Linaro-mm-sig

linaro-mm-sig@lists.linaro.org

37 participants
6629 discussions

DeFi Yield Farming Traps: High Returns or Total Wipeouts?

by luisannete22＠gmail.com

Decentralized finance (DeFi) promises passive income through yield farming, but many protocols are riddled with risks, including outright scams. High APYs often mask exploitable code or exit strategies, leading to massive losses. This piece explores yield farming pitfalls, educating users on safer participation while highlighting recovery avenues. 1. Luring with Unrealistic Yields Scammers launch DeFi protocols advertising yields over 1000% APY, drawing liquidity providers with token rewards. Victims deposit pairs like ETH-USDT into pools, staking LP tokens for farm tokens. These yields stem from inflationary emissions, unsustainable without constant inflows. Educatively, legitimate projects like Aave offer modest, risk-adjusted returns; anything hyperbolic warrants scrutiny. Check tokenomics on sites like DefiLlama for emission schedules and TVL authenticity. 2. Smart Contract Vulnerabilities and Exploits Many scams embed flaws in contracts, allowing devs to mint unlimited tokens or drain pools. Flash loan attacks amplify this, borrowing to manipulate prices then repaying in one transaction. Post-exploit, funds are swiftly moved: split into smaller batches, bridged to chains like Arbitrum, and swapped to stablecoins. Understanding oracles (e.g., Chainlink) helps spot manipulation-prone setups, as faulty price feeds enable arbitrage scams. 3. Impermanent Loss and Rug Pull Mechanics Yield farmers face impermanent loss from price volatility, but scammers exacerbate it by dumping farm tokens, crashing values. In rug pulls, liquidity is removed suddenly, stranding providers. Funds then undergo obfuscation: mixing via decentralized services, converting to privacy coins, or layering through multiple DEXs. Real cases from 2025 show how anonymous teams vanish, leaving code audits as a key preventive measure. 4. Laundering and Exit Strategies Cleaned assets hit CEXs for fiat, using accounts in low-regulation areas. Mules or nested wallets add layers, making tracing multifaceted. Educatively, monitoring on-chain metrics like holder distribution via tools like Nansen can flag concentration risks indicative of scams. Where Tracing Can Intervene DeFi's open ledgers enable detailed tracing, especially pre-cash-out. Interventions include smart contract freezes (if upgradable) or exchange alerts. Cryptera Chain Signals excels in DeFi scam forensics, analyzing contract interactions and fund flows to identify actionable points. Their 2026 track record includes recovering farmed assets through chain mapping and authority collaborations. Visit https://www.crypterachainsignals.com/ for DeFi recovery support, or email info(a)crypterachainsignals.com to initiate help. Approach DeFi with audited protocols, diversified stakes, and exit plans. Education mitigates risks, turning potential traps into opportunities.

3 months, 1 week

NFT Scams: From Minting Frauds to Wash Trading Schemes

by rogerstewer＠gmail.com

The non-fungible token (NFT) market exploded in popularity, but with it came a wave of scams exploiting creators and collectors alike. From fake minting sites to artificial hype, understanding these schemes is crucial for anyone venturing into digital collectibles. This article dissects common NFT frauds, their mechanics, and potential recovery strategies, emphasizing the importance of due diligence in this volatile space. 1. Fake Minting and Launch Scams Scammers often create counterfeit NFT projects mimicking legitimate ones, complete with stolen artwork and hype on social media. Victims are lured to mint NFTs on fraudulent websites that promise exclusivity or low gas fees. These sites typically require connecting a wallet and approving transactions, but instead of minting, they drain funds or steal approvals for unlimited transfers. For instance, a fake Bored Ape Yacht Club drop might siphon Ethereum directly. The blockchain records this as a standard transfer, but the victim loses control instantly. Educatively, always verify project links through official channels and use tools like Etherscan to check contract interactions before approving. 2. Rug Pulls in NFT Collections Once a collection gains traction, scammers execute a "rug pull" by abandoning the project after collecting mint fees. They hype roadmaps with promises of utilities like metaverse access or airdrops, only to sell off their holdings and delete social accounts. Funds from mints are pooled in a smart contract, then drained via hidden backdoors. This creates a sudden price crash, leaving holders with worthless tokens. Real-world examples include projects that raised millions in 2025 only to vanish, highlighting the need for auditing contracts via platforms like Certik. Scammers split proceeds across wallets to evade immediate detection, often using automated bots for efficiency. 3. Wash Trading and Market Manipulation To inflate perceived value, scammers engage in wash trading: buying and selling NFTs between controlled wallets to fake volume and drive up floor prices. This attracts genuine buyers who then face dumps. On marketplaces like OpenSea, this appears as rapid trades, but blockchain analysis reveals clustered addresses. Privacy tools like mixers are then used to obscure funds, hopping to chains like Polygon for lower fees. Educatively, tools like Dune Analytics can reveal unnatural trading patterns, helping investors spot fakes before committing. 4. Secondary Market Thefts and Phishing Even after purchase, NFTs are targeted via phishing for wallet credentials or through malicious Discord bots. Stolen items are quickly flipped on other marketplaces or laundered as collateral in DeFi loans. Funds from sales follow familiar paths: splitting, chain-hopping to Solana or Avalanche, and cashing out via exchanges. Once in fiat, tracing becomes a legal matter, underscoring the global challenge of NFT fraud. Where Tracing Can Intervene NFT scams leave digital footprints that experts can exploit if acted on promptly. Early reporting allows monitoring of token transfers and wallet clusters. Marketplaces often freeze suspicious listings upon evidence, while chain analysis identifies endpoints. Blockchain investigation firms like Cryptera Chain Signals specialize in NFT fraud tracing, mapping token movements across marketplaces and chains to pinpoint recovery opportunities. With expertise in forensics and partnerships with platforms, they assist in freezing assets and building cases for law enforcement, boasting numerous successes in 2026 recoveries. For professional assistance with NFT scam investigations or asset recovery, visit the Cryptera Chain Signals website at https://www.crypterachainsignals.com/. You can contact them directly via email at info(a)crypterachainsignals.com or through their secure inquiry form. Navigating NFTs requires skepticism: verify creators, audit contracts, and use secure wallets. If scammed, document everything and seek help immediately to maximize recovery chances.

3 months, 1 week

Cross-Chain Bridge Exploits: Following the Money After DeFi Hacks

by luisannete22＠gmail.com

DeFi bridges are frequent hack targets, with billions stolen historically—funds often traceable despite complexity. 1. The Exploit Hackers exploit vulnerabilities in bridge contracts. Drain liquidity pools or mint unauthorized tokens. 2. Immediate Movement Stolen assets bridged back or swapped. Split across wallets. Laundered via mixers/DEXs. 3. Laundering Path Funds hop chains, convert to stablecoins, then to exchanges. 4. Cash-Out Attempts Many hit centralized platforms eventually. Where Tracing Can Intervene Bridges leave detailed trails. Multi-Chain Analysis: Track across ecosystems. Taint Tracking: Flag tainted funds at exchanges. Community/DAO Freezes: Some protocols freeze. Cryptera Chain Signals (CCS) provides expert multi-chain forensics for hack victims and projects, identifying paths and aiding freezes/recoveries. For DeFi hack or exploit recovery support, visit https://www.crypterachainsignals.com/ or email info(a)crypterachainsignals.com. Use audited bridges, diversify, and stay informed on security alerts.

3 months, 1 week

Title: Lost Wallet Access: Recovering Funds Without the Seed Phrase

by rogerstewer＠gmail.com

Not all losses are scams—many stem from forgotten passwords, damaged hardware, or partial seed phrases. 1. Common Scenarios Forgotten wallet PIN/password. Partial seed phrase remembered. Corrupted wallet files from old devices. 2. The Challenge Without full access, funds appear locked forever. Brute-forcing full seeds is impractical. 3. Recovery Methods Experts use: Targeted analysis on wallet files. Derivation path testing. Advanced password cracking (ethical, non-brute-force). 4. Secure Migration Once accessed, migrate to new secure setups (multisig, hardware). Where Tracing Can Intervene This isn't tracing stolen funds it's forensic wallet recovery. Firms like Cryptera Chain Signals (CCS) offer specialized lost wallet recovery using secure, non-custodial methods no seed required upfront. They've assisted in numerous 2026 cases with high success when partial info exists. Visit https://www.crypterachainsignals.com/ or email info(a)crypterachainsignals.com for wallet recovery consultations. Always back up seeds securely and test restores periodically.

3 months, 1 week

Fake Investment Platforms: Anatomy of a Rug Pull Scam

by rogerstewer＠gmail.com

Scammers launch bogus trading/investment sites promising guaranteed returns, then vanish with deposits. 1. Luring Victims Ads on social media or Telegram promote "AI trading bots" or "exclusive funds." Victims sign up and deposit crypto via provided wallets. 2. Controlled Environment Fake interfaces show rising balances to encourage more investment. Withdrawals blocked with excuses ("taxes," "verification"). 3. The Exit Scam When enough funds accumulate: Site goes offline. Funds transferred out rapidly. 4. Obfuscation & Cash-Out Similar to other scams: splitting, mixing, chain-hopping, then exchange fiat off-ramps. Where Tracing Can Intervene Many platforms use traceable patterns (e.g., repeated deposit addresses). Early Alerts: Monitor for sudden outflows. Clustering: Group related wallets to reveal operators. Legal Leverage: Evidence supports civil or criminal action. Cryptera Chain Signals (CCS) analyzes these platforms' transaction histories, traces to exchanges, and supports recovery efforts with detailed reports and partnerships. For help with fake investment scams, head to https://www.crypterachainsignals.com/ or contact info(a)crypterachainsignals.com. Research platforms thoroughly check audits, team transparency, and community feedback.

3 months, 1 week

Phishing Attacks on Wallets: How Hackers Drain Your Crypto in Minutes

by luisannete22＠gmail.com

Phishing remains one of the most common ways scammers steal crypto—often through fake websites, malicious emails, or compromised links. 1. The Bait Victims receive urgent messages: "Your wallet is at risk—verify here" or fake airdrop/claim links from trusted projects. Clicking leads to spoofed sites mimicking MetaMask, Ledger, or exchanges. Users enter seed phrases, private keys, or approve malicious transactions. 2. Instant Drainage Once credentials or approvals are obtained: Scammers sweep funds to their address. Drainers auto-transfer everything (tokens, NFTs). 3. Rapid Laundering Funds move fast: Split and peeled into smaller amounts. Bridged to other chains. Mixed or swapped to break links. 4. Cash-Out Deposited to exchanges, often KYC-bypassed via layered accounts. Where Tracing Can Intervene Phishing thefts leave clear on-chain trails if reported quickly. Real-Time Monitoring: Track outgoing sweeps and downstream hops. Pattern Recognition: Identify common drainer signatures or exchange deposit clusters. Freeze Potential: Exchanges can halt if illicit origin proven early. Firms like Cryptera Chain Signals (CCS) excel at rapid phishing investigations, using AI-powered tracing to follow funds across chains and facilitate exchange freezes. In 2026, they've helped recover significant portions in time-sensitive cases. Visit https://www.crypterachainsignals.com/ for crypto scam recovery support, or email info(a)crypterachainsignals.com to get started. Protect yourself with hardware wallets and bookmark verification never enter seeds online.

3 months, 1 week

Romance Scams in Crypto: The Slow-Burn Theft Exposed Cryptera Chain Signals

by luisannete22＠gmail.com

The rise of cryptocurrency has amplified romance scams, where fraudsters build emotional trust over weeks or months before requesting funds. These "pig butchering" operations are particularly devastating because victims often send large sums willingly. 1. Building False Trust Scammers create fake profiles on dating apps or social media, posing as successful investors or entrepreneurs. They share "proof" of crypto gains to lure victims into trading platforms they control. Conversations escalate to "exclusive opportunities" like private presales or high-yield pools. Victims are guided to deposit crypto into wallets or fake exchanges. 2. The Extraction Phase Once trust is established, scammers pressure victims to invest more, promising quick returns. Funds go to scammer-controlled addresses. Fake dashboards show fabricated profits to encourage further deposits. 3. Obfuscation Tactics After extraction, funds are quickly moved: Split across dozens of wallets. Hopped through bridges to privacy-focused chains. Mixed via services or converted to privacy coins like Monero. 4. Final Laundering Cleaned funds hit centralized exchanges for fiat withdrawal, often via mule accounts. Recovery window closes fast once converted. Where Tracing Can Intervene Quick action is essential in romance scams due to the emotional manipulation factor. Immediate Reporting: Preserve all chat logs, transaction IDs, and screenshots. Blockchain Analysis: Trace patterns like repeated small deposits or specific bridge usage. Exchange Cooperation: Provide evidence to freeze incoming deposits. Blockchain investigation firms like Cryptera Chain Signals (CCS) specialize in tracing romance scam funds through complex paths, identifying endpoints, and assisting with freeze requests. With advanced forensics and a track record of hundreds of recoveries (including 2026 cases), they help victims map flows and pursue actionable steps before full laundering. For professional help with romance scam or crypto fraud recovery, visit the Cryptera Chain Signals website at https://www.crypterachainsignals.com/. Contact them directly via email at info(a)crypterachainsignals.com or through their secure inquiry form. Emotional scams hurt deeply, but blockchain transparency offers hope—act swiftly and seek expert help.

3 months, 1 week

[PATCH v3 11/12] nilfs2: widen trace event i_ino fields to u64

by jlayton＠kernel.org

The content of this message was lost. It was probably cross-posted to multiple lists and previously handled on another list.

3 months, 1 week

[PATCH v3 10/12] f2fs: widen trace event i_ino fields to u64

by jlayton＠kernel.org

The content of this message was lost. It was probably cross-posted to multiple lists and previously handled on another list.

3 months, 1 week

[PATCH v2 000/110] vfs: change inode->i_ino from unsigned long to u64

by Jeff Layton

This version splits the change up to be more bisectable. It first adds a new kino_t typedef and a new "PRIino" macro to hold the width specifier for format strings. The conversion is done, and then everything is changed to remove the new macro and typedef. I also missed a few places in the earlier set. This one hopefully does a bit more thorough job. My thanks and apologies to everyone who sent R-b/A-b for the v1 series. v2 breaks a lot of the changes up into two patches so many of those didn't carry over. Please resend those if you're still OK with it. The entire pile is in the "iino-u64" branch of my tree, if anyone is interested in testing this: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/jlayton/linux.git/ Original cover letter follows: ----------------------8<----------------------- Christian said [1] to "just do it" when I proposed this, so here we are! For historical reasons, the inode->i_ino field is an unsigned long, which means that it's 32 bits on 32 bit architectures. This has caused a number of filesystems to implement hacks to hash a 64-bit identifier into a 32-bit field, and deprives us of a universal identifier field for an inode. This patchset changes the inode->i_ino field from an unsigned long to a u64. This shouldn't make any material difference on 64-bit hosts, but 32-bit hosts will see struct inode grow by at least 4 bytes. This could have effects on slabcache sizes and field alignment. The bulk of the changes are to format strings and tracepoints, since the kernel itself doesn't care that much about the i_ino field. The first patch changes some vfs function arguments, so check that one out carefully. With this change, we may be able to shrink some inode structures. For instance, struct nfs_inode has a fileid field that holds the 64-bit inode number. With this set of changes, that field could be eliminated. I'd rather leave that sort of cleanups for later just to keep this simple. Much of this set was generated by LLM, but I attributed it to myself since I consider this to be in the "menial tasks" category of LLM usage. [1]: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-fsdevel/20260219-portrait-winkt-959070cee42f@… Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton(a)kernel.org> --- Changes in v2: - Use a typedef and macro and do the change in two steps to make it cleanly bisectable - Fix check_for_busy_inodes() in fscrypt - Added patch to reorganize tracepoint structs for better packing - Added patch to change sock.sk_ino to u64 - Added patch to clean up internal handling of inode numbers in audit subsystem - Drop some unnecessary casts - Link to v1: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20260226-iino-u64-v1-0-ccceff366db9@kernel.org --- Jeff Layton (110): vfs: introduce kino_t typedef and PRIino format macro vfs: widen inode hash/lookup functions to u64 audit: widen ino fields to u64 net: change sock.sk_ino and sock_i_ino() to u64 trace: store i_ino as u64 instead of ino_t/unsigned long trace: reorder TP_STRUCT__entry fields for better packing on 32-bit ext4: use PRIino format for i_ino jbd2: use PRIino format for i_ino f2fs: use PRIino format for i_ino lockd: use PRIino format for i_ino nfs: use PRIino format for i_ino nfsd: use PRIino format for i_ino locks: use PRIino format for i_ino proc: use PRIino format for i_ino nilfs2: use PRIino format for i_ino 9p: use PRIino format for i_ino affs: use PRIino format for i_ino afs: use PRIino format for i_ino autofs: use PRIino format for i_ino befs: use PRIino format for i_ino bfs: use PRIino format for i_ino cachefiles: use PRIino format for i_ino ceph: use PRIino format for i_ino coda: use PRIino format for i_ino cramfs: use PRIino format for i_ino ecryptfs: use PRIino format for i_ino efs: use PRIino format for i_ino exportfs: use PRIino format for i_ino ext2: use PRIino format for i_ino freevxfs: use PRIino format for i_ino hfs: use PRIino format for i_ino hfsplus: use PRIino format for i_ino hpfs: use PRIino format for i_ino isofs: use PRIino format for i_ino jffs2: use PRIino format for i_ino jfs: use PRIino format for i_ino minix: use PRIino format for i_ino nsfs: use PRIino format for i_ino ntfs3: use PRIino format for i_ino ocfs2: use PRIino format for i_ino orangefs: use PRIino format for i_ino overlayfs: use PRIino format for i_ino qnx4: use PRIino format for i_ino qnx6: use PRIino format for i_ino ubifs: use PRIino format for i_ino udf: use PRIino format for i_ino ufs: use PRIino format for i_ino zonefs: use PRIino format for i_ino security: use PRIino format for i_ino drm/amdgpu: use PRIino format for i_ino fsnotify: use PRIino format for i_ino net: use PRIino format for i_ino uprobes: use PRIino format for i_ino dma-buf: use PRIino format for i_ino fscrypt: use PRIino format for i_ino fsverity: use PRIino format for i_ino iomap: use PRIino format for i_ino net: use PRIino format for i_ino vfs: use PRIino format for i_ino vfs: change kino_t from unsigned long to u64 ext4: replace PRIino with %llu/%llx format strings jbd2: replace PRIino with %llu/%llx format strings f2fs: replace PRIino with %llu/%llx format strings lockd: replace PRIino with %llu/%llx format strings nfs: replace PRIino with %llu/%llx format strings nfsd: replace PRIino with %llu/%llx format strings proc: replace PRIino with %llu/%llx format strings nilfs2: replace PRIino with %llu/%llx format strings 9p: replace PRIino with %llu/%llx format strings affs: replace PRIino with %llu/%llx format strings afs: replace PRIino with %llu/%llx format strings autofs: replace PRIino with %llu/%llx format strings befs: replace PRIino with %llu/%llx format strings bfs: replace PRIino with %llu/%llx format strings cachefiles: replace PRIino with %llu/%llx format strings ceph: replace PRIino with %llu/%llx format strings coda: replace PRIino with %llu/%llx format strings cramfs: replace PRIino with %llu/%llx format strings ecryptfs: replace PRIino with %llu/%llx format strings efs: replace PRIino with %llu/%llx format strings exportfs: replace PRIino with %llu/%llx format strings ext2: replace PRIino with %llu/%llx format strings freevxfs: replace PRIino with %llu/%llx format strings hfs: replace PRIino with %llu/%llx format strings hfsplus: replace PRIino with %llu/%llx format strings hpfs: replace PRIino with %llu/%llx format strings isofs: replace PRIino with %llu/%llx format strings jffs2: replace PRIino with %llu/%llx format strings jfs: replace PRIino with %llu/%llx format strings minix: replace PRIino with %llu/%llx format strings ntfs3: replace PRIino with %llu/%llx format strings ocfs2: replace PRIino with %llu/%llx format strings orangefs: replace PRIino with %llu/%llx format strings overlayfs: replace PRIino with %llu/%llx format strings qnx4: replace PRIino with %llu/%llx format strings qnx6: replace PRIino with %llu/%llx format strings ubifs: replace PRIino with %llu/%llx format strings udf: replace PRIino with %llu/%llx format strings ufs: replace PRIino with %llu/%llx format strings zonefs: replace PRIino with %llu/%llx format strings fscrypt: replace PRIino with %llu/%llx format strings fsverity: replace PRIino with %llu/%llx format strings iomap: replace PRIino with %llu/%llx format strings fsnotify: replace PRIino with %llu/%llx format strings security: replace PRIino with %llu/%llx format strings drm/amdgpu: replace PRIino with %llu/%llx format strings dma-buf: replace PRIino with %llu/%llx format strings net: replace PRIino with %llu/%llx format strings uprobes: replace PRIino with %llu/%llx format strings vfs: remove kino_t typedef and PRIino format macro drivers/dma-buf/dma-buf.c | 2 +- drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_object.c | 4 +- fs/9p/vfs_addr.c | 4 +- fs/9p/vfs_inode.c | 6 +- fs/9p/vfs_inode_dotl.c | 6 +- fs/affs/amigaffs.c | 8 +- fs/affs/bitmap.c | 2 +- fs/affs/dir.c | 2 +- fs/affs/file.c | 20 +- fs/affs/inode.c | 12 +- fs/affs/namei.c | 14 +- fs/affs/symlink.c | 2 +- fs/afs/dir.c | 10 +- fs/afs/dir_search.c | 2 +- fs/afs/dynroot.c | 2 +- fs/afs/inode.c | 2 +- fs/autofs/inode.c | 2 +- fs/befs/linuxvfs.c | 28 +- fs/bfs/dir.c | 4 +- fs/cachefiles/io.c | 6 +- fs/cachefiles/namei.c | 12 +- fs/cachefiles/xattr.c | 2 +- fs/ceph/crypto.c | 4 +- fs/coda/dir.c | 2 +- fs/coda/inode.c | 2 +- fs/cramfs/inode.c | 2 +- fs/crypto/crypto.c | 2 +- fs/crypto/hooks.c | 2 +- fs/crypto/keyring.c | 4 +- fs/crypto/keysetup.c | 2 +- fs/dcache.c | 4 +- fs/ecryptfs/crypto.c | 6 +- fs/ecryptfs/file.c | 2 +- fs/efs/inode.c | 6 +- fs/eventpoll.c | 2 +- fs/exportfs/expfs.c | 4 +- fs/ext2/dir.c | 10 +- fs/ext2/ialloc.c | 9 +- fs/ext2/inode.c | 2 +- fs/ext2/trace.h | 8 +- fs/ext2/xattr.c | 14 +- fs/ext4/dir.c | 2 +- fs/ext4/ext4.h | 4 +- fs/ext4/extents.c | 8 +- fs/ext4/extents_status.c | 28 +- fs/ext4/fast_commit.c | 8 +- fs/ext4/ialloc.c | 10 +- fs/ext4/indirect.c | 2 +- fs/ext4/inline.c | 14 +- fs/ext4/inode.c | 22 +- fs/ext4/ioctl.c | 4 +- fs/ext4/mballoc.c | 6 +- fs/ext4/migrate.c | 2 +- fs/ext4/move_extent.c | 20 +- fs/ext4/namei.c | 10 +- fs/ext4/orphan.c | 16 +- fs/ext4/page-io.c | 10 +- fs/ext4/super.c | 22 +- fs/ext4/xattr.c | 10 +- fs/f2fs/compress.c | 4 +- fs/f2fs/dir.c | 2 +- fs/f2fs/extent_cache.c | 8 +- fs/f2fs/f2fs.h | 6 +- fs/f2fs/file.c | 12 +- fs/f2fs/gc.c | 2 +- fs/f2fs/inline.c | 4 +- fs/f2fs/inode.c | 48 ++-- fs/f2fs/namei.c | 8 +- fs/f2fs/node.c | 12 +- fs/f2fs/recovery.c | 10 +- fs/f2fs/xattr.c | 10 +- fs/freevxfs/vxfs_bmap.c | 4 +- fs/fserror.c | 2 +- fs/hfs/catalog.c | 2 +- fs/hfs/extent.c | 4 +- fs/hfs/inode.c | 4 +- fs/hfsplus/attributes.c | 10 +- fs/hfsplus/catalog.c | 2 +- fs/hfsplus/dir.c | 6 +- fs/hfsplus/extents.c | 6 +- fs/hfsplus/inode.c | 8 +- fs/hfsplus/super.c | 6 +- fs/hfsplus/xattr.c | 10 +- fs/hpfs/dir.c | 4 +- fs/hpfs/dnode.c | 4 +- fs/hpfs/ea.c | 4 +- fs/hpfs/inode.c | 4 +- fs/inode.c | 49 ++-- fs/iomap/ioend.c | 2 +- fs/iomap/trace.h | 8 +- fs/isofs/compress.c | 2 +- fs/isofs/dir.c | 2 +- fs/isofs/inode.c | 6 +- fs/isofs/namei.c | 2 +- fs/jbd2/journal.c | 4 +- fs/jbd2/transaction.c | 2 +- fs/jffs2/dir.c | 4 +- fs/jffs2/file.c | 4 +- fs/jffs2/fs.c | 18 +- fs/jfs/inode.c | 2 +- fs/jfs/jfs_imap.c | 2 +- fs/jfs/jfs_metapage.c | 2 +- fs/lockd/svclock.c | 8 +- fs/lockd/svcsubs.c | 2 +- fs/locks.c | 6 +- fs/minix/inode.c | 10 +- fs/nfs/dir.c | 20 +- fs/nfs/file.c | 8 +- fs/nfs/filelayout/filelayout.c | 8 +- fs/nfs/flexfilelayout/flexfilelayout.c | 8 +- fs/nfs/inode.c | 6 +- fs/nfs/nfs4proc.c | 4 +- fs/nfs/pnfs.c | 12 +- fs/nfsd/export.c | 2 +- fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c | 4 +- fs/nfsd/nfsfh.c | 4 +- fs/nfsd/vfs.c | 2 +- fs/nilfs2/alloc.c | 10 +- fs/nilfs2/bmap.c | 2 +- fs/nilfs2/btnode.c | 2 +- fs/nilfs2/btree.c | 12 +- fs/nilfs2/dir.c | 12 +- fs/nilfs2/direct.c | 4 +- fs/nilfs2/gcinode.c | 2 +- fs/nilfs2/inode.c | 8 +- fs/nilfs2/mdt.c | 2 +- fs/nilfs2/namei.c | 2 +- fs/nilfs2/segment.c | 2 +- fs/notify/fdinfo.c | 4 +- fs/nsfs.c | 4 +- fs/ntfs3/super.c | 2 +- fs/ocfs2/alloc.c | 2 +- fs/ocfs2/aops.c | 4 +- fs/ocfs2/dir.c | 8 +- fs/ocfs2/dlmfs/dlmfs.c | 10 +- fs/ocfs2/extent_map.c | 12 +- fs/ocfs2/inode.c | 2 +- fs/ocfs2/quota_local.c | 2 +- fs/ocfs2/refcounttree.c | 10 +- fs/ocfs2/xattr.c | 4 +- fs/orangefs/inode.c | 2 +- fs/overlayfs/export.c | 2 +- fs/overlayfs/namei.c | 4 +- fs/overlayfs/util.c | 2 +- fs/pipe.c | 2 +- fs/proc/fd.c | 2 +- fs/proc/task_mmu.c | 4 +- fs/qnx4/inode.c | 4 +- fs/qnx6/inode.c | 2 +- fs/ubifs/debug.c | 8 +- fs/ubifs/dir.c | 28 +- fs/ubifs/file.c | 28 +- fs/ubifs/journal.c | 6 +- fs/ubifs/super.c | 16 +- fs/ubifs/tnc.c | 4 +- fs/ubifs/xattr.c | 14 +- fs/udf/directory.c | 18 +- fs/udf/file.c | 2 +- fs/udf/inode.c | 12 +- fs/udf/namei.c | 8 +- fs/udf/super.c | 2 +- fs/ufs/balloc.c | 6 +- fs/ufs/dir.c | 10 +- fs/ufs/ialloc.c | 6 +- fs/ufs/inode.c | 18 +- fs/ufs/ufs_fs.h | 6 +- fs/ufs/util.c | 2 +- fs/verity/init.c | 2 +- fs/zonefs/super.c | 8 +- fs/zonefs/trace.h | 18 +- include/linux/audit.h | 2 +- include/linux/fs.h | 28 +- include/net/sock.h | 4 +- include/trace/events/cachefiles.h | 18 +- include/trace/events/ext4.h | 423 +++++++++++++++-------------- include/trace/events/f2fs.h | 172 ++++++------ include/trace/events/filelock.h | 34 +-- include/trace/events/filemap.h | 20 +- include/trace/events/fs_dax.h | 20 +- include/trace/events/fsverity.h | 30 +- include/trace/events/hugetlbfs.h | 42 +-- include/trace/events/netfs.h | 8 +- include/trace/events/nilfs2.h | 12 +- include/trace/events/readahead.h | 18 +- include/trace/events/timestamp.h | 16 +- include/trace/events/writeback.h | 162 +++++------ kernel/audit.h | 9 +- kernel/audit_fsnotify.c | 4 +- kernel/audit_watch.c | 8 +- kernel/auditsc.c | 2 +- kernel/events/uprobes.c | 4 +- net/ax25/af_ax25.c | 2 +- net/bluetooth/af_bluetooth.c | 4 +- net/can/bcm.c | 2 +- net/ipv4/ping.c | 2 +- net/ipv4/raw.c | 2 +- net/ipv4/tcp_ipv4.c | 2 +- net/ipv4/udp.c | 2 +- net/ipv6/datagram.c | 2 +- net/ipv6/tcp_ipv6.c | 2 +- net/key/af_key.c | 2 +- net/netlink/af_netlink.c | 2 +- net/netlink/diag.c | 2 +- net/netrom/af_netrom.c | 4 +- net/packet/af_packet.c | 2 +- net/packet/diag.c | 2 +- net/phonet/socket.c | 4 +- net/rose/af_rose.c | 4 +- net/sctp/proc.c | 4 +- net/socket.c | 2 +- net/unix/af_unix.c | 2 +- net/unix/diag.c | 6 +- net/x25/x25_proc.c | 4 +- net/xdp/xsk_diag.c | 2 +- security/apparmor/apparmorfs.c | 4 +- security/integrity/integrity_audit.c | 2 +- security/ipe/audit.c | 2 +- security/lsm_audit.c | 10 +- security/selinux/hooks.c | 10 +- security/smack/smack_lsm.c | 12 +- 220 files changed, 1181 insertions(+), 1181 deletions(-) --- base-commit: 842cfe0733c5a03982a7ae496de6fdc0dd661a41 change-id: 20260224-iino-u64-b44a3a72543c Best regards, -- Jeff Layton <jlayton(a)kernel.org>

3 months, 1 week

Jump to page:

2026

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

Linaro-mm-sig