Hi,
Sorry for the delay
On Tue, 24 Sept 2024 at 15:17, Jason Merrill jason@redhat.com wrote:
On 9/23/24 2:08 AM, ci_notify@linaro.org wrote:
Dear contributor, our automatic CI has detected problems related to your patch(es). Please find some details below. If you have any questions, please follow up on linaro-toolchain@lists.linaro.org mailing list, Libera's #linaro-tcwg channel, or ping your favourite Linaro toolchain developer on the usual project channel.
We understand that it might be difficult to find the necessary logs or reproduce the issue locally. If you can't get what you need from our CI within minutes, let us know and we will be happy to help.
In gcc_check master-arm after:
| gcc patch https://patchwork.sourceware.org/patch/97864 | Author: Jason Merrill jason@redhat.com | Date: Mon Sep 23 11:06:11 2024 -0400 | | libstdc++: #ifdef out #pragma GCC system_header | | Tested x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, OK for trunk? | | -- 8< -- | | In r15-3714-gd3a7302ec5985a I added -Wsystem-headers to the libstdc++ build | ... 379 lines of the commit log omitted. | ... applied on top of baseline commit: | 4700ad1c78c c++: diagnose this specifier in requires expr [PR116798]
FAIL: 3 regressions
regressions.sum: === libstdc++ tests ===
Running libstdc++:libstdc++-dg/conformance.exp ... FAIL: 17_intro/headers/c++2011/parallel_mode.cc (test for excess errors) FAIL: 17_intro/headers/c++2014/parallel_mode.cc (test for excess errors) FAIL: 17_intro/headers/c++2017/parallel_mode.cc -std=gnu++17 (test for excess errors)
You can find the failure logs in *.log.1.xz files in
The full lists of regressions and improvements as well as configure and make commands are in
The list of [ignored] baseline and flaky failures are in
Thanks, I believe https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2024-September/663711.html should fix this.
IIUC, you committed that followup patch as r15-3858-g2407dbe1d88706, but I'm still seeing these errors in a more recent CI build on aarch64 (r15-3959-g87905f63a6521e)
It seems something in your followup patch prevented it from being recognized by patchwork (I can't find it in https://patchwork.sourceware.org/project/gcc/list/, and thus it didn't trigger precommit validation where we could have easily checked that it actually fixed the problem).
Thanks,
Christophe
linaro-toolchain mailing list -- linaro-toolchain@lists.linaro.org To unsubscribe send an email to linaro-toolchain-leave@lists.linaro.org