Re: Summary of required work for a Versatile Express QEMU model

On Wed, 2011-02-16 at 10:18 +0000, Peter Maydell wrote:

On 16 February 2011 10:13, Loïc Minier loic.minier@linaro.org wrote:

...

BTW are these patches being sent upstream?

I think for upstreaming it would be cleaner to have a hw/vexpress.c rather than trying to wedge it into hw/realview.c -- the two boards are sufficiently different that I think we should just think of them as distinct (and call it 'vexpress' to match the Linux kernel naming.)

-- PMM

I agree. If you initiate work on this we will send you our updates.