Dear contributor,
Our automatic CI has detected problems related to your patch(es). Please find some details below.
In master-arm, after:
| commit glibc-2.42.9000-338-g324084649b2
| Author: DJ Delorie <dj(a)redhat.com>
| Date: Wed Oct 15 21:37:56 2025 -0400
|
| sprof: check pread size and offset for overflow
|
| Add a bit of descriptive paranoia to the values we read from
| the ELF headers and use to access data.
|
| ... 1 lines of the commit log omitted.
Produces Failure:
| Results changed to
| # reset_artifacts:
| -10
| # true:
| 0
| # build_abe binutils:
| 1
| # build_abe gcc:
| 2
| # build_abe linux:
| 4
| # build_abe glibc:
| # FAILED
| # build_abe gdb:
| # First few build errors in logs:
| # 00:03:33 sprof.c:573:16: error: format ‘%zd’ expects argument of type ‘signed size_t’, but argument 5 has type ‘off_t’ {aka ‘long long int’} [-Werror=format=]
| # 00:03:33 sprof.c:573:16: error: format ‘%zu’ expects argument of type ‘size_t’, but argument 6 has type ‘__off64_t’ {aka ‘long long int’} [-Werror=format=]
| # 00:03:33 sprof.c:573:16: error: format ‘%zd’ expects argument of type ‘signed size_t’, but argument 5 has type ‘off_t’ {aka ‘long long int’} [-Werror=format=]
| # 00:03:33 sprof.c:573:16: error: format ‘%zu’ expects argument of type ‘size_t’, but argument 6 has type ‘__off64_t’ {aka ‘long long int’} [-Werror=format=]
| # 00:03:33 sprof.c:573:16: error: format ‘%zd’ expects argument of type ‘signed size_t’, but argument 5 has type ‘off_t’ {aka ‘long long int’} [-Werror=format=]
| # 00:03:33 sprof.c:573:16: error: format ‘%zu’ expects argument of type ‘size_t’, but argument 6 has type ‘__off64_t’ {aka ‘long long int’} [-Werror=format=]
| # 00:03:33 sprof.c:573:16: error: format ‘%zd’ expects argument of type ‘signed size_t’, but argument 5 has type ‘off_t’ {aka ‘long long int’} [-Werror=format=]
| # 00:03:33 sprof.c:573:16: error: format ‘%zu’ expects argument of type ‘size_t’, but argument 6 has type ‘__off64_t’ {aka ‘long long int’} [-Werror=format=]
| # 00:03:33 sprof.c:573:16: error: format ‘%zd’ expects argument of type ‘signed size_t’, but argument 5 has type ‘off_t’ {aka ‘long long int’} [-Werror=format=]
| # 00:03:33 sprof.c:573:16: error: format ‘%zu’ expects argument of type ‘size_t’, but argument 6 has type ‘__off64_t’ {aka ‘long long int’} [-Werror=format=]
|
| From
| # reset_artifacts:
| -10
| # true:
| 0
| # build_abe binutils:
| 1
| # build_abe gcc:
| 2
| # build_abe linux:
| 4
| # build_abe glibc:
| 5
| # build_abe gdb:
| 6
Used configuration :
*CI config* tcwg_gnu_native_build master-arm
*configure and test flags:* none, autodetected on armv8l-unknown-linux-gnueabihf
We track this bug report under https://linaro.atlassian.net/browse/GNU-1709. Please let us know if you have a fix.
If you have any questions regarding this report, please ask on linaro-toolchain(a)lists.linaro.org mailing list.
-----------------8<--------------------------8<--------------------------8<--------------------------
The information below contains the details of the failures, and the ways to reproduce a debug environment:
You can find the failure logs in
* https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gnu_native_build--master-arm-build/1226/arti…
The full lists of regressions and improvements as well as configure and make commands are in
* https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gnu_native_build--master-arm-build/1226/arti…
Current build : https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gnu_native_build--master-arm-build/1226/arti…
Reference build : https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gnu_native_build--master-arm-build/1225/arti…
Instruction to reproduce the build : https://gitlab.com/LinaroLtd/tcwg/ci/interesting-commits/-/raw/master/glibc…
Full commit : https://sourceware.org/git/?p=glibc.git;a=commitdiff;h=324084649b2da2f6840e…
Hi,
These errors are probably caused by incorrect test programs. Please ignore the mail. We'll update the tests.
I apologize for the false detection.
> Dear contributor,
>
> Our automatic CI has detected problems related to your patch(es). Please find some details below.
>
> In tcwg_flang_test/main-aarch64-Ofast-sve_vls-lto-lld, after:
> | commit llvmorg-22-init-11449-ga6181dc84b79
> | Author: Peter Klausler <pklausler(a)nvidia.com>
> | Date: Thu Oct 16 12:20:53 2025 -0700
> |
> | [flang] Refine checks for NULL() in expressions (#163655)
> |
> | Fix a false positive "NULL can't be an operand here" error message
> | arising in a defined generic interface for an intrinsic operator (==)
> | with multiple spellings.
> | ... 2 lines of the commit log omitted.
>
> Produces 3 regressions:
> |
> | regressions.sum:
> | Running test-suite:Fujitsu/Fortran/0573 ...
> | NOEXE: test-suite :: Fujitsu/Fortran/0573/Fujitsu-Fortran-0573_0001.test
> | NOEXE: test-suite :: Fujitsu/Fortran/0573/Fujitsu-Fortran-0573_0002.test
> | NOEXE: test-suite :: Fujitsu/Fortran/0573/Fujitsu-Fortran-0573_0009.test
> | # "NOEXE" means : the test program cannot be compiled
>
> Used configuration :
> * Toolchain : cmake -G Ninja ../llvm/llvm "-DLLVM_ENABLE_PROJECTS=clang;lld;flang;clang-tools-extra" "-DLLVM_ENABLE_RUNTIMES=openmp" -DCMAKE_BUILD_TYPE=Release -DLLVM_ENABLE_ASSERTIONS=True -DCMAKE_INSTALL_PREFIX=../llvm-install "-DLLVM_TARGETS_TO_BUILD=AArch64" -DCLANG_DEFAULT_LINKER=lld
> * Testsuite : export LD_LIBRARY_PATH=$\WORKSPACE/llvm-install/lib/aarch64-unknown-linux-gnu$\{LD_LIBRARY_PATH:+:$\LD_LIBRARY_PATH}
> cmake -GNinja -DCMAKE_C_COMPILER="$\WORKSPACE/llvm-install/bin2/clang" -DCMAKE_CXX_COMPILER="$\WORKSPACE/llvm-install/bin2/clang++" -DCMAKE_Fortran_COMPILER="$\WORKSPACE/llvm-install/bin2/flang-new" -DCMAKE_BUILD_TYPE=Release -DCMAKE_C_FLAGS= -DCMAKE_CXX_FLAGS= -DCMAKE_Fortran_FLAGS= -DCMAKE_C_FLAGS_RELEASE="-O3 -ffast-math -march=armv8.4-a+sve -msve-vector-bits=256 -flto -fuse-ld=lld -DNDEBUG" -DCMAKE_CXX_FLAGS_RELEASE="-O3 -ffast-math -march=armv8.4-a+sve -msve-vector-bits=256 -flto -fuse-ld=lld -DNDEBUG" -DCMAKE_Fortran_FLAGS_RELEASE="-O3 -ffast-math -march=armv8.4-a+sve -msve-vector-bits=256 -flto -fuse-ld=lld -DNDEBUG" -DTEST_SUITE_FORTRAN=ON -DTEST_SUITE_SUBDIRS=Fujitsu -DTEST_SUITE_FUJITSU_WITH_FAST_MATH=ON "$\WORKSPACE/test/test-suite"
>
> We track this bug report under https://linaro.atlassian.net/browse/LLVM-2097. Please let us know if you have a fix.
>
> If you have any questions regarding this report, please ask on linaro-toolchain(a)lists.linaro.org mailing list.
>
> -----------------8<--------------------------8<--------------------------8<--------------------------
>
> The information below contains the details of the failures, and the ways to reproduce a debug environment:
>
> You can find the failure logs in *.log.1.xz files in
> * https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_flang_test--main-aarch64-Ofast-sve_vls-lto-l…
> The full lists of regressions and improvements as well as configure and make commands are in
> * https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_flang_test--main-aarch64-Ofast-sve_vls-lto-l…
> The list of [ignored] baseline and flaky failures are in
> * https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_flang_test--main-aarch64-Ofast-sve_vls-lto-l…
>
> Fujitsu testsuite : https://github.com/fujitsu/compiler-test-suite/
>
> Current build : https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_flang_test--main-aarch64-Ofast-sve_vls-lto-l…
> Reference build : https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_flang_test--main-aarch64-Ofast-sve_vls-lto-l…
>
> Instruction to reproduce the build : https://gitlab.com/LinaroLtd/tcwg/ci/interesting-commits/-/raw/master/llvm/…
>
> Full commit : https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/a6181dc84b79dd368c7a43ef4f6f164…