11 Dec
2014
11 Dec
'14
3:01 p.m.
On 11 December 2014 at 14:36, Nicolas Dechesne nicolas.dechesne@linaro.org wrote:
and it's quite consistent over multiple runs. So it's much more than 40% actually.. if we apply these ratios we get theoretical numbers that makes more sense... the ifc6410 should definitely be faster than panda..
Nice!
So, we can do this in two stages: first, we move the bus clock all the way up. Test. Then we move the CPU clock one step at a time. Test. Rinse, repeat.
We should find a comfortable and performing level somewhere between 1.2 and 1.5 GHz.
cheers, --renato