/ext4/inode-test.c @@ -0,0 +1,239 @@ +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 +/* + * KUnit test of ext4 inode that verify the seconds part of [a/c/m] + * timestamps in ext4 inode structs are decoded correctly. + */ + +#include <kunit/test.h> +#include <linux/kernel.h> +#include <linux/time64.h> + +#include "ext4.h" + +/* binary: 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 */ +#define LOWER_MSB_0 0L +/* binary: 01111111 11111111 11111111 11111111 */ +#define UPPER_MSB_0 0x7fffffffL +/* binary: 10000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 */ +#define LOWER_MSB_1 (-0x80000000L) +/* binary: 11111111 11111111 11111111 11111111 */ +#define UPPER_MSB_1 (-1L) +/* binary: 00111111 11111111 11111111 11111111 */ +#define MAX_NANOSECONDS ((1L << 30) - 1) + +#define CASE_NAME_FORMAT "%s: msb:%x lower_bound:%x extra_bits: %x" + +struct timestamp_expectation { + const char *test_case_name; + struct timespec64 expected; + u32 extra_bits; + bool msb_set; + bool lower_bound; +}; + +static time64_t get_32bit_time(const struct timestamp_expectation * const test) +{ + if (test->msb_set) { + if (test->lower_bound) + return LOWER_MSB_1; + + return UPPER_MSB_1; + } + + if (test->lower_bound) + return LOWER_MSB_0; + return UPPER_MSB_0; +} + + +/* + * These tests are derived from the table under + * Documentation/filesystems/ext4/inodes.rst Inode Timestamps + */ +static void inode_test_xtimestamp_decoding(struct kunit *test) +{ + const struct timestamp_expectation test_data[] = { + { + .test_case_name = + "1901-12-13 Lower bound of 32bit < 0 timestamp, no extra bits", + .msb_set = true, + .lower_bound = true, + .extra_bits = 0, + .expected = {.tv_sec = -0x80000000LL, .tv_nsec = 0L}, + }, + + { + .test_case_name = + "1969-12-31 Upper bound of 32bit < 0 timestamp, no extra bits", + .msb_set = true, + .lower_bound = false, + .extra_bits = 0, + .expected = {.tv_sec = -1LL, .tv_nsec = 0L}, + }, + + { + .test_case_name = + "1970-01-01 Lower bound of 32bit >=0 timestamp, no extra bits", + .msb_set = false, + .lower_bound = true, + .extra_bits = 0, + .expected = {0LL, 0L}, + }, + + { + .test_case_name = + "2038-01-19 Upper bound of 32bit >=0 timestamp, no extra bits", + .msb_set = false, + .lower_bound = false, + .extra_bits = 0, + .expected = {.tv_sec = 0x7fffffffLL, .tv_nsec = 0L}, + }, + + { + .test_case_name = + "2038-01-19 Lower bound of 32bit <0 timestamp, lo extra sec bit on", + .msb_set = true, + .lower_bound = true, + .extra_bits = 1, + .expected = {.tv_sec = 0x80000000LL, .tv_nsec = 0L}, + }, + + { + .test_case_name = + "2106-02-07 Upper bound of 32bit <0 timestamp, lo extra sec bit on", + .msb_set = true, + .lower_bound = false, + .extra_bits = 1, + .expected = {.tv_sec = 0xffffffffLL, .tv_nsec = 0L}, + }, + + { + .test_case_name = + "2106-02-07 Lower bound of 32bit >=0 timestamp, lo extra sec bit on", + .msb_set = false, + .lower_bound = true, + .extra_bits = 1, + .expected = {.tv_sec = 0x100000000LL, .tv_nsec = 0L}, + }, + + { + .test_case_name = + "2174-02-25 Upper bound of 32bit >=0 timestamp, lo extra sec bit on", + .msb_set = false, + .lower_bound = false, + .extra_bits = 1, + .expected = {.tv_sec = 0x17fffffffLL, .tv_nsec = 0L}, + }, + + { + .test_case_name = + "2174-02-25 Lower bound of 32bit <0 timestamp, hi extra sec bit on", + .msb_set = true, + .lower_bound = true, + .extra_bits = 2, + .expected = {.tv_sec = 0x180000000LL, .tv_nsec = 0L}, + }, + + { + .test_case_name = + "2242-03-16 Upper bound of 32bit <0 timestamp, hi extra sec bit on", + .msb_set = true, + .lower_bound = false, + .extra_bits = 2, + .expected = {.tv_sec = 0x1ffffffffLL, .tv_nsec = 0L}, + }, + + { + .test_case_name = + "2242-03-16 Lower bound of 32bit >=0 timestamp, hi extra sec bit on", + .msb_set = false, + .lower_bound = true, + .extra_bits = 2, + .expected = {.tv_sec = 0x200000000LL, .tv_nsec = 0L}, + }, + + { + .test_case_name = + "2310-04-04 Upper bound of 32bit >=0 timestamp, hi extra sec bit on", + .msb_set = false, + .lower_bound = false, + .extra_bits = 2, + .expected = {.tv_sec = 0x27fffffffLL, .tv_nsec = 0L}, + }, + + { + .test_case_name = +"2310-04-04 Upper bound of 32bit>=0 timestamp, hi extra sec bit 1. 1 ns bit 1", + .msb_set = false, + .lower_bound = false, + .extra_bits = 6, + .expected = {.tv_sec = 0x27fffffffLL, .tv_nsec = 1L}, + }, + + { + .test_case_name = +"2378-04-22 Lower bound of 32bit>= timestamp. Extra sec bits 1. ns bits 1", + .msb_set = false, + .lower_bound = true, + .extra_bits = 0xFFFFFFFF, + .expected = {.tv_sec = 0x300000000LL, + .tv_nsec = MAX_NANOSECONDS}, + }, + + { + .test_case_name = + "2378-04-22 Lower bound of 32bit >= timestamp. All extra sec bits on", + .msb_set = false, + .lower_bound = true, + .extra_bits = 3, + .expected = {.tv_sec = 0x300000000LL, .tv_nsec = 0L}, + }, + + { + .test_case_name = + "2446-05-10 Upper bound of 32bit >= timestamp. All extra sec bits on", + .msb_set = false, + .lower_bound = false, + .extra_bits = 3, + .expected = {.tv_sec = 0x37fffffffLL, .tv_nsec = 0L}, + } + }; + + struct timespec64 timestamp; + int i; + + for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(test_data); ++i) { + timestamp.tv_sec = get_32bit_time(&test_data[i]); + ext4_decode_extra_time(&timestamp, + cpu_to_le32(test_data[i].extra_bits)); + + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ_MSG(test, + test_data[i].expected.tv_sec, + timestamp.tv_sec, + CASE_NAME_FORMAT, + test_data[i].test_case_name, + test_data[i].msb_set, + test_data[i].lower_bound, + test_data[i].extra_bits); + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ_MSG(test, + test_data[i].expected.tv_nsec, + timestamp.tv_nsec, + CASE_NAME_FORMAT, + test_data[i].test_case_name, + test_data[i].msb_set, + test_data[i].lower_bound, + test_data[i].extra_bits); + } +} + +static struct kunit_case ext4_inode_test_cases[] = { + KUNIT_CASE(inode_test_xtimestamp_decoding), + {} +}; + +static struct kunit_suite ext4_inode_test_suite = { + .name = "ext4_inode_test", + .test_cases = ext4_inode_test_cases, +}; + +kunit_test_suite(ext4_inode_test_suite); -- 2.23.0.866.gb869b98d4c-goog

6 years

2
2
0 0

[PATCH linux-kselftest/test v5] ext4: add kunit test for decoding extended timestamps

by Iurii Zaikin

KUnit tests for decoding extended 64 bit timestamps that verify the seconds part of [a/c/m] timestamps in ext4 inode structs are decoded correctly. KUnit tests, which run on boot and output the results to the debug log in TAP format (http://testanything.org/). are only useful for kernel devs running KUnit test harness. Not for inclusion into a production build. Test data is derived from the table under Documentation/filesystems/ext4/inodes.rst Inode Timestamps. Signed-off-by: Iurii Zaikin <yzaikin(a)google.com> --- fs/ext4/Kconfig | 14 +++ fs/ext4/Makefile | 1 + fs/ext4/inode-test.c | 239 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 3 files changed, 254 insertions(+) create mode 100644 fs/ext4/inode-test.c diff --git a/fs/ext4/Kconfig b/fs/ext4/Kconfig index cbb5ca830e57..f13dde8ed92b 100644 --- a/fs/ext4/Kconfig +++ b/fs/ext4/Kconfig @@ -106,3 +106,17 @@ config EXT4_DEBUG If you select Y here, then you will be able to turn on debugging with a command such as: echo 1 > /sys/module/ext4/parameters/mballoc_debug + +config EXT4_KUNIT_TESTS + bool "KUnit tests for ext4" + select EXT4_FS + depends on KUNIT + help + This builds the ext4 KUnit tests, which run on boot and output + the results to the debug log in TAP format (http://testanything.org/). + Only useful for kernel devs running KUnit test harness. Not for + inclusion into a production build. + For more information on KUnit and unit tests in general please refer + to the KUnit documentation in Documentation/dev-tools/kunit/. + + If unsure, say N. diff --git a/fs/ext4/Makefile b/fs/ext4/Makefile index b17ddc229ac5..840b91d040f1 100644 --- a/fs/ext4/Makefile +++ b/fs/ext4/Makefile @@ -13,4 +13,5 @@ ext4-y := balloc.o bitmap.o block_validity.o dir.o ext4_jbd2.o extents.o \ ext4-$(CONFIG_EXT4_FS_POSIX_ACL) += acl.o ext4-$(CONFIG_EXT4_FS_SECURITY) += xattr_security.o +ext4-$(CONFIG_EXT4_KUNIT_TESTS) += inode-test.o ext4-$(CONFIG_FS_VERITY) += verity.o diff --git a/fs/ext4/inode-test.c b/fs/ext4/inode-test.c new file mode 100644 index 000000000000..1f2c486bc1c2 --- /dev/null +++ b/fs/ext4/inode-test.c @@ -0,0 +1,239 @@ +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 +/* + * KUnit test of ext4 inode that verify the seconds part of [a/c/m] + * timestamps in ext4 inode structs are decoded correctly. + */ + +#include <kunit/test.h> +#include <linux/kernel.h> +#include <linux/time64.h> + +#include "ext4.h" + +/* binary: 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 */ +#define LOWER_MSB_0 0L +/* binary: 01111111 11111111 11111111 11111111 */ +#define UPPER_MSB_0 0x7fffffffL +/* binary: 10000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 */ +#define LOWER_MSB_1 (-0x80000000L) +/* binary: 11111111 11111111 11111111 11111111 */ +#define UPPER_MSB_1 (-1L) +/* binary: 00111111 11111111 11111111 11111111 */ +#define MAX_NANOSECONDS ((1L << 30) - 1) + +#define CASE_NAME_FORMAT "%s: msb:%x lower_bound:%x extra_bits: %x" + +struct timestamp_expectation { + const char *test_case_name; + struct timespec64 expected; + u32 extra_bits; + bool msb_set; + bool lower_bound; +}; + +static time64_t get_32bit_time(const struct timestamp_expectation * const test) +{ + if (test->msb_set) { + if (test->lower_bound) + return LOWER_MSB_1; + + return UPPER_MSB_1; + } + + if (test->lower_bound) + return LOWER_MSB_0; + return UPPER_MSB_0; +} + + +/* + * These tests are derived from the table under + * Documentation/filesystems/ext4/inodes.rst Inode Timestamps + */ +static void inode_test_xtimestamp_decoding(struct kunit *test) +{ + const struct timestamp_expectation test_data[] = { + { + .test_case_name = + "1901-12-13 Lower bound of 32bit < 0 timestamp, no extra bits", + .msb_set = true, + .lower_bound = true, + .extra_bits = 0, + .expected = {.tv_sec = -0x80000000LL, .tv_nsec = 0L}, + }, + + { + .test_case_name = + "1969-12-31 Upper bound of 32bit < 0 timestamp, no extra bits", + .msb_set = true, + .lower_bound = false, + .extra_bits = 0, + .expected = {.tv_sec = -1LL, .tv_nsec = 0L}, + }, + + { + .test_case_name = + "1970-01-01 Lower bound of 32bit >=0 timestamp, no extra bits", + .msb_set = false, + .lower_bound = true, + .extra_bits = 0, + .expected = {0LL, 0L}, + }, + + { + .test_case_name = + "2038-01-19 Upper bound of 32bit >=0 timestamp, no extra bits", + .msb_set = false, + .lower_bound = false, + .extra_bits = 0, + .expected = {.tv_sec = 0x7fffffffLL, .tv_nsec = 0L}, + }, + + { + .test_case_name = + "2038-01-19 Lower bound of 32bit <0 timestamp, lo extra sec bit on", + .msb_set = true, + .lower_bound = true, + .extra_bits = 1, + .expected = {.tv_sec = 0x80000000LL, .tv_nsec = 0L}, + }, + + { + .test_case_name = + "2106-02-07 Upper bound of 32bit <0 timestamp, lo extra sec bit on", + .msb_set = true, + .lower_bound = false, + .extra_bits = 1, + .expected = {.tv_sec = 0xffffffffLL, .tv_nsec = 0L}, + }, + + { + .test_case_name = + "2106-02-07 Lower bound of 32bit >=0 timestamp, lo extra sec bit on", + .msb_set = false, + .lower_bound = true, + .extra_bits = 1, + .expected = {.tv_sec = 0x100000000LL, .tv_nsec = 0L}, + }, + + { + .test_case_name = + "2174-02-25 Upper bound of 32bit >=0 timestamp, lo extra sec bit on", + .msb_set = false, + .lower_bound = false, + .extra_bits = 1, + .expected = {.tv_sec = 0x17fffffffLL, .tv_nsec = 0L}, + }, + + { + .test_case_name = + "2174-02-25 Lower bound of 32bit <0 timestamp, hi extra sec bit on", + .msb_set = true, + .lower_bound = true, + .extra_bits = 2, + .expected = {.tv_sec = 0x180000000LL, .tv_nsec = 0L}, + }, + + { + .test_case_name = + "2242-03-16 Upper bound of 32bit <0 timestamp, hi extra sec bit on", + .msb_set = true, + .lower_bound = false, + .extra_bits = 2, + .expected = {.tv_sec = 0x1ffffffffLL, .tv_nsec = 0L}, + }, + + { + .test_case_name = + "2242-03-16 Lower bound of 32bit >=0 timestamp, hi extra sec bit on", + .msb_set = false, + .lower_bound = true, + .extra_bits = 2, + .expected = {.tv_sec = 0x200000000LL, .tv_nsec = 0L}, + }, + + { + .test_case_name = + "2310-04-04 Upper bound of 32bit >=0 timestamp, hi extra sec bit on", + .msb_set = false, + .lower_bound = false, + .extra_bits = 2, + .expected = {.tv_sec = 0x27fffffffLL, .tv_nsec = 0L}, + }, + + { + .test_case_name = +"2310-04-04 Upper bound of 32bit>=0 timestamp, hi extra sec bit 1. 1 ns bit 1", + .msb_set = false, + .lower_bound = false, + .extra_bits = 6, + .expected = {.tv_sec = 0x27fffffffLL, .tv_nsec = 1L}, + }, + + { + .test_case_name = +"2378-04-22 Lower bound of 32bit>= timestamp. Extra sec bits 1. ns bits 1", + .msb_set = false, + .lower_bound = true, + .extra_bits = 0xFFFFFFFF, + .expected = {.tv_sec = 0x300000000LL, + .tv_nsec = MAX_NANOSECONDS}, + }, + + { + .test_case_name = + "2378-04-22 Lower bound of 32bit >= timestamp. All extra sec bits on", + .msb_set = false, + .lower_bound = true, + .extra_bits = 3, + .expected = {.tv_sec = 0x300000000LL, .tv_nsec = 0L}, + }, + + { + .test_case_name = + "2446-05-10 Upper bound of 32bit >= timestamp. All extra sec bits on", + .msb_set = false, + .lower_bound = false, + .extra_bits = 3, + .expected = {.tv_sec = 0x37fffffffLL, .tv_nsec = 0L}, + } + }; + + struct timespec64 timestamp; + int i; + + for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(test_data); ++i) { + timestamp.tv_sec = get_32bit_time(&test_data[i]); + ext4_decode_extra_time(&timestamp, + cpu_to_le32(test_data[i].extra_bits)); + + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ_MSG(test, + test_data[i].expected.tv_sec, + timestamp.tv_sec, + CASE_NAME_FORMAT, + test_data[i].test_case_name, + test_data[i].msb_set, + test_data[i].lower_bound, + test_data[i].extra_bits); + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ_MSG(test, + test_data[i].expected.tv_nsec, + timestamp.tv_nsec, + CASE_NAME_FORMAT, + test_data[i].test_case_name, + test_data[i].msb_set, + test_data[i].lower_bound, + test_data[i].extra_bits); + } +} + +static struct kunit_case ext4_inode_test_cases[] = { + KUNIT_CASE(inode_test_xtimestamp_decoding), + {} +}; + +static struct kunit_suite ext4_inode_test_suite = { + .name = "ext4_inode_test", + .test_cases = ext4_inode_test_cases, +}; + +kunit_test_suite(ext4_inode_test_suite); -- 2.23.0.866.gb869b98d4c-goog

6 years

3
3
0 0

[PATCH v3 0/3] ftrace: Introduce PERMANENT ftrace_ops flag

by Miroslav Benes

Livepatch uses ftrace for redirection to new patched functions. It means that if ftrace is disabled, all live patched functions are disabled as well. Toggling global 'ftrace_enabled' sysctl thus affect it directly. It is not a problem per se, because only administrator can set sysctl values, but it still may be surprising. Introduce PERMANENT ftrace_ops flag to amend this. If the FTRACE_OPS_FL_PERMANENT is set on any ftrace ops, the tracing cannot be disabled by disabling ftrace_enabled. Equally, a callback with the flag set cannot be registered if ftrace_enabled is disabled. v2->v3: - ftrace_enabled explicitly set to true - selftest from Joe Lawrence (I just split it to two patches) - typo fix v1->v2: - different logic, proposed by Joe Lawrence Joe Lawrence (2): selftests/livepatch: Make dynamic debug setup and restore generic selftests/livepatch: Test interaction with ftrace_enabled Miroslav Benes (1): ftrace: Introduce PERMANENT ftrace_ops flag Documentation/trace/ftrace-uses.rst | 8 +++ Documentation/trace/ftrace.rst | 4 +- include/linux/ftrace.h | 3 + kernel/livepatch/patch.c | 3 +- kernel/trace/ftrace.c | 23 ++++++- tools/testing/selftests/livepatch/Makefile | 3 +- .../testing/selftests/livepatch/functions.sh | 34 +++++++--- .../selftests/livepatch/test-callbacks.sh | 2 +- .../selftests/livepatch/test-ftrace.sh | 65 +++++++++++++++++++ .../selftests/livepatch/test-livepatch.sh | 2 +- .../selftests/livepatch/test-shadow-vars.sh | 2 +- 11 files changed, 132 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-) create mode 100755 tools/testing/selftests/livepatch/test-ftrace.sh -- 2.23.0

6 years

5
14
0 0

[PATCH linux-kselftest/test v3] lib/list-test: add a test for the 'list' doubly linked list

by David Gow

Add a KUnit test for the kernel doubly linked list implementation in include/linux/list.h Each test case (list_test_x) is focused on testing the behaviour of the list function/macro 'x'. None of the tests pass invalid lists to these macros, and so should behave identically with DEBUG_LIST enabled and disabled. Note that, at present, it only tests the list_ types (not the singly-linked hlist_), and does not yet test all of the list_for_each_entry* macros (and some related things like list_prepare_entry). Signed-off-by: David Gow <davidgow(a)google.com> --- Note: v2 can be found here: https://lkml.org/lkml/2019/10/10/1011 This revision fixes some issues with the memory allocation in the 'list_test_list_init' test. In particular, it uses a KUnit assert to verify that the lists allocated with kmalloc() and kzalloc() are non-NULL (and also properly passes GFP_KERNEL to them). Since this depends on KUnit, which is not yet upstream, it probably makes sense for it to go into the linux-kselftest/test branch alongside KUnit itself. v2 has ended up in the -mm tree, and is already in -next, though. I think it nevertheless makes sense to move this change to the linux-kselftest/test branch, as outlined here: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-kselftest/CABVgOS=W4cfFoE=JT4mbk1zkUsreucrw_B… Thanks, -- David MAINTAINERS | 5 + lib/Kconfig.debug | 12 + lib/Makefile | 3 + lib/list-test.c | 740 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 4 files changed, 760 insertions(+) create mode 100644 lib/list-test.c diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS index 7ef985e01457..9ccabdb25a26 100644 --- a/MAINTAINERS +++ b/MAINTAINERS @@ -9504,6 +9504,11 @@ F: Documentation/misc-devices/lis3lv02d.rst F: drivers/misc/lis3lv02d/ F: drivers/platform/x86/hp_accel.c +LIST UNIT TEST +M: David Gow <davidgow(a)google.com> +S: Maintained +F: lib/list-test.c + LIVE PATCHING M: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe(a)redhat.com> M: Jiri Kosina <jikos(a)kernel.org> diff --git a/lib/Kconfig.debug b/lib/Kconfig.debug index a3017a5dadcd..7b648141ff52 100644 --- a/lib/Kconfig.debug +++ b/lib/Kconfig.debug @@ -1961,6 +1961,18 @@ config SYSCTL_KUNIT_TEST If unsure, say N. +config LIST_TEST + bool "KUnit Test for Kernel Linked-list structures" + depends on KUNIT + help + This builds the linked list unit test, which runs on boot. + It tests that the API and basic functionality of the list_head type + and associated macros. + For more information on KUnit and unit tests in general please refer + to the KUnit documentation in Documentation/dev-tools/kunit/. + + If unsure, say N. + config TEST_UDELAY tristate "udelay test driver" help diff --git a/lib/Makefile b/lib/Makefile index bba1fd5485f7..309e174ee35d 100644 --- a/lib/Makefile +++ b/lib/Makefile @@ -292,3 +292,6 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_GENERIC_LIB_MULDI3) += muldi3.o obj-$(CONFIG_GENERIC_LIB_CMPDI2) += cmpdi2.o obj-$(CONFIG_GENERIC_LIB_UCMPDI2) += ucmpdi2.o obj-$(CONFIG_OBJAGG) += objagg.o + +# KUnit tests +obj-$(CONFIG_LIST_TEST) += list-test.o diff --git a/lib/list-test.c b/lib/list-test.c new file mode 100644 index 000000000000..de6de4ef32c9 --- /dev/null +++ b/lib/list-test.c @@ -0,0 +1,740 @@ +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 +/* + * KUnit test for the Kernel Linked-list structures. + * + * Copyright (C) 2019, Google LLC. + * Author: David Gow <davidgow(a)google.com> + */ +#include <kunit/test.h> + +#include <linux/list.h> + +struct list_test_struct { + int data; + struct list_head list; +}; + +static void list_test_list_init(struct kunit *test) +{ + /* Test the different ways of initialising a list. */ + struct list_head list1 = LIST_HEAD_INIT(list1); + struct list_head list2; + LIST_HEAD(list3); + struct list_head *list4; + struct list_head *list5; + + INIT_LIST_HEAD(&list2); + + list4 = kzalloc(sizeof(*list4), GFP_KERNEL); + KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, list4); + INIT_LIST_HEAD(list4); + + list5 = kmalloc(sizeof(*list5), GFP_KERNEL); + KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, list5); + memset(list5, 0xFF, sizeof(*list5)); + INIT_LIST_HEAD(list5); + + /* list_empty_careful() checks both next and prev. */ + KUNIT_EXPECT_TRUE(test, list_empty_careful(&list1)); + KUNIT_EXPECT_TRUE(test, list_empty_careful(&list2)); + KUNIT_EXPECT_TRUE(test, list_empty_careful(&list3)); + KUNIT_EXPECT_TRUE(test, list_empty_careful(list4)); + KUNIT_EXPECT_TRUE(test, list_empty_careful(list5)); + + kfree(list4); + kfree(list5); +} + +static void list_test_list_add(struct kunit *test) +{ + struct list_head a, b; + LIST_HEAD(list); + + list_add(&a, &list); + list_add(&b, &list); + + /* should be [list] -> b -> a */ + KUNIT_EXPECT_PTR_EQ(test, list.next, &b); + KUNIT_EXPECT_PTR_EQ(test, b.prev, &list); + KUNIT_EXPECT_PTR_EQ(test, b.next, &a); +} + +static void list_test_list_add_tail(struct kunit *test) +{ + struct list_head a, b; + LIST_HEAD(list); + + list_add_tail(&a, &list); + list_add_tail(&b, &list); + + /* should be [list] -> a -> b */ + KUNIT_EXPECT_PTR_EQ(test, list.next, &a); + KUNIT_EXPECT_PTR_EQ(test, a.prev, &list); + KUNIT_EXPECT_PTR_EQ(test, a.next, &b); +} + +static void list_test_list_del(struct kunit *test) +{ + struct list_head a, b; + LIST_HEAD(list); + + list_add_tail(&a, &list); + list_add_tail(&b, &list); + + /* before: [list] -> a -> b */ + list_del(&a); + + /* now: [list] -> b */ + KUNIT_EXPECT_PTR_EQ(test, list.next, &b); + KUNIT_EXPECT_PTR_EQ(test, b.prev, &list); +} + +static void list_test_list_replace(struct kunit *test) +{ + struct list_head a_old, a_new, b; + LIST_HEAD(list); + + list_add_tail(&a_old, &list); + list_add_tail(&b, &list); + + /* before: [list] -> a_old -> b */ + list_replace(&a_old, &a_new); + + /* now: [list] -> a_new -> b */ + KUNIT_EXPECT_PTR_EQ(test, list.next, &a_new); + KUNIT_EXPECT_PTR_EQ(test, b.prev, &a_new); +} + +static void list_test_list_replace_init(struct kunit *test) +{ + struct list_head a_old, a_new, b; + LIST_HEAD(list); + + list_add_tail(&a_old, &list); + list_add_tail(&b, &list); + + /* before: [list] -> a_old -> b */ + list_replace_init(&a_old, &a_new); + + /* now: [list] -> a_new -> b */ + KUNIT_EXPECT_PTR_EQ(test, list.next, &a_new); + KUNIT_EXPECT_PTR_EQ(test, b.prev, &a_new); + + /* check a_old is empty (initialized) */ + KUNIT_EXPECT_TRUE(test, list_empty_careful(&a_old)); +} + +static void list_test_list_swap(struct kunit *test) +{ + struct list_head a, b; + LIST_HEAD(list); + + list_add_tail(&a, &list); + list_add_tail(&b, &list); + + /* before: [list] -> a -> b */ + list_swap(&a, &b); + + /* after: [list] -> b -> a */ + KUNIT_EXPECT_PTR_EQ(test, &b, list.next); + KUNIT_EXPECT_PTR_EQ(test, &a, list.prev); + + KUNIT_EXPECT_PTR_EQ(test, &a, b.next); + KUNIT_EXPECT_PTR_EQ(test, &list, b.prev); + + KUNIT_EXPECT_PTR_EQ(test, &list, a.next); + KUNIT_EXPECT_PTR_EQ(test, &b, a.prev); +} + +static void list_test_list_del_init(struct kunit *test) +{ + struct list_head a, b; + LIST_HEAD(list); + + list_add_tail(&a, &list); + list_add_tail(&b, &list); + + /* before: [list] -> a -> b */ + list_del_init(&a); + /* after: [list] -> b, a initialised */ + + KUNIT_EXPECT_PTR_EQ(test, list.next, &b); + KUNIT_EXPECT_PTR_EQ(test, b.prev, &list); + KUNIT_EXPECT_TRUE(test, list_empty_careful(&a)); +} + +static void list_test_list_move(struct kunit *test) +{ + struct list_head a, b; + LIST_HEAD(list1); + LIST_HEAD(list2); + + list_add_tail(&a, &list1); + list_add_tail(&b, &list2); + + /* before: [list1] -> a, [list2] -> b */ + list_move(&a, &list2); + /* after: [list1] empty, [list2] -> a -> b */ + + KUNIT_EXPECT_TRUE(test, list_empty(&list1)); + + KUNIT_EXPECT_PTR_EQ(test, &a, list2.next); + KUNIT_EXPECT_PTR_EQ(test, &b, a.next); +} + +static void list_test_list_move_tail(struct kunit *test) +{ + struct list_head a, b; + LIST_HEAD(list1); + LIST_HEAD(list2); + + list_add_tail(&a, &list1); + list_add_tail(&b, &list2); + + /* before: [list1] -> a, [list2] -> b */ + list_move_tail(&a, &list2); + /* after: [list1] empty, [list2] -> b -> a */ + + KUNIT_EXPECT_TRUE(test, list_empty(&list1)); + + KUNIT_EXPECT_PTR_EQ(test, &b, list2.next); + KUNIT_EXPECT_PTR_EQ(test, &a, b.next); +} + +static void list_test_list_bulk_move_tail(struct kunit *test) +{ + struct list_head a, b, c, d, x, y; + struct list_head *list1_values[] = { &x, &b, &c, &y }; + struct list_head *list2_values[] = { &a, &d }; + struct list_head *ptr; + LIST_HEAD(list1); + LIST_HEAD(list2); + int i = 0; + + list_add_tail(&x, &list1); + list_add_tail(&y, &list1); + + list_add_tail(&a, &list2); + list_add_tail(&b, &list2); + list_add_tail(&c, &list2); + list_add_tail(&d, &list2); + + /* before: [list1] -> x -> y, [list2] -> a -> b -> c -> d */ + list_bulk_move_tail(&y, &b, &c); + /* after: [list1] -> x -> b -> c -> y, [list2] -> a -> d */ + + list_for_each(ptr, &list1) { + KUNIT_EXPECT_PTR_EQ(test, ptr, list1_values[i]); + i++; + } + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, i, 4); + i = 0; + list_for_each(ptr, &list2) { + KUNIT_EXPECT_PTR_EQ(test, ptr, list2_values[i]); + i++; + } + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, i, 2); +} + +static void list_test_list_is_first(struct kunit *test) +{ + struct list_head a, b; + LIST_HEAD(list); + + list_add_tail(&a, &list); + list_add_tail(&b, &list); + + KUNIT_EXPECT_TRUE(test, list_is_first(&a, &list)); + KUNIT_EXPECT_FALSE(test, list_is_first(&b, &list)); +} + +static void list_test_list_is_last(struct kunit *test) +{ + struct list_head a, b; + LIST_HEAD(list); + + list_add_tail(&a, &list); + list_add_tail(&b, &list); + + KUNIT_EXPECT_FALSE(test, list_is_last(&a, &list)); + KUNIT_EXPECT_TRUE(test, list_is_last(&b, &list)); +} + +static void list_test_list_empty(struct kunit *test) +{ + struct list_head a; + LIST_HEAD(list1); + LIST_HEAD(list2); + + list_add_tail(&a, &list1); + + KUNIT_EXPECT_FALSE(test, list_empty(&list1)); + KUNIT_EXPECT_TRUE(test, list_empty(&list2)); +} + +static void list_test_list_empty_careful(struct kunit *test) +{ + /* This test doesn't check correctness under concurrent access */ + struct list_head a; + LIST_HEAD(list1); + LIST_HEAD(list2); + + list_add_tail(&a, &list1); + + KUNIT_EXPECT_FALSE(test, list_empty_careful(&list1)); + KUNIT_EXPECT_TRUE(test, list_empty_careful(&list2)); +} + +static void list_test_list_rotate_left(struct kunit *test) +{ + struct list_head a, b; + LIST_HEAD(list); + + list_add_tail(&a, &list); + list_add_tail(&b, &list); + + /* before: [list] -> a -> b */ + list_rotate_left(&list); + /* after: [list] -> b -> a */ + + KUNIT_EXPECT_PTR_EQ(test, list.next, &b); + KUNIT_EXPECT_PTR_EQ(test, b.prev, &list); + KUNIT_EXPECT_PTR_EQ(test, b.next, &a); +} + +static void list_test_list_rotate_to_front(struct kunit *test) +{ + struct list_head a, b, c, d; + struct list_head *list_values[] = { &c, &d, &a, &b }; + struct list_head *ptr; + LIST_HEAD(list); + int i = 0; + + list_add_tail(&a, &list); + list_add_tail(&b, &list); + list_add_tail(&c, &list); + list_add_tail(&d, &list); + + /* before: [list] -> a -> b -> c -> d */ + list_rotate_to_front(&c, &list); + /* after: [list] -> c -> d -> a -> b */ + + list_for_each(ptr, &list) { + KUNIT_EXPECT_PTR_EQ(test, ptr, list_values[i]); + i++; + } + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, i, 4); +} + +static void list_test_list_is_singular(struct kunit *test) +{ + struct list_head a, b; + LIST_HEAD(list); + + /* [list] empty */ + KUNIT_EXPECT_FALSE(test, list_is_singular(&list)); + + list_add_tail(&a, &list); + + /* [list] -> a */ + KUNIT_EXPECT_TRUE(test, list_is_singular(&list)); + + list_add_tail(&b, &list); + + /* [list] -> a -> b */ + KUNIT_EXPECT_FALSE(test, list_is_singular(&list)); +} + +static void list_test_list_cut_position(struct kunit *test) +{ + struct list_head entries[3], *cur; + LIST_HEAD(list1); + LIST_HEAD(list2); + int i = 0; + + list_add_tail(&entries[0], &list1); + list_add_tail(&entries[1], &list1); + list_add_tail(&entries[2], &list1); + + /* before: [list1] -> entries[0] -> entries[1] -> entries[2] */ + list_cut_position(&list2, &list1, &entries[1]); + /* after: [list2] -> entries[0] -> entries[1], [list1] -> entries[2] */ + + list_for_each(cur, &list2) { + KUNIT_EXPECT_PTR_EQ(test, cur, &entries[i]); + i++; + } + + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, i, 2); + + list_for_each(cur, &list1) { + KUNIT_EXPECT_PTR_EQ(test, cur, &entries[i]); + i++; + } +} + +static void list_test_list_cut_before(struct kunit *test) +{ + struct list_head entries[3], *cur; + LIST_HEAD(list1); + LIST_HEAD(list2); + int i = 0; + + list_add_tail(&entries[0], &list1); + list_add_tail(&entries[1], &list1); + list_add_tail(&entries[2], &list1); + + /* before: [list1] -> entries[0] -> entries[1] -> entries[2] */ + list_cut_before(&list2, &list1, &entries[1]); + /* after: [list2] -> entries[0], [list1] -> entries[1] -> entries[2] */ + + list_for_each(cur, &list2) { + KUNIT_EXPECT_PTR_EQ(test, cur, &entries[i]); + i++; + } + + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, i, 1); + + list_for_each(cur, &list1) { + KUNIT_EXPECT_PTR_EQ(test, cur, &entries[i]); + i++; + } +} + +static void list_test_list_splice(struct kunit *test) +{ + struct list_head entries[5], *cur; + LIST_HEAD(list1); + LIST_HEAD(list2); + int i = 0; + + list_add_tail(&entries[0], &list1); + list_add_tail(&entries[1], &list1); + list_add_tail(&entries[2], &list2); + list_add_tail(&entries[3], &list2); + list_add_tail(&entries[4], &list1); + + /* before: [list1]->e[0]->e[1]->e[4], [list2]->e[2]->e[3] */ + list_splice(&list2, &entries[1]); + /* after: [list1]->e[0]->e[1]->e[2]->e[3]->e[4], [list2] uninit */ + + list_for_each(cur, &list1) { + KUNIT_EXPECT_PTR_EQ(test, cur, &entries[i]); + i++; + } + + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, i, 5); +} + +static void list_test_list_splice_tail(struct kunit *test) +{ + struct list_head entries[5], *cur; + LIST_HEAD(list1); + LIST_HEAD(list2); + int i = 0; + + list_add_tail(&entries[0], &list1); + list_add_tail(&entries[1], &list1); + list_add_tail(&entries[2], &list2); + list_add_tail(&entries[3], &list2); + list_add_tail(&entries[4], &list1); + + /* before: [list1]->e[0]->e[1]->e[4], [list2]->e[2]->e[3] */ + list_splice_tail(&list2, &entries[4]); + /* after: [list1]->e[0]->e[1]->e[2]->e[3]->e[4], [list2] uninit */ + + list_for_each(cur, &list1) { + KUNIT_EXPECT_PTR_EQ(test, cur, &entries[i]); + i++; + } + + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, i, 5); +} + +static void list_test_list_splice_init(struct kunit *test) +{ + struct list_head entries[5], *cur; + LIST_HEAD(list1); + LIST_HEAD(list2); + int i = 0; + + list_add_tail(&entries[0], &list1); + list_add_tail(&entries[1], &list1); + list_add_tail(&entries[2], &list2); + list_add_tail(&entries[3], &list2); + list_add_tail(&entries[4], &list1); + + /* before: [list1]->e[0]->e[1]->e[4], [list2]->e[2]->e[3] */ + list_splice_init(&list2, &entries[1]); + /* after: [list1]->e[0]->e[1]->e[2]->e[3]->e[4], [list2] empty */ + + list_for_each(cur, &list1) { + KUNIT_EXPECT_PTR_EQ(test, cur, &entries[i]); + i++; + } + + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, i, 5); + + KUNIT_EXPECT_TRUE(test, list_empty_careful(&list2)); +} + +static void list_test_list_splice_tail_init(struct kunit *test) +{ + struct list_head entries[5], *cur; + LIST_HEAD(list1); + LIST_HEAD(list2); + int i = 0; + + list_add_tail(&entries[0], &list1); + list_add_tail(&entries[1], &list1); + list_add_tail(&entries[2], &list2); + list_add_tail(&entries[3], &list2); + list_add_tail(&entries[4], &list1); + + /* before: [list1]->e[0]->e[1]->e[4], [list2]->e[2]->e[3] */ + list_splice_tail_init(&list2, &entries[4]); + /* after: [list1]->e[0]->e[1]->e[2]->e[3]->e[4], [list2] empty */ + + list_for_each(cur, &list1) { + KUNIT_EXPECT_PTR_EQ(test, cur, &entries[i]); + i++; + } + + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, i, 5); + + KUNIT_EXPECT_TRUE(test, list_empty_careful(&list2)); +} + +static void list_test_list_entry(struct kunit *test) +{ + struct list_test_struct test_struct; + + KUNIT_EXPECT_PTR_EQ(test, &test_struct, list_entry(&(test_struct.list), struct list_test_struct, list)); +} + +static void list_test_list_first_entry(struct kunit *test) +{ + struct list_test_struct test_struct1, test_struct2; + LIST_HEAD(list); + + list_add_tail(&test_struct1.list, &list); + list_add_tail(&test_struct2.list, &list); + + + KUNIT_EXPECT_PTR_EQ(test, &test_struct1, list_first_entry(&list, struct list_test_struct, list)); +} + +static void list_test_list_last_entry(struct kunit *test) +{ + struct list_test_struct test_struct1, test_struct2; + LIST_HEAD(list); + + list_add_tail(&test_struct1.list, &list); + list_add_tail(&test_struct2.list, &list); + + + KUNIT_EXPECT_PTR_EQ(test, &test_struct2, list_last_entry(&list, struct list_test_struct, list)); +} + +static void list_test_list_first_entry_or_null(struct kunit *test) +{ + struct list_test_struct test_struct1, test_struct2; + LIST_HEAD(list); + + KUNIT_EXPECT_FALSE(test, list_first_entry_or_null(&list, struct list_test_struct, list)); + + list_add_tail(&test_struct1.list, &list); + list_add_tail(&test_struct2.list, &list); + + KUNIT_EXPECT_PTR_EQ(test, &test_struct1, list_first_entry_or_null(&list, struct list_test_struct, list)); +} + +static void list_test_list_next_entry(struct kunit *test) +{ + struct list_test_struct test_struct1, test_struct2; + LIST_HEAD(list); + + list_add_tail(&test_struct1.list, &list); + list_add_tail(&test_struct2.list, &list); + + + KUNIT_EXPECT_PTR_EQ(test, &test_struct2, list_next_entry(&test_struct1, list)); +} + +static void list_test_list_prev_entry(struct kunit *test) +{ + struct list_test_struct test_struct1, test_struct2; + LIST_HEAD(list); + + list_add_tail(&test_struct1.list, &list); + list_add_tail(&test_struct2.list, &list); + + + KUNIT_EXPECT_PTR_EQ(test, &test_struct1, list_prev_entry(&test_struct2, list)); +} + +static void list_test_list_for_each(struct kunit *test) +{ + struct list_head entries[3], *cur; + LIST_HEAD(list); + int i = 0; + + list_add_tail(&entries[0], &list); + list_add_tail(&entries[1], &list); + list_add_tail(&entries[2], &list); + + list_for_each(cur, &list) { + KUNIT_EXPECT_PTR_EQ(test, cur, &entries[i]); + i++; + } + + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, i, 3); +} + +static void list_test_list_for_each_prev(struct kunit *test) +{ + struct list_head entries[3], *cur; + LIST_HEAD(list); + int i = 2; + + list_add_tail(&entries[0], &list); + list_add_tail(&entries[1], &list); + list_add_tail(&entries[2], &list); + + list_for_each_prev(cur, &list) { + KUNIT_EXPECT_PTR_EQ(test, cur, &entries[i]); + i--; + } + + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, i, -1); +} + +static void list_test_list_for_each_safe(struct kunit *test) +{ + struct list_head entries[3], *cur, *n; + LIST_HEAD(list); + int i = 0; + + + list_add_tail(&entries[0], &list); + list_add_tail(&entries[1], &list); + list_add_tail(&entries[2], &list); + + list_for_each_safe(cur, n, &list) { + KUNIT_EXPECT_PTR_EQ(test, cur, &entries[i]); + list_del(&entries[i]); + i++; + } + + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, i, 3); + KUNIT_EXPECT_TRUE(test, list_empty(&list)); +} + +static void list_test_list_for_each_prev_safe(struct kunit *test) +{ + struct list_head entries[3], *cur, *n; + LIST_HEAD(list); + int i = 2; + + list_add_tail(&entries[0], &list); + list_add_tail(&entries[1], &list); + list_add_tail(&entries[2], &list); + + list_for_each_prev_safe(cur, n, &list) { + KUNIT_EXPECT_PTR_EQ(test, cur, &entries[i]); + list_del(&entries[i]); + i--; + } + + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, i, -1); + KUNIT_EXPECT_TRUE(test, list_empty(&list)); +} + +static void list_test_list_for_each_entry(struct kunit *test) +{ + struct list_test_struct entries[5], *cur; + static LIST_HEAD(list); + int i = 0; + + for (i = 0; i < 5; ++i) { + entries[i].data = i; + list_add_tail(&entries[i].list, &list); + } + + i = 0; + + list_for_each_entry(cur, &list, list) { + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, cur->data, i); + i++; + } + + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, i, 5); +} + +static void list_test_list_for_each_entry_reverse(struct kunit *test) +{ + struct list_test_struct entries[5], *cur; + static LIST_HEAD(list); + int i = 0; + + for (i = 0; i < 5; ++i) { + entries[i].data = i; + list_add_tail(&entries[i].list, &list); + } + + i = 4; + + list_for_each_entry_reverse(cur, &list, list) { + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, cur->data, i); + i--; + } + + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, i, -1); +} + +static struct kunit_case list_test_cases[] = { + KUNIT_CASE(list_test_list_init), + KUNIT_CASE(list_test_list_add), + KUNIT_CASE(list_test_list_add_tail), + KUNIT_CASE(list_test_list_del), + KUNIT_CASE(list_test_list_replace), + KUNIT_CASE(list_test_list_replace_init), + KUNIT_CASE(list_test_list_swap), + KUNIT_CASE(list_test_list_del_init), + KUNIT_CASE(list_test_list_move), + KUNIT_CASE(list_test_list_move_tail), + KUNIT_CASE(list_test_list_bulk_move_tail), + KUNIT_CASE(list_test_list_is_first), + KUNIT_CASE(list_test_list_is_last), + KUNIT_CASE(list_test_list_empty), + KUNIT_CASE(list_test_list_empty_careful), + KUNIT_CASE(list_test_list_rotate_left), + KUNIT_CASE(list_test_list_rotate_to_front), + KUNIT_CASE(list_test_list_is_singular), + KUNIT_CASE(list_test_list_cut_position), + KUNIT_CASE(list_test_list_cut_before), + KUNIT_CASE(list_test_list_splice), + KUNIT_CASE(list_test_list_splice_tail), + KUNIT_CASE(list_test_list_splice_init), + KUNIT_CASE(list_test_list_splice_tail_init), + KUNIT_CASE(list_test_list_entry), + KUNIT_CASE(list_test_list_first_entry), + KUNIT_CASE(list_test_list_last_entry), + KUNIT_CASE(list_test_list_first_entry_or_null), + KUNIT_CASE(list_test_list_next_entry), + KUNIT_CASE(list_test_list_prev_entry), + KUNIT_CASE(list_test_list_for_each), + KUNIT_CASE(list_test_list_for_each_prev), + KUNIT_CASE(list_test_list_for_each_safe), + KUNIT_CASE(list_test_list_for_each_prev_safe), + KUNIT_CASE(list_test_list_for_each_entry), + KUNIT_CASE(list_test_list_for_each_entry_reverse), + {}, +}; + +static struct kunit_suite list_test_module = { + .name = "list-test", + .test_cases = list_test_cases, +}; + +kunit_test_suite(list_test_module); -- 2.23.0.700.g56cf767bdb-goog

6 years

1
0
0 0

[Kernel.org Helpdesk #80110] Bugzilla Component for KUnit?

by Konstantin Ryabitsev via RT

On 2019-10-07 17:21:50, brendanhiggins(a)google.com wrote: > On Fri, Oct 4, 2019 at 11:55 AM Konstantin Ryabitsev via RT > <kernel-helpdesk(a)rt.linuxfoundation.org> wrote: > > > > On 2019-10-02 17:53:58, brendanhiggins(a)google.com wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > > > I am thinking about requesting a Bugzilla component for my kernel > > > project KUnit. I am not sure if this is the right place for it. > > > Some > > > background on KUnit: We are working on adding unit testing for the > > > Linux > > > kernel[1][2]. We have our initial patchset that introduces the > > > subsystem > > > in the process of being merged (Linus sent our PR back to us for a > > > minor > > > fix[3], so it should be in either 5.4-rc2 or 5.5, but is > > > nevertheless > > > in > > > linux-next). However, we also have a staging repo that people are > > > using > > > and some supporting code that lives outside of the kernel. > > > > > > So I am trying to figure out: > > > > > > 1. Is it appropriate to request a Bugzilla component before our > > > subsystem has been merged into torvalds/master? I would just > > > wait, > > > but I have some users looking to file issues, so I would prefer > > > to > > > provide them something sooner rather than later. > > > > > > 2. Is it appropriate to use the kernel's Bugzilla to track issues > > > outside of the Linux kernel? As I mention above, we have code > > > that > > > lives outside of the kernel; is it appropriate to use > > > kernel.org's > > > Bugzilla for this? > > > > > > 3. Does Bugzilla match my planned usage model? It doesn't look like > > > Bugzilla get's much usage aside from reporting bugs. I want to > > > use > > > it for tracking feature progress and things like that. Is that > > > okay? > > > > Yes, we can certainly host this on bugzilla.kernel.org. Would you be > > okay with Tools/KUnit as product/category? > > Cool, well as long as none of my above points are an issue for you. > Then yes, can you create me a component? I am fine with Tools/KUnit as > the product/category. Apologies for the delay, mostly due to Thanksgiving in Canada. You should be able to start using Tools/KUnit now. It uses a default virtual assignee tools_kunit(a)kernel-bugs.kernel.org, so to start receiving bugmail for it, please follow instructions on this page: https://korg.wiki.kernel.org/userdoc/bugzilla#to_start_getting_bug_reports_… Best regards, -- Konstantin Ryabitsev Director, LF Projects IT The Linux Foundation

6 years

3
2
0 0

[PATCH linux-kselftest/test v4] ext4: add kunit test for decoding extended timestamps

by Iurii Zaikin

KUnit tests for decoding extended 64 bit timestamps that verify the seconds part of [a/c/m] timestamps in ext4 inode structs are decoded correctly. KUnit tests, which run on boot and output the results to the debug log in TAP format (http://testanything.org/). are only useful for kernel devs running KUnit test harness. Not for inclusion into a production build. Test data is derive from the table under Documentation/filesystems/ext4/inodes.rst Inode Timestamps. Signed-off-by: Iurii Zaikin <yzaikin(a)google.com> --- fs/ext4/Kconfig | 14 +++ fs/ext4/Makefile | 1 + fs/ext4/inode-test.c | 239 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 3 files changed, 254 insertions(+) create mode 100644 fs/ext4/inode-test.c diff --git a/fs/ext4/Kconfig b/fs/ext4/Kconfig index cbb5ca830e57..f13dde8ed92b 100644 --- a/fs/ext4/Kconfig +++ b/fs/ext4/Kconfig @@ -106,3 +106,17 @@ config EXT4_DEBUG If you select Y here, then you will be able to turn on debugging with a command such as: echo 1 > /sys/module/ext4/parameters/mballoc_debug + +config EXT4_KUNIT_TESTS + bool "KUnit tests for ext4" + select EXT4_FS + depends on KUNIT + help + This builds the ext4 KUnit tests, which run on boot and output + the results to the debug log in TAP format (http://testanything.org/). + Only useful for kernel devs running KUnit test harness. Not for + inclusion into a production build. + For more information on KUnit and unit tests in general please refer + to the KUnit documentation in Documentation/dev-tools/kunit/. + + If unsure, say N. diff --git a/fs/ext4/Makefile b/fs/ext4/Makefile index b17ddc229ac5..a0588fd2eea6 100644 --- a/fs/ext4/Makefile +++ b/fs/ext4/Makefile @@ -13,4 +13,5 @@ ext4-y := balloc.o bitmap.o block_validity.o dir.o ext4_jbd2.o extents.o \ ext4-$(CONFIG_EXT4_FS_POSIX_ACL) += acl.o ext4-$(CONFIG_EXT4_FS_SECURITY) += xattr_security.o +ext4-$(CONFIG_EXT4_KUNIT_TESTS) += inode-test.o ext4-$(CONFIG_FS_VERITY) += verity.o diff --git a/fs/ext4/inode-test.c b/fs/ext4/inode-test.c new file mode 100644 index 000000000000..3b3a453ff382 --- /dev/null +++ b/fs/ext4/inode-test.c @@ -0,0 +1,239 @@ +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 +/* + * KUnit test of ext4 inode that verify the seconds part of [a/c/m] + * timestamps in ext4 inode structs are decoded correctly. + */ + +#include <kunit/test.h> +#include <linux/kernel.h> +#include <linux/time64.h> + +#include "ext4.h" + +/* binary: 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 */ +#define LOWER_MSB_0 0L +/* binary: 01111111 11111111 11111111 11111111 */ +#define UPPER_MSB_0 0x7fffffffL +/* binary: 10000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 */ +#define LOWER_MSB_1 (-0x80000000L) +/* binary: 11111111 11111111 11111111 11111111 */ +#define UPPER_MSB_1 (-1L) +/* binary: 00111111 11111111 11111111 11111111 */ +#define MAX_NANOSECONDS ((1L << 30) - 1) + +#define CASE_NAME_FORMAT "%s: msb:%x lower_bound:%x extra_bits: %x" + +struct timestamp_expectation { + const char *test_case_name; + struct timespec64 expected; + u32 extra_bits; + bool msb_set; + bool lower_bound; +}; + +static time64_t get_32bit_time(const struct timestamp_expectation * const test) +{ + if (test->msb_set) { + if (test->lower_bound) + return LOWER_MSB_1; + + return UPPER_MSB_1; + } + + if (test->lower_bound) + return LOWER_MSB_0; + return UPPER_MSB_0; +} + + +/* + * These tests are derived from the table under + * Documentation/filesystems/ext4/inodes.rst Inode Timestamps + */ +static void inode_test_xtimestamp_decoding(struct kunit *test) +{ + const struct timestamp_expectation test_data[] = { + { + .test_case_name = + "1901-12-13 Lower bound of 32bit < 0 timestamp, no extra bits.", + .msb_set = true, + .lower_bound = true, + .extra_bits = 0, + .expected = {.tv_sec = -0x80000000LL, .tv_nsec = 0L}, + }, + + { + .test_case_name = + "1969-12-31 Upper bound of 32bit < 0 timestamp, no extra bits.", + .msb_set = true, + .lower_bound = false, + .extra_bits = 0, + .expected = {.tv_sec = -1LL, .tv_nsec = 0L}, + }, + + { + .test_case_name = + "1970-01-01 Lower bound of 32bit >=0 timestamp, no extra bits.", + .msb_set = false, + .lower_bound = true, + .extra_bits = 0, + .expected = {0LL, 0L}, + }, + + { + .test_case_name = + "2038-01-19 Upper bound of 32bit >=0 timestamp, no extra bits.", + .msb_set = false, + .lower_bound = false, + .extra_bits = 0, + .expected = {.tv_sec = 0x7fffffffLL, .tv_nsec = 0L}, + }, + + { + .test_case_name = + "2038-01-19 Lower bound of 32bit <0 timestamp, lo extra sec bit on.", + .msb_set = true, + .lower_bound = true, + .extra_bits = 1, + .expected = {.tv_sec = 0x80000000LL, .tv_nsec = 0L}, + }, + + { + .test_case_name = + "2106-02-07 Upper bound of 32bit <0 timestamp, lo extra sec bit on.", + .msb_set = true, + .lower_bound = false, + .extra_bits = 1, + .expected = {.tv_sec = 0xffffffffLL, .tv_nsec = 0L}, + }, + + { + .test_case_name = + "2106-02-07 Lower bound of 32bit >=0 timestamp, lo extra sec bit on.", + .msb_set = false, + .lower_bound = true, + .extra_bits = 1, + .expected = {.tv_sec = 0x100000000LL, .tv_nsec = 0L}, + }, + + { + .test_case_name = + "2174-02-25 Upper bound of 32bit >=0 timestamp, lo extra sec bit on.", + .msb_set = false, + .lower_bound = false, + .extra_bits = 1, + .expected = {.tv_sec = 0x17fffffffLL, .tv_nsec = 0L}, + }, + + { + .test_case_name = + "2174-02-25 Lower bound of 32bit <0 timestamp, hi extra sec bit on.", + .msb_set = true, + .lower_bound = true, + .extra_bits = 2, + .expected = {.tv_sec = 0x180000000LL, .tv_nsec = 0L}, + }, + + { + .test_case_name = + "2242-03-16 Upper bound of 32bit <0 timestamp, hi extra sec bit on.", + .msb_set = true, + .lower_bound = false, + .extra_bits = 2, + .expected = {.tv_sec = 0x1ffffffffLL, .tv_nsec = 0L}, + }, + + { + .test_case_name = + "2242-03-16 Lower bound of 32bit >=0 timestamp, hi extra sec bit on.", + .msb_set = false, + .lower_bound = true, + .extra_bits = 2, + .expected = {.tv_sec = 0x200000000LL, .tv_nsec = 0L}, + }, + + { + .test_case_name = + "2310-04-04 Upper bound of 32bit >=0 timestamp, hi extra sec bit on.", + .msb_set = false, + .lower_bound = false, + .extra_bits = 2, + .expected = {.tv_sec = 0x27fffffffLL, .tv_nsec = 0L}, + }, + + { + .test_case_name = +"2310-04-04 Upper bound of 32bit>=0 timestamp, hi extra sec bit 1. 1 ns bit 1.", + .msb_set = false, + .lower_bound = false, + .extra_bits = 6, + .expected = {.tv_sec = 0x27fffffffLL, .tv_nsec = 1L}, + }, + + { + .test_case_name = +"2378-04-22 Lower bound of 32bit>= timestamp. Extra sec bits 1. ns bits 1.", + .msb_set = false, + .lower_bound = true, + .extra_bits = 0xFFFFFFFF, + .expected = {.tv_sec = 0x300000000LL, + .tv_nsec = MAX_NANOSECONDS}, + }, + + { + .test_case_name = + "2378-04-22 Lower bound of 32bit >= timestamp. All extra sec bits on.", + .msb_set = false, + .lower_bound = true, + .extra_bits = 3, + .expected = {.tv_sec = 0x300000000LL, .tv_nsec = 0L}, + }, + + { + .test_case_name = + "2446-05-10 Upper bound of 32bit >= timestamp. All extra sec bits on.", + .msb_set = false, + .lower_bound = false, + .extra_bits = 3, + .expected = {.tv_sec = 0x37fffffffLL, .tv_nsec = 0L}, + } + }; + + struct timespec64 timestamp; + int i; + + for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(test_data); ++i) { + timestamp.tv_sec = get_32bit_time(&test_data[i]); + ext4_decode_extra_time(&timestamp, + cpu_to_le32(test_data[i].extra_bits)); + + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ_MSG(test, + test_data[i].expected.tv_sec, + timestamp.tv_sec, + CASE_NAME_FORMAT, + test_data[i].test_case_name, + test_data[i].msb_set, + test_data[i].lower_bound, + test_data[i].extra_bits); + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ_MSG(test, + test_data[i].expected.tv_nsec, + timestamp.tv_nsec, + CASE_NAME_FORMAT, + test_data[i].test_case_name, + test_data[i].msb_set, + test_data[i].lower_bound, + test_data[i].extra_bits); + } +} + +static struct kunit_case ext4_inode_test_cases[] = { + KUNIT_CASE(inode_test_xtimestamp_decoding), + {} +}; + +static struct kunit_suite ext4_inode_test_suite = { + .name = "ext4_inode_test", + .test_cases = ext4_inode_test_cases, +}; + +kunit_test_suite(ext4_inode_test_suite); -- 2.23.0.700.g56cf767bdb-goog

6 years

2
2
0 0

[PATCH linux-kselftest/test v3] ext4: add kunit test for decoding extended timestamps

by Iurii Zaikin

KUnit tests for decoding extended 64 bit timestamps that verify the seconds part of [a/c/m] timestamps in ext4 inode structs are decoded correctly. KUnit tests, which run on boot and output the results to the debug log in TAP format (http://testanything.org/). are only useful for kernel devs running KUnit test harness. Not for inclusion into a production build. Test data is derive from the table under Documentation/filesystems/ext4/inodes.rst Inode Timestamps. Signed-off-by: Iurii Zaikin <yzaikin(a)google.com> --- fs/ext4/Kconfig | 14 +++ fs/ext4/Makefile | 1 + fs/ext4/inode-test.c | 239 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 3 files changed, 254 insertions(+) create mode 100644 fs/ext4/inode-test.c diff --git a/fs/ext4/Kconfig b/fs/ext4/Kconfig index cbb5ca830e57..605c3d506934 100644 --- a/fs/ext4/Kconfig +++ b/fs/ext4/Kconfig @@ -106,3 +106,17 @@ config EXT4_DEBUG If you select Y here, then you will be able to turn on debugging with a command such as: echo 1 > /sys/module/ext4/parameters/mballoc_debug + +config EXT4_KUNIT_TESTS + bool "KUnit test for ext4 inode" + depends on EXT4_FS + depends on KUNIT + help + This builds the ext4 KUnit tests, which run on boot and output + the results to the debug log in TAP format (http://testanything.org/). + Only useful for kernel devs running KUnit test harness. Not for + inclusion into a production build. + For more information on KUnit and unit tests in general please refer + to the KUnit documentation in Documentation/dev-tools/kunit/. + + If unsure, say N. diff --git a/fs/ext4/Makefile b/fs/ext4/Makefile index b17ddc229ac5..a0588fd2eea6 100644 --- a/fs/ext4/Makefile +++ b/fs/ext4/Makefile @@ -13,4 +13,5 @@ ext4-y := balloc.o bitmap.o block_validity.o dir.o ext4_jbd2.o extents.o \ ext4-$(CONFIG_EXT4_FS_POSIX_ACL) += acl.o ext4-$(CONFIG_EXT4_FS_SECURITY) += xattr_security.o +ext4-$(CONFIG_EXT4_KUNIT_TESTS) += inode-test.o ext4-$(CONFIG_FS_VERITY) += verity.o diff --git a/fs/ext4/inode-test.c b/fs/ext4/inode-test.c new file mode 100644 index 000000000000..3b3a453ff382 --- /dev/null +++ b/fs/ext4/inode-test.c @@ -0,0 +1,239 @@ +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 +/* + * KUnit test of ext4 inode that verify the seconds part of [a/c/m] + * timestamps in ext4 inode structs are decoded correctly. + */ + +#include <kunit/test.h> +#include <linux/kernel.h> +#include <linux/time64.h> + +#include "ext4.h" + +/* binary: 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 */ +#define LOWER_MSB_0 0L +/* binary: 01111111 11111111 11111111 11111111 */ +#define UPPER_MSB_0 0x7fffffffL +/* binary: 10000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 */ +#define LOWER_MSB_1 (-0x80000000L) +/* binary: 11111111 11111111 11111111 11111111 */ +#define UPPER_MSB_1 (-1L) +/* binary: 00111111 11111111 11111111 11111111 */ +#define MAX_NANOSECONDS ((1L << 30) - 1) + +#define CASE_NAME_FORMAT "%s: msb:%x lower_bound:%x extra_bits: %x" + +struct timestamp_expectation { + const char *test_case_name; + struct timespec64 expected; + u32 extra_bits; + bool msb_set; + bool lower_bound; +}; + +static time64_t get_32bit_time(const struct timestamp_expectation * const test) +{ + if (test->msb_set) { + if (test->lower_bound) + return LOWER_MSB_1; + + return UPPER_MSB_1; + } + + if (test->lower_bound) + return LOWER_MSB_0; + return UPPER_MSB_0; +} + + +/* + * These tests are derived from the table under + * Documentation/filesystems/ext4/inodes.rst Inode Timestamps + */ +static void inode_test_xtimestamp_decoding(struct kunit *test) +{ + const struct timestamp_expectation test_data[] = { + { + .test_case_name = + "1901-12-13 Lower bound of 32bit < 0 timestamp, no extra bits.", + .msb_set = true, + .lower_bound = true, + .extra_bits = 0, + .expected = {.tv_sec = -0x80000000LL, .tv_nsec = 0L}, + }, + + { + .test_case_name = + "1969-12-31 Upper bound of 32bit < 0 timestamp, no extra bits.", + .msb_set = true, + .lower_bound = false, + .extra_bits = 0, + .expected = {.tv_sec = -1LL, .tv_nsec = 0L}, + }, + + { + .test_case_name = + "1970-01-01 Lower bound of 32bit >=0 timestamp, no extra bits.", + .msb_set = false, + .lower_bound = true, + .extra_bits = 0, + .expected = {0LL, 0L}, + }, + + { + .test_case_name = + "2038-01-19 Upper bound of 32bit >=0 timestamp, no extra bits.", + .msb_set = false, + .lower_bound = false, + .extra_bits = 0, + .expected = {.tv_sec = 0x7fffffffLL, .tv_nsec = 0L}, + }, + + { + .test_case_name = + "2038-01-19 Lower bound of 32bit <0 timestamp, lo extra sec bit on.", + .msb_set = true, + .lower_bound = true, + .extra_bits = 1, + .expected = {.tv_sec = 0x80000000LL, .tv_nsec = 0L}, + }, + + { + .test_case_name = + "2106-02-07 Upper bound of 32bit <0 timestamp, lo extra sec bit on.", + .msb_set = true, + .lower_bound = false, + .extra_bits = 1, + .expected = {.tv_sec = 0xffffffffLL, .tv_nsec = 0L}, + }, + + { + .test_case_name = + "2106-02-07 Lower bound of 32bit >=0 timestamp, lo extra sec bit on.", + .msb_set = false, + .lower_bound = true, + .extra_bits = 1, + .expected = {.tv_sec = 0x100000000LL, .tv_nsec = 0L}, + }, + + { + .test_case_name = + "2174-02-25 Upper bound of 32bit >=0 timestamp, lo extra sec bit on.", + .msb_set = false, + .lower_bound = false, + .extra_bits = 1, + .expected = {.tv_sec = 0x17fffffffLL, .tv_nsec = 0L}, + }, + + { + .test_case_name = + "2174-02-25 Lower bound of 32bit <0 timestamp, hi extra sec bit on.", + .msb_set = true, + .lower_bound = true, + .extra_bits = 2, + .expected = {.tv_sec = 0x180000000LL, .tv_nsec = 0L}, + }, + + { + .test_case_name = + "2242-03-16 Upper bound of 32bit <0 timestamp, hi extra sec bit on.", + .msb_set = true, + .lower_bound = false, + .extra_bits = 2, + .expected = {.tv_sec = 0x1ffffffffLL, .tv_nsec = 0L}, + }, + + { + .test_case_name = + "2242-03-16 Lower bound of 32bit >=0 timestamp, hi extra sec bit on.", + .msb_set = false, + .lower_bound = true, + .extra_bits = 2, + .expected = {.tv_sec = 0x200000000LL, .tv_nsec = 0L}, + }, + + { + .test_case_name = + "2310-04-04 Upper bound of 32bit >=0 timestamp, hi extra sec bit on.", + .msb_set = false, + .lower_bound = false, + .extra_bits = 2, + .expected = {.tv_sec = 0x27fffffffLL, .tv_nsec = 0L}, + }, + + { + .test_case_name = +"2310-04-04 Upper bound of 32bit>=0 timestamp, hi extra sec bit 1. 1 ns bit 1.", + .msb_set = false, + .lower_bound = false, + .extra_bits = 6, + .expected = {.tv_sec = 0x27fffffffLL, .tv_nsec = 1L}, + }, + + { + .test_case_name = +"2378-04-22 Lower bound of 32bit>= timestamp. Extra sec bits 1. ns bits 1.", + .msb_set = false, + .lower_bound = true, + .extra_bits = 0xFFFFFFFF, + .expected = {.tv_sec = 0x300000000LL, + .tv_nsec = MAX_NANOSECONDS}, + }, + + { + .test_case_name = + "2378-04-22 Lower bound of 32bit >= timestamp. All extra sec bits on.", + .msb_set = false, + .lower_bound = true, + .extra_bits = 3, + .expected = {.tv_sec = 0x300000000LL, .tv_nsec = 0L}, + }, + + { + .test_case_name = + "2446-05-10 Upper bound of 32bit >= timestamp. All extra sec bits on.", + .msb_set = false, + .lower_bound = false, + .extra_bits = 3, + .expected = {.tv_sec = 0x37fffffffLL, .tv_nsec = 0L}, + } + }; + + struct timespec64 timestamp; + int i; + + for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(test_data); ++i) { + timestamp.tv_sec = get_32bit_time(&test_data[i]); + ext4_decode_extra_time(&timestamp, + cpu_to_le32(test_data[i].extra_bits)); + + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ_MSG(test, + test_data[i].expected.tv_sec, + timestamp.tv_sec, + CASE_NAME_FORMAT, + test_data[i].test_case_name, + test_data[i].msb_set, + test_data[i].lower_bound, + test_data[i].extra_bits); + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ_MSG(test, + test_data[i].expected.tv_nsec, + timestamp.tv_nsec, + CASE_NAME_FORMAT, + test_data[i].test_case_name, + test_data[i].msb_set, + test_data[i].lower_bound, + test_data[i].extra_bits); + } +} + +static struct kunit_case ext4_inode_test_cases[] = { + KUNIT_CASE(inode_test_xtimestamp_decoding), + {} +}; + +static struct kunit_suite ext4_inode_test_suite = { + .name = "ext4_inode_test", + .test_cases = ext4_inode_test_cases, +}; + +kunit_test_suite(ext4_inode_test_suite); -- 2.23.0.700.g56cf767bdb-goog

6 years

2
1
0 0

Re: Linux 5.4 - bpf test build fails

by Prabhakar Kushwaha

" On Wed, Oct 16, 2019 at 3:59 PM Prabhakar Kushwaha <prabhakar.pkin(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > On Tue, Sep 24, 2019 at 12:56:53PM -0600, Shuah Khan wrote: > > On 9/24/19 12:49 PM, Daniel Borkmann wrote: > > > On Tue, Sep 24, 2019 at 09:48:35AM -0600, Shuah Khan wrote: > > > > On 9/24/19 9:43 AM, Yonghong Song wrote: > > > > > On 9/24/19 8:26 AM, Shuah Khan wrote: > > > > > > Hi Alexei and Daniel, > > > > > > > > > > > > bpf test doesn't build on Linux 5.4 mainline. Do you know what's > > > > > > happening here. > > > > > > > > > > > > make -C tools/testing/selftests/bpf/ > > > > > > > > > > > > -c progs/test_core_reloc_ptr_as_arr.c -o - || echo "clang failed") | \ > > > > > > llc -march=bpf -mcpu=generic -filetype=obj -o > > > > > > /mnt/data/lkml/linux_5.4/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_core_reloc_ptr_as_arr.o > > > > > > > > > > > > progs/test_core_reloc_ptr_as_arr.c:25:6: error: use of unknown builtin > > > > > > '__builtin_preserve_access_index' > > > > > > [-Wimplicit-function-declaration] > > > > > > if (BPF_CORE_READ(&out->a, &in[2].a)) > > > > > > ^ > > > > > > ./bpf_helpers.h:533:10: note: expanded from macro 'BPF_CORE_READ' > > > > > > __builtin_preserve_access_index(src)) > > > > > > ^ > > > > > > progs/test_core_reloc_ptr_as_arr.c:25:6: warning: incompatible > > > > > > integer to > > > > > > pointer conversion passing 'int' to parameter of type 'const > > > > > > void *' > > > > > > [-Wint-conversion] > > > > > > if (BPF_CORE_READ(&out->a, &in[2].a)) > > > > > > ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ > > > > > > ./bpf_helpers.h:533:10: note: expanded from macro 'BPF_CORE_READ' > > > > > > __builtin_preserve_access_index(src)) > > > > > > ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ > > > > > > 1 warning and 1 error generated. > > > > > > llc: error: llc: <stdin>:1:1: error: expected top-level entity > > > > > > clang failed > > > > > > > > > > > > Also > > > > > > > > > > > > make TARGETS=bpf kselftest fails as well. Dependency between > > > > > > tools/lib/bpf and the test. How can we avoid this type of > > > > > > dependency or resolve it in a way it doesn't result in build > > > > > > failures? > > > > > > > > > > Thanks, Shuah. > > > > > > > > > > The clang __builtin_preserve_access_index() intrinsic is > > > > > introduced in LLVM9 (which just released last week) and > > > > > the builtin and other CO-RE features are only supported > > > > > in LLVM10 (current development branch) with more bug fixes > > > > > and added features. > > > > > > > > > > I think we should do a feature test for llvm version and only > > > > > enable these tests when llvm version >= 10. > > > > > > > > Yes. If new tests depend on a particular llvm revision, the failing > > > > the build is a regression. I would like to see older tests that don't > > > > have dependency build and run. > > > > > > So far we haven't made it a requirement as majority of BPF contributors > > > that would run/add tests in here are also on bleeding edge LLVM anyway > > > and other CIs like 0-day bot have simply upgraded their LLVM version > > > from git whenever there was a failure similar to the one here so its > > > ensured that really /all/ test cases are running and nothing would be > > > skipped. There is worry to some degree that CIs just keep sticking to > > > an old compiler since tests "just" pass and regressions wouldn't be > > > caught on new releases for those that are skipped. > > > > > Sure. Bleeding edge is developer mode. We still have to be concerned > > about users that might not upgrade quickly. > > > > > That said, for the C based tests, it should actually be straight forward > > > to categorize them based on built-in macros like ... > > > > > > $ echo | clang -dM -E - > > > [...] > > > #define __clang_major__ 10 > > > #define __clang_minor__ 0 > > > [...] > > > > What would nice running the tests you can run and then say some tests > > aren't going to run. Is this something you can support? > > Once there is such infra in place, should be possible. > > > > ... given there is now also bpf-gcc, the test matrix gets bigger anyway, > > > so it might be worth rethinking to run the suite multiple times with > > > different major llvm{,gcc} versions at some point to make sure their > > > generated BPF bytecode keeps passing the verifier, and yell loudly if > > > newer features had to be skipped due to lack of recent compiler version. > > > This would be a super set of /just/ skipping tests and improve coverage > > > at the same time. > > > > Probably. Reality is most users will just quit and add bpf to "hard to > > run category" of tests. > > I don't really worry too much about such users at this point, more important > is that we have a way to test bpf-gcc and llvm behavior side by side to > make sure behavior is consistent and to have some sort of automated CI > integration that runs BPF kselftests before we even stare at a patch for > review. These are right now the two highest prio items from BPF testing > side where we need to get to. > I am also facing same issue with Linux-5.4 for ARM64 platforms. I am using ubuntu-18.04 which has LLVM version 6.0.0. Looks like there is no LLVM of version 9.0 or 10.0 available for ARM64. https://apt.llvm.org/ I also tried "sudo ./llvm.sh 9". But it does not install llvm version. root@ubuntu$ sudo ./llvm.sh 9 + LLVM_VERSION=9 + '[' 1 -eq 1 ']' + LLVM_VERSION=9 ++ lsb_release -is + DISTRO=Ubuntu ++ lsb_release -sr + VERSION=18.04 + DIST_VERSION=Ubuntu_18.04 + [[ 0 -ne 0 ]] + declare -A LLVM_VERSION_PATTERNS + LLVM_VERSION_PATTERNS[8]=-8 + LLVM_VERSION_PATTERNS[9]=-9 + LLVM_VERSION_PATTERNS[10]= + '[' '!' _ ']' + LLVM_VERSION_STRING=-9 + case "$DIST_VERSION" in + REPO_NAME='deb http://apt.llvm.org/bionic/ llvm-toolchain-bionic-9 main' + wget -O - https://apt.llvm.org/llvm-snapshot.gpg.key + apt-key add - --2019-10-16 03:33:34-- https://apt.llvm.org/llvm-snapshot.gpg.key Resolving apt.llvm.org (apt.llvm.org)... 151.101.190.49, 2a04:4e42:a::561 Connecting to apt.llvm.org (apt.llvm.org)|151.101.190.49|:443... connected. HTTP request sent, awaiting response... 200 OK Length: 3145 (3.1K) [application/octet-stream] Saving to: ?STDOUT? - 100%[====================================================================================================>] 3.07K --.-KB/s in 0s 2019-10-16 03:33:35 (74.8 MB/s) - written to stdout [3145/3145] OK + add-apt-repository 'deb http://apt.llvm.org/bionic/ llvm-toolchain-bionic-9 main' Hit:1 http://apt.llvm.org/bionic llvm-toolchain-bionic InRelease Hit:2 http://apt.llvm.org/bionic llvm-toolchain-bionic-9 InRelease Hit:3 http://apt.llvm.org/bionic llvm-toolchain-bionic-8 InRelease Hit:4 http://us.ports.ubuntu.com/ubuntu-ports bionic InRelease Hit:5 http://us.ports.ubuntu.com/ubuntu-ports bionic-updates InRelease Hit:6 http://ports.ubuntu.com/ubuntu-ports bionic-security InRelease Hit:7 http://us.ports.ubuntu.com/ubuntu-ports bionic-backports InRelease Reading package lists... Done N: Skipping acquire of configured file 'main/binary-arm64/Packages' as repository 'http://apt.llvm.org/bionic llvm-toolchain-bionic InRelease' doesn't support architecture 'arm64' N: Skipping acquire of configured file 'main/binary-arm64/Packages' as repository 'http://apt.llvm.org/bionic llvm-toolchain-bionic-9 InRelease' doesn't support architecture 'arm64' N: Skipping acquire of configured file 'main/binary-arm64/Packages' as repository 'http://apt.llvm.org/bionic llvm-toolchain-bionic-8 InRelease' doesn't support architecture 'arm64' + apt-get update Hit:1 http://apt.llvm.org/bionic llvm-toolchain-bionic InRelease Hit:2 http://apt.llvm.org/bionic llvm-toolchain-bionic-9 InRelease Hit:3 http://apt.llvm.org/bionic llvm-toolchain-bionic-8 InRelease Hit:4 http://us.ports.ubuntu.com/ubuntu-ports bionic InRelease Hit:5 http://us.ports.ubuntu.com/ubuntu-ports bionic-updates InRelease Hit:6 http://ports.ubuntu.com/ubuntu-ports bionic-security InRelease Hit:7 http://us.ports.ubuntu.com/ubuntu-ports bionic-backports InRelease Reading package lists... Done N: Skipping acquire of configured file 'main/binary-arm64/Packages' as repository 'http://apt.llvm.org/bionic llvm-toolchain-bionic InRelease' doesn't support architecture 'arm64' N: Skipping acquire of configured file 'main/binary-arm64/Packages' as repository 'http://apt.llvm.org/bionic llvm-toolchain-bionic-9 InRelease' doesn't support architecture 'arm64' N: Skipping acquire of configured file 'main/binary-arm64/Packages' as repository 'http://apt.llvm.org/bionic llvm-toolchain-bionic-8 InRelease' doesn't support architecture 'arm64' + apt-get install -y clang-9 lldb-9 lld-9 clangd-9 Reading package lists... Done Building dependency tree Reading state information... Done E: Unable to locate package clang-9 E: Unable to locate package lldb-9 E: Unable to locate package lld-9 E: Unable to locate package clangd-9 --prabhakar(pk)

6 years

1
0
0 0

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

Linux-kselftest-mirror October 2019