On Nov 8, 2017, at 9:03 PM, Pinski, Andrew Andrew.Pinski@cavium.com wrote:
I thought the decision Linaro/Arm was going to take over the development of the ILP32? What happened to that decision?
Hi Andrew,
Where such a decision was discussed?
-- Maxim Kuvyrkov www.linaro.org
Thanks, Andrew
-----Original Message----- From: Yao Qi [mailto:yao.qi@linaro.org] Sent: Wednesday, November 8, 2017 9:50 AM To: Pinski, Andrew Andrew.Pinski@cavium.com Cc: Maxim Kuvyrkov maxim.kuvyrkov@linaro.org; Linaro Toolchain linaro-toolchain@lists.linaro.org; Szabolcs Nagy szabolcs.nagy@arm.com; Ellcey, Steve Steve.Ellcey@cavium.com Subject: Re: ILP32 toolchain status update
On 8 November 2017 at 16:56, Pinski, Andrew Andrew.Pinski@cavium.com wrote:
What env are you using? Are the glibc versions on the same between ILP32 and LP64? Because when that was true I did not have any issues with libthread_db.
I didn't run gdb tests in ILP32 env, and I don't have such env. I got gdb.sum from Steve on 18 Oct. You are on the cc as well. All my analysis is based on that gdb.sum.
Anyways I did not see some of those failures listed below when using the correct setup.
OK, can you send me a gdb.sum?
-- Yao Qi