On 29 June 2012 14:57, Zhenqiang Chen zhenqiang.chen@linaro.org wrote:
Michael,
Lots of fails disappear in the precise repawned tests. But there is a new one which pass in previous test but fail in the new test.
~uweigand/gcc-linaro/lp-1010826-4.7-p2/+merge/112036 armv7l-precise-cbuild339-ursa4-cortexa9hfr1
-PASS: gcc.dg/simulate-thread/atomic-other-int.c -O0 -g thread simulation test +UNSUPPORTED: gcc.dg/simulate-thread/atomic-other-int.c -O0 -g thread simulation test
Not sure there. Ulrich, could that real?
What's about this one? ~michaelh1/gcc-linaro/later-split-symrefs/+merge/112479 armv7l-natty-cbuild339-tcpanda05-cortexa9r1
-PASS: 27_io/basic_filebuf/close/char/9964.cc execution test +FAIL: 27_io/basic_filebuf/close/char/9964.cc execution test
Yip, that's common but undiagnosed. I've added it to the list.
Thanks! -Zhenqiang On 28 June 2012 09:19, Zhenqiang Chen zhenqiang.chen@linaro.org wrote:
On 28 June 2012 05:55, Michael Hope michael.hope@linaro.org wrote:
We've had a few testsuite failures recently which were due to the auto builder itself. I've started a log at: https://wiki.linaro.org/WorkingGroups/ToolChain/CBuild/FailureLog
so we can track the incident rate and see if there's a pattern.
Zhenqiang, if you see an unexpected failure could you respawn the build and notify me?
OK.
-Zhenqiang