linaro-toolchain August 2024

linaro-toolchain@lists.linaro.org

9 participants
9 discussions

Re: [Linaro-TCWG-CI] gcc-15-3083-gbcb33b12370: FAIL: 1 regressions on master-thumb_m0_soft_eabi

by Bernd Edlinger

Hi, Can you check if this patch fixes the regressions? https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2024-August/661245.html Thanks Bernd. On 8/23/24 01:57, ci_notify(a)linaro.org wrote: > Dear contributor, our automatic CI has detected problems related to your patch(es). Please find some details below. If you have any questions, please follow up on linaro-toolchain(a)lists.linaro.org mailing list, Libera's #linaro-tcwg channel, or ping your favourite Linaro toolchain developer on the usual project channel. > > We appreciate that it might be difficult to find the necessary logs or reproduce the issue locally. If you can't get what you need from our CI within minutes, let us know and we will be happy to help. > > We track this report status in https://linaro.atlassian.net/browse/GNU-1318 , please let us know if you are looking at the problem and/or when you have a fix. > > In arm-eabi cortex-m0 soft after: > > | commit gcc-15-3083-gbcb33b12370 > | Author: Bernd Edlinger <bernd.edlinger(a)hotmail.de> > | Date: Fri Aug 16 12:26:27 2024 +0200 > | > | Do not emit a redundant DW_TAG_lexical_block for inlined subroutines > | > | While this already works correctly for the case when an inlined > | subroutine contains only one subrange, a redundant DW_TAG_lexical_block > | is still emitted when the subroutine has multiple blocks. > | > | Fixes: ac02e5b75451 ("re PR debug/37801 (DWARF output for inlined functions > | ... 11 lines of the commit log omitted. > > FAIL: 1 regressions > > regressions.sum: > === gcc tests === > > Running gcc:gcc.dg/debug/dwarf2/dwarf2.exp ... > FAIL: gcc.dg/debug/dwarf2/inline7.c scan-assembler-times DW_AT_ranges 2 > > > You can find the failure logs in *.log.1.xz files in > - https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gnu_embed_check_gcc--master-thumb_m0_soft_ea… > The full lists of regressions and improvements as well as configure and make commands are in > - https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gnu_embed_check_gcc--master-thumb_m0_soft_ea… > The list of [ignored] baseline and flaky failures are in > - https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gnu_embed_check_gcc--master-thumb_m0_soft_ea… > > The configuration of this build is: > CI config tcwg_gnu_embed_check_gcc arm-eabi -mthumb -march=armv6s-m -mtune=cortex-m0 -mfloat-abi=soft -mfpu=auto > > -----------------8<--------------------------8<--------------------------8<-------------------------- > The information below can be used to reproduce a debug environment: > > Current build : https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gnu_embed_check_gcc--master-thumb_m0_soft_ea… > Reference build : https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gnu_embed_check_gcc--master-thumb_m0_soft_ea… > > Reproduce last good and first bad builds: https://git-us.linaro.org/toolchain/ci/interesting-commits.git/plain/gcc/sh… > > Full commit : https://github.com/gcc-mirror/gcc/commit/bcb33b1237042e9540a905d9de19219f87… > > List of configurations that regressed due to this commit : > * tcwg_gnu_embed_check_gcc > ** master-thumb_m0_soft_eabi > *** FAIL: 1 regressions > *** https://git-us.linaro.org/toolchain/ci/interesting-commits.git/plain/gcc/sh… > *** https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gnu_embed_check_gcc--master-thumb_m0_soft_ea…

1 month, 3 weeks

RE: [Linaro-TCWG-CI] gcc-15-3087-gb07f8a30115: FAIL: 2 regressions on aarch64

by Andrew Pinski (QUIC)

> -----Original Message----- > From: ci_notify(a)linaro.org <ci_notify(a)linaro.org> > Sent: Thursday, August 22, 2024 10:30 AM > To: rguenth(a)gcc.gnu.org > Cc: gcc-regression(a)gcc.gnu.org; Andrew Pinski (QUIC) > <quic_apinski(a)quicinc.com> > Subject: [Linaro-TCWG-CI] gcc-15-3087-gb07f8a30115: FAIL: 2 > regressions on aarch64 > > Dear contributor, our automatic CI has detected problems > related to your patch(es). Please find some details below. If > you have any questions, please follow up on linaro- > toolchain(a)lists.linaro.org mailing list, Libera's #linaro-tcwg > channel, or ping your favourite Linaro toolchain developer on > the usual project channel. > > We appreciate that it might be difficult to find the necessary > logs or reproduce the issue locally. If you can't get what you > need from our CI within minutes, let us know and we will be > happy to help. > > We track this report status in > https://linaro.atlassian.net/browse/GNU-1317 , please let us > know if you are looking at the problem and/or when you have > a fix. I have filed https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116463 for the failure (which was a missed optimization even before the patch; the detection of vector complex multiply is very sensitive in changes to the IR differences). Thanks, Andrew Pinski > > In gcc_check master-aarch64 after: > > | commit gcc-15-3087-gb07f8a30115 > | Author: Andrew Pinski <quic_apinski(a)quicinc.com> > | Date: Wed Aug 21 17:41:38 2024 -0700 > | > | fold: Fix `a * 1j` if a has side effects [PR116454] > | > | The problem here was a missing save_expr around arg0 > since > | it is used twice, once in REALPART_EXPR and once in > IMAGPART_EXPR. > | Thia adds the save_expr and reformats the code slightly > so it is a > | little easier to understand. It excludes the case when arg0 > is > | a COMPLEX_EXPR since in that case we'll end up with the > distinct > | ... 19 lines of the commit log omitted. > > FAIL: 2 regressions > > regressions.sum: > === gcc tests === > > Running gcc:gcc.dg/vect/complex/complex.exp ... > FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/complex/fast-math-complex-mls-double.c > scan-tree-dump vect "Found COMPLEX_FMA" > FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/complex/fast-math-complex-mls-float.c > scan-tree-dump vect "Found COMPLEX_FMA" > > > You can find the failure logs in *.log.1.xz files in > - https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gcc_check--master-aarch64- > build/2486/artifact/artifacts/00-sumfiles/ > The full lists of regressions and improvements as well as > configure and make commands are in > - https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gcc_check--master-aarch64- > build/2486/artifact/artifacts/notify/ > The list of [ignored] baseline and flaky failures are in > - https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gcc_check--master-aarch64- > build/2486/artifact/artifacts/sumfiles/xfails.xfail > > The configuration of this build is: > CI config tcwg_gcc_check master-aarch64 > > -----------------8<--------------------------8<--------------------------8<--- > ----------------------- > The information below can be used to reproduce a debug > environment: > > Current build : https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gcc_check-- > master-aarch64-build/2486/artifact/artifacts > Reference build : https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gcc_check-- > master-aarch64-build/2485/artifact/artifacts > > Reproduce last good and first bad builds: https://git- > us.linaro.org/toolchain/ci/interesting- > commits.git/plain/gcc/sha1/b07f8a301158e53717b8688cc8ea > 430b6f02574c/tcwg_gcc_check/master- > aarch64/reproduction_instructions.txt > > Full commit : https://github.com/gcc- > mirror/gcc/commit/b07f8a301158e53717b8688cc8ea430b6f0 > 2574c > > List of configurations that regressed due to this commit : > * tcwg_gcc_check > ** master-aarch64 > *** FAIL: 2 regressions > *** https://git-us.linaro.org/toolchain/ci/interesting- > commits.git/plain/gcc/sha1/b07f8a301158e53717b8688cc8ea > 430b6f02574c/tcwg_gcc_check/master-aarch64/details.txt > *** https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gcc_check--master- > aarch64-build/2486/artifact/artifacts

1 month, 3 weeks

RE: [Linaro-TCWG-CI] gcc-15-2986-gcd2f394418b: Failure on aarch64

by Andrew Pinski (QUIC)

This is already recorded as https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116409 . I am about to submit a v2 of the patch to fix this too. > -----Original Message----- > From: ci_notify(a)linaro.org <ci_notify(a)linaro.org> > Sent: Tuesday, August 20, 2024 8:34 AM > To: Andrew Pinski (QUIC) <quic_apinski(a)quicinc.com> > Cc: gcc-regression(a)gcc.gnu.org > Subject: [Linaro-TCWG-CI] gcc-15-2986-gcd2f394418b: Failure > on aarch64 > > Dear contributor, our automatic CI has detected problems > related to your patch(es). Please find some details below. If > you have any questions, please follow up on linaro- > toolchain(a)lists.linaro.org mailing list, Libera's #linaro-tcwg > channel, or ping your favourite Linaro toolchain developer on > the usual project channel. > > We appreciate that it might be difficult to find the necessary > logs or reproduce the issue locally. If you can't get what you > need from our CI within minutes, let us know and we will be > happy to help. > > We track this report status in > https://linaro.atlassian.net/browse/GNU-1316 , please let us > know if you are looking at the problem and/or when you have > a fix. > > In master-aarch64 after: > > | commit gcc-15-2986-gcd2f394418b > | Author: Andrew Pinski <quic_apinski(a)quicinc.com> > | Date: Sat Apr 20 00:13:12 2024 -0700 > | > | PHIOPT: move factor_out_conditional_operation over to > use gimple_match_op > | > | To start working on more with expressions with more > than one operand, converting > | over to use gimple_match_op is needed. > | The added side-effect here is > factor_out_conditional_operation can now support > | builtins/internal calls that has one operand without any > extra code added. > | > | ... 20 lines of the commit log omitted. > > Results changed to > # reset_artifacts: > -10 > # true: > 0 > # build_abe binutils: > 1 > # build_abe gcc: > 2 > # build_abe linux: > 4 > # build_abe glibc: > # FAILED > # build_abe gdb: > # First few build errors in logs: > # 00:02:13 ../sysdeps/ieee754/dbl-64/e_hypot.c:146:1: > internal compiler error: in factor_out_conditional_operation, > at tree-ssa-phiopt.cc:407 # 00:02:13 make[2]: *** > [/home/tcwg- > buildslave/workspace/tcwg_gnu_2/abe/builds/aarch64- > unknown-linux-gnu/aarch64-unknown-linux-gnu/glibc- > glibc.git~master/sysd-rules:553: /home/tcwg- > buildslave/workspace/tcwg_gnu_2/abe/builds/aarch64- > unknown-linux-gnu/aarch64-unknown-linux-gnu/glibc- > glibc.git~master/math/e_hypot.o] Error 1 # 00:02:13 make[1]: > *** [Makefile:484: math/others] Error 2 # 00:02:13 make: *** > [Makefile:9: all] Error 2 > > From > # reset_artifacts: > -10 > # true: > 0 > # build_abe binutils: > 1 > # build_abe gcc: > 2 > # build_abe linux: > 4 > # build_abe glibc: > 5 > # build_abe gdb: > 6 > > The configuration of this build is: > CI config tcwg_gnu_native_build master-aarch64 > > -----------------8<--------------------------8<--------------------------8<--- > ----------------------- > The information below can be used to reproduce a debug > environment: > > Current build : > https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gnu_native_build--master- > aarch64-build/747/artifact/artifacts > Reference build : > https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gnu_native_build--master- > aarch64-build/746/artifact/artifacts > > Reproduce last good and first bad builds: https://git- > us.linaro.org/toolchain/ci/interesting- > commits.git/plain/gcc/sha1/cd2f394418be0cc15d05c97ed725 > 67f2f5e15172/tcwg_gnu_native_build/master- > aarch64/reproduction_instructions.txt > > Full commit : https://github.com/gcc- > mirror/gcc/commit/cd2f394418be0cc15d05c97ed72567f2f5e1 > 5172 > > List of configurations that regressed due to this commit : > * tcwg_gnu_native_build > ** master-aarch64 > *** Failure > *** https://git-us.linaro.org/toolchain/ci/interesting- > commits.git/plain/gcc/sha1/cd2f394418be0cc15d05c97ed725 > 67f2f5e15172/tcwg_gnu_native_build/master- > aarch64/details.txt > *** https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gnu_native_build--master- > aarch64-build/747/artifact/artifacts

1 month, 4 weeks

Fwd: ☠ Buildbot (LLVM Buildbot): clang-aarch64-sve-vls-2stage - failed test (failure) (main)

by David Blaikie

---------- Forwarded message --------- From: David Blaikie <dblaikie(a)gmail.com> Date: Thu, Jul 25, 2024 at 6:43 PM Subject: Re: ☠ Buildbot (LLVM Buildbot): clang-aarch64-sve-vls-2stage - failed test (failure) (main) To: <llvm.buildmaster(a)lab.llvm.org> Cc: <llvm.buildmaster(a)lab.llvm.org> This bot seems to be sending fail-mail when it's already red. My understanding was that fail mail only went out on green->red transitions. Is that understanding incorrect? Should this be reconfigured to match that understanding/not send fail mail when it's already red? On Thu, Jul 25, 2024 at 4:10 PM <llvm.buildmaster(a)lab.llvm.org> wrote: > The Buildbot has detected a failed build on builder > clang-aarch64-sve-vls-2stage while building clang. > > Full details are available at: > https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/4/builds/943 > > Worker for this Build: linaro-g3-02 > Blamelist: > David Blaikie <dblaikie(a)gmail.com> > > BUILD FAILED: failed test (failure) > > Step 18 (test-suite) failure: test (failure) > ... > [ 24%] Built target > gfortran-regression-execute-regression__internal_readwrite_1_f90 > cd > /home/tcwg-buildbot/worker/clang-aarch64-sve-vls-2stage/test/sandbox/build/Fortran/gfortran/regression > && > /home/tcwg-buildbot/worker/clang-aarch64-sve-vls-2stage/stage2.install/bin/llvm-size > --format=sysv > /home/tcwg-buildbot/worker/clang-aarch64-sve-vls-2stage/test/sandbox/build/Fortran/gfortran/regression/gfortran-regression-execute-regression__internal_readwrite_4_f90 > > > /home/tcwg-buildbot/worker/clang-aarch64-sve-vls-2stage/test/sandbox/build/Fortran/gfortran/regression/gfortran-regression-execute-regression__internal_readwrite_4_f90.size > make[2]: Leaving directory > '/home/tcwg-buildbot/worker/clang-aarch64-sve-vls-2stage/test/sandbox/build' > [ 24%] Built target > gfortran-regression-execute-regression__internal_readwrite_4_f90 > make[1]: Leaving directory > '/home/tcwg-buildbot/worker/clang-aarch64-sve-vls-2stage/test/sandbox/build' > make: *** [Makefile:136: all] Error 2 > 2024-07-25 23:09:27 INFO: Testing... > 2024-07-25 23:09:27 INFO: Execute: > /home/tcwg-buildbot/worker/clang-aarch64-sve-vls-2stage/stage1/bin/llvm-lit > -v -j 32 > /home/tcwg-buildbot/worker/clang-aarch64-sve-vls-2stage/test/sandbox/build > -o > /home/tcwg-buildbot/worker/clang-aarch64-sve-vls-2stage/test/sandbox/build/outputqee5waec.json > -- Testing: 9770 tests, 32 workers -- > NOEXE: test-suite :: Bitcode/simd_ops/simd_ops_test_op_abs_1026.test (1 of > 9770) > ******************** TEST 'test-suite :: > Bitcode/simd_ops/simd_ops_test_op_abs_1026.test' FAILED ******************** > Executable > '/home/tcwg-buildbot/worker/clang-aarch64-sve-vls-2stage/test/sandbox/build/Bitcode/simd_ops/simd_ops_test_op_abs_1026' > is missing > ******************** > NOEXE: test-suite :: Bitcode/simd_ops/simd_ops_test_op_abs_1028.test (2 of > 9770) > ******************** TEST 'test-suite :: > Bitcode/simd_ops/simd_ops_test_op_abs_1028.test' FAILED ******************** > Executable > '/home/tcwg-buildbot/worker/clang-aarch64-sve-vls-2stage/test/sandbox/build/Bitcode/simd_ops/simd_ops_test_op_abs_1028' > is missing > ******************** > NOEXE: test-suite :: Bitcode/simd_ops/simd_ops_test_op_abs_367.test (3 of > 9770) > ******************** TEST 'test-suite :: > Bitcode/simd_ops/simd_ops_test_op_abs_367.test' FAILED ******************** > Executable > '/home/tcwg-buildbot/worker/clang-aarch64-sve-vls-2stage/test/sandbox/build/Bitcode/simd_ops/simd_ops_test_op_abs_367' > is missing > ******************** > NOEXE: test-suite :: Bitcode/simd_ops/simd_ops_test_op_abs_40.test (4 of > 9770) > ******************** TEST 'test-suite :: > Bitcode/simd_ops/simd_ops_test_op_abs_40.test' FAILED ******************** > Executable > '/home/tcwg-buildbot/worker/clang-aarch64-sve-vls-2stage/test/sandbox/build/Bitcode/simd_ops/simd_ops_test_op_abs_40' > is missing > ******************** > NOEXE: test-suite :: Bitcode/simd_ops/simd_ops_test_op_abs_366.test (5 of > 9770) > ******************** TEST 'test-suite :: > Bitcode/simd_ops/simd_ops_test_op_abs_366.test' FAILED ******************** > Executable > '/home/tcwg-buildbot/worker/clang-aarch64-sve-vls-2stage/test/sandbox/build/Bitcode/simd_ops/simd_ops_test_op_abs_366' > is missing > ******************** > NOEXE: test-suite :: Bitcode/simd_ops/simd_ops_test_op_add_1030.test (6 of > 9770) > ******************** TEST 'test-suite :: > Bitcode/simd_ops/simd_ops_test_op_add_1030.test' FAILED ******************** > Executable > '/home/tcwg-buildbot/worker/clang-aarch64-sve-vls-2stage/test/sandbox/build/Bitcode/simd_ops/simd_ops_test_op_add_1030' > is missing > ******************** > NOEXE: test-suite :: Bitcode/simd_ops/simd_ops_test_op_abs_699.test (7 of > 9770) > ******************** TEST 'test-suite :: > Bitcode/simd_ops/simd_ops_test_op_abs_699.test' FAILED ******************** > Executable > '/home/tcwg-buildbot/worker/clang-aarch64-sve-vls-2stage/test/sandbox/build/Bitcode/simd_ops/simd_ops_test_op_abs_699' > is missing > ******************** > NOEXE: test-suite :: Bitcode/simd_ops/simd_ops_test_op_abs_368.test (8 of > 9770) > ******************** TEST 'test-suite :: > Bitcode/simd_ops/simd_ops_test_op_abs_368.test' FAILED ******************** > Executable > '/home/tcwg-buildbot/worker/clang-aarch64-sve-vls-2stage/test/sandbox/build/Bitcode/simd_ops/simd_ops_test_op_abs_368' > is missing > ******************** > NOEXE: test-suite :: Bitcode/simd_ops/simd_ops_test_op_add_1031.test (9 of > 9770) > ******************** TEST 'test-suite :: > Bitcode/simd_ops/simd_ops_test_op_add_1031.test' FAILED ******************** > Executable > '/home/tcwg-buildbot/worker/clang-aarch64-sve-vls-2stage/test/sandbox/build/Bitcode/simd_ops/simd_ops_test_op_add_1031' > is missing > ******************** > NOEXE: test-suite :: Bitcode/simd_ops/simd_ops_test_op_abs_39.test (10 of > 9770) > ******************** TEST 'test-suite :: > Bitcode/simd_ops/simd_ops_test_op_abs_39.test' FAILED ******************** > Executable > '/home/tcwg-buildbot/worker/clang-aarch64-sve-vls-2stage/test/sandbox/build/Bitcode/simd_ops/simd_ops_test_op_abs_39' > is missing > ******************** > > Sincerely, > LLVM Buildbot > >

2 months, 1 week

[Linaro-TCWG-CI] binutils-2_41-release-3996-g6ae8a30d44f: Failure on aarch64

by ci_notify＠linaro.org

Dear contributor, our automatic CI has detected problems related to your patch(es). Please find some details below. If you have any questions, please follow up on linaro-toolchain(a)lists.linaro.org mailing list, Libera's #linaro-tcwg channel, or ping your favourite Linaro toolchain developer on the usual project channel. We appreciate that it might be difficult to find the necessary logs or reproduce the issue locally. If you can't get what you need from our CI within minutes, let us know and we will be happy to help. We track this report status in https://linaro.atlassian.net/browse/GNU-1312 , please let us know if you are looking at the problem and/or when you have a fix. In CI config tcwg_kernel/gnu-master-aarch64-lts-defconfig after: | commit binutils-2_41-release-3996-g6ae8a30d44f | Author: Jan Beulich <jbeulich(a)suse.com> | Date: Fri Aug 9 11:59:31 2024 +0200 | | gas: have scrubber retain more whitespace | | According to the description of the state machine, the expectation | appears to be that (leaving aside labels) any insn mnemonic or | directive would be followed by a comma separated list of operands. That | may have been true very long ago, but the latest with the advent of more | elaborate macros this isn't rhe case anymore. Neither macro parameters | ... 26 lines of the commit log omitted. Results changed to # reset_artifacts: -10 # build_abe binutils: -9 # build_abe stage1: -5 # build_abe qemu: -2 # linux_n_obj: 8104 From # reset_artifacts: -10 # build_abe binutils: -9 # build_abe stage1: -5 # build_abe qemu: -2 # linux_n_obj: 9328 # linux build successful: all # linux boot successful: boot The configuration of this build is: CI config tcwg_kernel/gnu-master-aarch64-lts-defconfig -----------------8<--------------------------8<--------------------------8<-------------------------- The information below can be used to reproduce a debug environment: Current build : https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_kernel--gnu-master-aarch64-lts-defconfig-bui… Reference build : https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_kernel--gnu-master-aarch64-lts-defconfig-bui… Reproduce last good and first bad builds: https://git-us.linaro.org/toolchain/ci/interesting-commits.git/plain/binuti… Full commit : https://sourceware.org/git/?p=binutils-gdb.git;a=commitdiff;h=6ae8a30d44f01… List of configurations that regressed due to this commit : * tcwg_kernel ** gnu-master-aarch64-lts-defconfig *** Failure *** https://git-us.linaro.org/toolchain/ci/interesting-commits.git/plain/binuti… *** https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_kernel--gnu-master-aarch64-lts-defconfig-bui…

2 months, 1 week

[Linaro-TCWG-CI] glibc-2.40.9000-60-g07972839108: FAIL: 18 regressions on arm

by ci_notify＠linaro.org

Dear contributor, our automatic CI has detected problems related to your patch(es). Please find some details below. If you have any questions, please follow up on linaro-toolchain(a)lists.linaro.org mailing list, Libera's #linaro-tcwg channel, or ping your favourite Linaro toolchain developer on the usual project channel. We appreciate that it might be difficult to find the necessary logs or reproduce the issue locally. If you can't get what you need from our CI within minutes, let us know and we will be happy to help. We track this report status in https://linaro.atlassian.net/browse/GNU-1309 , please let us know if you are looking at the problem and/or when you have a fix. In master-arm after: | commit glibc-2.40.9000-60-g07972839108 | Author: Paul Zimmermann <Paul.Zimmermann(a)inria.fr> | Date: Thu Jul 25 16:38:08 2024 +0200 | | added inputs giving large errors on x86_64 for new C23 functions | | These functions are exp10m1, exp2m1, log10p1, log2p1. | Also regenerated ulps on x86_64. | | For each format, there are 4 values, one for each rounding mode. | (For the intel96 format, there are 8 values, 4 for Intel hardware, | ... 3 lines of the commit log omitted. FAIL: 18 regressions regressions.sum: === glibc tests === Running glibc:math ... FAIL: math/test-double-exp10m1 FAIL: math/test-double-exp2m1 FAIL: math/test-double-log10p1 FAIL: math/test-float-exp10m1 FAIL: math/test-float-exp2m1 FAIL: math/test-float-log10p1 FAIL: math/test-float32-exp10m1 ... and 12 more entries You can find the failure logs in *.log.1.xz files in - https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gnu_native_check_glibc--master-arm-build/799… The full lists of regressions and improvements as well as configure and make commands are in - https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gnu_native_check_glibc--master-arm-build/799… The list of [ignored] baseline and flaky failures are in - https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gnu_native_check_glibc--master-arm-build/799… The configuration of this build is: CI config tcwg_gnu_native_check_glibc master-arm -----------------8<--------------------------8<--------------------------8<-------------------------- The information below can be used to reproduce a debug environment: Current build : https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gnu_native_check_glibc--master-arm-build/799… Reference build : https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gnu_native_check_glibc--master-arm-build/797… Reproduce last good and first bad builds: https://git-us.linaro.org/toolchain/ci/interesting-commits.git/plain/glibc/… Full commit : https://sourceware.org/git/?p=glibc.git;a=commitdiff;h=07972839108495245d8b… List of configurations that regressed due to this commit : * tcwg_gnu_native_check_glibc ** master-arm *** FAIL: 18 regressions *** https://git-us.linaro.org/toolchain/ci/interesting-commits.git/plain/glibc/… *** https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gnu_native_check_glibc--master-arm-build/799…

2 months, 1 week

Re: [Linaro-TCWG-CI] llvmorg-20-init-1360-ga42e515e3a9f: Failure on aarch64

by Maxim Kuvyrkov

Hi Julian, Your patch below breaks Flang build [on aarch64]. Would you please investigate? The interesting log is at https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_flang_build--main-aarch64-build/174/artifact… . Thanks! -- Maxim Kuvyrkov https://www.linaro.org > On Aug 5, 2024, at 16:56, ci_notify(a)linaro.org wrote: > > Dear contributor, our automatic CI has detected problems related to your patch(es). Please find some details below. If you have any questions, please follow up on linaro-toolchain(a)lists.linaro.org mailing list, Libera's #linaro-tcwg channel, or ping your favourite Linaro toolchain developer on the usual project channel. > > We appreciate that it might be difficult to find the necessary logs or reproduce the issue locally. If you can't get what you need from our CI within minutes, let us know and we will be happy to help. > > We track this report status in https://linaro.atlassian.net/browse/LLVM-1306 , please let us know if you are looking at the problem and/or when you have a fix. > > In CI config tcwg_flang_build/main-aarch64 after: > > | commit llvmorg-20-init-1360-ga42e515e3a9f > | Author: Julian Brown <julian.brown(a)amd.com> > | Date: Mon Aug 5 12:37:07 2024 +0100 > | > | [OpenMP] OpenMP 5.1 "assume" directive parsing support (#92731) > | > | This is a minimal patch to support parsing for "omp assume" directives. > | These are meant to be hints to a compiler's optimisers: as such, it is > | legitimate (if not very useful) to ignore them. The patch builds on top > | of the existing support for "omp assumes" directives (note spelling!). > | > | ... 8 lines of the commit log omitted. > > Results changed to > # reset_artifacts: > -10 > # true: > 0 > # build_llvm -- clang;lld;flang;openmp;clang-tools-extra : > # FAILED > > From > # reset_artifacts: > -10 > # true: > 0 > # build_llvm -- clang;lld;flang;openmp;clang-tools-extra : > 1 > > The configuration of this build is: > CI config tcwg_flang_build/main-aarch64 > > -----------------8<--------------------------8<--------------------------8<-------------------------- > The information below can be used to reproduce a debug environment: > > Current build : https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_flang_build--main-aarch64-build/174/artifact… > Reference build : https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_flang_build--main-aarch64-build/172/artifact… > > Reproduce last good and first bad builds: https://git-us.linaro.org/toolchain/ci/interesting-commits.git/plain/llvm/s… > > Full commit : https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/a42e515e3a9f3bb4e44389c097b8910… > > List of configurations that regressed due to this commit : > * tcwg_flang_build > ** main-aarch64 > *** Failure > *** https://git-us.linaro.org/toolchain/ci/interesting-commits.git/plain/llvm/s… > *** https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_flang_build--main-aarch64-build/174/artifact…

2 months, 1 week

Re: [Linaro-TCWG-CI] gcc-15-2414-g2d105efd6f60: FAIL: 3 regressions on aarch64

by Sam James

ci_notify(a)linaro.org writes: > Dear contributor, our automatic CI has detected problems related to > your patch(es). Please find some details below. If you have any > questions, please follow up on linaro-toolchain(a)lists.linaro.org > mailing list, Libera's #linaro-tcwg channel, or ping your favourite > Linaro toolchain developer on the usual project channel. > > We appreciate that it might be difficult to find the necessary logs or > reproduce the issue locally. If you can't get what you need from our > CI within minutes, let us know and we will be happy to help. > > We track this report status in https://linaro.atlassian.net/browse/GNU-1305 , please let us know if you are looking at the problem and/or when you have a fix. > > In gcc_check master-aarch64 after: > > | commit gcc-15-2414-g2d105efd6f60 > | Author: Sam James <sam(a)gentoo.org> > | Date: Tue Jul 30 17:10:01 2024 +0100 > | > | testsuite: fix whitespace in dg-do assemble directive > | > | * gcc.target/aarch64/simd/vmmla.c: Fix whitespace in dg directive. > > FAIL: 3 regressions > > regressions.sum: > === gcc tests === > > Running gcc:gcc.target/aarch64/simd/simd.exp ... > UNRESOLVED: gcc.target/aarch64/simd/vmmla.c scan-assembler-times \\tsmmla\\tv[0-9]+.4s, v[0-9]+.16b, v[0-9]+.16b 1 > UNRESOLVED: gcc.target/aarch64/simd/vmmla.c scan-assembler-times \\tummla\\tv[0-9]+.4s, v[0-9]+.16b, v[0-9]+.16b 1 > UNRESOLVED: gcc.target/aarch64/simd/vmmla.c scan-assembler-times \\tusmmla\\tv[0-9]+.4s, v[0-9]+.16b, v[0-9]+.16b 1 > [...] Thanks. The test has been broken since it was added. Filed https://gcc.gnu.org/PR116207.

2 months, 2 weeks

Re: [Linaro-TCWG-CI] llvmorg-20-init-943-g366eade911b5: FAIL: 7 regressions: 7 improvements on aarch64

by Maxim Kuvyrkov

Hi Leandro, Our Flang CI is running in test mode, and it already catches regressions! > On Aug 1, 2024, at 01:27, ci_notify(a)linaro.org wrote: > > Dear contributor, our automatic CI has detected problems related to your patch(es). Please find some details below. If you have any questions, please follow up on linaro-toolchain(a)lists.linaro.org mailing list, Libera's #linaro-tcwg channel, or ping your favourite Linaro toolchain developer on the usual project channel. > > We appreciate that it might be difficult to find the necessary logs or reproduce the issue locally. If you can't get what you need from our CI within minutes, let us know and we will be happy to help. > > We track this report status in https://linaro.atlassian.net/browse/LLVM-1300 , please let us know if you are looking at the problem and/or when you have a fix. > > In CI config tcwg_flang_test/main-aarch64-Ofast-sve_vls-lto-lld after: > > | commit llvmorg-20-init-943-g366eade911b5 > | Author: Leandro Lupori <leandro.lupori(a)linaro.org> > | Date: Wed Jul 31 14:39:06 2024 -0300 > | > | [flang][OpenMP] Reland Fix copyprivate semantic checks (#95799) (#101009) > | > | There are some cases in which variables used in OpenMP constructs > | are predetermined as private. The semantic checks for copyprivate > | were not handling those cases. > | > | Besides that, shared symbols were not being properly represented > | ... 9 lines of the commit log omitted. > > FAIL: 7 regressions: 7 improvements > > regressions.sum: > === test-suite tests === > > Running test-suite:Fujitsu/Fortran/0141 ... > FAIL: test-suite :: Fujitsu/Fortran/0141/Fujitsu-Fortran-0141_0019.test This means that after your patch the test that could not compile before, now compiles, but fails to run correctly. This is an improvement. > > Running test-suite:Fujitsu/Fortran/0153 ... > NOEXE: test-suite :: Fujitsu/Fortran/0153/Fujitsu-Fortran-0153_0234.test > NOEXE: test-suite :: Fujitsu/Fortran/0153/Fujitsu-Fortran-0153_0235.test > NOEXE: test-suite :: Fujitsu/Fortran/0153/Fujitsu-Fortran-0153_0237.test These tests go the other way -- they used to fail at runtime before, but now they fail to compile. > > ... and 5 more entries > > improvements.sum: > === test-suite tests === > > Running test-suite:Fujitsu/Fortran/0141 ... > NOEXE: test-suite :: Fujitsu/Fortran/0141/Fujitsu-Fortran-0141_0019.test > > Running test-suite:Fujitsu/Fortran/0153 ... > FAIL: test-suite :: Fujitsu/Fortran/0153/Fujitsu-Fortran-0153_0237.test > FAIL: test-suite :: Fujitsu/Fortran/0153/Fujitsu-Fortran-0153_0234.test > FAIL: test-suite :: Fujitsu/Fortran/0153/Fujitsu-Fortran-0153_0235.test > > ... and 5 more entries Please investigate, and let me know if you need any help in reproducing or troubleshooting these. Thanks! -- Maxim Kuvyrkov https://www.linaro.org > > You can find the failure logs in *.log.1.xz files in > - https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_flang_test--main-aarch64-Ofast-sve_vls-lto-l… > The full lists of regressions and improvements as well as configure and make commands are in > - https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_flang_test--main-aarch64-Ofast-sve_vls-lto-l… > The list of [ignored] baseline and flaky failures are in > - https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_flang_test--main-aarch64-Ofast-sve_vls-lto-l… > > The configuration of this build is: > CI config tcwg_flang_test/main-aarch64-Ofast-sve_vls-lto-lld > > -----------------8<--------------------------8<--------------------------8<-------------------------- > The information below can be used to reproduce a debug environment: > > Current build : https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_flang_test--main-aarch64-Ofast-sve_vls-lto-l… > Reference build : https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_flang_test--main-aarch64-Ofast-sve_vls-lto-l… > > Reproduce last good and first bad builds: https://git-us.linaro.org/toolchain/ci/interesting-commits.git/plain/llvm/s… > > Full commit : https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/366eade911b54878c9cc1835d2544fb… > > List of configurations that regressed due to this commit : > * tcwg_flang_test > ** main-aarch64-Ofast-sve_vls-lto-lld > *** FAIL: 7 regressions: 7 improvements > *** https://git-us.linaro.org/toolchain/ci/interesting-commits.git/plain/llvm/s… > *** https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_flang_test--main-aarch64-Ofast-sve_vls-lto-l…

2 months, 2 weeks

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

linaro-toolchain August 2024