19 Jan
2026
19 Jan
'26
8:04 a.m.
On Sun, Jan 18, 2026 at 11:32:20PM -0800, John Hubbard wrote:
On 1/18/26 11:25 PM, Leon Romanovsky wrote:
On Sun, Jan 18, 2026 at 01:40:11PM -0800, John Hubbard wrote:
On 1/18/26 4:08 AM, Leon Romanovsky wrote:
From: Leon Romanovsky leonro@nvidia.com
...
+/**
- dma_buf_attachment_is_revoke - check if a DMA-buf importer implements
- revoke semantics.
- @attach: the DMA-buf attachment to check
- Returns true if DMA-buf importer honors revoke semantics, which is
- negotiated with the exporter, by making sure that importer implements
- .invalidate_mappings() callback and calls to dma_buf_pin() after
- DMA-buf attach.
- */
+static inline bool +dma_buf_attachment_is_revoke(struct dma_buf_attachment *attach)
Maybe a slight rename, to dma_buf_attachment_is_revocable()?
I can do that. The issue is that even "dma_buf_attachment_is_revoke" is already too long. :)
If you're really pressed for space for some reason,
Mainly aesthetics.
maybe dma_buf_attach_revocable() ?
Just trying to hang on to the "revocable" part of the name, as I think it's an improvement.
Sure
thanks,
John Hubbard