16 May
2022
16 May
'22
5:54 a.m.
On 16/05/2022 03:59, Neal Liu wrote:
Okay, I could rename it for next patch if you preferred. But there are lots of yaml files which are not named as first compatible.
Yes, I know, I quite likely I also produced such bindings, but a specific name is rather preferred. Otherwise you will have a difficult naming choice when your next Aspeed UDC requires new bindings file because of some differences (not yet known now).
We can rename the bindings if next Aspeed UDC needs, don't you think? Currently, Aspeed has no requirement.
So just use proper name from the beginning....
Best regards, Krzysztof