linaro-toolchain March 2025

linaro-toolchain@lists.linaro.org

21 participants
30 discussions

[Linaro-TCWG-CI] binutils-2_41-release-6320-ga8373e160b7: 1 regressions 1 improvements on arm

by ci_notify＠linaro.org

Dear contributor, Our automatic CI has detected problems related to your patch(es). Please find some details below. In binutils_check master-arm, after: | commit binutils-2_41-release-6320-ga8373e160b7 | Author: Jens Remus <jremus(a)linux.ibm.com> | Date: Fri Mar 21 15:29:03 2025 +0100 | | ld: Correct test pr19719 naming mix-up | | The suffix "defined/undefined" in the ld test pr19719 name specifies | whether weak fun() is defined or undefined is mixed up. | | ... 19 lines of the commit log omitted. Produces 1 regressions 1 improvements: | | regressions.sum: | Running ld:ld-elf/shared.exp ... | XPASS: Run pr19719 fun defined | | improvements.sum: | Running ld:ld-elf/shared.exp ... | XPASS: Run pr19719 fun undefined Used configuration : *CI config* tcwg_binutils_check master-arm *configure and test flags:* none, autodetected on armv8l-unknown-linux-gnueabihf We track this bug report under https://linaro.atlassian.net/browse/GNU-1549. Please let us know if you have a fix. If you have any questions regarding this report, please ask on linaro-toolchain(a)lists.linaro.org mailing list. -----------------8<--------------------------8<--------------------------8<-------------------------- The information below contains the details of the failures, and the ways to reproduce a debug environment: You can find the failure logs in *.log.1.xz files in * https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_binutils_check--master-arm-build/2383/artifa… The full lists of regressions and improvements as well as configure and make commands are in * https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_binutils_check--master-arm-build/2383/artifa… The list of [ignored] baseline and flaky failures are in * https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_binutils_check--master-arm-build/2383/artifa… Current build : https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_binutils_check--master-arm-build/2383/artifa… Reference build : https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_binutils_check--master-arm-build/2381/artifa… Instruction to reproduce the build : https://git-us.linaro.org/toolchain/ci/interesting-commits.git/plain/binuti… Full commit : https://sourceware.org/git/?p=binutils-gdb.git;a=commitdiff;h=a8373e160b791…

1 month

Re: [Linaro-TCWG-CI] gcc-15-8904-ge200f53a555: 2 regressions on aarch64

by Jonathan Wakely

On Wed, 26 Mar 2025 at 00:55, <ci_notify(a)linaro.org> wrote: > > Dear contributor, > > Our automatic CI has detected problems related to your patch(es). Please find some details below. > > In gcc_check master-aarch64, after: > | commit gcc-15-8904-ge200f53a555 > | Author: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely(a)redhat.com> > | Date: Tue Mar 25 13:24:08 2025 +0000 > | > | libstdc++: Optimize std::vector construction from input iterators [PR108487] > | > | LWG 3291 make std::ranges::iota_view's iterator have input_iterator_tag > | as its iterator_category, even though it satisfies the C++20 > | std::forward_iterator concept. This means that the traditional > | ... 41 lines of the commit log omitted. > > Produces 2 regressions: > | > | regressions.sum: > | Running g++:g++.dg/dg.exp ... > | FAIL: g++.dg/tree-ssa/initlist-opt1.C -std=c++26 scan-tree-dump gimple "_M_range_initialize<const char\\* const\\*>" > | FAIL: g++.dg/tree-ssa/initlist-opt2.C -std=c++26 scan-tree-dump gimple "_M_range_initialize<const char\\* const\\*>" > > Used configuration : > *CI config* tcwg_gcc_check master-aarch64 > *configure and test flags:* none, autodetected on aarch64-unknown-linux-gnu > > We track this bug report under https://linaro.atlassian.net/browse/GNU-1548. Please let us know if you have a fix. I have a fix: --- a/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/tree-ssa/initlist-opt1.C +++ b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/tree-ssa/initlist-opt1.C @@ -4,7 +4,7 @@ // { dg-skip-if "requires hosted libstdc++ for string" { ! hostedlib } } // Test that we do range-initialization from const char *. -// { dg-final { scan-tree-dump {_M_range_initialize<const char\* const\*>} "gimple" } } +// { dg-final { scan-tree-dump {_M_range_initialize_n<const char\* const\*} "gimple" } } // { dg-final { scan-tree-dump {static const char.*72} "gimple" } } #include <string> > > If you have any questions regarding this report, please ask on linaro-toolchain(a)lists.linaro.org mailing list. > > -----------------8<--------------------------8<--------------------------8<-------------------------- > > The information below contains the details of the failures, and the ways to reproduce a debug environment: > > You can find the failure logs in *.log.1.xz files in > * https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gcc_check--master-aarch64-build/3491/artifac… > The full lists of regressions and improvements as well as configure and make commands are in > * https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gcc_check--master-aarch64-build/3491/artifac… > The list of [ignored] baseline and flaky failures are in > * https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gcc_check--master-aarch64-build/3491/artifac… > > Current build : https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gcc_check--master-aarch64-build/3491/artifac… > Reference build : https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gcc_check--master-aarch64-build/3490/artifac… > > Instruction to reproduce the build : https://git-us.linaro.org/toolchain/ci/interesting-commits.git/plain/gcc/sh… > > Full commit : https://gcc.gnu.org/git/?p=gcc.git;a=commitdiff;h=e200f53a5556516ec831e6b7a…

1 month

Re: [Linaro-TCWG-CI] gcc patch #109136: Failure on aarch64

by Christophe Lyon

Hi, We had a "disk full" issue on that machine, sorry for the false alarm. We can manually retrigger the build if you wish? Thanks, Christophe On Tue, 25 Mar 2025 at 12:22, <ci_notify(a)linaro.org> wrote: > > Dear contributor, > > Our automatic CI has detected problems related to your patch(es). Please find some details below. > > In gcc_build master-aarch64, after: > | gcc patch https://patchwork.sourceware.org/patch/109136 > | Author: Hu, Lin1 <lin1.hu(a)intel.com> > | Date: Tue Mar 25 15:44:51 2025 +0800 > | > | [PATCH] i386: Add "s_" as Saturation for AVX10.2 Converting Intrinsics. > | > | Hi, all > | > | This patch aims to add "s_" after 'cvt' represent saturation. > | ... 21 lines of the commit log omitted. > | ... applied on top of baseline commit: > | 7679b826840 opcodes: fix wrong code in expand_binop_directly [PR117811] > > Produces Failure: > | Results changed to > | # reset_artifacts: > | -10 > | # true: > | 0 > | # build_abe gcc: > | # FAILED > | > | From > | # reset_artifacts: > | -10 > | # true: > | 0 > | # build_abe gcc: > | 1 > > Used configuration : > *CI config* tcwg_gcc_build master-aarch64 > *configure and test flags:* none, autodetected on aarch64-unknown-linux-gnu > > If you have any questions regarding this report, please ask on linaro-toolchain(a)lists.linaro.org mailing list. > > -----------------8<--------------------------8<--------------------------8<-------------------------- > > The information below contains the details of the failures, and the ways to reproduce a debug environment: > > You can find the failure logs in > * https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gcc_build--master-aarch64-precommit/17123/ar… > The full lists of regressions and improvements as well as configure and make commands are in > * https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gcc_build--master-aarch64-precommit/17123/ar… > > Current build : https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gcc_build--master-aarch64-precommit/17123/ar… > Reference build : https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gcc_build--master-aarch64-build/3294/artifac… > > Warning: we do not enable maintainer-mode nor automatically update > generated files, which may lead to failures if the patch modifies the > master files.

1 month

Re: [Linaro-TCWG-CI] gcc patch #109150: Failure on aarch64

by Christophe Lyon

Hi, We had a "disk full" issue on that machine, sorry for the false alarm. We can manually retrigger the build if you wish? Thanks, Christophe On Tue, 25 Mar 2025 at 12:10, <ci_notify(a)linaro.org> wrote: > > Dear contributor, > > Our automatic CI has detected problems related to your patch(es). Please find some details below. > > In simplebootstrap_build master-aarch64-bootstrap, after: > | gcc patch https://patchwork.sourceware.org/patch/109150 > | Author: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely(a)redhat.com> > | Date: Tue Mar 25 10:24:01 2025 +0000 > | > | [committed] libstdc++: Cast -1 to size_t in <format> [PR119429] > | > | This avoids a runtime error from Clang's annoying -fsanitize=integer > | (even though it's not undefined and behaves correctly). > | > | ... 5 lines of the commit log omitted. > | ... applied on top of baseline commit: > | 4d1b1969566 libstdc++: Fix handling of common cpp20-only ranges for flat sets [PR119415] > > Produces Failure: > | Results changed to > | # reset_artifacts: > | -10 > | # true: > | 0 > | # build_abe bootstrap: > | # FAILED > | > | From > | # reset_artifacts: > | -10 > | # true: > | 0 > | # build_abe bootstrap: > | 1 > > Used configuration : > *CI config* tcwg_simplebootstrap_build master-aarch64-bootstrap > *configure and test flags:* none, autodetected on aarch64-unknown-linux-gnu > > If you have any questions regarding this report, please ask on linaro-toolchain(a)lists.linaro.org mailing list. > > -----------------8<--------------------------8<--------------------------8<-------------------------- > > The information below contains the details of the failures, and the ways to reproduce a debug environment: > > You can find the failure logs in > * https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_simplebootstrap_build--master-aarch64-bootst… > The full lists of regressions and improvements as well as configure and make commands are in > * https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_simplebootstrap_build--master-aarch64-bootst… > > Current build : https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_simplebootstrap_build--master-aarch64-bootst… > Reference build : https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_simplebootstrap_build--master-aarch64-bootst… > > Warning: we do not enable maintainer-mode nor automatically update > generated files, which may lead to failures if the patch modifies the > master files.

1 month

Re: [Linaro-TCWG-CI] gcc patch #109141: Failure on aarch64

by Christophe Lyon

Hi, We had a "disk full" issue on that machine, sorry for the false alarm. We can manually retrigger the build if you wish? Thanks, Christophe On Tue, 25 Mar 2025 at 12:24, <ci_notify(a)linaro.org> wrote: > > Dear contributor, > > Our automatic CI has detected problems related to your patch(es). Please find some details below. > > In gcc_build master-aarch64, after: > | gcc patch https://patchwork.sourceware.org/patch/109141 > | Author: Tobias Burnus <tburnus(a)baylibre.com> > | Date: Tue Mar 25 10:32:08 2025 +0100 > | > | [Patch] omp-general.cc: Remove 'if' around call to always 'true' returning function [PR118627] > | > | I intent to commit this a bit later today as obvious, > | unless there are comments. > | > | ... 35 lines of the commit log omitted. > | ... applied on top of baseline commit: > | 7679b826840 opcodes: fix wrong code in expand_binop_directly [PR117811] > > Produces Failure: > | Results changed to > | # reset_artifacts: > | -10 > | # true: > | 0 > | # build_abe gcc: > | # FAILED > | > | From > | # reset_artifacts: > | -10 > | # true: > | 0 > | # build_abe gcc: > | 1 > > Used configuration : > *CI config* tcwg_gcc_build master-aarch64 > *configure and test flags:* none, autodetected on aarch64-unknown-linux-gnu > > If you have any questions regarding this report, please ask on linaro-toolchain(a)lists.linaro.org mailing list. > > -----------------8<--------------------------8<--------------------------8<-------------------------- > > The information below contains the details of the failures, and the ways to reproduce a debug environment: > > You can find the failure logs in > * https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gcc_build--master-aarch64-precommit/17126/ar… > The full lists of regressions and improvements as well as configure and make commands are in > * https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gcc_build--master-aarch64-precommit/17126/ar… > > Current build : https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gcc_build--master-aarch64-precommit/17126/ar… > Reference build : https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gcc_build--master-aarch64-build/3294/artifac… > > Warning: we do not enable maintainer-mode nor automatically update > generated files, which may lead to failures if the patch modifies the > master files.

1 month

Re: [Linaro-TCWG-CI] gcc patch #109137: Failure on aarch64

by Christophe Lyon

Hi, We had a "disk full" issue on that machine, sorry for the false alarm. We can manually retrigger the build if you wish? Thanks, Christophe On Tue, 25 Mar 2025 at 12:22, <ci_notify(a)linaro.org> wrote: > > Dear contributor, > > Our automatic CI has detected problems related to your patch(es). Please find some details below. > > In gcc_build master-aarch64, after: > | gcc patch https://patchwork.sourceware.org/patch/109137 > | Author: Sam James <sam(a)gentoo.org> > | Date: Tue Mar 25 07:54:09 2025 +0000 > | > | [PATCH] testsuite: add testcase for recent alias fix > | > | r15-7961-gdc47161c1f32c3 fixes a typo in ao_compare::compare_ao_refs > | but there wasn't a testcase available at the time. Now there is. > | > | ... 8 lines of the commit log omitted. > | ... applied on top of baseline commit: > | 7679b826840 opcodes: fix wrong code in expand_binop_directly [PR117811] > > Produces Failure: > | Results changed to > | # reset_artifacts: > | -10 > | # true: > | 0 > | # build_abe gcc: > | # FAILED > | > | From > | # reset_artifacts: > | -10 > | # true: > | 0 > | # build_abe gcc: > | 1 > > Used configuration : > *CI config* tcwg_gcc_build master-aarch64 > *configure and test flags:* none, autodetected on aarch64-unknown-linux-gnu > > If you have any questions regarding this report, please ask on linaro-toolchain(a)lists.linaro.org mailing list. > > -----------------8<--------------------------8<--------------------------8<-------------------------- > > The information below contains the details of the failures, and the ways to reproduce a debug environment: > > You can find the failure logs in > * https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gcc_build--master-aarch64-precommit/17124/ar… > The full lists of regressions and improvements as well as configure and make commands are in > * https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gcc_build--master-aarch64-precommit/17124/ar… > > Current build : https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gcc_build--master-aarch64-precommit/17124/ar… > Reference build : https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gcc_build--master-aarch64-build/3294/artifac… > > Warning: we do not enable maintainer-mode nor automatically update > generated files, which may lead to failures if the patch modifies the > master files.

1 month

Request to update Clang in libc++ pre-commit CI

by Mark de Wever

Hi, Clang 20 has been released and per libc++ policy we want to remove support for Clang 18. While testing a patch to remove Clang 18 support [1] I noticed the ARM buildbots you maintain failed [2] since they use Clang 18. Would it be possible to update these bots to Clang 20 or Clang 19? [1] https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/130142 [2] https://buildkite.com/llvm-project/libcxx-ci/builds/41081 Kind regards, Mark

1 month

https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/131921

by Louis Dionne

Hi, We have encountered a CI failure on a libc++ CI bot owned by this list. I am seeking assistance to help debug the issue since it's a bit difficult to do without having access to that platform. This is time sensitive for us, since the patch fixes a real issue we encountered and we'd like to get it fixed in the LLVM 20 release. See https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/131921#issuecomment-2737539434 for more details. Thanks, Louis

1 month

Re: [Linaro-TCWG-CI] gcc-15-8649-g1d2257dc850: 1 regressions on arm

by Richard Earnshaw (lists)

On 21/03/2025 20:36, ci_notify(a)linaro.org wrote: > Dear contributor, > > Our automatic CI has detected problems related to your patch(es). Please find some details below. > > In gcc_check master-arm, after: > | commit gcc-15-8649-g1d2257dc850 > | Author: Richard Earnshaw <rearnsha(a)arm.com> > | Date: Fri Mar 21 15:20:03 2025 +0000 > | > | arm: testsuite: make unaligned-memcpy-*.c executable tests [PR91614] > | > | These tests have been looking for a very specific instruction sequence > | which has the tendency to be fairly unstable as a result. But what is > | more interesting is that the the tests must not contain instructions > | ... 22 lines of the commit log omitted. > > Produces 1 regressions: > | > | regressions.sum: > | Running gcc:gcc.target/arm/arm.exp ... > | FAIL: gcc.target/arm/unaligned-memcpy-4.c scan-assembler-not unaligned Should be fixed now. The scanner was matching 'unaligned' in a .file directive containing the test name. R. > > Used configuration : > *CI config* tcwg_gcc_check master-arm > *configure and test flags:* none, autodetected on armv8l-unknown-linux-gnueabihf > > We track this bug report under https://linaro.atlassian.net/browse/GNU-1545. Please let us know if you have a fix. > > If you have any questions regarding this report, please ask on linaro-toolchain(a)lists.linaro.org mailing list. > > -----------------8<--------------------------8<--------------------------8<-------------------------- > > The information below contains the details of the failures, and the ways to reproduce a debug environment: > > You can find the failure logs in *.log.1.xz files in > * https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gcc_check--master-arm-build/3580/artifact/ar… > The full lists of regressions and improvements as well as configure and make commands are in > * https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gcc_check--master-arm-build/3580/artifact/ar… > The list of [ignored] baseline and flaky failures are in > * https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gcc_check--master-arm-build/3580/artifact/ar… > > Current build : https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gcc_check--master-arm-build/3580/artifact/ar… > Reference build : https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gcc_check--master-arm-build/3579/artifact/ar… > > Instruction to reproduce the build : https://git-us.linaro.org/toolchain/ci/interesting-commits.git/plain/gcc/sh… > > Full commit : https://gcc.gnu.org/git/?p=gcc.git;a=commitdiff;h=1d2257dc850d088f6d9267b46…

1 month

[Linaro-TCWG-CI] gcc-15-8650-g94fa9f4d27b: 6 regressions on arm

by Paul Richard Thomas

Hello there, You had previously warned me of the problem with the pre-commit patch, from which I was able to identify the problem. Unfortunately, I screwed up by only correcting the cast of 'dim' in three out of four places. Hans-Peter Nilsson has put it right and I believe that the regression will disappear. Thanks for your help on this. Paul

1 month

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

linaro-toolchain March 2025