== Progress ==
* Support (5/10)
- Bug triage: reviewing the 300+ bugs on ARM
- remaining 220 bugs are all still pertinent
* Release (2/10)
- Woes due to GCC ABI change may delay 3.8.0 release
- Tested on both ARM and AArch64 with old environment, all green.
* Background (3/10)
- Code review, meetings, discussions, general support, etc.
- EuroLLVM, FOSDEM preparations, ARM sync
o Teaching activity (2/10)
== Progress ==
o Linaro GCC (2/10)
* Delivered 2016.01-1 Snapshot respin with fix for Linaro PR #2001
* Gave some support on backports
o Infra/Validation (1/10)
* Compared ABE master results.
o GCC dev. (2/10)
* Identified the way testcases are uploaded on the remote target in
cross validation as the root cause of validation instabilities. Digging
into GCC .exp files and DejaGNU to fix it cleanly.
o Misc (3/10)
* Various meetings
* Start a backport/validation document
== Plan ==
o Continue backports/validation document
o Continue on the ongoing cards opened
== Progress ==
LLDB development
-- Debugging of return value related issue coming up on chromebook ARM
[TCWG-228] [2/10]
-- Setup of Arm testing on AArch64 using chroot on highkey [TCWG-231] [1/10]
-- Investigation of failures when setting watchpoint on vector
variables [TCWG-231] [4/10]
Miscellaneous [3/10]
-- Meetings, emails, discussions etc.
-- Travel for Thailand visa application
== Plan ==
LLDB development
-- Try a fix of return value related issue coming up on chromebook ARM
-- Submit fix for failures when setting watchpoint on vector variables
-- Mark triaged failures with xfail decorators and bug numbers.
== Progress ==
LLDB development
-- Triage testsuite failures on AArch64 highkey [TCWG-231] [5/10]
-- Triage testsuite failures on chromebook (armel) [TCWG-228] [3/10]
Miscellaneous [2/10]
-- Meetings, emails, discussions etc.
-- Documents preparation for Thailand visa
== Plan ==
LLDB development
-- Create chroots for armhf and armel testing on AArch64 highkey board
-- Investigate ABI related issues when returning values on armel and armhf
-- Further bug triage and mark triaged failures with xfail decorators
and bug numbers.
Miscellaneous
-- Travel for Thailand visa application submission.
== This Week ==
* PR43721 (4/10)
- Patch review from Jim
- Bootstrapped and tested on x86, cross-tested with arm-linux-gnueabi
- Looking at regressions with arm-linux-gnueabi
- Wrote test-cases
* Benchmarking (2/10)
- lto spec2006 benchmarking
* Backport (1/10)
- Build successful for r232440 and r232442, failed for r232442
* PR24293 (1/10)
- Addressed comments by Marek and committed to trunk
* Misc (2/10)
- Meetings
- PR69133 - Fixed by Honza. Instead of gating on
lto_file_data as I did in my patch, gating on gimple_has_body_p()
was more suitable.
- Awaiting upstream response for tcwg-319
- Connect Slides outline, read doc on tree-ssa propagation and lto
plugin driver.
== Next Week ==
Continue ongoing tasks
== Progress ==
* Validation
- no progress in timeout issues: still didn't manage to access the logs
- 1st backport workshop successful in the team. We can increase
the difficulty for the next time :)
- initial prototype (naive) of an auto-backporter (using backflip)
when the patch are selected for inclusion
* GCC
- TCWG-485/PR68620: patch under review
- TCWG-484/target attributes testsuite fixes: committed.
- bug #1994: provided woraround to kernel team.
Related to GCC PR63304. Working on a further patch
for GCC.
* Misc (conf calls, meetings, emails, ....)
== Next ==
* Validation:
- debug timeout issues
- extended validation
* GCC:
- bug fixing
# Progress #
* Fix the arm software single step regression. [3/10]. Done.
* TCWG-503 Done.
* TCWG-491, have a patch to avoid GDB crash. Patch is pending for
review.
* TCWG-517. [2/10]
Fix fail in gdb.base/interrupt-noterm.exp. Patch is posted.
* TCWG-514. [3/10]
Fix new fails in foll-exec.exp and foll-vfork.exp. Patch is pending
for review.
* TCWG-509, GDB 7.11 release. [2/10]
GDB is in a good shape to create 7.11 branch except PR 19474. Go
through GDB test results and no ARM or AArch64 specific issues.
# Plan #
* TCWG-509, GDB 7.11 release.
* Upstream patch review.
--
Yao
The Linaro Toolchain Working Group (TCWG) announces the 2016.01-1
snapshot of the Linaro GCC 5 source package.
This package is a respin of 2016.01 source package and contains a fix
for Linaro bugzilla’s PR #2001:
* [AArch64] ICE in final_scan_insn on aarch64-linux-gnu.
This snapshot tarball is available on:
http://snapshots.linaro.org/components/toolchain/gcc-linaro/5.3-2016.01-1/
Original release notes from 2016.01 source package can be find below:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Linaro Toolchain Working Group (TCWG) is pleased to announce the
2016.01 snapshot of the Linaro GCC 5 source package.
This monthly snapshot[1] is based on FSF GCC 5.3+svn232321 and
includes performance improvements and bug fixes backported from
mainline GCC. This snapshot contents will be part of the 2016.02
stable [1] quarterly release.
Interesting changes in this GCC source package snapshot include:
* Updates to GCC 5.3+svn232321
* Fixes Linaro Bugzillas: #1982, #1980
* Backport of [BugFix] [AArch32] PR 68149 Fix ICE in unaligned_loaddi split
* Backport of [BugFix] [AArch32] PR target/68214: Delete
IP-reg-clobbering call-through-mem patterns
* Backport of [BugFix] [AArch32] PR target/68390
* Backport of [Bugfix] [AArch64] PR rtl-optimization/68796 Add
compare-of-zero_extract pattern
* Backport of [BugFix] [AArch64] PR target/68696 FAIL:
gcc.target/aarch64/vbslq_u64_1.c scan-assembler-times bif\tv 1
* Backport of [BugFix] PR rtl-optimization/68381
* Backport of [ARMv8.1] [AArch32] Add ACLE feature macro for ARMv8.1
instructions
* Backport of [ARMv8.1] [AArch32] Add ACLE intrinsics vqrdmlah and vqrdmlsh
* Backport of [ARMv8.1] [AArch32] Add ACLE intrinsics vqrdmlah_lane
and vqrdmlsh_lane
* Backport of [ARMv8.1] [AArch32] Add patterns for new instructions
* Backport of [ARMv8.1] [AArch32] Add support for ARMv8.1
* Backport of [ARMv8.1] [AArch32] Multilib support for ARMv8.1.
* Backport of [ARMv8.1] [AArch32] Support ARMv8.1 ARM tests
* Backport of [AArch32] [AArch32] Fix armv8.1 support at configure time
* Backport of [AArch32] Add attribute for compatibility with ARM pipeline models
* Backport of [AArch32] Fix vector TYPE_MODE in streaming-out
* Backport of [AArch64] 1/7 Add support for ARMv8.1 Adv.SIMD instructions
* Backport of [AArch64] 2/7 Add sqrdmah, sqrdmsh instructions
* Backport of [AArch64] 3/7 Add builtins for ARMv8.1 Adv.SIMD instructions
* Backport of [AArch64] 4/7 Add ACLE feature macro for ARMv8.1
Adv.SIMD instructions
* Backport of [AArch64] 5/7 Dejagnu support for ARMv8.1 Adv.SIMD
* Backport of [AArch64] 6/7 Add NEON intrinsics vqrdmlah and vqrdmlsh
* Backport of [AArch64] 7/7 Add NEON intrinsics vqrdmlah_lane and vqrdmlsh_lane
* Backport of [AArch64] Documentation fix for -fpic
* Backport of [AArch64] fix 3/7 Add builtins for ARMv8.1 Adv.SIMD instructions
* Backport of [AArch64] Fix a few failures with LSE enabled
* Backport of [AArch64] Improve add immediate expansion
* Backport of [AArch64] Improve comparison with complex immediates
followed by branch/cset
* Backport of [AArch64] Rework ARMv8.1 command line options
* Backport of [AArch64] Update patterns to support FP zero
* Backport of [AArch64] Use aarch64_sync_memory_operand in
atomic_store<mode> pattern
* Backport of [AArch64] Use vector wide add for mixed-mode adds
* Backport of [Misc] Only restrict pure simplification in mult-extend
subst case, allow other substitutions
* Backport of [Testsuite] [AArch64] Skip big-endian as well for
gcc.target/aarch64/got_mem_hoist_1.c
* Backport of [Testsuite] Make stackalign test LTO proof
* Backport of [Testsuite] Testcase for PR rtl-optimization/68381
Feedback and Support
Subscribe to the important Linaro mailing lists and join our IRC
channels to stay on top of Linaro development.
** Linaro Toolchain Development "mailing list":
http://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/linaro-toolchain
** Linaro Toolchain IRC channel on irc.freenode.net at @#linaro-tcwg@
* Bug reports should be filed in bugzilla against GCC product:
http://bugs.linaro.org/enter_bug.cgi?product=GCC
* Interested in commercial support? inquire at "Linaro support":
mailto:support@linaro.org
[1]. Stable source package releases are defined as releases where the
full Linaro Toolchain validation plan is executed.
[2]. Source package snapshots are defined when the compiler is only
put through unit-testing and full validation is not performed.
Folks,
I'd like to know the general opinion on this:
https://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=23529
>From past experience, and my limited point of view, it seems that the
GCC community decided to change the ABI, plotted some runes, conjured
up a broken implementation (whose bugs people will exploit and GCC
will end up keeping them) and pushed distros to follow.
I don't know how much distros were involved in the original design.
Did they request the changes? Or was that an internal change? How do
you guys get to decide when to break the world?
I also don't know how will be your policy towards the bugs that people
started "using". Are you going to force them moving to a more sane
implementation (by issuing compiler/linker errors) or are you going to
support as legacy for the decades to come?
Is there a detailed document describing all the changes, and is the
GCC implementation following that to the letter, or are there still
bugs in the current version? I'm not talking about an email thread,
but an actual document on GCC's docs pages.
All I know is that people in the Clang community waited until GCC's
implementation was stable, but somehow Debian based distros started
moving as if there was something unholy about the previous ABI, and
we've been getting segmentation faults on Hello World!
I don't know much about the changes myself, nor I was involved in the
discussion, but this is now a major pain for release 3.8.0 and I
thought it would be better if I sent an email to Linaro folks and
members (which form most of the ARM GNU developers) instead of going
on the main lists.
That also gives me a bit more freedom to be more candid. I wouldn't
send those questions as they are to the GCC/binutils lists, or people
would kill me. I don't mean any of them as an offence, they are
genuine questions from someone that is not on top of that issue.
cheers,
--renato
