Hi Andrew,
On Thursday, April 19, 2012 9:41 PM Andrew Morton wrote:
On Tue, 03 Apr 2012 16:10:05 +0200 Marek Szyprowski m.szyprowski@samsung.com wrote:
This is (yet another) update of CMA patches.
Looks OK to me. It's a lot of code.
Please move it into linux-next, and if all is well, ask Linus to pull the tree into 3.5-rc1. Please be sure to cc me on that email.
Ok, thanks! Is it possible to get your acked-by or reviewed-by tag? It might help a bit to get the pull request accepted by Linus. :)
I suggest that you include additional patches which enable CMA as much as possible on as many architectures as possible so that it gets maximum coverage testing in linux-next. Remove those Kconfig patches when merging upstream.
All this code will probably mess up my tree, but I'll work that out. It would be more awkward if the CMA code were to later disappear from linux-next or were not merged into 3.5-rc1. Let's avoid that.
I've put the patches on my dma-mapping-next branch and we will see the result (and/or complaints) on Monday.
Best regards