On Friday 28 September 2012 01:09 PM, Maarten Lankhorst wrote:
Op 28-09-12 09:29, Rob Clark schreef:
From: Rob Clark rob@ti.com
We never really clarified if unmap could be done in atomic context. But since mapping might require sleeping, this implies mutex in use to synchronize mapping/unmapping, so unmap could sleep as well. Add a might_sleep() to clarify this.
Signed-off-by: Rob Clark rob@ti.com Acked-by: Daniel Vetter daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch
drivers/base/dma-buf.c | 2 ++ 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/base/dma-buf.c b/drivers/base/dma-buf.c index c30f3e1..877eacb 100644 --- a/drivers/base/dma-buf.c +++ b/drivers/base/dma-buf.c @@ -298,6 +298,8 @@ void dma_buf_unmap_attachment(struct dma_buf_attachment *attach, struct sg_table *sg_table, enum dma_data_direction direction) {
- might_sleep();
- if (WARN_ON(!attach || !attach->dmabuf || !sg_table)) return;
Looks good to me!
Reviewed-by: Maarten Lankhorst maarten.lankhorst@canonical.com
Thanks Rob,
Applied to for-next.
-- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-media" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html