On 29 June 2012 18:05, Ramana Radhakrishnan ramana.radhakrishnan@linaro.org wrote:
On 29 June 2012 11:00, Zhenqiang Chen zhenqiang.chen@linaro.org wrote:
On 29 June 2012 17:12, Ramana Radhakrishnan ramana.radhakrishnan@linaro.org wrote:
On 29 June 2012 07:52, Zhenqiang Chen zhenqiang.chen@linaro.org wrote:
Another two cases fail in precise test:
-PASS: c-c++-common/simulate-thread/bitfields-3.c -O0 -g thread simulation test +UNSUPPORTED: c-c++-common/simulate-thread/bitfields-3.c -O0 -g thread simulation test -PASS: gcc.dg/simulate-thread/atomic-other-short.c -O0 -g thread simulation test +UNSUPPORTED: gcc.dg/simulate-thread/atomic-other-short.c -O0 -g thread simulation test
In previous test, we have -PASS: c-c++-common/simulate-thread/bitfields-1.c -O0 -g thread simulation test +UNSUPPORTED: c-c++-common/simulate-thread/bitfields-1.c -O0 -g thread simulation test
Have you tried looking into the logs. gcc.log.xz and gcc.sum.xz should show what's happening ? Having said that I took a quick look and there's something funny. I don't find an unsupported case in those logs, but the testsuite-diff shows it. I don't fully understand what's going on here.
Ramana
For atomic-other-short.c, error is from gdb. Here is the log from gcc.log.xz at http://ex.seabright.co.nz/build/gcc-linaro-4.7+bzr115000~michaelh1~later-spl...
/cbuild/slaves/ursa1/gcc-linaro-4.7+bzr115000~michaelh1~later-split-symrefs/gcc/gcc-linaro-4.7/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/simulate-thread/simulate-thread.gdb:11: Error in sourced command file:UNSUPPORTED: gcc.dg/simulate-thread/atomic-other-short.c -O0 -g thread simulation test
Hmmm but it didn't show up in the test log from Uli's merge request which is where I looked :)
Sorry for misleading. The two new fails are from Michael's merge request.
For Uli's merge request, there is only one new UNSUPPORTED:
-PASS: gcc.dg/simulate-thread/atomic-other-int.c -O0 -g thread simulation test +UNSUPPORTED: gcc.dg/simulate-thread/atomic-other-int.c -O0 -g thread simulation test
Log at: http://ex.seabright.co.nz/build/gcc-linaro-4.7+bzr115000~uweigand~lp-1010826... (This test is respawned by Michael)
But the case PASS in the original test. Log at: http://ex.seabright.co.nz/build/gcc-linaro-4.7+bzr115000~uweigand~lp-1010826...
So I think atomic-other-int.c is not a real regression.
Thanks! -Zhenqiang