Re: Benchmarking / justifying cortex-strings

On Mon, Sep 05, 2011 at 03:21:49PM +1200, Michael Hope wrote:

memchr is good. memset could be better for blocks of less than 1k. strchr gets second place but is eclipsed by newlib's version. strcmp need work. strcmp is good.

It's strcpy which is good in this last sentence, though it basically matches newlib's version.

I'm curious about the "political" side of cortexstrings -- is there active interest by the library maintainers in picking up our versions?