On 6 July 2012 00:10, Michael Hope michael.hope@linaro.org wrote:
Hi Ramana. These are covered by the release process documentation but I thought I'd fill them out.
The builds are completing. You can see the finished grid at: http://ex.seabright.co.nz/helpers/buildlog/gcc-linaro-4.7-2012
Click on 'Compare' for each machine to see the results like: http://ex.seabright.co.nz/helpers/testcompare/gcc-linaro-4.7-2012.07/logs/ar...
The test compare picks a close version but falls back to something ancient. Add the correct previous version like: http://ex.seabright.co.nz/helpers/testcompare/gcc-linaro-4.7-2012.07/logs/ar...
Check for any differences by searching for 'Just in'. A is the previous release, B is this. There's one regression in http://ex.seabright.co.nz/helpers/testcompare/gcc-linaro-4.7-2012.07/logs/ar...
which is: gcc.target/arm/pr42172-1.c scan-assembler-times ldr 1
The test results look fine for all but .
http://ex.seabright.co.nz/build/gcc-linaro-4.7-2012.07/logs/x86_64-precise-c...
thinks the oecore builds failed. Is this the expected behaviour ?
I also don't yet see ubutest or benchmarks for 4.6 having run for the arm boards so I've tried spawning them again.
Ramana
Ramana
I'd normally check our upstream builds: http://ex.seabright.co.nz/helpers/buildlog/gcc-4.7+svn
but this is a ARMv5 fault and we only track Cortex-A9. Checking gcc-testresults shows: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2012-07/msg00171.html
so the fault is upstream.
I've spawned the test-oecore-gcc-linaro-4.7-2012.07 / x86_64-heavy and ubutest-gcc-linaro-4.7-2012.07 / i686,x86_64 jobs. The results will pop up similar to the 4.6 ones in the buildlog.
-- Michael