== Progress ==
* 64-bits ops in Neon: upstream accepted the patch for gcc-4.9-stage1
* smin-umin: several benchmarks runs necessary to confirm that the
generic patch I suspected actually caused the regression. However, it
also brings improvements in other benches (office-type).
* looked at libasan: very little configuration seems necessary, but
running a sample program under qemu leads to asan runtime complains.
* internal tasks
== Next ==
* smin-umin: run benchmarks on trunk to confirm the regression is also present.
* vectorizer cost model: handle Richard's feedback.
* get more codecs sample codes.
* libasan: understand error messages
Christophe.
== Progress ==
* February merge 4.6 and 4.7
- backport a patch from upstream to resolve conflicts
- this backport introduced some merge issues
- fix pushed and merge request ongoing
* Boehm GC AArch64 support:
- libatomic_ops maintainer rework the patch to make the usage of
gcc atomic builtins available on the other targets
- test exhibit some failures
* libunwind aarch64 support
- bug status moved to critical
- configuration and machine description done
- implementation ongoing
* Aarch64 porting meeting:
- Cancelled this week
== Next ==
* February merge 4.6 and 4.7
- log new testsuite failures in launchpad
* Boehm GC AArch64 support:
- fix libatomic_ops
- validate GCC's Boehm gc integration
* libunwind aarch64 support
- conitnue.
== Progress ==
* Implementing GC sections support in bintuils
Looking at aarch64 relocations to consider while sweeping.
* Cbuild experiments to test gcc svn aarch64 4.7 branch.
Connection problems to the cbuild machines are solved now.
Thanks to Matt. Spawned the build.
Misc
------
* Attend tool chain weekly meet, and stand up call
* Had a look at one x86_64 related patch that gone into GCC trunk.
== Next week ==
* Continue Implementing GC sections support in binutils.
* Start analysis on jump threading in GCC.
== Progress ==
-Attended 1:1 and other team meetings
-Read linaro wiki and on boarding instructions
-Backported Cortex A7 pipeline description to Linaro 4.7 gcc from fsf
trunk and got it reviewed
== Plan for next week ==
- Look into CoreMark regresses in Thumb-2 mode when using the LR regnum.
- Start with research for Removing unnecessary zero/sign extends
Progress:
* Linaro's KVM/QEMU mini-summit, aimed at summarising current status,
identifying what needs to be done and what Linaro should be doing:
https://wiki.linaro.org/LEG/Engineering/Virtualization/201302MiniSummit
* implemented support for variable-length qdev array properties in QEMU
and sent out patch for this plus vexpress fixes which use it
* investigated how to run the Linux Test Project syscall tests under
QEMU to improve the quality of our linux-user mode testing
(wrote up a howto for the QEMU wiki: http://wiki.qemu.org/Testing/LTP
many thanks to fabo for whipping up a Jenkins job to run these nightly)
* couple of trivial linux-user patches as example low-hanging fruit
revealed by the LTP test results
-- PMM
== Progress ==
* Buildbots
- Setting up Chromebook with a buildbot
- http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?view=revision&revision=174421
- http://lab.llvm.org:8011/builders/clang-native-arm-cortex-a15
- 1h25min builds (3x faster than Pandas)
* LAVA
- Trying LLVM builds on Arndale
- GCC segfaults:
- "The bug is not reproducible, so it is likely a hardware or OS problem."
* Distributed Panda
- Setting up the boards, getting distcc on them
- Speedup is squat (1.9%) because of too many parallel linking
- Need to add LD to a group with less resources on Ninja
* Vectorization
- Reviewing some patches, discussing implementation details
- Vectorization vs. O3 speedup: 2.5x ~ 3.0x (on both ARM and x86_64)
- Working on global structure alias analysis
* LLVM
- Campaigning for integrates-as to be turned on by defaultfor ARM
- ARM seems interested in fixing the eventual bugs
- Adding 'armv7l' triple to default to 'cortex-a8'
- http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?view=revision&revision=174466
- Campaining for buildbots to use CMAke/Ninja
* EuroLLVM
- Followup meeting, securing funding
== Plan ==
* Change buildbots to not "make clean", try cmake
* Try to reduce parallel linking flood, try one more panda
* Continue with global structure alias analysis
* Try to setup a test-suite buildbot
== Progress ==
* Welcomed Kugan to the team working on GCC
* Welcomed James Elliott to the team as project manager
* Found Cortex-A9 bootstrapping issue raised as PR56184
* Fixed build issues in GCC and GDB.
* Patch reviews.
== Next week ==
* Investigate PR56184 further.
== Future ==
* Run HOT/COLD partitioning benchmarks
* Analyse ARM results
* On x86_64 to see what the actual benefit we could get
* fix-gcc-multiarch-testing
* Come up with strawman proposal for updating testsuite to handle
testing with varying command-line options.
--
Matthew Gretton-Dann
Toolchain Working Group, Linaro
hi,
i am using linaro toolcahin binaries to execute simple .c file , so that it creates ARM executable output file i can run on Linaro installed on Hackberry board.
this are the all steps i follwed from beginnng..
please let me know if i am missing something here..
1. i have downloaded gcc for ubuntu from this link https://launchpad.net/linaro-toolchain-binaries/+milestone/2012.04
2. on ubuntu, i did tar xjf gcc-linaro-arm-linux-gnueabi-2012.04-20120426_linux.tar.bz2 export ARM_CROSS_TOOLS=pwd/gcc-linaro-arm-linux-gnueabi-2012.04-20120426_linux/bin/arm-linux-gnueabi- export ARMCC=${ARMEL_CROSS_TOOLS}gcc
& then
$ARMCC hello.c
it created a.out (which is simple executable file and not ARM executable)
What i am doing wrong here? i am not getting how do i need to configure gcc .
please revert back ASAP!
Thanks & regards,
Swati
The contents of this e-mail and any attachment(s) may contain confidential or privileged information for the intended recipient(s). Unintended recipients are prohibited from taking action on the basis of information in this e-mail and using or disseminating the information, and must notify the sender and delete it from their system. L&T Infotech will not accept responsibility or liability for the accuracy or completeness of, or the presence of any virus or disabling code in this e-mail"
Hi,
It seems to me that your current toolchain releases [1] don't default to a
multiarch layout. Am I looking in the right place? Do you anticipate enabling
multiarch in the future? Is doing this currently blocked by limitations in
tools such as crosstool-ng?
1. http://releases.linaro.org/13.01/components/toolchain/binaries
Thanks,
Christopher
--
Employee of Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc.
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum, hosted by
the Linux Foundation
