On Mon, 18 Aug 2025 16:54:23 +0530 Meghana Malladi wrote:
@@ -1332,6 +1350,13 @@ static int prueth_xsk_wakeup(struct net_device *ndev, u32 qid, u32 flags) } }
- if (flags & XDP_WAKEUP_RX) {
if (!napi_if_scheduled_mark_missed(&emac->napi_rx)) {
if (likely(napi_schedule_prep(&emac->napi_rx)))
__napi_schedule(&emac->napi_rx);
}
- }
- return 0;
I suspect this series is generated against old source or there's another conflicting series in flight, because git ends up applying this chunk to prueth_xsk_pool_disable() :S
Before you proceed with AF_XDP could you make this driver build under COMPILE_TEST on x86? This is very easy to miss, luckily we got an off list report but its pure luck. And obviously much more effort for the maintainers to investigate than if it was caught by the CI.
linaro-mm-sig@lists.linaro.org