24.11.2021 10:18, Akhil R пишет:

...

*i2c_dev)

...

          i2c_dev->is_vi = true;

}

How are you going to differentiate the VI I2C from a non-VI? This doesn't look right.

This patch adds the ACPI support to only non-VI I2C. The device_ids in match table are added accordingly. I suppose, of_device_is_compatible always returns false as there is no device tree. Agree with the other comments.

Will the VI I2C have a different ACPI ID or how it's going to work?