Hello,
We have been using Linaro GCC 7.5-2019.12 for the A53.
As we move on to new tech there seems to be no support for "-
mcpu=cortex-a55".
Today, we use the aarch64-elf- toolchain.
What GCC do you suggest we start using for A55 ?
Thanks,
Stefan
After llvm commit fbc0c308d599fe3300ab6516650b65b41979446d
Author: Nikita Popov <nikita.ppv(a)gmail.com>
[BasicAA] Handle known bits as ranges
the following benchmarks slowed down by more than 2%:
- 464.h264ref slowed down by 7% from 10899 to 11610 perf samples
- 464.h264ref:libc.so.6 slowed down by 11% from 3538 to 3922 perf samples
Below reproducer instructions can be used to re-build both "first_bad" and "last_good" cross-toolchains used in this bisection. Naturally, the scripts will fail when triggerring benchmarking jobs if you don't have access to Linaro TCWG CI.
For your convenience, we have uploaded tarballs with pre-processed source and assembly files at:
- First_bad save-temps: https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_bmk_ci_llvm-bisect-tcwg_bmk_tx1-llvm-master-…
- Last_good save-temps: https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_bmk_ci_llvm-bisect-tcwg_bmk_tx1-llvm-master-…
- Baseline save-temps: https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_bmk_ci_llvm-bisect-tcwg_bmk_tx1-llvm-master-…
Configuration:
- Benchmark: SPEC CPU2006
- Toolchain: Clang + Glibc + LLVM Linker
- Version: all components were built from their tip of trunk
- Target: aarch64-linux-gnu
- Compiler flags: -O2 -flto
- Hardware: NVidia TX1 4x Cortex-A57
This benchmarking CI is work-in-progress, and we welcome feedback and suggestions at linaro-toolchain(a)lists.linaro.org . In our improvement plans is to add support for SPEC CPU2017 benchmarks and provide "perf report/annotate" data behind these reports.
THIS IS THE END OF INTERESTING STUFF. BELOW ARE LINKS TO BUILDS, REPRODUCTION INSTRUCTIONS, AND THE RAW COMMIT.
This commit has regressed these CI configurations:
- tcwg_bmk_llvm_tx1/llvm-master-aarch64-spec2k6-O2_LTO
First_bad build: https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_bmk_ci_llvm-bisect-tcwg_bmk_tx1-llvm-master-…
Last_good build: https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_bmk_ci_llvm-bisect-tcwg_bmk_tx1-llvm-master-…
Baseline build: https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_bmk_ci_llvm-bisect-tcwg_bmk_tx1-llvm-master-…
Even more details: https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_bmk_ci_llvm-bisect-tcwg_bmk_tx1-llvm-master-…
Reproduce builds:
<cut>
mkdir investigate-llvm-fbc0c308d599fe3300ab6516650b65b41979446d
cd investigate-llvm-fbc0c308d599fe3300ab6516650b65b41979446d
# Fetch scripts
git clone https://git.linaro.org/toolchain/jenkins-scripts
# Fetch manifests and test.sh script
mkdir -p artifacts/manifests
curl -o artifacts/manifests/build-baseline.sh https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_bmk_ci_llvm-bisect-tcwg_bmk_tx1-llvm-master-… --fail
curl -o artifacts/manifests/build-parameters.sh https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_bmk_ci_llvm-bisect-tcwg_bmk_tx1-llvm-master-… --fail
curl -o artifacts/test.sh https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_bmk_ci_llvm-bisect-tcwg_bmk_tx1-llvm-master-… --fail
chmod +x artifacts/test.sh
# Reproduce the baseline build (build all pre-requisites)
./jenkins-scripts/tcwg_bmk-build.sh @@ artifacts/manifests/build-baseline.sh
# Save baseline build state (which is then restored in artifacts/test.sh)
mkdir -p ./bisect
rsync -a --del --delete-excluded --exclude /bisect/ --exclude /artifacts/ --exclude /llvm/ ./ ./bisect/baseline/
cd llvm
# Reproduce first_bad build
git checkout --detach fbc0c308d599fe3300ab6516650b65b41979446d
../artifacts/test.sh
# Reproduce last_good build
git checkout --detach 30a3652b6ade43504087f6e3acd8dc879055f501
../artifacts/test.sh
cd ..
</cut>
Full commit (up to 1000 lines):
<cut>
commit fbc0c308d599fe3300ab6516650b65b41979446d
Author: Nikita Popov <nikita.ppv(a)gmail.com>
Date: Mon Oct 25 15:47:21 2021 +0200
[BasicAA] Handle known bits as ranges
BasicAA currently tries to determine that the offset is positive by
checking whether all variable indices are positive based on known
bits, multiplied by a positive scale. However, this is incorrect
if the scale multiplication might overflow. In the modified test
case the original value is positive, but may be negative after a
left shift.
Fix this by converting known bits into a constant range and reusing
the range-based logic, which handles overflow correctly.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D112611
---
llvm/lib/Analysis/BasicAliasAnalysis.cpp | 51 +++++-----------------
.../test/Analysis/BasicAA/assume-index-positive.ll | 4 +-
2 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 43 deletions(-)
diff --git a/llvm/lib/Analysis/BasicAliasAnalysis.cpp b/llvm/lib/Analysis/BasicAliasAnalysis.cpp
index 0305732ca5d5..8cf947c43bf4 100644
--- a/llvm/lib/Analysis/BasicAliasAnalysis.cpp
+++ b/llvm/lib/Analysis/BasicAliasAnalysis.cpp
@@ -318,15 +318,6 @@ struct CastedValue {
return N;
}
- KnownBits evaluateWith(KnownBits N) const {
- assert(N.getBitWidth() == V->getType()->getPrimitiveSizeInBits() &&
- "Incompatible bit width");
- if (TruncBits) N = N.trunc(N.getBitWidth() - TruncBits);
- if (SExtBits) N = N.sext(N.getBitWidth() + SExtBits);
- if (ZExtBits) N = N.zext(N.getBitWidth() + ZExtBits);
- return N;
- }
-
ConstantRange evaluateWith(ConstantRange N) const {
assert(N.getBitWidth() == V->getType()->getPrimitiveSizeInBits() &&
"Incompatible bit width");
@@ -1250,8 +1241,6 @@ AliasResult BasicAAResult::aliasGEP(
if (!DecompGEP1.VarIndices.empty()) {
APInt GCD;
- bool AllNonNegative = DecompGEP1.Offset.isNonNegative();
- bool AllNonPositive = DecompGEP1.Offset.isNonPositive();
ConstantRange OffsetRange = ConstantRange(DecompGEP1.Offset);
for (unsigned i = 0, e = DecompGEP1.VarIndices.size(); i != e; ++i) {
const VariableGEPIndex &Index = DecompGEP1.VarIndices[i];
@@ -1266,24 +1255,19 @@ AliasResult BasicAAResult::aliasGEP(
else
GCD = APIntOps::GreatestCommonDivisor(GCD, ScaleForGCD.abs());
- if (AllNonNegative || AllNonPositive) {
- KnownBits Known = Index.Val.evaluateWith(
- computeKnownBits(Index.Val.V, DL, 0, &AC, Index.CxtI, DT));
- bool SignKnownZero = Known.isNonNegative();
- bool SignKnownOne = Known.isNegative();
- AllNonNegative &= (SignKnownZero && Scale.isNonNegative()) ||
- (SignKnownOne && Scale.isNonPositive());
- AllNonPositive &= (SignKnownZero && Scale.isNonPositive()) ||
- (SignKnownOne && Scale.isNonNegative());
- }
+ ConstantRange CR =
+ computeConstantRange(Index.Val.V, true, &AC, Index.CxtI);
+ KnownBits Known =
+ computeKnownBits(Index.Val.V, DL, 0, &AC, Index.CxtI, DT);
+ CR = CR.intersectWith(
+ ConstantRange::fromKnownBits(Known, /* Signed */ true),
+ ConstantRange::Signed);
assert(OffsetRange.getBitWidth() == Scale.getBitWidth() &&
"Bit widths are normalized to MaxPointerSize");
- OffsetRange = OffsetRange.add(Index.Val
- .evaluateWith(computeConstantRange(
- Index.Val.V, true, &AC, Index.CxtI))
- .sextOrTrunc(OffsetRange.getBitWidth())
- .smul_fast(ConstantRange(Scale)));
+ OffsetRange = OffsetRange.add(
+ Index.Val.evaluateWith(CR).sextOrTrunc(OffsetRange.getBitWidth())
+ .smul_fast(ConstantRange(Scale)));
}
// We now have accesses at two offsets from the same base:
@@ -1300,21 +1284,6 @@ AliasResult BasicAAResult::aliasGEP(
(GCD - ModOffset).uge(V1Size.getValue()))
return AliasResult::NoAlias;
- // If we know all the variables are non-negative, then the total offset is
- // also non-negative and >= DecompGEP1.Offset. We have the following layout:
- // [0, V2Size) ... [TotalOffset, TotalOffer+V1Size]
- // If DecompGEP1.Offset >= V2Size, the accesses don't alias.
- if (AllNonNegative && V2Size.hasValue() &&
- DecompGEP1.Offset.uge(V2Size.getValue()))
- return AliasResult::NoAlias;
- // Similarly, if the variables are non-positive, then the total offset is
- // also non-positive and <= DecompGEP1.Offset. We have the following layout:
- // [TotalOffset, TotalOffset+V1Size) ... [0, V2Size)
- // If -DecompGEP1.Offset >= V1Size, the accesses don't alias.
- if (AllNonPositive && V1Size.hasValue() &&
- (-DecompGEP1.Offset).uge(V1Size.getValue()))
- return AliasResult::NoAlias;
-
if (V1Size.hasValue() && V2Size.hasValue()) {
// Compute ranges of potentially accessed bytes for both accesses. If the
// interseciton is empty, there can be no overlap.
diff --git a/llvm/test/Analysis/BasicAA/assume-index-positive.ll b/llvm/test/Analysis/BasicAA/assume-index-positive.ll
index 451592067f4b..a53fff2c6009 100644
--- a/llvm/test/Analysis/BasicAA/assume-index-positive.ll
+++ b/llvm/test/Analysis/BasicAA/assume-index-positive.ll
@@ -130,12 +130,12 @@ define void @symmetry([0 x i8]* %ptr, i32 %a, i32 %b, i32 %c) {
ret void
}
-; TODO: %ptr.neg and %ptr.shl may alias, as the shl renders the previously
+; %ptr.neg and %ptr.shl may alias, as the shl renders the previously
; non-negative value potentially negative.
define void @shl_of_non_negative(i8* %ptr, i64 %a) {
; CHECK-LABEL: Function: shl_of_non_negative
; CHECK: NoAlias: i8* %ptr.a, i8* %ptr.neg
-; CHECK: NoAlias: i8* %ptr.neg, i8* %ptr.shl
+; CHECK: MayAlias: i8* %ptr.neg, i8* %ptr.shl
%a.cmp = icmp sge i64 %a, 0
call void @llvm.assume(i1 %a.cmp)
%ptr.neg = getelementptr i8, i8* %ptr, i64 -2
</cut>
After llvm commit adf55ac6657693f7bfbe3087b599b4031a765a44
Author: Lang Hames <lhames(a)gmail.com>
[ORC] Call ExecutorProcessControl::disconnect in unit tests that require it.
the following hot functions slowed down by more than 10% (but their benchmarks slowed down by less than 2%):
- 400.perlbench:[.] S_find_byclass slowed down by 12% from 644 to 721 perf samples
Below reproducer instructions can be used to re-build both "first_bad" and "last_good" cross-toolchains used in this bisection. Naturally, the scripts will fail when triggerring benchmarking jobs if you don't have access to Linaro TCWG CI.
For your convenience, we have uploaded tarballs with pre-processed source and assembly files at:
- First_bad save-temps: https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_bmk_ci_llvm-bisect-tcwg_bmk_tx1-llvm-master-…
- Last_good save-temps: https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_bmk_ci_llvm-bisect-tcwg_bmk_tx1-llvm-master-…
- Baseline save-temps: https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_bmk_ci_llvm-bisect-tcwg_bmk_tx1-llvm-master-…
Configuration:
- Benchmark: SPEC CPU2006
- Toolchain: Clang + Glibc + LLVM Linker
- Version: all components were built from their tip of trunk
- Target: aarch64-linux-gnu
- Compiler flags: -O2
- Hardware: NVidia TX1 4x Cortex-A57
This benchmarking CI is work-in-progress, and we welcome feedback and suggestions at linaro-toolchain(a)lists.linaro.org . In our improvement plans is to add support for SPEC CPU2017 benchmarks and provide "perf report/annotate" data behind these reports.
THIS IS THE END OF INTERESTING STUFF. BELOW ARE LINKS TO BUILDS, REPRODUCTION INSTRUCTIONS, AND THE RAW COMMIT.
This commit has regressed these CI configurations:
- tcwg_bmk_llvm_tx1/llvm-master-aarch64-spec2k6-O2
First_bad build: https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_bmk_ci_llvm-bisect-tcwg_bmk_tx1-llvm-master-…
Last_good build: https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_bmk_ci_llvm-bisect-tcwg_bmk_tx1-llvm-master-…
Baseline build: https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_bmk_ci_llvm-bisect-tcwg_bmk_tx1-llvm-master-…
Even more details: https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_bmk_ci_llvm-bisect-tcwg_bmk_tx1-llvm-master-…
Reproduce builds:
<cut>
mkdir investigate-llvm-adf55ac6657693f7bfbe3087b599b4031a765a44
cd investigate-llvm-adf55ac6657693f7bfbe3087b599b4031a765a44
# Fetch scripts
git clone https://git.linaro.org/toolchain/jenkins-scripts
# Fetch manifests and test.sh script
mkdir -p artifacts/manifests
curl -o artifacts/manifests/build-baseline.sh https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_bmk_ci_llvm-bisect-tcwg_bmk_tx1-llvm-master-… --fail
curl -o artifacts/manifests/build-parameters.sh https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_bmk_ci_llvm-bisect-tcwg_bmk_tx1-llvm-master-… --fail
curl -o artifacts/test.sh https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_bmk_ci_llvm-bisect-tcwg_bmk_tx1-llvm-master-… --fail
chmod +x artifacts/test.sh
# Reproduce the baseline build (build all pre-requisites)
./jenkins-scripts/tcwg_bmk-build.sh @@ artifacts/manifests/build-baseline.sh
# Save baseline build state (which is then restored in artifacts/test.sh)
mkdir -p ./bisect
rsync -a --del --delete-excluded --exclude /bisect/ --exclude /artifacts/ --exclude /llvm/ ./ ./bisect/baseline/
cd llvm
# Reproduce first_bad build
git checkout --detach adf55ac6657693f7bfbe3087b599b4031a765a44
../artifacts/test.sh
# Reproduce last_good build
git checkout --detach f526ee5b8517b60620cd03bb3e5945ed69d6bfaa
../artifacts/test.sh
cd ..
</cut>
Full commit (up to 1000 lines):
<cut>
commit adf55ac6657693f7bfbe3087b599b4031a765a44
Author: Lang Hames <lhames(a)gmail.com>
Date: Tue Oct 12 14:55:49 2021 -0700
[ORC] Call ExecutorProcessControl::disconnect in unit tests that require it.
Another follow-up to 2815ed57e3c and 19b4e3cfc6a. For unit tests that don't use
an ExecutionSession we need to call ExecutorProcessControl::disconnect directly
to wait for the dispatcher to shut down.
https://llvm.org/PR52153
---
.../ExecutionEngine/Orc/EPCGenericJITLinkMemoryManagerTest.cpp | 2 ++
llvm/unittests/ExecutionEngine/Orc/EPCGenericMemoryAccessTest.cpp | 2 ++
2 files changed, 4 insertions(+)
diff --git a/llvm/unittests/ExecutionEngine/Orc/EPCGenericJITLinkMemoryManagerTest.cpp b/llvm/unittests/ExecutionEngine/Orc/EPCGenericJITLinkMemoryManagerTest.cpp
index f2b157e424b6..a95435aec2a3 100644
--- a/llvm/unittests/ExecutionEngine/Orc/EPCGenericJITLinkMemoryManagerTest.cpp
+++ b/llvm/unittests/ExecutionEngine/Orc/EPCGenericJITLinkMemoryManagerTest.cpp
@@ -134,6 +134,8 @@ TEST(EPCGenericJITLinkMemoryManagerTest, AllocFinalizeFree) {
auto Err2 = MemMgr->deallocate(std::move(*FA));
EXPECT_THAT_ERROR(std::move(Err2), Succeeded());
+
+ cantFail(SelfEPC->disconnect());
}
} // namespace
diff --git a/llvm/unittests/ExecutionEngine/Orc/EPCGenericMemoryAccessTest.cpp b/llvm/unittests/ExecutionEngine/Orc/EPCGenericMemoryAccessTest.cpp
index 78024644ca8b..beb0fefa094a 100644
--- a/llvm/unittests/ExecutionEngine/Orc/EPCGenericMemoryAccessTest.cpp
+++ b/llvm/unittests/ExecutionEngine/Orc/EPCGenericMemoryAccessTest.cpp
@@ -93,6 +93,8 @@ TEST(EPCGenericMemoryAccessTest, MemWrites) {
{{pointerToJITTargetAddress(&Test_Buffer), TestMsg}});
EXPECT_THAT_ERROR(std::move(Err5), Succeeded());
EXPECT_EQ(StringRef(Test_Buffer, TestMsg.size()), TestMsg);
+
+ cantFail(SelfEPC->disconnect());
}
} // namespace
</cut>
== This Week ==
* GCC
- Committed a clean up patch to gimple-isel
- PR93183: Committed fix
- PR102376: Patch approved upstream
- PR83750: Patch approved upstream but it regresses one test-case.
== Next Week ==
- Continue with ongoing tasks
After llvm commit bc69dd62c04a70d29943c1c06c7effed150b70e1
Author: Alexey Bataev <a.bataev(a)outlook.com>
[SLP]Improve graph reordering.
the following benchmarks grew in size by more than 1%:
- 444.namd grew in size by 2% from 192302 to 195218 bytes
Below reproducer instructions can be used to re-build both "first_bad" and "last_good" cross-toolchains used in this bisection. Naturally, the scripts will fail when triggerring benchmarking jobs if you don't have access to Linaro TCWG CI.
For your convenience, we have uploaded tarballs with pre-processed source and assembly files at:
- First_bad save-temps: https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_bmk_ci_llvm-bisect-tcwg_bmk_apm-llvm-master-…
- Last_good save-temps: https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_bmk_ci_llvm-bisect-tcwg_bmk_apm-llvm-master-…
- Baseline save-temps: https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_bmk_ci_llvm-bisect-tcwg_bmk_apm-llvm-master-…
Configuration:
- Benchmark: SPEC CPU2006
- Toolchain: Clang + Glibc + LLVM Linker
- Version: all components were built from their tip of trunk
- Target: aarch64-linux-gnu
- Compiler flags: -Os
- Hardware: APM Mustang 8x X-Gene1
This benchmarking CI is work-in-progress, and we welcome feedback and suggestions at linaro-toolchain(a)lists.linaro.org . In our improvement plans is to add support for SPEC CPU2017 benchmarks and provide "perf report/annotate" data behind these reports.
THIS IS THE END OF INTERESTING STUFF. BELOW ARE LINKS TO BUILDS, REPRODUCTION INSTRUCTIONS, AND THE RAW COMMIT.
This commit has regressed these CI configurations:
- tcwg_bmk_llvm_apm/llvm-master-aarch64-spec2k6-Os
First_bad build: https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_bmk_ci_llvm-bisect-tcwg_bmk_apm-llvm-master-…
Last_good build: https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_bmk_ci_llvm-bisect-tcwg_bmk_apm-llvm-master-…
Baseline build: https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_bmk_ci_llvm-bisect-tcwg_bmk_apm-llvm-master-…
Even more details: https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_bmk_ci_llvm-bisect-tcwg_bmk_apm-llvm-master-…
Reproduce builds:
<cut>
mkdir investigate-llvm-bc69dd62c04a70d29943c1c06c7effed150b70e1
cd investigate-llvm-bc69dd62c04a70d29943c1c06c7effed150b70e1
# Fetch scripts
git clone https://git.linaro.org/toolchain/jenkins-scripts
# Fetch manifests and test.sh script
mkdir -p artifacts/manifests
curl -o artifacts/manifests/build-baseline.sh https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_bmk_ci_llvm-bisect-tcwg_bmk_apm-llvm-master-… --fail
curl -o artifacts/manifests/build-parameters.sh https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_bmk_ci_llvm-bisect-tcwg_bmk_apm-llvm-master-… --fail
curl -o artifacts/test.sh https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_bmk_ci_llvm-bisect-tcwg_bmk_apm-llvm-master-… --fail
chmod +x artifacts/test.sh
# Reproduce the baseline build (build all pre-requisites)
./jenkins-scripts/tcwg_bmk-build.sh @@ artifacts/manifests/build-baseline.sh
# Save baseline build state (which is then restored in artifacts/test.sh)
mkdir -p ./bisect
rsync -a --del --delete-excluded --exclude /bisect/ --exclude /artifacts/ --exclude /llvm/ ./ ./bisect/baseline/
cd llvm
# Reproduce first_bad build
git checkout --detach bc69dd62c04a70d29943c1c06c7effed150b70e1
../artifacts/test.sh
# Reproduce last_good build
git checkout --detach 5661317f864abf750cf893c6a4cc7a977be0995a
../artifacts/test.sh
cd ..
</cut>
Full commit (up to 1000 lines):
<cut>
commit bc69dd62c04a70d29943c1c06c7effed150b70e1
Author: Alexey Bataev <a.bataev(a)outlook.com>
Date: Tue Aug 3 13:20:32 2021 -0700
[SLP]Improve graph reordering.
Reworked reordering algorithm. Originally, the compiler just tried to
detect the most common order in the reordarable nodes (loads, stores,
extractelements,extractvalues) and then fully rebuilding the graph in
the best order. This was not effecient, since it required an extra
memory and time for building/rebuilding tree, double the use of the
scheduling budget, which could lead to missing vectorization due to
exausted scheduling resources.
Patch provide 2-way approach for graph reodering problem. At first, all
reordering is done in-place, it doe not required tree
deleting/rebuilding, it just rotates the scalars/orders/reuses masks in
the graph node.
The first step (top-to bottom) rotates the whole graph, similarly to the previous
implementation. Compiler counts the number of the most used orders of
the graph nodes with the same vectorization factor and then rotates the
subgraph with the given vectorization factor to the most used order, if
it is not empty. Then repeats the same procedure for the subgraphs with
the smaller vectorization factor. We can do this because we still need
to reshuffle smaller subgraph when buildiong operands for the graph
nodes with lasrger vectorization factor, we can rotate just subgraph,
not the whole graph.
The second step (bottom-to-top) scans through the leaves and tries to
detect the users of the leaves which can be reordered. If the leaves can
be reorder in the best fashion, they are reordered and their user too.
It allows to remove double shuffles to the same ordering of the operands in
many cases and just reorder the user operations instead. Plus, it moves
the final shuffles closer to the top of the graph and in many cases
allows to remove extra shuffle because the same procedure is repeated
again and we can again merge some reordering masks and reorder user nodes
instead of the operands.
Also, patch improves cost model for gathering of loads, which improves
x264 benchmark in some cases.
Gives about +2% on AVX512 + LTO (more expected for AVX/AVX2) for {625,525}x264,
+3% for 508.namd, improves most of other benchmarks.
The compile and link time are almost the same, though in some cases it
should be better (we're not doing an extra instruction scheduling
anymore) + we may vectorize more code for the large basic blocks again
because of saving scheduling budget.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D105020
---
.../llvm/Transforms/Vectorize/SLPVectorizer.h | 3 +-
llvm/lib/Transforms/Vectorize/SLPVectorizer.cpp | 1364 ++++++++++++++------
.../AArch64/transpose-inseltpoison.ll | 84 +-
.../Transforms/SLPVectorizer/AArch64/transpose.ll | 84 +-
llvm/test/Transforms/SLPVectorizer/X86/addsub.ll | 42 +-
.../Transforms/SLPVectorizer/X86/crash_cmpop.ll | 6 +-
llvm/test/Transforms/SLPVectorizer/X86/extract.ll | 6 +-
.../SLPVectorizer/X86/jumbled-load-multiuse.ll | 12 +-
.../Transforms/SLPVectorizer/X86/jumbled-load.ll | 22 +-
.../SLPVectorizer/X86/jumbled_store_crash.ll | 29 +-
.../SLPVectorizer/X86/reorder_repeated_ops.ll | 4 +-
.../SLPVectorizer/X86/split-load8_2-unord.ll | 4 +-
.../X86/vectorize-reorder-alt-shuffle.ll | 9 +-
.../SLPVectorizer/X86/vectorize-reorder-reuse.ll | 52 +-
14 files changed, 1119 insertions(+), 602 deletions(-)
diff --git a/llvm/include/llvm/Transforms/Vectorize/SLPVectorizer.h b/llvm/include/llvm/Transforms/Vectorize/SLPVectorizer.h
index f416a592d683..5e8c29913cad 100644
--- a/llvm/include/llvm/Transforms/Vectorize/SLPVectorizer.h
+++ b/llvm/include/llvm/Transforms/Vectorize/SLPVectorizer.h
@@ -95,8 +95,7 @@ private:
/// Try to vectorize a list of operands.
/// \returns true if a value was vectorized.
- bool tryToVectorizeList(ArrayRef<Value *> VL, slpvectorizer::BoUpSLP &R,
- bool AllowReorder = false);
+ bool tryToVectorizeList(ArrayRef<Value *> VL, slpvectorizer::BoUpSLP &R);
/// Try to vectorize a chain that may start at the operands of \p I.
bool tryToVectorize(Instruction *I, slpvectorizer::BoUpSLP &R);
diff --git a/llvm/lib/Transforms/Vectorize/SLPVectorizer.cpp b/llvm/lib/Transforms/Vectorize/SLPVectorizer.cpp
index 9c0029484964..7400b3d8a503 100644
--- a/llvm/lib/Transforms/Vectorize/SLPVectorizer.cpp
+++ b/llvm/lib/Transforms/Vectorize/SLPVectorizer.cpp
@@ -21,6 +21,7 @@
#include "llvm/ADT/DenseSet.h"
#include "llvm/ADT/Optional.h"
#include "llvm/ADT/PostOrderIterator.h"
+#include "llvm/ADT/PriorityQueue.h"
#include "llvm/ADT/STLExtras.h"
#include "llvm/ADT/SetOperations.h"
#include "llvm/ADT/SetVector.h"
@@ -535,13 +536,68 @@ static bool isSimple(Instruction *I) {
return true;
}
+/// Shuffles \p Mask in accordance with the given \p SubMask.
+static void addMask(SmallVectorImpl<int> &Mask, ArrayRef<int> SubMask) {
+ if (SubMask.empty())
+ return;
+ if (Mask.empty()) {
+ Mask.append(SubMask.begin(), SubMask.end());
+ return;
+ }
+ SmallVector<int> NewMask(SubMask.size(), UndefMaskElem);
+ int TermValue = std::min(Mask.size(), SubMask.size());
+ for (int I = 0, E = SubMask.size(); I < E; ++I) {
+ if (SubMask[I] >= TermValue || SubMask[I] == UndefMaskElem ||
+ Mask[SubMask[I]] >= TermValue)
+ continue;
+ NewMask[I] = Mask[SubMask[I]];
+ }
+ Mask.swap(NewMask);
+}
+
+/// Order may have elements assigned special value (size) which is out of
+/// bounds. Such indices only appear on places which correspond to undef values
+/// (see canReuseExtract for details) and used in order to avoid undef values
+/// have effect on operands ordering.
+/// The first loop below simply finds all unused indices and then the next loop
+/// nest assigns these indices for undef values positions.
+/// As an example below Order has two undef positions and they have assigned
+/// values 3 and 7 respectively:
+/// before: 6 9 5 4 9 2 1 0
+/// after: 6 3 5 4 7 2 1 0
+/// \returns Fixed ordering.
+static void fixupOrderingIndices(SmallVectorImpl<unsigned> &Order) {
+ const unsigned Sz = Order.size();
+ SmallBitVector UsedIndices(Sz);
+ SmallVector<int> MaskedIndices;
+ for (unsigned I = 0; I < Sz; ++I) {
+ if (Order[I] < Sz)
+ UsedIndices.set(Order[I]);
+ else
+ MaskedIndices.push_back(I);
+ }
+ if (MaskedIndices.empty())
+ return;
+ SmallVector<int> AvailableIndices(MaskedIndices.size());
+ unsigned Cnt = 0;
+ int Idx = UsedIndices.find_first();
+ do {
+ AvailableIndices[Cnt] = Idx;
+ Idx = UsedIndices.find_next(Idx);
+ ++Cnt;
+ } while (Idx > 0);
+ assert(Cnt == MaskedIndices.size() && "Non-synced masked/available indices.");
+ for (int I = 0, E = MaskedIndices.size(); I < E; ++I)
+ Order[MaskedIndices[I]] = AvailableIndices[I];
+}
+
namespace llvm {
static void inversePermutation(ArrayRef<unsigned> Indices,
SmallVectorImpl<int> &Mask) {
Mask.clear();
const unsigned E = Indices.size();
- Mask.resize(E, E + 1);
+ Mask.resize(E, UndefMaskElem);
for (unsigned I = 0; I < E; ++I)
Mask[Indices[I]] = I;
}
@@ -581,6 +637,22 @@ static Optional<int> getInsertIndex(Value *InsertInst, unsigned Offset) {
return Index;
}
+/// Reorders the list of scalars in accordance with the given \p Order and then
+/// the \p Mask. \p Order - is the original order of the scalars, need to
+/// reorder scalars into an unordered state at first according to the given
+/// order. Then the ordered scalars are shuffled once again in accordance with
+/// the provided mask.
+static void reorderScalars(SmallVectorImpl<Value *> &Scalars,
+ ArrayRef<int> Mask) {
+ assert(!Mask.empty() && "Expected non-empty mask.");
+ SmallVector<Value *> Prev(Scalars.size(),
+ UndefValue::get(Scalars.front()->getType()));
+ Prev.swap(Scalars);
+ for (unsigned I = 0, E = Prev.size(); I < E; ++I)
+ if (Mask[I] != UndefMaskElem)
+ Scalars[Mask[I]] = Prev[I];
+}
+
namespace slpvectorizer {
/// Bottom Up SLP Vectorizer.
@@ -645,13 +717,12 @@ public:
void buildTree(ArrayRef<Value *> Roots,
ArrayRef<Value *> UserIgnoreLst = None);
- /// Construct a vectorizable tree that starts at \p Roots, ignoring users for
- /// the purpose of scheduling and extraction in the \p UserIgnoreLst taking
- /// into account (and updating it, if required) list of externally used
- /// values stored in \p ExternallyUsedValues.
- void buildTree(ArrayRef<Value *> Roots,
- ExtraValueToDebugLocsMap &ExternallyUsedValues,
- ArrayRef<Value *> UserIgnoreLst = None);
+ /// Builds external uses of the vectorized scalars, i.e. the list of
+ /// vectorized scalars to be extracted, their lanes and their scalar users. \p
+ /// ExternallyUsedValues contains additional list of external uses to handle
+ /// vectorization of reductions.
+ void
+ buildExternalUses(const ExtraValueToDebugLocsMap &ExternallyUsedValues = {});
/// Clear the internal data structures that are created by 'buildTree'.
void deleteTree() {
@@ -659,8 +730,6 @@ public:
ScalarToTreeEntry.clear();
MustGather.clear();
ExternalUses.clear();
- NumOpsWantToKeepOrder.clear();
- NumOpsWantToKeepOriginalOrder = 0;
for (auto &Iter : BlocksSchedules) {
BlockScheduling *BS = Iter.second.get();
BS->clear();
@@ -674,103 +743,22 @@ public:
/// Perform LICM and CSE on the newly generated gather sequences.
void optimizeGatherSequence();
- /// \returns The best order of instructions for vectorization.
- Optional<ArrayRef<unsigned>> bestOrder() const {
- assert(llvm::all_of(
- NumOpsWantToKeepOrder,
- [this](const decltype(NumOpsWantToKeepOrder)::value_type &D) {
- return D.getFirst().size() ==
- VectorizableTree[0]->Scalars.size();
- }) &&
- "All orders must have the same size as number of instructions in "
- "tree node.");
- auto I = std::max_element(
- NumOpsWantToKeepOrder.begin(), NumOpsWantToKeepOrder.end(),
- [](const decltype(NumOpsWantToKeepOrder)::value_type &D1,
- const decltype(NumOpsWantToKeepOrder)::value_type &D2) {
- return D1.second < D2.second;
- });
- if (I == NumOpsWantToKeepOrder.end() ||
- I->getSecond() <= NumOpsWantToKeepOriginalOrder)
- return None;
-
- return makeArrayRef(I->getFirst());
- }
-
- /// Builds the correct order for root instructions.
- /// If some leaves have the same instructions to be vectorized, we may
- /// incorrectly evaluate the best order for the root node (it is built for the
- /// vector of instructions without repeated instructions and, thus, has less
- /// elements than the root node). This function builds the correct order for
- /// the root node.
- /// For example, if the root node is \<a+b, a+c, a+d, f+e\>, then the leaves
- /// are \<a, a, a, f\> and \<b, c, d, e\>. When we try to vectorize the first
- /// leaf, it will be shrink to \<a, b\>. If instructions in this leaf should
- /// be reordered, the best order will be \<1, 0\>. We need to extend this
- /// order for the root node. For the root node this order should look like
- /// \<3, 0, 1, 2\>. This function extends the order for the reused
- /// instructions.
- void findRootOrder(OrdersType &Order) {
- // If the leaf has the same number of instructions to vectorize as the root
- // - order must be set already.
- unsigned RootSize = VectorizableTree[0]->Scalars.size();
- if (Order.size() == RootSize)
- return;
- SmallVector<unsigned, 4> RealOrder(Order.size());
- std::swap(Order, RealOrder);
- SmallVector<int, 4> Mask;
- inversePermutation(RealOrder, Mask);
- Order.assign(Mask.begin(), Mask.end());
- // The leaf has less number of instructions - need to find the true order of
- // the root.
- // Scan the nodes starting from the leaf back to the root.
- const TreeEntry *PNode = VectorizableTree.back().get();
- SmallVector<const TreeEntry *, 4> Nodes(1, PNode);
- SmallPtrSet<const TreeEntry *, 4> Visited;
- while (!Nodes.empty() && Order.size() != RootSize) {
- const TreeEntry *PNode = Nodes.pop_back_val();
- if (!Visited.insert(PNode).second)
- continue;
- const TreeEntry &Node = *PNode;
- for (const EdgeInfo &EI : Node.UserTreeIndices)
- if (EI.UserTE)
- Nodes.push_back(EI.UserTE);
- if (Node.ReuseShuffleIndices.empty())
- continue;
- // Build the order for the parent node.
- OrdersType NewOrder(Node.ReuseShuffleIndices.size(), RootSize);
- SmallVector<unsigned, 4> OrderCounter(Order.size(), 0);
- // The algorithm of the order extension is:
- // 1. Calculate the number of the same instructions for the order.
- // 2. Calculate the index of the new order: total number of instructions
- // with order less than the order of the current instruction + reuse
- // number of the current instruction.
- // 3. The new order is just the index of the instruction in the original
- // vector of the instructions.
- for (unsigned I : Node.ReuseShuffleIndices)
- ++OrderCounter[Order[I]];
- SmallVector<unsigned, 4> CurrentCounter(Order.size(), 0);
- for (unsigned I = 0, E = Node.ReuseShuffleIndices.size(); I < E; ++I) {
- unsigned ReusedIdx = Node.ReuseShuffleIndices[I];
- unsigned OrderIdx = Order[ReusedIdx];
- unsigned NewIdx = 0;
- for (unsigned J = 0; J < OrderIdx; ++J)
- NewIdx += OrderCounter[J];
- NewIdx += CurrentCounter[OrderIdx];
- ++CurrentCounter[OrderIdx];
- assert(NewOrder[NewIdx] == RootSize &&
- "The order index should not be written already.");
- NewOrder[NewIdx] = I;
- }
- std::swap(Order, NewOrder);
- }
- assert(Order.size() == RootSize &&
- "Root node is expected or the size of the order must be the same as "
- "the number of elements in the root node.");
- assert(llvm::all_of(Order,
- [RootSize](unsigned Val) { return Val != RootSize; }) &&
- "All indices must be initialized");
- }
+ /// Reorders the current graph to the most profitable order starting from the
+ /// root node to the leaf nodes. The best order is chosen only from the nodes
+ /// of the same size (vectorization factor). Smaller nodes are considered
+ /// parts of subgraph with smaller VF and they are reordered independently. We
+ /// can make it because we still need to extend smaller nodes to the wider VF
+ /// and we can merge reordering shuffles with the widening shuffles.
+ void reorderTopToBottom();
+
+ /// Reorders the current graph to the most profitable order starting from
+ /// leaves to the root. It allows to rotate small subgraphs and reduce the
+ /// number of reshuffles if the leaf nodes use the same order. In this case we
+ /// can merge the orders and just shuffle user node instead of shuffling its
+ /// operands. Plus, even the leaf nodes have different orders, it allows to
+ /// sink reordering in the graph closer to the root node and merge it later
+ /// during analysis.
+ void reorderBottomToTop();
/// \return The vector element size in bits to use when vectorizing the
/// expression tree ending at \p V. If V is a store, the size is the width of
@@ -793,6 +781,10 @@ public:
return MinVecRegSize;
}
+ unsigned getMinVF(unsigned Sz) const {
+ return std::max(2U, getMinVecRegSize() / Sz);
+ }
+
unsigned getMaximumVF(unsigned ElemWidth, unsigned Opcode) const {
unsigned MaxVF = MaxVFOption.getNumOccurrences() ?
MaxVFOption : TTI->getMaximumVF(ElemWidth, Opcode);
@@ -1621,12 +1613,29 @@ private:
/// \returns true if the scalars in VL are equal to this entry.
bool isSame(ArrayRef<Value *> VL) const {
- if (VL.size() == Scalars.size())
- return std::equal(VL.begin(), VL.end(), Scalars.begin());
- return VL.size() == ReuseShuffleIndices.size() &&
- std::equal(
- VL.begin(), VL.end(), ReuseShuffleIndices.begin(),
- [this](Value *V, int Idx) { return V == Scalars[Idx]; });
+ auto &&IsSame = [VL](ArrayRef<Value *> Scalars, ArrayRef<int> Mask) {
+ if (Mask.size() != VL.size() && VL.size() == Scalars.size())
+ return std::equal(VL.begin(), VL.end(), Scalars.begin());
+ return VL.size() == Mask.size() &&
+ std::equal(
+ VL.begin(), VL.end(), Mask.begin(),
+ [Scalars](Value *V, int Idx) { return V == Scalars[Idx]; });
+ };
+ if (!ReorderIndices.empty()) {
+ // TODO: implement matching if the nodes are just reordered, still can
+ // treat the vector as the same if the list of scalars matches VL
+ // directly, without reordering.
+ SmallVector<int> Mask;
+ inversePermutation(ReorderIndices, Mask);
+ if (VL.size() == Scalars.size())
+ return IsSame(Scalars, Mask);
+ if (VL.size() == ReuseShuffleIndices.size()) {
+ ::addMask(Mask, ReuseShuffleIndices);
+ return IsSame(Scalars, Mask);
+ }
+ return false;
+ }
+ return IsSame(Scalars, ReuseShuffleIndices);
}
/// A vector of scalars.
@@ -1701,6 +1710,12 @@ private:
}
}
+ /// Reorders operands of the node to the given mask \p Mask.
+ void reorderOperands(ArrayRef<int> Mask) {
+ for (ValueList &Operand : Operands)
+ reorderScalars(Operand, Mask);
+ }
+
/// \returns the \p OpIdx operand of this TreeEntry.
ValueList &getOperand(unsigned OpIdx) {
assert(OpIdx < Operands.size() && "Off bounds");
@@ -1760,19 +1775,14 @@ private:
return AltOp ? AltOp->getOpcode() : 0;
}
- /// Update operations state of this entry if reorder occurred.
- bool updateStateIfReorder() {
- if (ReorderIndices.empty())
- return false;
- InstructionsState S = getSameOpcode(Scalars, ReorderIndices.front());
- setOperations(S);
- return true;
- }
- /// When ReuseShuffleIndices is empty it just returns position of \p V
- /// within vector of Scalars. Otherwise, try to remap on its reuse index.
+ /// When ReuseReorderShuffleIndices is empty it just returns position of \p
+ /// V within vector of Scalars. Otherwise, try to remap on its reuse index.
int findLaneForValue(Value *V) const {
unsigned FoundLane = std::distance(Scalars.begin(), find(Scalars, V));
assert(FoundLane < Scalars.size() && "Couldn't find extract lane");
+ if (!ReorderIndices.empty())
+ FoundLane = ReorderIndices[FoundLane];
+ assert(FoundLane < Scalars.size() && "Couldn't find extract lane");
if (!ReuseShuffleIndices.empty()) {
FoundLane = std::distance(ReuseShuffleIndices.begin(),
find(ReuseShuffleIndices, FoundLane));
@@ -1856,7 +1866,7 @@ private:
TreeEntry *newTreeEntry(ArrayRef<Value *> VL, Optional<ScheduleData *> Bundle,
const InstructionsState &S,
const EdgeInfo &UserTreeIdx,
- ArrayRef<unsigned> ReuseShuffleIndices = None,
+ ArrayRef<int> ReuseShuffleIndices = None,
ArrayRef<unsigned> ReorderIndices = None) {
TreeEntry::EntryState EntryState =
Bundle ? TreeEntry::Vectorize : TreeEntry::NeedToGather;
@@ -1869,7 +1879,7 @@ private:
Optional<ScheduleData *> Bundle,
const InstructionsState &S,
const EdgeInfo &UserTreeIdx,
- ArrayRef<unsigned> ReuseShuffleIndices = None,
+ ArrayRef<int> ReuseShuffleIndices = None,
ArrayRef<unsigned> ReorderIndices = None) {
assert(((!Bundle && EntryState == TreeEntry::NeedToGather) ||
(Bundle && EntryState != TreeEntry::NeedToGather)) &&
@@ -1877,12 +1887,25 @@ private:
VectorizableTree.push_back(std::make_unique<TreeEntry>(VectorizableTree));
TreeEntry *Last = VectorizableTree.back().get();
Last->Idx = VectorizableTree.size() - 1;
- Last->Scalars.insert(Last->Scalars.begin(), VL.begin(), VL.end());
Last->State = EntryState;
Last->ReuseShuffleIndices.append(ReuseShuffleIndices.begin(),
ReuseShuffleIndices.end());
- Last->ReorderIndices.append(ReorderIndices.begin(), ReorderIndices.end());
- Last->setOperations(S);
+ if (ReorderIndices.empty()) {
+ Last->Scalars.assign(VL.begin(), VL.end());
+ Last->setOperations(S);
+ } else {
+ // Reorder scalars and build final mask.
+ Last->Scalars.assign(VL.size(), nullptr);
+ transform(ReorderIndices, Last->Scalars.begin(),
+ [VL](unsigned Idx) -> Value * {
+ if (Idx >= VL.size())
+ return UndefValue::get(VL.front()->getType());
+ return VL[Idx];
+ });
+ InstructionsState S = getSameOpcode(Last->Scalars);
+ Last->setOperations(S);
+ Last->ReorderIndices.append(ReorderIndices.begin(), ReorderIndices.end());
+ }
if (Last->State != TreeEntry::NeedToGather) {
for (Value *V : VL) {
assert(!getTreeEntry(V) && "Scalar already in tree!");
@@ -2431,14 +2454,6 @@ private:
}
};
- /// Contains orders of operations along with the number of bundles that have
- /// operations in this order. It stores only those orders that require
- /// reordering, if reordering is not required it is counted using \a
- /// NumOpsWantToKeepOriginalOrder.
- DenseMap<OrdersType, unsigned, OrdersTypeDenseMapInfo> NumOpsWantToKeepOrder;
- /// Number of bundles that do not require reordering.
- unsigned NumOpsWantToKeepOriginalOrder = 0;
-
// Analysis and block reference.
Function *F;
ScalarEvolution *SE;
@@ -2591,21 +2606,439 @@ void BoUpSLP::eraseInstructions(ArrayRef<Value *> AV) {
};
}
-void BoUpSLP::buildTree(ArrayRef<Value *> Roots,
- ArrayRef<Value *> UserIgnoreLst) {
- ExtraValueToDebugLocsMap ExternallyUsedValues;
- buildTree(Roots, ExternallyUsedValues, UserIgnoreLst);
+/// Reorders the given \p Reuses mask according to the given \p Mask. \p Reuses
+/// contains original mask for the scalars reused in the node. Procedure
+/// transform this mask in accordance with the given \p Mask.
+static void reorderReuses(SmallVectorImpl<int> &Reuses, ArrayRef<int> Mask) {
+ assert(!Mask.empty() && Reuses.size() == Mask.size() &&
+ "Expected non-empty mask.");
+ SmallVector<int> Prev(Reuses.begin(), Reuses.end());
+ Prev.swap(Reuses);
+ for (unsigned I = 0, E = Prev.size(); I < E; ++I)
+ if (Mask[I] != UndefMaskElem)
+ Reuses[Mask[I]] = Prev[I];
}
-void BoUpSLP::buildTree(ArrayRef<Value *> Roots,
- ExtraValueToDebugLocsMap &ExternallyUsedValues,
- ArrayRef<Value *> UserIgnoreLst) {
- deleteTree();
- UserIgnoreList = UserIgnoreLst;
- if (!allSameType(Roots))
+/// Reorders the given \p Order according to the given \p Mask. \p Order - is
+/// the original order of the scalars. Procedure transforms the provided order
+/// in accordance with the given \p Mask. If the resulting \p Order is just an
+/// identity order, \p Order is cleared.
+static void reorderOrder(SmallVectorImpl<unsigned> &Order, ArrayRef<int> Mask) {
+ assert(!Mask.empty() && "Expected non-empty mask.");
+ SmallVector<int> MaskOrder;
+ if (Order.empty()) {
+ MaskOrder.resize(Mask.size());
+ std::iota(MaskOrder.begin(), MaskOrder.end(), 0);
+ } else {
+ inversePermutation(Order, MaskOrder);
+ }
+ reorderReuses(MaskOrder, Mask);
+ if (ShuffleVectorInst::isIdentityMask(MaskOrder)) {
+ Order.clear();
return;
- buildTree_rec(Roots, 0, EdgeInfo());
+ }
+ Order.assign(Mask.size(), Mask.size());
+ for (unsigned I = 0, E = Mask.size(); I < E; ++I)
+ if (MaskOrder[I] != UndefMaskElem)
+ Order[MaskOrder[I]] = I;
+ fixupOrderingIndices(Order);
+}
+
+void BoUpSLP::reorderTopToBottom() {
+ // Maps VF to the graph nodes.
+ DenseMap<unsigned, SmallPtrSet<TreeEntry *, 4>> VFToOrderedEntries;
+ // ExtractElement gather nodes which can be vectorized and need to handle
+ // their ordering.
+ DenseMap<const TreeEntry *, OrdersType> GathersToOrders;
+ // Find all reorderable nodes with the given VF.
+ // Currently the are vectorized loads,extracts + some gathering of extracts.
+ for_each(VectorizableTree, [this, &VFToOrderedEntries, &GathersToOrders](
+ const std::unique_ptr<TreeEntry> &TE) {
+ // No need to reorder if need to shuffle reuses, still need to shuffle the
+ // node.
+ if (!TE->ReuseShuffleIndices.empty())
+ return;
+ if (TE->State == TreeEntry::Vectorize &&
+ isa<LoadInst, ExtractElementInst, ExtractValueInst, StoreInst,
+ InsertElementInst>(TE->getMainOp()) &&
+ !TE->isAltShuffle()) {
+ VFToOrderedEntries[TE->Scalars.size()].insert(TE.get());
+ } else if (TE->State == TreeEntry::NeedToGather &&
+ TE->getOpcode() == Instruction::ExtractElement &&
+ !TE->isAltShuffle() &&
+ isa<FixedVectorType>(cast<ExtractElementInst>(TE->getMainOp())
+ ->getVectorOperandType()) &&
+ allSameType(TE->Scalars) && allSameBlock(TE->Scalars)) {
+ // Check that gather of extractelements can be represented as
+ // just a shuffle of a single vector.
+ OrdersType CurrentOrder;
+ bool Reuse = canReuseExtract(TE->Scalars, TE->getMainOp(), CurrentOrder);
+ if (Reuse || !CurrentOrder.empty()) {
+ VFToOrderedEntries[TE->Scalars.size()].insert(TE.get());
+ GathersToOrders.try_emplace(TE.get(), CurrentOrder);
+ }
+ }
+ });
+
+ // Reorder the graph nodes according to their vectorization factor.
+ for (unsigned VF = VectorizableTree.front()->Scalars.size(); VF > 1;
+ VF /= 2) {
+ auto It = VFToOrderedEntries.find(VF);
+ if (It == VFToOrderedEntries.end())
+ continue;
+ // Try to find the most profitable order. We just are looking for the most
+ // used order and reorder scalar elements in the nodes according to this
+ // mostly used order.
+ const SmallPtrSetImpl<TreeEntry *> &OrderedEntries = It->getSecond();
+ // All operands are reordered and used only in this node - propagate the
+ // most used order to the user node.
+ DenseMap<OrdersType, unsigned, OrdersTypeDenseMapInfo> OrdersUses;
+ SmallPtrSet<const TreeEntry *, 4> VisitedOps;
+ for (const TreeEntry *OpTE : OrderedEntries) {
+ // No need to reorder this nodes, still need to extend and to use shuffle,
+ // just need to merge reordering shuffle and the reuse shuffle.
+ if (!OpTE->ReuseShuffleIndices.empty())
+ continue;
+ // Count number of orders uses.
+ const auto &Order = [OpTE, &GathersToOrders]() -> const OrdersType & {
+ if (OpTE->State == TreeEntry::NeedToGather)
+ return GathersToOrders.find(OpTE)->second;
+ return OpTE->ReorderIndices;
+ }();
+ // Stores actually store the mask, not the order, need to invert.
+ if (OpTE->State == TreeEntry::Vectorize && !OpTE->isAltShuffle() &&
+ OpTE->getOpcode() == Instruction::Store && !Order.empty()) {
+ SmallVector<int> Mask;
+ inversePermutation(Order, Mask);
+ unsigned E = Order.size();
+ OrdersType CurrentOrder(E, E);
+ transform(Mask, CurrentOrder.begin(), [E](int Idx) {
+ return Idx == UndefMaskElem ? E : static_cast<unsigned>(Idx);
+ });
+ fixupOrderingIndices(CurrentOrder);
+ ++OrdersUses.try_emplace(CurrentOrder).first->getSecond();
+ } else {
+ ++OrdersUses.try_emplace(Order).first->getSecond();
+ }
+ }
+ // Set order of the user node.
+ if (OrdersUses.empty())
+ continue;
+ // Choose the most used order.
+ ArrayRef<unsigned> BestOrder = OrdersUses.begin()->first;
+ unsigned Cnt = OrdersUses.begin()->second;
+ for (const auto &Pair : llvm::drop_begin(OrdersUses)) {
+ if (Cnt < Pair.second || (Cnt == Pair.second && Pair.first.empty())) {
+ BestOrder = Pair.first;
+ Cnt = Pair.second;
+ }
+ }
+ // Set order of the user node.
+ if (BestOrder.empty())
+ continue;
+ SmallVector<int> Mask;
+ inversePermutation(BestOrder, Mask);
+ SmallVector<int> MaskOrder(BestOrder.size(), UndefMaskElem);
+ unsigned E = BestOrder.size();
+ transform(BestOrder, MaskOrder.begin(), [E](unsigned I) {
+ return I < E ? static_cast<int>(I) : UndefMaskElem;
+ });
+ // Do an actual reordering, if profitable.
+ for (std::unique_ptr<TreeEntry> &TE : VectorizableTree) {
+ // Just do the reordering for the nodes with the given VF.
+ if (TE->Scalars.size() != VF) {
+ if (TE->ReuseShuffleIndices.size() == VF) {
+ // Need to reorder the reuses masks of the operands with smaller VF to
+ // be able to find the match between the graph nodes and scalar
+ // operands of the given node during vectorization/cost estimation.
+ assert(all_of(TE->UserTreeIndices,
+ [VF, &TE](const EdgeInfo &EI) {
+ return EI.UserTE->Scalars.size() == VF ||
+ EI.UserTE->Scalars.size() ==
+ TE->Scalars.size();
+ }) &&
+ "All users must be of VF size.");
+ // Update ordering of the operands with the smaller VF than the given
+ // one.
+ reorderReuses(TE->ReuseShuffleIndices, Mask);
+ }
+ continue;
+ }
+ if (TE->State == TreeEntry::Vectorize &&
+ isa<ExtractElementInst, ExtractValueInst, LoadInst, StoreInst,
+ InsertElementInst>(TE->getMainOp()) &&
+ !TE->isAltShuffle()) {
+ // Build correct orders for extract{element,value}, loads and
+ // stores.
+ reorderOrder(TE->ReorderIndices, Mask);
+ if (isa<InsertElementInst, StoreInst>(TE->getMainOp()))
+ TE->reorderOperands(Mask);
+ } else {
+ // Reorder the node and its operands.
+ TE->reorderOperands(Mask);
+ assert(TE->ReorderIndices.empty() &&
+ "Expected empty reorder sequence.");
+ reorderScalars(TE->Scalars, Mask);
+ }
+ if (!TE->ReuseShuffleIndices.empty()) {
+ // Apply reversed order to keep the original ordering of the reused
+ // elements to avoid extra reorder indices shuffling.
+ OrdersType CurrentOrder;
+ reorderOrder(CurrentOrder, MaskOrder);
+ SmallVector<int> NewReuses;
+ inversePermutation(CurrentOrder, NewReuses);
+ addMask(NewReuses, TE->ReuseShuffleIndices);
+ TE->ReuseShuffleIndices.swap(NewReuses);
+ }
+ }
+ }
+}
+
+void BoUpSLP::reorderBottomToTop() {
+ SetVector<TreeEntry *> OrderedEntries;
+ DenseMap<const TreeEntry *, OrdersType> GathersToOrders;
+ // Find all reorderable leaf nodes with the given VF.
+ // Currently the are vectorized loads,extracts without alternate operands +
+ // some gathering of extracts.
+ SmallVector<TreeEntry *> NonVectorized;
+ for_each(VectorizableTree, [this, &OrderedEntries, &GathersToOrders,
+ &NonVectorized](
+ const std::unique_ptr<TreeEntry> &TE) {
+ // No need to reorder if need to shuffle reuses, still need to shuffle the
+ // node.
+ if (!TE->ReuseShuffleIndices.empty())
+ return;
+ if (TE->State == TreeEntry::Vectorize &&
+ isa<LoadInst, ExtractElementInst, ExtractValueInst>(TE->getMainOp()) &&
+ !TE->isAltShuffle()) {
+ OrderedEntries.insert(TE.get());
+ } else if (TE->State == TreeEntry::NeedToGather &&
+ TE->getOpcode() == Instruction::ExtractElement &&
+ !TE->isAltShuffle() &&
+ isa<FixedVectorType>(cast<ExtractElementInst>(TE->getMainOp())
+ ->getVectorOperandType()) &&
+ allSameType(TE->Scalars) && allSameBlock(TE->Scalars)) {
+ // Check that gather of extractelements can be represented as
+ // just a shuffle of a single vector with a single user only.
+ OrdersType CurrentOrder;
+ bool Reuse = canReuseExtract(TE->Scalars, TE->getMainOp(), CurrentOrder);
+ if ((Reuse || !CurrentOrder.empty()) &&
+ !any_of(
+ VectorizableTree, [&TE](const std::unique_ptr<TreeEntry> &Entry) {
+ return Entry->State == TreeEntry::NeedToGather &&
+ Entry.get() != TE.get() && Entry->isSame(TE->Scalars);
+ })) {
+ OrderedEntries.insert(TE.get());
+ GathersToOrders.try_emplace(TE.get(), CurrentOrder);
+ }
+ }
+ if (TE->State != TreeEntry::Vectorize)
+ NonVectorized.push_back(TE.get());
+ });
+
+ // Checks if the operands of the users are reordarable and have only single
+ // use.
+ auto &&CheckOperands =
+ [this, &NonVectorized](const auto &Data,
+ SmallVectorImpl<TreeEntry *> &GatherOps) {
+ for (unsigned I = 0, E = Data.first->getNumOperands(); I < E; ++I) {
+ if (any_of(Data.second,
+ [I](const std::pair<unsigned, TreeEntry *> &OpData) {
+ return OpData.first == I &&
+ OpData.second->State == TreeEntry::Vectorize;
+ }))
+ continue;
+ ArrayRef<Value *> VL = Data.first->getOperand(I);
+ const TreeEntry *TE = nullptr;
+ const auto *It = find_if(VL, [this, &TE](Value *V) {
+ TE = getTreeEntry(V);
+ return TE;
+ });
+ if (It != VL.end() && TE->isSame(VL))
+ return false;
+ TreeEntry *Gather = nullptr;
+ if (count_if(NonVectorized, [VL, &Gather](TreeEntry *TE) {
+ assert(TE->State != TreeEntry::Vectorize &&
+ "Only non-vectorized nodes are expected.");
+ if (TE->isSame(VL)) {
+ Gather = TE;
+ return true;
+ }
+ return false;
+ }) > 1)
+ return false;
+ if (Gather)
+ GatherOps.push_back(Gather);
+ }
+ return true;
+ };
+ // 1. Propagate order to the graph nodes, which use only reordered nodes.
+ // I.e., if the node has operands, that are reordered, try to make at least
+ // one operand order in the natural order and reorder others + reorder the
+ // user node itself.
+ SmallPtrSet<const TreeEntry *, 4> Visited;
+ while (!OrderedEntries.empty()) {
+ // 1. Filter out only reordered nodes.
+ // 2. If the entry has multiple uses - skip it and jump to the next node.
+ MapVector<TreeEntry *, SmallVector<std::pair<unsigned, TreeEntry *>>> Users;
+ SmallVector<TreeEntry *> Filtered;
+ for (TreeEntry *TE : OrderedEntries) {
+ if (!(TE->State == TreeEntry::Vectorize ||
+ (TE->State == TreeEntry::NeedToGather &&
+ TE->getOpcode() == Instruction::ExtractElement)) ||
+ TE->UserTreeIndices.empty() || !TE->ReuseShuffleIndices.empty() ||
+ !all_of(drop_begin(TE->UserTreeIndices),
+ [TE](const EdgeInfo &EI) {
+ return EI.UserTE == TE->UserTreeIndices.front().UserTE;
+ }) ||
+ !Visited.insert(TE).second) {
+ Filtered.push_back(TE);
+ continue;
+ }
+ // Build a map between user nodes and their operands order to speedup
+ // search. The graph currently does not provide this dependency directly.
+ for (EdgeInfo &EI : TE->UserTreeIndices) {
+ TreeEntry *UserTE = EI.UserTE;
+ auto It = Users.find(UserTE);
+ if (It == Users.end())
+ It = Users.insert({UserTE, {}}).first;
+ It->second.emplace_back(EI.EdgeIdx, TE);
+ }
+ }
+ // Erase filtered entries.
+ for_each(Filtered,
+ [&OrderedEntries](TreeEntry *TE) { OrderedEntries.remove(TE); });
+ for (const auto &Data : Users) {
+ // Check that operands are used only in the User node.
+ SmallVector<TreeEntry *> GatherOps;
+ if (!CheckOperands(Data, GatherOps)) {
+ for_each(Data.second,
+ [&OrderedEntries](const std::pair<unsigned, TreeEntry *> &Op) {
+ OrderedEntries.remove(Op.second);
+ });
+ continue;
+ }
+ // All operands are reordered and used only in this node - propagate the
+ // most used order to the user node.
+ DenseMap<OrdersType, unsigned, OrdersTypeDenseMapInfo> OrdersUses;
+ SmallPtrSet<const TreeEntry *, 4> VisitedOps;
+ for (const auto &Op : Data.second) {
+ TreeEntry *OpTE = Op.second;
+ if (!OpTE->ReuseShuffleIndices.empty())
+ continue;
+ const auto &Order = [OpTE, &GathersToOrders]() -> const OrdersType & {
+ if (OpTE->State == TreeEntry::NeedToGather)
+ return GathersToOrders.find(OpTE)->second;
+ return OpTE->ReorderIndices;
+ }();
+ // Stores actually store the mask, not the order, need to invert.
+ if (OpTE->State == TreeEntry::Vectorize && !OpTE->isAltShuffle() &&
+ OpTE->getOpcode() == Instruction::Store && !Order.empty()) {
+ SmallVector<int> Mask;
+ inversePermutation(Order, Mask);
+ unsigned E = Order.size();
+ OrdersType CurrentOrder(E, E);
+ transform(Mask, CurrentOrder.begin(), [E](int Idx) {
+ return Idx == UndefMaskElem ? E : static_cast<unsigned>(Idx);
+ });
+ fixupOrderingIndices(CurrentOrder);
+ ++OrdersUses.try_emplace(CurrentOrder).first->getSecond();
+ } else {
+ ++OrdersUses.try_emplace(Order).first->getSecond();
+ }
+ if (VisitedOps.insert(OpTE).second)
+ OrdersUses.try_emplace({}, 0).first->getSecond() +=
+ OpTE->UserTreeIndices.size();
+ --OrdersUses[{}];
+ }
+ // If no orders - skip current nodes and jump to the next one, if any.
+ if (OrdersUses.empty()) {
+ for_each(Data.second,
+ [&OrderedEntries](const std::pair<unsigned, TreeEntry *> &Op) {
+ OrderedEntries.remove(Op.second);
+ });
+ continue;
+ }
+ // Choose the best order.
+ ArrayRef<unsigned> BestOrder = OrdersUses.begin()->first;
+ unsigned Cnt = OrdersUses.begin()->second;
+ for (const auto &Pair : llvm::drop_begin(OrdersUses)) {
+ if (Cnt < Pair.second || (Cnt == Pair.second && Pair.first.empty())) {
+ BestOrder = Pair.first;
+ Cnt = Pair.second;
+ }
+ }
+ // Set order of the user node (reordering of operands and user nodes).
+ if (BestOrder.empty()) {
+ for_each(Data.second,
+ [&OrderedEntries](const std::pair<unsigned, TreeEntry *> &Op) {
+ OrderedEntries.remove(Op.second);
+ });
+ continue;
+ }
+ // Erase operands from OrderedEntries list and adjust their orders.
+ VisitedOps.clear();
+ SmallVector<int> Mask;
+ inversePermutation(BestOrder, Mask);
+ SmallVector<int> MaskOrder(BestOrder.size(), UndefMaskElem);
+ unsigned E = BestOrder.size();
+ transform(BestOrder, MaskOrder.begin(), [E](unsigned I) {
+ return I < E ? static_cast<int>(I) : UndefMaskElem;
+ });
+ for (const std::pair<unsigned, TreeEntry *> &Op : Data.second) {
+ TreeEntry *TE = Op.second;
+ OrderedEntries.remove(TE);
+ if (!VisitedOps.insert(TE).second)
+ continue;
+ if (!TE->ReuseShuffleIndices.empty() && TE->ReorderIndices.empty()) {
+ // Just reorder reuses indices.
+ reorderReuses(TE->ReuseShuffleIndices, Mask);
+ continue;
+ }
+ // Gathers are processed separately.
+ if (TE->State != TreeEntry::Vectorize)
+ continue;
+ assert((BestOrder.size() == TE->ReorderIndices.size() ||
+ TE->ReorderIndices.empty()) &&
+ "Non-matching sizes of user/operand entries.");
+ reorderOrder(TE->ReorderIndices, Mask);
+ }
+ // For gathers just need to reorder its scalars.
+ for (TreeEntry *Gather : GatherOps) {
+ if (!Gather->ReuseShuffleIndices.empty())
+ continue;
+ assert(Gather->ReorderIndices.empty() &&
+ "Unexpected reordering of gathers.");
+ reorderScalars(Gather->Scalars, Mask);
+ OrderedEntries.remove(Gather);
+ }
+ // Reorder operands of the user node and set the ordering for the user
+ // node itself.
+ if (Data.first->State != TreeEntry::Vectorize ||
+ !isa<ExtractElementInst, ExtractValueInst, LoadInst>(
+ Data.first->getMainOp()) ||
+ Data.first->isAltShuffle())
+ Data.first->reorderOperands(Mask);
+ if (!isa<InsertElementInst, StoreInst>(Data.first->getMainOp()) ||
+ Data.first->isAltShuffle()) {
+ reorderScalars(Data.first->Scalars, Mask);
+ reorderOrder(Data.first->ReorderIndices, MaskOrder);
+ if (Data.first->ReuseShuffleIndices.empty() &&
+ !Data.first->ReorderIndices.empty() &&
+ !Data.first->isAltShuffle()) {
+ // Insert user node to the list to try to sink reordering deeper in
+ // the graph.
+ OrderedEntries.insert(Data.first);
+ }
+ } else {
+ reorderOrder(Data.first->ReorderIndices, Mask);
+ }
+ }
+ }
+}
+void BoUpSLP::buildExternalUses(
+ const ExtraValueToDebugLocsMap &ExternallyUsedValues) {
// Collect the values that we need to extract from the tree.
for (auto &TEPtr : VectorizableTree) {
TreeEntry *Entry = TEPtr.get();
@@ -2664,6 +3097,80 @@ void BoUpSLP::buildTree(ArrayRef<Value *> Roots,
}
}
+void BoUpSLP::buildTree(ArrayRef<Value *> Roots,
+ ArrayRef<Value *> UserIgnoreLst) {
+ deleteTree();
+ UserIgnoreList = UserIgnoreLst;
+ if (!allSameType(Roots))
+ return;
+ buildTree_rec(Roots, 0, EdgeInfo());
+}
+
+namespace {
+/// Tracks the state we can represent the loads in the given sequence.
+enum class LoadsState { Gather, Vectorize, ScatterVectorize };
+} // anonymous namespace
+
+/// Checks if the given array of loads can be represented as a vectorized,
+/// scatter or just simple gather.
+static LoadsState canVectorizeLoads(ArrayRef<Value *> VL, const Value *VL0,
+ const TargetTransformInfo &TTI,
+ const DataLayout &DL, ScalarEvolution &SE,
+ SmallVectorImpl<unsigned> &Order,
+ SmallVectorImpl<Value *> &PointerOps) {
+ // Check that a vectorized load would load the same memory as a scalar
+ // load. For example, we don't want to vectorize loads that are smaller
+ // than 8-bit. Even though we have a packed struct {<i2, i2, i2, i2>} LLVM
+ // treats loading/storing it as an i8 struct. If we vectorize loads/stores
+ // from such a struct, we read/write packed bits disagreeing with the
+ // unvectorized version.
+ Type *ScalarTy = VL0->getType();
+
+ if (DL.getTypeSizeInBits(ScalarTy) != DL.getTypeAllocSizeInBits(ScalarTy))
+ return LoadsState::Gather;
+
+ // Make sure all loads in the bundle are simple - we can't vectorize
+ // atomic or volatile loads.
+ PointerOps.clear();
+ PointerOps.resize(VL.size());
+ auto *POIter = PointerOps.begin();
+ for (Value *V : VL) {
+ auto *L = cast<LoadInst>(V);
+ if (!L->isSimple())
+ return LoadsState::Gather;
+ *POIter = L->getPointerOperand();
+ ++POIter;
+ }
+
+ Order.clear();
+ // Check the order of pointer operands.
+ if (llvm::sortPtrAccesses(PointerOps, ScalarTy, DL, SE, Order)) {
+ Value *Ptr0;
+ Value *PtrN;
+ if (Order.empty()) {
+ Ptr0 = PointerOps.front();
+ PtrN = PointerOps.back();
+ } else {
+ Ptr0 = PointerOps[Order.front()];
+ PtrN = PointerOps[Order.back()];
+ }
+ Optional<int> Diff =
+ getPointersDiff(ScalarTy, Ptr0, ScalarTy, PtrN, DL, SE);
+ // Check that the sorted loads are consecutive.
+ if (static_cast<unsigned>(*Diff) == VL.size() - 1)
+ return LoadsState::Vectorize;
+ Align CommonAlignment = cast<LoadInst>(VL0)->getAlign();
</cut>
And the rest of the week I flushed my maintainer queues ;-)
Other
=====
[update-ticket] <file:~/org/team.org::update-ticket>
Update [update-ticket] to work with cloud JIRA
Completed Reviews [8/8]
=======================
[PATCH 0/7] tests: docker images for hexagon, nios2, microblaze
Message-Id: <20211014224435.2539547-1-richard.henderson(a)linaro.org>
[PATCH] gdbstub: Switch to the thread receiving a signal
Message-Id: <20210930095111.23205-1-pavel(a)labath.sk>
[PATCH] replay: improve determinism of virtio-net
Message-Id: <162125666020.1252655.9997723318921206001.stgit@pasha-ThinkPad-X280>
[PATCH RESEND v3 0/2] add APIs to handle alternative sNaN propagation for fmax/fmin
Message-Id: <20211015065500.3850513-1-frank.chang(a)sifive.com>
[PATCH v3 0/5] plugins/cache: multicore cache modelling and minor tweaks
Message-Id: <20210722065428.134608-1-ma.mandourr(a)gmail.com>
[PATCH v2 0/2] plugins: add a drcov plugin
Message-Id: <163429165642.439576.16356288759891202632.stgit@pc-System-Product-Name>
[PATCH v2 0/2] plugins: add a drcov plugin
Message-Id: <163429165642.439576.16356288759891202632.stgit@pc-System-Product-Name>
[PATCH 0/3] KVM: qemu patches for few KVM features I developed
Message-Id: <20210914155214.105415-1-mlevitsk(a)redhat.com>
Absences
========
- Off Friday next week
Current Review Queue
====================
TODO [PATCH v2 00/48] tcg: optimize redundant sign extensions
Message-Id: <20211007195456.1168070-1-richard.henderson(a)linaro.org>
================================================================================================================================
TODO [PATCH] cpu-models-x86.rst: Tidy up a couple of things
Message-Id: <20211015100718.17828-1-pbonzini(a)redhat.com>
===================================================================================================================
TODO [PATCH 00/16] fdt: Make OF_BOARD a boolean option
Message-Id: <20211013010120.96851-1-sjg(a)chromium.org>
===========================================================================================================
TODO [PATCH v4 00/41] linux-user: Streamline handling of SIGSEGV
Message-Id: <20211006172307.780893-1-richard.henderson(a)linaro.org>
==================================================================================================================================
--
Alex Bennée