linaro-toolchain

linaro-toolchain@lists.linaro.org

9 participants
5466 discussions

Re: [Linaro-TCWG-CI] gdb patch #85948: FAIL: 7 regressions: 1 progressions on arm

by Tiezhu Yang

On 02/21/2024 03:52 AM, ci_notify(a)linaro.org wrote: > If you can't get what you need from our CI within minutes, let us know and we will be happy to help. We can see "Operation not permitted" in the log info, please try one of the following processes to test: (1) set ptrace_scope as 0 $ echo 0 | sudo tee /proc/sys/kernel/yama/ptrace_scope $ make check-gdb TESTS="gdb.threads/attach-many-short-lived-threads.exp" (2) use sudo $ sudo make check-gdb TESTS="gdb.threads/attach-many-short-lived-threads.exp" Thanks, Tiezhu

8 months

Re: [Linaro-TCWG-CI] gcc-14-9028-g7f3d900684a: FAIL: 1 regressions: 1 progressions on aarch64

by Jonathan Wakely

On Fri, 16 Feb 2024 at 19:03, <ci_notify(a)linaro.org> wrote: > > Dear contributor, our automatic CI has detected problems related to your patch(es). Please find some details below. If you have any questions, please follow up on linaro-toolchain(a)lists.linaro.org mailing list, Libera's #linaro-tcwg channel, or ping your favourite Linaro toolchain developer on the usual project channel. > > We appreciate that it might be difficult to find the necessary logs or reproduce the issue locally. If you can't get what you need from our CI within minutes, let us know and we will be happy to help. > > We track this report status in https://linaro.atlassian.net/browse/GNU-1155 , please let us know if you are looking at the problem and/or when you have a fix. Reported as https://gcc.gnu.org/PR113961 and fixed. > In gcc_check master-aarch64 after: > > | commit gcc-14-9028-g7f3d900684a > | Author: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely(a)redhat.com> > | Date: Wed Feb 7 11:31:10 2024 +0000 > | > | libstdc++: Fix FAIL: 26_numerics/random/pr60037-neg.cc [PR113931] > | > | PR libstdc++/87744 > | PR libstdc++/113931 > | > | libstdc++-v3/ChangeLog: > | > | ... 2 lines of the commit log omitted. > > FAIL: 1 regressions: 1 progressions > > regressions.sum: > === libstdc++ tests === > > Running libstdc++:libstdc++-dg/conformance.exp ... > FAIL: 26_numerics/random/pr60037-neg.cc -std=gnu++17 (test for errors, line 3350) > > > progressions.sum: > === libstdc++ tests === > > Running libstdc++:libstdc++-dg/conformance.exp ... > FAIL: 26_numerics/random/pr60037-neg.cc -std=gnu++17 (test for errors, line 271) > > > You can find the failure logs in *.log.1.xz files in > - https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gcc_check--master-aarch64-build/1615/artifac… > The full lists of regressions and progressions as well as configure and make commands are in > - https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gcc_check--master-aarch64-build/1615/artifac… > The list of [ignored] baseline and flaky failures are in > - https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gcc_check--master-aarch64-build/1615/artifac… > > The configuration of this build is: > CI config tcwg_gcc_check master-aarch64 > > -----------------8<--------------------------8<--------------------------8<-------------------------- > The information below can be used to reproduce a debug environment: > > Current build : https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gcc_check--master-aarch64-build/1615/artifac… > Reference build : https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gcc_check--master-aarch64-build/1614/artifac… > > Reproduce last good and first bad builds: https://git-us.linaro.org/toolchain/ci/interesting-commits.git/plain/gcc/sh… > > Full commit : https://github.com/gcc-mirror/gcc/commit/7f3d900684ad989164114f25eb46a33871… > > List of configurations that regressed due to this commit : > * tcwg_gcc_check > ** master-aarch64 > *** FAIL: 1 regressions: 1 progressions > *** https://git-us.linaro.org/toolchain/ci/interesting-commits.git/plain/gcc/sh… > *** https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gcc_check--master-aarch64-build/1615/artifac…

8 months

Re: [Linaro-TCWG-CI] gcc-14-8998-gc9ce332b557: FAIL: 2 regressions on aarch64

by Jonathan Wakely

On Thu, 15 Feb 2024 at 21:31, <ci_notify(a)linaro.org> wrote: > > Dear contributor, our automatic CI has detected problems related to your patch(es). Please find some details below. If you have any questions, please follow up on linaro-toolchain(a)lists.linaro.org mailing list, Libera's #linaro-tcwg channel, or ping your favourite Linaro toolchain developer on the usual project channel. > > We appreciate that it might be difficult to find the necessary logs or reproduce the issue locally. If you can't get what you need from our CI within minutes, let us know and we will be happy to help. > > We track this report status in https://linaro.atlassian.net/browse/GNU-1154 , please let us know if you are looking at the problem and/or when you have a fix. Also reported as https://gcc.gnu.org/PR113931 and now fixed. > > In gcc_check master-aarch64 after: > > | commit gcc-14-8998-gc9ce332b557 > | Author: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely(a)redhat.com> > | Date: Wed Feb 7 11:31:10 2024 +0000 > | > | libstdc++: Use 128-bit arithmetic for std::linear_congruential_engine [PR87744] > | > | For 32-bit targets without __int128 we need to implement the LCG > | transition function by hand using 64-bit types. > | > | We can also slightly simplify the __mod function by using if-constexpr > | unconditionally, disabling -Wc++17-extensions warnings with diagnostic > | ... 13 lines of the commit log omitted. > > FAIL: 2 regressions > > regressions.sum: > === libstdc++ tests === > > Running libstdc++:libstdc++-dg/conformance.exp ... > FAIL: 26_numerics/random/pr60037-neg.cc -std=gnu++17 (test for errors, line 271) > FAIL: 26_numerics/random/pr60037-neg.cc -std=gnu++17 (test for excess errors) > > > You can find the failure logs in *.log.1.xz files in > - https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gcc_check--master-aarch64-build/1609/artifac… > The full lists of regressions and progressions as well as configure and make commands are in > - https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gcc_check--master-aarch64-build/1609/artifac… > The list of [ignored] baseline and flaky failures are in > - https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gcc_check--master-aarch64-build/1609/artifac… > > The configuration of this build is: > CI config tcwg_gcc_check master-aarch64 > > -----------------8<--------------------------8<--------------------------8<-------------------------- > The information below can be used to reproduce a debug environment: > > Current build : https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gcc_check--master-aarch64-build/1609/artifac… > Reference build : https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gcc_check--master-aarch64-build/1608/artifac… > > Reproduce last good and first bad builds: https://git-us.linaro.org/toolchain/ci/interesting-commits.git/plain/gcc/sh… > > Full commit : https://github.com/gcc-mirror/gcc/commit/c9ce332b557bb95987d038d98ea929cdfd… > > List of configurations that regressed due to this commit : > * tcwg_gcc_check > ** master-aarch64 > *** FAIL: 2 regressions > *** https://git-us.linaro.org/toolchain/ci/interesting-commits.git/plain/gcc/sh… > *** https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gcc_check--master-aarch64-build/1609/artifac…

8 months

Fwd: [Linaro-TCWG-CI] glibc patch #85585: FAIL: 1 regressions on arm

by H.J. Lu

FAIL: elf/tst-gnu2-tls2 indicates that your _dl_tlsdesc_dynamic may not preserve all caller-saved registers. Please find out how the test fails. H.J. ---------- Forwarded message --------- From: <ci_notify(a)linaro.org> Date: Wed, Feb 14, 2024 at 3:50 PM Subject: [Linaro-TCWG-CI] glibc patch #85585: FAIL: 1 regressions on arm To: <hjl.tools(a)gmail.com> Dear contributor, our automatic CI has detected problems related to your patch(es). Please find some details below. If you have any questions, please follow up on linaro-toolchain(a)lists.linaro.org mailing list, Libera's #linaro-tcwg channel, or ping your favourite Linaro toolchain developer on the usual project channel. We appreciate that it might be difficult to find the necessary logs or reproduce the issue locally. If you can't get what you need from our CI within minutes, let us know and we will be happy to help. In glibc_check master-arm after: | glibc patch https://patchwork.sourceware.org/patch/85585 | Author: H.J. Lu <hjl.tools(a)gmail.com> | Date: Sun Feb 11 19:19:49 2024 -0800 | | x86-64: Update _dl_tlsdesc_dynamic to preserve vector registers | | Compiler generates the following instruction sequence for GNU2 dynamic | TLS access: | | leaq tls_var@TLSDESC(%rip), %rax | call *tls_var@TLSCALL(%rax) | ... 13 lines of the commit log omitted. | ... applied on top of baseline commit: | dbae3a3940 trivial doc fix: remove weird phrase "syscall takes zero to five arguments" FAIL: 1 regressions regressions.sum: === glibc tests === Running glibc:elf ... FAIL: elf/tst-gnu2-tls2 You can find the failure logs in *.log.1.xz files in - https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_glibc_check--master-arm-precommit/1460/artif… The full lists of regressions and progressions as well as configure and make commands are in - https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_glibc_check--master-arm-precommit/1460/artif… The list of [ignored] baseline and flaky failures are in - https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_glibc_check--master-arm-precommit/1460/artif… The configuration of this build is: CI config tcwg_glibc_check master-arm -----------------8<--------------------------8<--------------------------8<-------------------------- The information below can be used to reproduce a debug environment: Current build : https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_glibc_check--master-arm-precommit/1460/artif… Reference build : https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_glibc_check--master-arm-build/953/artifact/a… -- H.J.

8 months

Re: [Linaro-TCWG-CI] glibc patch #85772: FAIL: 1 regressions on aarch64

by H.J. Lu

On Thu, Feb 15, 2024 at 11:36 AM <ci_notify(a)linaro.org> wrote: > > Dear contributor, our automatic CI has detected problems related to your patch(es). Please find some details below. If you have any questions, please follow up on linaro-toolchain(a)lists.linaro.org mailing list, Libera's #linaro-tcwg channel, or ping your favourite Linaro toolchain developer on the usual project channel. > > We appreciate that it might be difficult to find the necessary logs or reproduce the issue locally. If you can't get what you need from our CI within minutes, let us know and we will be happy to help. > > In glibc_check master-aarch64 after: > > | glibc patch https://patchwork.sourceware.org/patch/85772 > | Author: H.J. Lu <hjl.tools(a)gmail.com> > | Date: Thu Feb 15 03:27:19 2024 -0800 > | > | sort-makefile-lines.py: Allow '_' in name and "^# name" > | > | '_' is used in Makefile variable names and many variables end with > | "^# name". Relax sort-makefile-lines.py to allow '_' in name and > | "^# name" as variable end. This fixes BZ #31385. > | ... applied on top of baseline commit: > | dbae3a3940 trivial doc fix: remove weird phrase "syscall takes zero to five arguments" > > FAIL: 1 regressions > > regressions.sum: > === glibc tests === > > Running glibc:. ... > FAIL: lint-makefiles > > > Should be fixed now. -- H.J.

8 months

[ACTIVITY] report week ending 15 Feb

by Peter Maydell

Progress (short week, 3 days): * UM-2 [QEMU upstream maintainership] - various bits of cleanup and maintainer stuff - working on a 3-phase-reset-aware equivalent to qemu_register_reset(): have some basically working code, need to tidy it up and look for where the changes it makes to reset ordering might break things - sent out an email proposing that we deprecate-and-drop the pxa2xx, omap and strongarm boards. This has at least produced a useful conversation that's clarified which of these models people are using as part of their Linux kernel testing or development process. I'd still like to drop some of them if we can, though... -- PMM

8 months

Re: [Linaro-TCWG-CI] gcc patch #85713: FAIL: 19 regressions on arm

by Maxim Kuvyrkov

Hi Richard, This is a false positive. We had a bit of instability in our CI yesterday, and it should be all fixed now. Thanks, -- Maxim Kuvyrkov https://www.linaro.org > On Feb 14, 2024, at 23:00, ci_notify(a)linaro.org wrote: > > Dear contributor, our automatic CI has detected problems related to your patch(es). Please find some details below. If you have any questions, please follow up on linaro-toolchain(a)lists.linaro.org mailing list, Libera's #linaro-tcwg channel, or ping your favourite Linaro toolchain developer on the usual project channel. > > We appreciate that it might be difficult to find the necessary logs or reproduce the issue locally. If you can't get what you need from our CI within minutes, let us know and we will be happy to help. > > In gcc_check master-arm after: > > | gcc patch https://patchwork.sourceware.org/patch/85713 > | Author: Richard Biener <rguenther(a)suse.de> > | Date: Wed Feb 14 13:02:56 2024 +0100 > | > | tree-optimization/113910 - huge compile time during PTA > | > | For the testcase in PR113910 we spend a lot of time in PTA comparing > | bitmaps for looking up equivalence class members. This points to > | the very weak bitmap_hash function which effectively hashes set > | and a subset of not set bits. The following improves it by mixing > | that weak result with the population count of the bitmap, reducing > | ... 19 lines of the commit log omitted. > | ... applied on top of baseline commit: > | a032c319cb9 testsuite: gdc: Require ucn in gdc.test/runnable/mangle.d etc. [PR104739] > > FAIL: 19 regressions > > regressions.sum: > === g++ tests === > > Running g++:g++.dg/dg.exp ... > FAIL: c-c++-common/pr44832.c -std=gnu++17 (test for excess errors) > FAIL: c-c++-common/pr44832.c -std=gnu++98 (test for excess errors) > FAIL: g++.dg/opt/pr100541-2.C -std=gnu++14 (test for excess errors) > FAIL: g++.dg/opt/pr100541-2.C -std=gnu++17 (test for excess errors) > FAIL: g++.dg/opt/pr100541-2.C -std=gnu++20 (test for excess errors) > > Running g++:g++.dg/pch/pch.exp ... > ... and 29 more entries > > You can find the failure logs in *.log.1.xz files in > - https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gcc_check--master-arm-precommit/6118/artifac… > The full lists of regressions and progressions as well as configure and make commands are in > - https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gcc_check--master-arm-precommit/6118/artifac… > The list of [ignored] baseline and flaky failures are in > - https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gcc_check--master-arm-precommit/6118/artifac… > > The configuration of this build is: > CI config tcwg_gcc_check master-arm > > -----------------8<--------------------------8<--------------------------8<-------------------------- > The information below can be used to reproduce a debug environment: > > Current build : https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gcc_check--master-arm-precommit/6118/artifac… > Reference build : https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gcc_check--master-arm-build/1717/artifact/ar…

8 months

[Linaro-TCWG-CI] binutils-2_41-release-2297-g313f04b6edc: FAIL: 1 regressions on arm

by ci_notify＠linaro.org

Dear contributor, our automatic CI has detected problems related to your patch(es). Please find some details below. If you have any questions, please follow up on linaro-toolchain(a)lists.linaro.org mailing list, Libera's #linaro-tcwg channel, or ping your favourite Linaro toolchain developer on the usual project channel. We appreciate that it might be difficult to find the necessary logs or reproduce the issue locally. If you can't get what you need from our CI within minutes, let us know and we will be happy to help. We track this report status in https://linaro.atlassian.net/browse/GNU-1153 , please let us know if you are looking at the problem and/or when you have a fix. In binutils_check master-arm after: | commit binutils-2_41-release-2297-g313f04b6edc | Author: Alan Modra <amodra(a)gmail.com> | Date: Thu Feb 15 19:03:07 2024 +1030 | | Re: elf_backend_finish_dynamic_symbol returning false | | I didn't examine ld testsuite logs properly after cf95b909e2c2. | Replacing one of the "return false" with BFD_ASSERT in | finish_dynamic_symbol was wrong as it causes segmentation faults on | testcases expected to fail. Revert those changes and instead make | a bfd_final_link failure noisy. FAIL: 1 regressions regressions.sum: === ld tests === Running ld:ld-arm/arm-elf.exp ... FAIL: non-contiguous-arm7 You can find the failure logs in *.log.1.xz files in - https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_binutils_check--master-arm-build/776/artifac… The full lists of regressions and progressions as well as configure and make commands are in - https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_binutils_check--master-arm-build/776/artifac… The list of [ignored] baseline and flaky failures are in - https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_binutils_check--master-arm-build/776/artifac… The configuration of this build is: CI config tcwg_binutils_check master-arm -----------------8<--------------------------8<--------------------------8<-------------------------- The information below can be used to reproduce a debug environment: Current build : https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_binutils_check--master-arm-build/776/artifac… Reference build : https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_binutils_check--master-arm-build/775/artifac… Reproduce last good and first bad builds: https://git-us.linaro.org/toolchain/ci/interesting-commits.git/plain/binuti… Full commit : https://sourceware.org/git/?p=binutils-gdb.git;a=commitdiff;h=313f04b6edcd0… List of configurations that regressed due to this commit : * tcwg_binutils_check ** master-arm *** FAIL: 1 regressions *** https://git-us.linaro.org/toolchain/ci/interesting-commits.git/plain/binuti… *** https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_binutils_check--master-arm-build/776/artifac…

8 months

Re: [Linaro-TCWG-CI] 2 patches in gdb: FAIL: 5 regressions on aarch64

by Guinevere Larsen

Hi! I just checked out this regression but I think there's something odd going on in the setup that is running the tests. When I run the test locally, the relevant part of the logs looks like this: (gdb) PASS: gdb.threads/threadcrash.exp: test_live_inferior: continue to breakpoint: running to breakpoint print $_inferior_thread_count^M $1 = 7^M (gdb) PASS: gdb.threads/threadcrash.exp: test_live_inferior: $thread_count == 7 thread apply all backtrace^M ^M < lots of GDB output > (gdb) PASS: gdb.threads/threadcrash.exp: test_live_inferior: Get thread information PASS: gdb.threads/threadcrash.exp: test_live_inferior: $unwind_fail == false PASS: gdb.threads/threadcrash.exp: test_live_inferior: $thread_count == [llength $test_list] Whereas the failed log reads like this: (gdb) PASS: gdb.threads/threadcrash.exp: test_live_inferior: continue to breakpoint: running to breakpoint print $_inferior_thread_count $1 = 7PASS: gdb.threads/threadcrash.exp: test_live_inferior: $thread_count == 7 (gdb) PASS: gdb.threads/threadcrash.exp: test_live_inferior: Get thread information PASS: gdb.threads/threadcrash.exp: test_live_inferior: $unwind_fail == false FAIL: gdb.threads/threadcrash.exp: test_live_inferior: $thread_count == [llength $test_list] thread apply all backtrace Notice how the gdb command to "apply all backtrace", which is used to create the test_list variable, happens after checking if the variable has been set correctly. I have no clue how things can get so out of sync... -- Cheers, Guinevere Larsen She/Her/Hers On 13/02/2024 17:09, ci_notify(a)linaro.org wrote: > Dear contributor, our automatic CI has detected problems related to your patch(es). Please find some details below. If you have any questions, please follow up on linaro-toolchain(a)lists.linaro.org mailing list, Libera's #linaro-tcwg channel, or ping your favourite Linaro toolchain developer on the usual project channel. > > We appreciate that it might be difficult to find the necessary logs or reproduce the issue locally. If you can't get what you need from our CI within minutes, let us know and we will be happy to help. > > In gdb_check master-aarch64 after: > > | 2 patches in gdb > | Patchwork URL: https://patchwork.sourceware.org/patch/85659 > | f687941ee52 gdb/testsuite: reduce gdb.threads/threadcrash.exp reliance on libc symbols > | 2e746d0ae56 gdb/testsuite: fix gdb.threads/threadcrash.exp on 32-bit arm targets > | ... applied on top of baseline commit: > | 7e4208a3f5d [gdb/tdep] Fix reverse execution of LDR(immediate) T4 > > FAIL: 5 regressions > > regressions.sum: > === gdb tests === > > Running gdb:gdb.threads/threadcrash.exp ... > FAIL: gdb.threads/threadcrash.exp: test_corefile: $thread_count == [llength $test_list] > FAIL: gdb.threads/threadcrash.exp: test_corefile: getting thread count (got interactive prompt) > FAIL: gdb.threads/threadcrash.exp: test_corefile: loading_corefile > FAIL: gdb.threads/threadcrash.exp: test_gcore: $thread_count == [llength $test_list] > FAIL: gdb.threads/threadcrash.exp: test_live_inferior: $thread_count == [llength $test_list] > > > You can find the failure logs in *.log.1.xz files in > - https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gdb_check--master-aarch64-precommit/1701/art… > The full lists of regressions and progressions as well as configure and make commands are in > - https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gdb_check--master-aarch64-precommit/1701/art… > The list of [ignored] baseline and flaky failures are in > - https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gdb_check--master-aarch64-precommit/1701/art… > > The configuration of this build is: > CI config tcwg_gdb_check master-aarch64 > > -----------------8<--------------------------8<--------------------------8<-------------------------- > The information below can be used to reproduce a debug environment: > > Current build : https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gdb_check--master-aarch64-precommit/1701/art… > Reference build : https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gdb_check--master-aarch64-build/814/artifact…

8 months, 1 week

Re: [Linaro-TCWG-CI] gcc-14-8949-g2ca373b7e8a: FAIL: 1 regressions: 11 progressions on arm

by Maxim Kuvyrkov

> On Feb 13, 2024, at 22:03, ci_notify(a)linaro.org wrote: > > Dear contributor, our automatic CI has detected problems related to your patch(es). Please find some details below. If you have any questions, please follow up on linaro-toolchain(a)lists.linaro.org mailing list, Libera's #linaro-tcwg channel, or ping your favourite Linaro toolchain developer on the usual project channel. > > We appreciate that it might be difficult to find the necessary logs or reproduce the issue locally. If you can't get what you need from our CI within minutes, let us know and we will be happy to help. > > We track this report status in https://linaro.atlassian.net/browse/GNU-1151 , please let us know if you are looking at the problem and/or when you have a fix. > > In gcc_check master-arm after: > > | commit gcc-14-8949-g2ca373b7e8a > | Author: Jakub Jelinek <jakub(a)redhat.com> > | Date: Tue Feb 13 10:33:08 2024 +0100 > | > | libgcc: Fix UB in FP_FROM_BITINT > | > | As I wrote earlier, I was seeing > | FAIL: gcc.dg/torture/bitint-24.c -O0 execution test > | FAIL: gcc.dg/torture/bitint-24.c -O2 execution test > | with the ia32 _BitInt enablement patch on i686-linux. I thought > | floatbitintxf.c was miscompiled with -O2 -march=i686 -mtune=generic, but it > | ... 34 lines of the commit log omitted. > > FAIL: 1 regressions: 11 progressions > > regressions.sum: > === gcc tests === > > Running gcc:gcc.dg/vect/vect.exp ... > FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/tsvc/vect-tsvc-s1281.c execution test Hi Jakub, The failure is due to the timeout. I'm going to investigate whether this is a legitimate failure or your change just pushed testcase execution time over the threshold. Running on tcwg-local: timeout -k 30s 330s ./vect-tsvc-s1281.exe spawn [open ...] value: inf, expected: inf timeout: the monitored command dumped core FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/tsvc/vect-tsvc-s1281.c execution test > > > progressions.sum: > === gcc tests === > > Running gcc:gcc.dg/guality/guality.exp ... > UNRESOLVED: c-c++-common/guality/Og-static-wo-1.c -O0 compilation failed to produce executable > FAIL: c-c++-common/guality/Og-static-wo-1.c -O0 (test for excess errors) > FAIL: gcc.dg/guality/pr41447-1.c -O0 execution test > > Running gcc:gcc.dg/ipa/ipa.exp ... > UNRESOLVED: gcc.dg/ipa/iinline-4.c scan-ipa-dump inline "hooray4[^\\n]*inline copy in test4" > UNRESOLVED: gcc.dg/ipa/iinline-4.c scan-ipa-dump inline "hooray1[^\\n]*inline copy in test1" > ... and 7 more entries Ignore these "progressions". We are having a bit of instability after enabling guality tests in our setup. -- Maxim Kuvyrkov https://www.linaro.org > > You can find the failure logs in *.log.1.xz files in > - https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gcc_check--master-arm-build/1710/artifact/ar… > The full lists of regressions and progressions as well as configure and make commands are in > - https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gcc_check--master-arm-build/1710/artifact/ar… > The list of [ignored] baseline and flaky failures are in > - https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gcc_check--master-arm-build/1710/artifact/ar… > > The configuration of this build is: > CI config tcwg_gcc_check master-arm > > -----------------8<--------------------------8<--------------------------8<-------------------------- > The information below can be used to reproduce a debug environment: > > Current build : https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gcc_check--master-arm-build/1710/artifact/ar… > Reference build : https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gcc_check--master-arm-build/1709/artifact/ar… > > Reproduce last good and first bad builds: https://git-us.linaro.org/toolchain/ci/interesting-commits.git/plain/gcc/sh… > > Full commit : https://github.com/gcc-mirror/gcc/commit/2ca373b7e8adf9cc0c17aecab5e1cc6c76… > > List of configurations that regressed due to this commit : > * tcwg_gcc_check > ** master-arm > *** FAIL: 1 regressions: 11 progressions > *** https://git-us.linaro.org/toolchain/ci/interesting-commits.git/plain/gcc/sh… > *** https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gcc_check--master-arm-build/1710/artifact/ar…

8 months, 1 week

Jump to page:

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

linaro-toolchain