linaro-toolchain

linaro-toolchain@lists.linaro.org

5668 discussions

How Business Analysts Drive Organizational Success and Innovation

by David Gibbs

Business analysts are the bridge between strategy and execution, turning data into decisions that drive organizational success and innovation. By gathering stakeholder requirements, analyzing processes, and prioritizing solutions, they reduce waste, improve customer experiences, and accelerate time-to-market. Their expertise in mapping workflows and identifying opportunities for automation enables teams to focus on high-impact work while minimizing risk. Leveraging structured methodologies and modern analytics, business analysts translate complex information into clear, actionable roadmaps. This fosters cross-functional collaboration, supports data-driven culture, and uncovers new revenue streams. When aligned with leadership, their insights guide product strategy, operational improvements, and digital transformation initiatives that keep organizations competitive. Preparing for certification strengthens these capabilities. The PeopleCert Business Analysis Exam Questions help candidates master core techniques, from requirements elicitation to stakeholder management, ensuring they can contribute measurable value from day one. Employers value certified analysts who demonstrate proficiency; practicing with PeopleCert Business Analysis Exam Questions signals readiness and commitment to continuous improvement. Why I choose Certboosters: it offers focused practice tests, clear explanations, and realistic exam simulators tailored to real-world scenarios, making it easier to retain knowledge and build confidence before taking your exam. Start practicing today to accelerate your impact, career growth, and professional credibility. Use the link below to check the practice test questions: https://www.certboosters.com/peoplecert/path/peoplecert-business-analysis

3 months, 1 week

[Linaro-TCWG-CI] glibc-2.42.9000-337-g1b657c53c21: 4 regressions on arm

by ci_notify＠linaro.org

Dear contributor, Our automatic CI has detected problems related to your patch(es). Please find some details below. In glibc_check master-arm, after: | commit glibc-2.42.9000-337-g1b657c53c21 | Author: Siddhesh Poyarekar <siddhesh(a)sourceware.org> | Date: Fri Oct 10 20:21:13 2025 -0400 | | Simplify powl computation for small integral y [BZ #33411] | | The powl implementation for x86_64 ends up multiplying X once more than | necessary and then throwing away that result. This results in an | overflow flag being set in cases where there is no overflow. | ... 7 lines of the commit log omitted. Produces 4 regressions: | | regressions.sum: | Running glibc:math ... | FAIL: math/test-double-pow | FAIL: math/test-float32x-pow | FAIL: math/test-float64-pow | FAIL: math/test-ldouble-pow Used configuration : *CI config* tcwg_glibc_check master-arm *configure and test flags:* none, autodetected on armv8l-unknown-linux-gnueabihf We track this bug report under https://linaro.atlassian.net/browse/GNU-1714. Please let us know if you have a fix. If you have any questions regarding this report, please ask on linaro-toolchain(a)lists.linaro.org mailing list. -----------------8<--------------------------8<--------------------------8<-------------------------- The information below contains the details of the failures, and the ways to reproduce a debug environment: You can find the failure logs in *.log.1.xz files in * https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_glibc_check--master-arm-build/3176/artifact/… The full lists of regressions and improvements as well as configure and make commands are in * https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_glibc_check--master-arm-build/3176/artifact/… The list of [ignored] baseline and flaky failures are in * https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_glibc_check--master-arm-build/3176/artifact/… Current build : https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_glibc_check--master-arm-build/3176/artifact/… Reference build : https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_glibc_check--master-arm-build/3173/artifact/… Instruction to reproduce the build : https://gitlab.com/LinaroLtd/tcwg/ci/interesting-commits/-/raw/master/glibc… Full commit : https://sourceware.org/git/?p=glibc.git;a=commitdiff;h=1b657c53c21a100082b0…

3 months, 1 week

[Linaro-TCWG-CI] glibc-2.42.9000-338-g324084649b2: Failure on arm

by ci_notify＠linaro.org

Dear contributor, Our automatic CI has detected problems related to your patch(es). Please find some details below. In master-arm, after: | commit glibc-2.42.9000-338-g324084649b2 | Author: DJ Delorie <dj(a)redhat.com> | Date: Wed Oct 15 21:37:56 2025 -0400 | | sprof: check pread size and offset for overflow | | Add a bit of descriptive paranoia to the values we read from | the ELF headers and use to access data. | | ... 1 lines of the commit log omitted. Produces Failure: | Results changed to | # reset_artifacts: | -10 | # true: | 0 | # build_abe binutils: | 1 | # build_abe gcc: | 2 | # build_abe linux: | 4 | # build_abe glibc: | # FAILED | # build_abe gdb: | # First few build errors in logs: | # 00:03:33 sprof.c:573:16: error: format ‘%zd’ expects argument of type ‘signed size_t’, but argument 5 has type ‘off_t’ {aka ‘long long int’} [-Werror=format=] | # 00:03:33 sprof.c:573:16: error: format ‘%zu’ expects argument of type ‘size_t’, but argument 6 has type ‘__off64_t’ {aka ‘long long int’} [-Werror=format=] | # 00:03:33 sprof.c:573:16: error: format ‘%zd’ expects argument of type ‘signed size_t’, but argument 5 has type ‘off_t’ {aka ‘long long int’} [-Werror=format=] | # 00:03:33 sprof.c:573:16: error: format ‘%zu’ expects argument of type ‘size_t’, but argument 6 has type ‘__off64_t’ {aka ‘long long int’} [-Werror=format=] | # 00:03:33 sprof.c:573:16: error: format ‘%zd’ expects argument of type ‘signed size_t’, but argument 5 has type ‘off_t’ {aka ‘long long int’} [-Werror=format=] | # 00:03:33 sprof.c:573:16: error: format ‘%zu’ expects argument of type ‘size_t’, but argument 6 has type ‘__off64_t’ {aka ‘long long int’} [-Werror=format=] | # 00:03:33 sprof.c:573:16: error: format ‘%zd’ expects argument of type ‘signed size_t’, but argument 5 has type ‘off_t’ {aka ‘long long int’} [-Werror=format=] | # 00:03:33 sprof.c:573:16: error: format ‘%zu’ expects argument of type ‘size_t’, but argument 6 has type ‘__off64_t’ {aka ‘long long int’} [-Werror=format=] | # 00:03:33 sprof.c:573:16: error: format ‘%zd’ expects argument of type ‘signed size_t’, but argument 5 has type ‘off_t’ {aka ‘long long int’} [-Werror=format=] | # 00:03:33 sprof.c:573:16: error: format ‘%zu’ expects argument of type ‘size_t’, but argument 6 has type ‘__off64_t’ {aka ‘long long int’} [-Werror=format=] | | From | # reset_artifacts: | -10 | # true: | 0 | # build_abe binutils: | 1 | # build_abe gcc: | 2 | # build_abe linux: | 4 | # build_abe glibc: | 5 | # build_abe gdb: | 6 Used configuration : *CI config* tcwg_gnu_native_build master-arm *configure and test flags:* none, autodetected on armv8l-unknown-linux-gnueabihf We track this bug report under https://linaro.atlassian.net/browse/GNU-1709. Please let us know if you have a fix. If you have any questions regarding this report, please ask on linaro-toolchain(a)lists.linaro.org mailing list. -----------------8<--------------------------8<--------------------------8<-------------------------- The information below contains the details of the failures, and the ways to reproduce a debug environment: You can find the failure logs in * https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gnu_native_build--master-arm-build/1226/arti… The full lists of regressions and improvements as well as configure and make commands are in * https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gnu_native_build--master-arm-build/1226/arti… Current build : https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gnu_native_build--master-arm-build/1226/arti… Reference build : https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gnu_native_build--master-arm-build/1225/arti… Instruction to reproduce the build : https://gitlab.com/LinaroLtd/tcwg/ci/interesting-commits/-/raw/master/glibc… Full commit : https://sourceware.org/git/?p=glibc.git;a=commitdiff;h=324084649b2da2f6840e…

3 months, 1 week

Re: [Linaro-TCWG-CI] llvmorg-22-init-11449-ga6181dc84b79: 3 regressions on aarch64

by Takahiro Kawashima (Fujitsu)

Hi, These errors are probably caused by incorrect test programs. Please ignore the mail. We'll update the tests. I apologize for the false detection. > Dear contributor, > > Our automatic CI has detected problems related to your patch(es). Please find some details below. > > In tcwg_flang_test/main-aarch64-Ofast-sve_vls-lto-lld, after: > | commit llvmorg-22-init-11449-ga6181dc84b79 > | Author: Peter Klausler <pklausler(a)nvidia.com> > | Date: Thu Oct 16 12:20:53 2025 -0700 > | > | [flang] Refine checks for NULL() in expressions (#163655) > | > | Fix a false positive "NULL can't be an operand here" error message > | arising in a defined generic interface for an intrinsic operator (==) > | with multiple spellings. > | ... 2 lines of the commit log omitted. > > Produces 3 regressions: > | > | regressions.sum: > | Running test-suite:Fujitsu/Fortran/0573 ... > | NOEXE: test-suite :: Fujitsu/Fortran/0573/Fujitsu-Fortran-0573_0001.test > | NOEXE: test-suite :: Fujitsu/Fortran/0573/Fujitsu-Fortran-0573_0002.test > | NOEXE: test-suite :: Fujitsu/Fortran/0573/Fujitsu-Fortran-0573_0009.test > | # "NOEXE" means : the test program cannot be compiled > > Used configuration : > * Toolchain : cmake -G Ninja ../llvm/llvm "-DLLVM_ENABLE_PROJECTS=clang;lld;flang;clang-tools-extra" "-DLLVM_ENABLE_RUNTIMES=openmp" -DCMAKE_BUILD_TYPE=Release -DLLVM_ENABLE_ASSERTIONS=True -DCMAKE_INSTALL_PREFIX=../llvm-install "-DLLVM_TARGETS_TO_BUILD=AArch64" -DCLANG_DEFAULT_LINKER=lld > * Testsuite : export LD_LIBRARY_PATH=$\WORKSPACE/llvm-install/lib/aarch64-unknown-linux-gnu$\{LD_LIBRARY_PATH:+:$\LD_LIBRARY_PATH} > cmake -GNinja -DCMAKE_C_COMPILER="$\WORKSPACE/llvm-install/bin2/clang" -DCMAKE_CXX_COMPILER="$\WORKSPACE/llvm-install/bin2/clang++" -DCMAKE_Fortran_COMPILER="$\WORKSPACE/llvm-install/bin2/flang-new" -DCMAKE_BUILD_TYPE=Release -DCMAKE_C_FLAGS= -DCMAKE_CXX_FLAGS= -DCMAKE_Fortran_FLAGS= -DCMAKE_C_FLAGS_RELEASE="-O3 -ffast-math -march=armv8.4-a+sve -msve-vector-bits=256 -flto -fuse-ld=lld -DNDEBUG" -DCMAKE_CXX_FLAGS_RELEASE="-O3 -ffast-math -march=armv8.4-a+sve -msve-vector-bits=256 -flto -fuse-ld=lld -DNDEBUG" -DCMAKE_Fortran_FLAGS_RELEASE="-O3 -ffast-math -march=armv8.4-a+sve -msve-vector-bits=256 -flto -fuse-ld=lld -DNDEBUG" -DTEST_SUITE_FORTRAN=ON -DTEST_SUITE_SUBDIRS=Fujitsu -DTEST_SUITE_FUJITSU_WITH_FAST_MATH=ON "$\WORKSPACE/test/test-suite" > > We track this bug report under https://linaro.atlassian.net/browse/LLVM-2097. Please let us know if you have a fix. > > If you have any questions regarding this report, please ask on linaro-toolchain(a)lists.linaro.org mailing list. > > -----------------8<--------------------------8<--------------------------8<-------------------------- > > The information below contains the details of the failures, and the ways to reproduce a debug environment: > > You can find the failure logs in *.log.1.xz files in > * https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_flang_test--main-aarch64-Ofast-sve_vls-lto-l… > The full lists of regressions and improvements as well as configure and make commands are in > * https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_flang_test--main-aarch64-Ofast-sve_vls-lto-l… > The list of [ignored] baseline and flaky failures are in > * https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_flang_test--main-aarch64-Ofast-sve_vls-lto-l… > > Fujitsu testsuite : https://github.com/fujitsu/compiler-test-suite/ > > Current build : https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_flang_test--main-aarch64-Ofast-sve_vls-lto-l… > Reference build : https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_flang_test--main-aarch64-Ofast-sve_vls-lto-l… > > Instruction to reproduce the build : https://gitlab.com/LinaroLtd/tcwg/ci/interesting-commits/-/raw/master/llvm/… > > Full commit : https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/a6181dc84b79dd368c7a43ef4f6f164…

3 months, 2 weeks

Re: [Linaro-TCWG-CI] gcc-16-3093-gc7de7ddbfae: 1 regression on aarch64

by Andrew Pinski

On Sun, Aug 10, 2025 at 3:22 PM <ci_notify(a)linaro.org> wrote: > Dear contributor, > > Our automatic CI has detected problems related to your patch(es). Please > find some details below. > > In master-aarch64, after: > | commit gcc-16-3093-gc7de7ddbfae > | Author: Andrew Pinski <quic_apinski(a)quicinc.com> > | Date: Sun Jun 8 10:51:02 2025 -0700 > | > | forwprop: Change optimize_agr_copyprop into forward walk instead > of backwards > | > | While thinking about how to implement the rest of the copy prop > and makes sure not > | to introduce some compile time problems, optimize_agr_copyprop > should be changed > | into a forwproping rather than looking backwards. > | ... 10 lines of the commit log omitted. > > Produces 1 regression: > | > | regressions.sum: > | Running acats:chapter c4 ... > | FAIL: c41303a > > Used configuration : > *CI config* tcwg_gnu_native_check_gcc master-aarch64 > *configure and test flags:* none, autodetected on > aarch64-unknown-linux-gnu > > We track this bug report under > https://linaro.atlassian.net/browse/GNU-1648. Please let us know if you > have a fix. > I filed https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121494 and will be looking into later tonight or tomorrow. It also happens on s390x which gives me a hint of where to start to try to reproduce it on x86_64. Thanks, Andrew > > If you have any questions regarding this report, please ask on > linaro-toolchain(a)lists.linaro.org mailing list. > > > -----------------8<--------------------------8<--------------------------8<-------------------------- > > The information below contains the details of the failures, and the ways > to reproduce a debug environment: > > You can find the failure logs in *.log.1.xz files in > * > https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gnu_native_check_gcc--master-aarch64-build/2… > The full lists of regressions and improvements as well as configure and > make commands are in > * > https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gnu_native_check_gcc--master-aarch64-build/2… > The list of [ignored] baseline and flaky failures are in > * > https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gnu_native_check_gcc--master-aarch64-build/2… > > Current build : > https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gnu_native_check_gcc--master-aarch64-build/2… > Reference build : > https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gnu_native_check_gcc--master-aarch64-build/2… > > Instruction to reproduce the build : > https://gitlab.com/Linaro/tcwg/ci/interesting-commits/-/raw/master/gcc/sha1… > > Full commit : See in git+ssh://linaroci@gcc.gnu.org/git/gcc.git

4 months, 2 weeks

Fwd: [llvm/llvm-project] [mlir][llvm] Add intrinsic arg and result attribute support (PR #150783)

by Tobias Gysi

Dear Linaro Team, I am looking for advice on how to reproduce a flang-arm64-windows-msvc LLVM build bot failure. I hope I ended up in the right place here. I had to revert a PR (https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/150783) that broke the flang-arm64-windows-msvc LLVM build bot in the morning due to some tablegen-related problem. I did prepare a reland PR ( https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/151125) that addresses a potential issue. However, since I did not see any other build bot failures and since I was not able to reproduce the problem locally, I wonder if there is a way to run the build bot on my reland PR? Alternatively, hints on how to reproduce the problem locally on a x86 Linux machine would be appreciated. Best, Tobias ---------- Forwarded message --------- From: LLVM Continuous Integration <notifications(a)github.com> Date: Tue, Jul 29, 2025 at 9:58 AM Subject: Re: [llvm/llvm-project] [mlir][llvm] Add intrinsic arg and result attribute support (PR #150783) To: llvm/llvm-project <llvm-project(a)noreply.github.com> Cc: Tobias Gysi <tobias.gysi(a)nextsilicon.com>, State change < state_change(a)noreply.github.com> *llvm-ci* left a comment (llvm/llvm-project#150783) <https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/150783#issuecomment-3131154498> LLVM Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder flang-arm64-windows-msvc running on linaro-armv8-windows-msvc-01 while building mlir at step 6 "test-build-unified-tree-check-mlir". Full details are available at: https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/207/builds/4441 Here is the relevant piece of the build log for the reference Step 6 (test-build-unified-tree-check-mlir) failure: test (failure) ******************** TEST 'MLIR :: Dialect/Bufferization/Transforms/one-shot-module-bufferize-analysis.mlir' FAILED ******************** Exit Code: 1 Command Output (stdout): -- # RUN: at line 1 c:\users\tcwg\llvm-worker\flang-arm64-windows-msvc\build\bin\mlir-opt.exe C:\Users\tcwg\llvm-worker\flang-arm64-windows-msvc\llvm-project\mlir\test\Dialect\Bufferization\Transforms\one-shot-module-bufferize-analysis.mlir -one-shot-bufferize="bufferize-function-boundaries test-analysis-only" -split-input-file | c:\users\tcwg\llvm-worker\flang-arm64-windows-msvc\build\bin\filecheck.exe C:\Users\tcwg\llvm-worker\flang-arm64-windows-msvc\llvm-project\mlir\test\Dialect\Bufferization\Transforms\one-shot-module-bufferize-analysis.mlir # executed command: 'c:\users\tcwg\llvm-worker\flang-arm64-windows-msvc\build\bin\mlir-opt.exe' 'C:\Users\tcwg\llvm-worker\flang-arm64-windows-msvc\llvm-project\mlir\test\Dialect\Bufferization\Transforms\one-shot-module-bufferize-analysis.mlir' '-one-shot-bufferize=bufferize-function-boundaries test-analysis-only' -split-input-file # .---command stderr------------ # | Assertion failed: implArgAndResultAttrsOpInterface && "`::mlir::CallOpInterface` expected its base interface `::mlir::ArgAndResultAttrsOpInterface` to be registered", file C:/Users/tcwg/llvm-worker/flang-arm64-windows-msvc/build/tools/mlir/include\mlir/Interfaces/CallInterfaces.h.inc, line 122 # | PLEASE submit a bug report to https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/ and include the crash backtrace. # | Stack dump: # | 0. Program arguments: c:\\users\\tcwg\\llvm-worker\\flang-arm64-windows-msvc\\build\\bin\\mlir-opt.exe C:\\Users\\tcwg\\llvm-worker\\flang-arm64-windows-msvc\\llvm-project\\mlir\\test\\Dialect\\Bufferization\\Transforms\\one-shot-module-bufferize-analysis.mlir "-one-shot-bufferize=bufferize-function-boundaries test-analysis-only" -split-input-file # | Exception Code: 0xC000001D # | #0 0x00007ff60737543c (c:\users\tcwg\llvm-worker\flang-arm64-windows-msvc\build\bin\mlir-opt.exe+0x1af543c) # | #1 0x00007ffff958ae50 (C:\WINDOWS\System32\ucrtbase.dll+0x7ae50) # | #2 0xff61fffff958ba5c # `----------------------------- # error: command failed with exit status: 0xc000001d # executed command: 'c:\users\tcwg\llvm-worker\flang-arm64-windows-msvc\build\bin\filecheck.exe' 'C:\Users\tcwg\llvm-worker\flang-arm64-windows-msvc\llvm-project\mlir\test\Dialect\Bufferization\Transforms\one-shot-module-bufferize-analysis.mlir' # .---command stderr------------ # | C:\Users\tcwg\llvm-worker\flang-arm64-windows-msvc\llvm-project\mlir\test\Dialect\Bufferization\Transforms\one-shot-module-bufferize-analysis.mlir:23:17: error: CHECK-LABEL: expected string not found in input # | // CHECK-LABEL: func @extract_slice_fun( # | ^ # | <stdin>:1:1: note: scanning from here # | module { # | ^ # | <stdin>:1:3: note: possible intended match here # | module { # | ^ # | # | Input file: <stdin> # | Check file: C:\Users\tcwg\llvm-worker\flang-arm64-windows-msvc\llvm-project\mlir\test\Dialect\Bufferization\Transforms\one-shot-module-bufferize-analysis.mlir # | # | -dump-input=help explains the following input dump. # | # | Input was: # | <<<<<< # | 1: module { # | label:23'0 X~~~~~~~~ error: no match found # | label:23'1 ? possible intended match # | 2: } # | label:23'0 ~~ # | 3: # | label:23'0 ~ # | 4: // ----- # | label:23'0 ~~~~~~~~~ # | >>>>>> # `----------------------------- # error: command failed with exit status: 1 ... Step 7 (test-build-unified-tree-check-flang) failure: test (failure) ******************** TEST 'Flang :: Intrinsics/math-codegen.fir' FAILED ******************** Exit Code: 2 Command Output (stdout): -- # RUN: at line 1 split-file C:\Users\tcwg\llvm-worker\flang-arm64-windows-msvc\llvm-project\flang\test\Intrinsics\math-codegen.fir C:\Users\tcwg\llvm-worker\flang-arm64-windows-msvc\build\tools\flang\test\Intrinsics\Output\math-codegen.fir.tmp # executed command: split-file 'C:\Users\tcwg\llvm-worker\flang-arm64-windows-msvc\llvm-project\flang\test\Intrinsics\math-codegen.fir' 'C:\Users\tcwg\llvm-worker\flang-arm64-windows-msvc\build\tools\flang\test\Intrinsics\Output\math-codegen.fir.tmp' # RUN: at line 5 fir-opt C:\Users\tcwg\llvm-worker\flang-arm64-windows-msvc\build\tools\flang\test\Intrinsics\Output\math-codegen.fir.tmp/abs_fast.fir --fir-to-llvm-ir="target=x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu" | c:\users\tcwg\llvm-worker\flang-arm64-windows-msvc\build\bin\filecheck.exe C:\Users\tcwg\llvm-worker\flang-arm64-windows-msvc\build\tools\flang\test\Intrinsics\Output\math-codegen.fir.tmp/abs_fast.fir # executed command: fir-opt 'C:\Users\tcwg\llvm-worker\flang-arm64-windows-msvc\build\tools\flang\test\Intrinsics\Output\math-codegen.fir.tmp/abs_fast.fir' --fir-to-llvm-ir=target=x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu # .---command stderr------------ # | Assertion failed: implArgAndResultAttrsOpInterface && "`::mlir::CallOpInterface` expected its base interface `::mlir::ArgAndResultAttrsOpInterface` to be registered", file C:/Users/tcwg/llvm-worker/flang-arm64-windows-msvc/build/tools/mlir/include\mlir/Interfaces/CallInterfaces.h.inc, line 122 # | PLEASE submit a bug report to https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/ and include the crash backtrace. # | Stack dump: # | 0. Program arguments: fir-opt C:\\Users\\tcwg\\llvm-worker\\flang-arm64-windows-msvc\\build\\tools\\flang\\test\\Intrinsics\\Output\\math-codegen.fir.tmp/abs_fast.fir --fir-to-llvm-ir=target=x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu # | Exception Code: 0xC000001D # | #0 0x00007ff777271f54 mlir::detail::FallbackTypeIDResolver::registerImplicitTypeID(class llvm::StringRef) (c:\users\tcwg\llvm-worker\flang-arm64-windows-msvc\build\bin\fir-opt.exe+0x1331f54) # | #1 0x00007ffff958ae50 (C:\WINDOWS\System32\ucrtbase.dll+0x7ae50) # | #2 0xdd54fffff958ba5c # `----------------------------- # error: command failed with exit status: 0xc000001d # executed command: 'c:\users\tcwg\llvm-worker\flang-arm64-windows-msvc\build\bin\filecheck.exe' 'C:\Users\tcwg\llvm-worker\flang-arm64-windows-msvc\build\tools\flang\test\Intrinsics\Output\math-codegen.fir.tmp/abs_fast.fir' # .---command stderr------------ # | FileCheck error: '<stdin>' is empty. # | FileCheck command line: c:\users\tcwg\llvm-worker\flang-arm64-windows-msvc\build\bin\filecheck.exe C:\Users\tcwg\llvm-worker\flang-arm64-windows-msvc\build\tools\flang\test\Intrinsics\Output\math-codegen.fir.tmp/abs_fast.fir # `----------------------------- # error: command failed with exit status: 2 -- ******************** — Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/150783#issuecomment-3131154498>, or unsubscribe <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ABW7H2HANJOPE6QLHGYKBD33K…> . You are receiving this because you modified the open/close state.Message ID: <llvm/llvm-project/pull/150783/c3131154498(a)github.com> -- This e-mail message and any attachments thereto are intended only for the person or entity to which it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged material. Any retransmission, dissemination, copying or other use of, or taking of any action in reliance upon this information is prohibited. If you are not the intended addressee, please contact the sender immediately and delete the materials and information from your device and system and confirm the deletion by reply e-mail.

4 months, 2 weeks

[Linaro-TCWG-CI] binutils-2_41-release-7632-g09292f4ae2c: 1 regression on arm

by ci_notify＠linaro.org

Dear contributor, Our automatic CI has detected problems related to your patch(es). Please find some details below. In master-arm, after: | commit binutils-2_41-release-7632-g09292f4ae2c | Author: Indu Bhagat <indu.bhagat(a)oracle.com> | Date: Tue Aug 19 01:08:06 2025 -0700 | | binutils: dwarf: fix display of large cfa_offset | | eh_frame textual dump was not correct when the cfa_offset is a large | value. The reason is that the dumping code generally assumes the | cfa_offset is an 'int'. | ... 31 lines of the commit log omitted. Produces 1 regression: | | regressions.sum: | Running gas:gas/cfi/cfi.exp ... | FAIL: CFI common 10 Used configuration : *CI config* tcwg_gnu_native_check_binutils master-arm *configure and test flags:* none, autodetected on armv8l-unknown-linux-gnueabihf We track this bug report under https://linaro.atlassian.net/browse/GNU-1658. Please let us know if you have a fix. If you have any questions regarding this report, please ask on linaro-toolchain(a)lists.linaro.org mailing list. -----------------8<--------------------------8<--------------------------8<-------------------------- The information below contains the details of the failures, and the ways to reproduce a debug environment: You can find the failure logs in *.log.1.xz files in * https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gnu_native_check_binutils--master-arm-build/… The full lists of regressions and improvements as well as configure and make commands are in * https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gnu_native_check_binutils--master-arm-build/… The list of [ignored] baseline and flaky failures are in * https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gnu_native_check_binutils--master-arm-build/… Current build : https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gnu_native_check_binutils--master-arm-build/… Reference build : https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gnu_native_check_binutils--master-arm-build/… Instruction to reproduce the build : https://gitlab.com/LinaroLtd/tcwg/ci/interesting-commits/-/raw/master/binut… Full commit : https://sourceware.org/git/?p=binutils-gdb.git;a=commitdiff;h=09292f4ae2ccb…

4 months, 2 weeks

Re: [Linaro-TCWG-CI] llvmorg-22-init-6462-g35b22764e26a: 1 regression on aarch64

by Takahiro Kawashima (Fujitsu)

Hi, Probably this failure is a false detection caused by a floating-point precision error in fast-math. Please ignore the mail. We'll update the test. I apologize for the false detection. > Dear contributor, > > Our automatic CI has detected problems related to your patch(es). Please find some details below. > > In tcwg_flang_test/main-aarch64-Ofast-sve_vls-lto-lld, after: > | commit llvmorg-22-init-6462-g35b22764e26a > | Author: Hassnaa Hamdi <hassnaa.hamdi(a)arm.com> > | Date: Thu Sep 4 19:31:30 2025 +0100 > | > | [LV][AArch64] Prefer epilogue with fixed-width over scalable VF. (#155546) > | > | In case of equal costs Prefer epilogue with fixed-width over scalable VF. > | That is helpful in cases like post-LTO vectorization where epilogue with > | fixed-width VF can be removed when we eventually know that the trip count > | ... 1 lines of the commit log omitted. > > Produces 1 regression: > | > | regressions.sum: > | Running test-suite:Fujitsu/Fortran/0136 ... > | FAIL: test-suite :: Fujitsu/Fortran/0136/Fujitsu-Fortran-0136_0012.test > | # "FAIL" means : the execution of the compiled binary failed / output of the binary differs from the expected one > > Used configuration : > * Toolchain : cmake -G Ninja ../llvm/llvm "-DLLVM_ENABLE_PROJECTS=clang;lld;flang;clang-tools-extra" "-DLLVM_ENABLE_RUNTIMES=openmp" -DCMAKE_BUILD_TYPE=Release -DLLVM_ENABLE_ASSERTIONS=True -DCMAKE_INSTALL_PREFIX=../llvm-install "-DLLVM_TARGETS_TO_BUILD=AArch64" -DCLANG_DEFAULT_LINKER=lld > * Testsuite : export LD_LIBRARY_PATH=$\WORKSPACE/llvm-install/lib/aarch64-unknown-linux-gnu$\{LD_LIBRARY_PATH:+:$\LD_LIBRARY_PATH} > cmake -GNinja -DCMAKE_C_COMPILER="$\WORKSPACE/llvm-install/bin2/clang" -DCMAKE_CXX_COMPILER="$\WORKSPACE/llvm-install/bin2/clang++" -DCMAKE_Fortran_COMPILER="$\WORKSPACE/llvm-install/bin2/flang-new" -DCMAKE_BUILD_TYPE=Release -DCMAKE_C_FLAGS= -DCMAKE_CXX_FLAGS= -DCMAKE_Fortran_FLAGS= -DCMAKE_C_FLAGS_RELEASE="-O3 -ffast-math -march=armv8.4-a+sve -msve-vector-bits=256 -flto -fuse-ld=lld -DNDEBUG" -DCMAKE_CXX_FLAGS_RELEASE="-O3 -ffast-math -march=armv8.4-a+sve -msve-vector-bits=256 -flto -fuse-ld=lld -DNDEBUG" -DCMAKE_Fortran_FLAGS_RELEASE="-O3 -ffast-math -march=armv8.4-a+sve -msve-vector-bits=256 -flto -fuse-ld=lld -DNDEBUG" -DTEST_SUITE_FORTRAN=ON -DTEST_SUITE_SUBDIRS=Fujitsu -DTEST_SUITE_FUJITSU_WITH_FAST_MATH=ON "$\WORKSPACE/test/test-suite" > > We track this bug report under https://linaro.atlassian.net/browse/LLVM-2090. Please let us know if you have a fix. > > If you have any questions regarding this report, please ask on linaro-toolchain(a)lists.linaro.org mailing list. > > -----------------8<--------------------------8<--------------------------8<-------------------------- > > The information below contains the details of the failures, and the ways to reproduce a debug environment: > > You can find the failure logs in *.log.1.xz files in > * https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_flang_test--main-aarch64-Ofast-sve_vls-lto-l… > The full lists of regressions and improvements as well as configure and make commands are in > * https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_flang_test--main-aarch64-Ofast-sve_vls-lto-l… > The list of [ignored] baseline and flaky failures are in > * https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_flang_test--main-aarch64-Ofast-sve_vls-lto-l… > > Fujitsu testsuite : https://github.com/fujitsu/compiler-test-suite/ > > Current build : https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_flang_test--main-aarch64-Ofast-sve_vls-lto-l… > Reference build : https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_flang_test--main-aarch64-Ofast-sve_vls-lto-l… > > Instruction to reproduce the build : https://gitlab.com/LinaroLtd/tcwg/ci/interesting-commits/-/raw/master/llvm/… > > Full commit : https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/35b22764e26aa02ef3ad849bb449bf7…

4 months, 3 weeks

Re: [Linaro-TCWG-CI] llvmorg-22-init-6898-gdf430c33a71f: Failure on aarch64

by Nathan Chancellor

On Wed, Sep 10, 2025 at 05:23:47AM +0000, ci_notify(a)linaro.org wrote: > In tcwg_kernel/llvm-master-aarch64-stable-allyesconfig, after: > | commit llvmorg-22-init-6898-gdf430c33a71f > | Author: Nathan Chancellor <nathan(a)kernel.org> > | Date: Mon Sep 8 11:33:57 2025 -0700 > | > | [Frontend] Define __SANITIZE__ macros for kernel address variants (#156543) > | > | GCC defines these macros for both userspace and kernel address > | sanitizers: > | > | ... 29 lines of the commit log omitted. > > Produces Failure: > | Results changed to > | # reset_artifacts: > | -10 > | # build_abe binutils: > | -9 > | # build_kernel_llvm: > | -5 > | # build_abe qemu: > | -2 > | # linux_n_obj: > | 316 > | # First few build errors in logs: > | # 00:08:01 ./include/linux/compiler-clang.h:28:9: error: '__SANITIZE_ADDRESS__' macro redefined [-Werror,-Wmacro-redefined] > | # 00:08:01 ./include/linux/compiler-clang.h:28:9: error: '__SANITIZE_ADDRESS__' macro redefined [-Werror,-Wmacro-redefined] > | # 00:08:01 ./include/linux/compiler-clang.h:28:9: error: '__SANITIZE_ADDRESS__' macro redefined [-Werror,-Wmacro-redefined] > | # 00:08:01 ./include/linux/compiler-clang.h:28:9: error: '__SANITIZE_ADDRESS__' macro redefined [-Werror,-Wmacro-redefined] > | # 00:08:01 ./include/linux/compiler-clang.h:28:9: error: '__SANITIZE_ADDRESS__' macro redefined [-Werror,-Wmacro-redefined] > | # 00:08:01 ./include/linux/compiler-clang.h:28:9: error: '__SANITIZE_ADDRESS__' macro redefined [-Werror,-Wmacro-redefined] > | # 00:08:01 ./include/linux/compiler-clang.h:28:9: error: '__SANITIZE_ADDRESS__' macro redefined [-Werror,-Wmacro-redefined] > | # 00:08:01 ./include/linux/compiler-clang.h:28:9: error: '__SANITIZE_ADDRESS__' macro redefined [-Werror,-Wmacro-redefined] > | # 00:08:01 ./include/linux/compiler-clang.h:28:9: error: '__SANITIZE_ADDRESS__' macro redefined [-Werror,-Wmacro-redefined] > | # 00:08:01 ./include/linux/compiler-clang.h:28:9: error: '__SANITIZE_ADDRESS__' macro redefined [-Werror,-Wmacro-redefined] Thanks for the report. The kernel side fix for this has been picked up in a maintainer's tree [1] so it should be in Linus's tree soon then into stable shortly after that. This was already a problem in certain trees with CONFIG_KCSAN and __SANITIZE_THREAD__, I just made it a little worse ;) [1]: https://git.kernel.org/akpm/mm/c/3fac212fe489aa0dbe8d80a42a7809840ca7b0f9 Cheers, Nathan

4 months, 3 weeks

Re: [Linaro-TCWG-CI] gcc-16-3649-gc440b585ba3: 4 regressions on master-thumb_m3_softfp_eabi

by Luc Grosheintz

I'd like to apologize for causing these regressions. Below I've copied out the relevant parts from the logs. To me it looks like _Xv is a reserved identifier. I'll prepare a patch to fix the issue. On 9/9/25 6:54 AM, ci_notify(a)linaro.org wrote: > Dear contributor, > > Our automatic CI has detected problems related to your patch(es). Please find some details below. > > In arm-eabi cortex-m3 softfp, after: > | commit gcc-16-3649-gc440b585ba3 > | Author: Luc Grosheintz <luc.grosheintz(a)gmail.com> > | Date: Thu Sep 4 14:20:28 2025 +0200 > | > | libstdc++: Implement constant_wrapper, cw from P2781R9. > | > | This is a partial implementation of P2781R9. It adds std::cw and > | std::constant_wrapper, but doesn't modify __integral_constant_like for > | span/mdspan. > | ... 25 lines of the commit log omitted. > > Produces 4 regressions: > | > | regressions.sum: > | Running g++:g++.old-deja/old-deja.exp ... > | FAIL: g++.old-deja/g++.robertl/eb39.C -std=c++26 (test for excess errors) Code: 4651: template<_CwFixedValue _Xv, typename> 4652: struct constant_wrapper : _CwOperators 4653: { Compiler error: /home/tcwg-buildslave/workspace/tcwg_gnu_0/abe/builds/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/arm-eabi/gcc-gcc.git~master-stage2/arm-eabi/libstdc++-v3/include/type_traits:4651:26: error: expected '>' before numeric constant My guess is that _Xv is a reserved name. It's not on the list of common bad identifiers [1], but it's the only guess I have. [1]: https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/libstdc++/manual/source_code_style.html > | FAIL: g++.old-deja/g++.robertl/eb54.C -std=c++26 (test for excess errors) Same as above. > | UNRESOLVED: g++.old-deja/g++.robertl/eb54.C -std=c++26 compilation failed to produce executable Same as above. > | FAIL: g++.old-deja/g++.warn/iomanip.C -std=gnu++26 (test for excess errors) Same as above. > Used configuration : > *CI config* tcwg_gnu_embed_check_gcc arm-eabi -mthumb -march=armv7-m -mtune=cortex-m3 -mfloat-abi=softfp -mfpu=auto > *configure and test flags:* --target arm-eabi --disable-multilib --with-mode=thumb --with-cpu=cortex-m3 --with-float=softfp --target_board=-mthumb/-march=armv7-m/-mtune=cortex-m3/-mfloat-abi=softfp/-mfpu=auto qemu_cpu=cortex-m3 > > We track this bug report under https://linaro.atlassian.net/browse/GNU-1676. Please let us know if you have a fix. > > If you have any questions regarding this report, please ask on linaro-toolchain(a)lists.linaro.org mailing list. > > -----------------8<--------------------------8<--------------------------8<-------------------------- > > The information below contains the details of the failures, and the ways to reproduce a debug environment: > > You can find the failure logs in *.log.1.xz files in > * https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gnu_embed_check_gcc--master-thumb_m3_softfp_… > The full lists of regressions and improvements as well as configure and make commands are in > * https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gnu_embed_check_gcc--master-thumb_m3_softfp_… > The list of [ignored] baseline and flaky failures are in > * https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gnu_embed_check_gcc--master-thumb_m3_softfp_… > > Current build : https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gnu_embed_check_gcc--master-thumb_m3_softfp_… > Reference build : https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gnu_embed_check_gcc--master-thumb_m3_softfp_… > > Instruction to reproduce the build : https://gitlab.com/LinaroLtd/tcwg/ci/interesting-commits/-/raw/master/gcc/s… > > Full commit : See in git+ssh://linaroci@gcc.gnu.org/git/gcc.git

4 months, 3 weeks

← Newer
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
...
567
Older →

Jump to page:

2026

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

linaro-toolchain