On 5 September 2011 17:40, Christian Robottom Reis kiko@linaro.org wrote:
On Mon, Sep 05, 2011 at 03:21:49PM +1200, Michael Hope wrote:
memchr is good. memset could be better for blocks of less than 1k. strchr gets second place but is eclipsed by newlib's version. strcmp need work. strcmp is good.
It's strcpy which is good in this last sentence, though it basically matches newlib's version.
I think that's because it IS newlib's version - I've not done a strcpy.
I'm curious about the "political" side of cortexstrings -- is there active interest by the library maintainers in picking up our versions?
There is interest from partners in having optimised versions; I think the library maintainers are happy to take it if you can convince them that they are improvements.
Dave