Hi Sumit,
On Wed, Sep 10, 2025 at 11:40:11AM +0530, Sumit Semwal wrote:
Hello Maxime,
On Mon, 28 Jul 2025 at 13:51, Maxime Ripard mripard@kernel.org wrote:
We've discussed a number of times of how some heap names are bad, but not really what makes a good heap name.
Let's document what we expect the heap names to look like.
Thank you for the patch. In principle, I'm ok to take this patch, with the obvious understanding that if there are future heap name requirements that can't be satisfied with these rules, we will discuss and adapt the rules accordingly.
I hope this sounds reasonable to all.
If I don't hear any objections, I'll merge this by this weekend.
As far as I know, it's still not merged?
Maxime