Re: Armhf dynamic linker path

On Wednesday 11 April 2012 11:25:55 Paulo César Pereira de Andrade wrote:

Probably beating a dead cow, but, the major problem with sysroots would be the triplet name?

E.g, in any architecture:

/arm-linux-gnueabi/sysroot-contents-here

it isn't really about having a sysroot the toolchain can find. that already works today for any target or multilib or isa or soft/hard float or arch or <anything>. the issue is having an ldso in its canonical path for runtime usage. i don't think anyone wants hardcoded tuple dirs in the root. some people can't even handle /bin or /sbin or /lib, so i'm afraid this proposal would cause them to implode ;). -mike