Linaro-mm-sig

linaro-mm-sig@lists.linaro.org

20 participants
2966 discussions

[PATCH v2 0/5] Add Toshiba Visconti DNN image processing accelerator driver

by Yuji Ishikawa

This series is the DNN image processing accelerator driver for Toshiba's ARM SoC, Visconti[0]. This provides DT binding documentation, device driver, MAINTAINER files and documents. Best regards, Yuji [0]: https://toshiba.semicon-storage.com/ap-en/semiconductor/product/image-recog… dt-bindings: soc: visconti: Add Toshiba Visconti DNN image processing accelerator bindings v1 -> v2: - No update soc: visconti: Add Toshiba Visconti image processing accelerator common source v1 -> v2: - checked with checkpatch.pl --strict soc: visconti: Add Toshiba Visconti DNN image processing accelerator v1 -> v2: - checked with checkpatch.pl --strict - removed unused code MAINTAINERS: Add entries for Toshiba Visconti DNN image processing v1 -> v2: - No update Documentation: driver-api: visconti: add a description of DNN driver. v1 -> v2: - newly added documents Yuji Ishikawa (5): dt-bindings: soc: visconti: Add Toshiba Visconti DNN image processing accelerator bindings soc: visconti: Add Toshiba Visconti image processing accelerator common source soc: visconti: Add Toshiba Visconti DNN image processing accelerator MAINTAINERS: Add entries for Toshiba Visconti DNN image processing accelerator Documentation: driver-api: visconti: add a description of DNN driver. .../soc/visconti/toshiba,visconti-dnn.yaml | 54 ++ Documentation/driver-api/visconti/common.rst | 115 ++++ Documentation/driver-api/visconti/dnn.rst | 394 +++++++++++++ MAINTAINERS | 2 + drivers/soc/Kconfig | 1 + drivers/soc/Makefile | 1 + drivers/soc/visconti/Kconfig | 7 + drivers/soc/visconti/Makefile | 8 + drivers/soc/visconti/dnn/Makefile | 6 + drivers/soc/visconti/dnn/dnn.c | 523 ++++++++++++++++++ drivers/soc/visconti/dnn/hwd_dnn.c | 183 ++++++ drivers/soc/visconti/dnn/hwd_dnn.h | 68 +++ drivers/soc/visconti/dnn/hwd_dnn_reg.h | 228 ++++++++ drivers/soc/visconti/ipa_common.c | 55 ++ drivers/soc/visconti/ipa_common.h | 18 + drivers/soc/visconti/uapi/dnn.h | 77 +++ drivers/soc/visconti/uapi/ipa.h | 90 +++ 17 files changed, 1830 insertions(+) create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/soc/visconti/toshiba,visconti-dnn.yaml create mode 100644 Documentation/driver-api/visconti/common.rst create mode 100644 Documentation/driver-api/visconti/dnn.rst create mode 100644 drivers/soc/visconti/Kconfig create mode 100644 drivers/soc/visconti/Makefile create mode 100644 drivers/soc/visconti/dnn/Makefile create mode 100644 drivers/soc/visconti/dnn/dnn.c create mode 100644 drivers/soc/visconti/dnn/hwd_dnn.c create mode 100644 drivers/soc/visconti/dnn/hwd_dnn.h create mode 100644 drivers/soc/visconti/dnn/hwd_dnn_reg.h create mode 100644 drivers/soc/visconti/ipa_common.c create mode 100644 drivers/soc/visconti/ipa_common.h create mode 100644 drivers/soc/visconti/uapi/dnn.h create mode 100644 drivers/soc/visconti/uapi/ipa.h -- 2.17.1

2 years, 11 months

[PATCH v2 00/21] Fix performance regressions with TLB and add GuC support

by Mauro Carvalho Chehab

TLB invalidation is a slow operation. It should not be doing lightly, as it causes performance regressions, like this: [178.821002] i915 0000:00:02.0: [drm] *ERROR* rcs0 TLB invalidation did not complete in 4ms! This series contain 1) some patches that makes TLB invalidation to happen only on active, non-wedged engines, doing cache invalidation in batch and only when GT objects are exposed to userspace: drm/i915/gt: Ignore TLB invalidations on idle engines drm/i915/gt: Only invalidate TLBs exposed to user manipulation drm/i915/gt: Skip TLB invalidations once wedged drm/i915/gt: Batch TLB invalidations drm/i915/gt: Move TLB invalidation to its own file 2) It fixes two bugs, being the first a workaround: drm/i915/gt: Invalidate TLB of the OA unit at TLB invalidations drm/i915: Invalidate the TLBs on each GT drm/i915/guc: Introduce TLB_INVALIDATION_ALL action 3) It adds GuC support. Besides providing TLB invalidation on some additional hardware, this should also help serializing GuC operations with TLB invalidation: drm/i915/guc: Introduce TLB_INVALIDATION_ALL action drm/i915/guc: Define CTB based TLB invalidation routines drm/i915: Add platform macro for selective tlb flush drm/i915: Define GuC Based TLB invalidation routines drm/i915: Add generic interface for tlb invalidation for XeHP drm/i915: Use selective tlb invalidations where supported 4) It adds the corresponding kernel-doc markups for the kAPI used for TLB invalidation. While I could have split this into smaller pieces, I'm opting to send them altogether, in order for CI trybot to better verify what issues will be closed with this series. --- v2: - no changes. Just rebased on the top of drm-tip: 2022y-07m-14d-08h-35m-36s, as CI trybot was having troubles applying it. Hopefully, it will now work. Chris Wilson (7): drm/i915/gt: Ignore TLB invalidations on idle engines drm/i915/gt: Invalidate TLB of the OA unit at TLB invalidations drm/i915/gt: Only invalidate TLBs exposed to user manipulation drm/i915/gt: Skip TLB invalidations once wedged drm/i915/gt: Batch TLB invalidations drm/i915/gt: Move TLB invalidation to its own file drm/i915: Invalidate the TLBs on each GT Mauro Carvalho Chehab (8): drm/i915/gt: document with_intel_gt_pm_if_awake() drm/i915/gt: describe the new tlb parameter at i915_vma_resource drm/i915/guc: use kernel-doc for enum intel_guc_tlb_inval_mode drm/i915/guc: document the TLB invalidation struct members drm/i915: document tlb field at struct drm_i915_gem_object drm/i915/gt: document TLB cache invalidation functions drm/i915/guc: describe enum intel_guc_tlb_invalidation_type drm/i915/guc: document TLB cache invalidation functions Piotr Piórkowski (1): drm/i915/guc: Introduce TLB_INVALIDATION_ALL action Prathap Kumar Valsan (5): drm/i915/guc: Define CTB based TLB invalidation routines drm/i915: Add platform macro for selective tlb flush drm/i915: Define GuC Based TLB invalidation routines drm/i915: Add generic interface for tlb invalidation for XeHP drm/i915: Use selective tlb invalidations where supported drivers/gpu/drm/i915/Makefile | 1 + .../gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_object_types.h | 6 +- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_pages.c | 28 +- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_engine.h | 1 + drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_gt.c | 125 +------- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_gt.h | 2 - .../gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_gt_buffer_pool.h | 3 +- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_gt_defines.h | 11 + drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_gt_pm.h | 10 + drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_gt_regs.h | 8 + drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_gt_types.h | 22 +- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_ppgtt.c | 8 +- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_tlb.c | 295 ++++++++++++++++++ drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_tlb.h | 30 ++ .../gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/abi/guc_actions_abi.h | 54 ++++ drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc.c | 232 ++++++++++++++ drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc.h | 36 +++ drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_ct.c | 24 +- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_fwif.h | 9 + .../gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_submission.c | 91 +++++- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h | 4 +- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_pci.c | 1 + drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_vma.c | 46 ++- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_vma.h | 2 + drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_vma_resource.c | 9 +- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_vma_resource.h | 6 +- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_device_info.h | 1 + 27 files changed, 910 insertions(+), 155 deletions(-) create mode 100644 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_gt_defines.h create mode 100644 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_tlb.c create mode 100644 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_tlb.h -- 2.36.1

2 years, 11 months

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 06/21] drm/i915/gt: Batch TLB invalidations

by Tvrtko Ursulin

On 20/07/2022 08:13, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote: > On Mon, 18 Jul 2022 14:52:05 +0100 > Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin(a)linux.intel.com> wrote: > >> >> On 14/07/2022 13:06, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote: >>> From: Chris Wilson <chris.p.wilson(a)intel.com> >>> >>> Invalidate TLB in patch, in order to reduce performance regressions. >> >> "in batches"? > > Yeah. Will fix it. > >>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_ppgtt.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_ppgtt.c >>> index d8b94d638559..2da6c82a8bd2 100644 >>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_ppgtt.c >>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_ppgtt.c >>> @@ -206,8 +206,12 @@ void ppgtt_bind_vma(struct i915_address_space *vm, >>> void ppgtt_unbind_vma(struct i915_address_space *vm, >>> struct i915_vma_resource *vma_res) >>> { >>> - if (vma_res->allocated) >>> - vm->clear_range(vm, vma_res->start, vma_res->vma_size); >>> + if (!vma_res->allocated) >>> + return; >>> + >>> + vm->clear_range(vm, vma_res->start, vma_res->vma_size); >>> + if (vma_res->tlb) >>> + vma_invalidate_tlb(vm, *vma_res->tlb); >> >> The patch is about more than batching? If there is a security hole in >> this area (unbind) with the current code? > > No, I don't think there's a security hole. The rationale for this is > not due to it. In this case obvious question is why are these changes in the patch which declares itself to be about batching invalidations? Because... > Since commit 2f6b90da9192 ("drm/i915: Use vma resources for async unbinding"), > VMA unbind can happen either sync or async. > > So, the logic needs to do TLB invalidate on two places. After this > patch, the code at __i915_vma_evict is: > > struct dma_fence *__i915_vma_evict(struct i915_vma *vma, bool async) > { > ... > if (async) > unbind_fence = i915_vma_resource_unbind(vma_res, > &vma->obj->mm.tlb); > else > unbind_fence = i915_vma_resource_unbind(vma_res, NULL); > > vma->resource = NULL; > > atomic_and(~(I915_VMA_BIND_MASK | I915_VMA_ERROR | I915_VMA_GGTT_WRITE), > &vma->flags); > > i915_vma_detach(vma); > > if (!async) { > if (unbind_fence) { > dma_fence_wait(unbind_fence, false); > dma_fence_put(unbind_fence); > unbind_fence = NULL; > } > vma_invalidate_tlb(vma->vm, vma->obj->mm.tlb); > } > ... > > So, basically, if !async, __i915_vma_evict() will do TLB cache invalidation. > > However, when async is used, the actual page release will happen later, > at this function: > > void ppgtt_unbind_vma(struct i915_address_space *vm, > struct i915_vma_resource *vma_res) > { > if (!vma_res->allocated) > return; > > vm->clear_range(vm, vma_res->start, vma_res->vma_size); > if (vma_res->tlb) > vma_invalidate_tlb(vm, *vma_res->tlb); > } .. frankly I don't follow since I don't see any page release happening in here. Just PTE clearing. I am explaining why it looks to me that the patch is doing two things. Implementing batching _and_ adding invalidation points at VMA unbind sites, while so far we had it at backing store release only. Maybe I am wrong and perhaps I am too slow to pick up on the explanation here. So if the patch is doing two things please split it up. I am further confused by the invalidation call site in evict and in unbind - why there can't be one logical site since the logical sequence is evict -> unbind. Regards, Tvrtko

2 years, 12 months

[PATCH v1 0/6] Move all drivers to a common dma-buf locking convention

by Dmitry Osipenko

Hello, This series moves all drivers to a dynamic dma-buf locking specification. From now on all dma-buf importers are made responsible for holding dma-buf's reservation lock around all operations performed over dma-bufs. This common locking convention allows us to utilize reservation lock more broadly around kernel without fearing of potential dead locks. This patchset passes all i915 selftests. It was also tested using VirtIO, Panfrost, Lima and Tegra drivers. I tested cases of display+GPU, display+V4L and GPU+V4L dma-buf sharing, which covers majority of kernel drivers since rest of the drivers share same or similar code paths. This is a continuation of [1] where Christian König asked to factor out the dma-buf locking changes into separate series. [1] https://lore.kernel.org/dri-devel/20220526235040.678984-1-dmitry.osipenko@c… Dmitry Osipenko (6): dma-buf: Add _unlocked postfix to function names drm/gem: Take reservation lock for vmap/vunmap operations dma-buf: Move all dma-bufs to dynamic locking specification dma-buf: Acquire wait-wound context on attachment media: videobuf2: Stop using internal dma-buf lock dma-buf: Remove internal lock drivers/dma-buf/dma-buf.c | 198 +++++++++++------- drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_dma_buf.c | 4 +- drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_ttm.c | 4 +- drivers/gpu/drm/armada/armada_gem.c | 14 +- drivers/gpu/drm/drm_client.c | 4 +- drivers/gpu/drm/drm_gem.c | 28 +++ drivers/gpu/drm/drm_gem_cma_helper.c | 6 +- drivers/gpu/drm/drm_gem_framebuffer_helper.c | 6 +- drivers/gpu/drm/drm_gem_shmem_helper.c | 6 +- drivers/gpu/drm/drm_prime.c | 12 +- drivers/gpu/drm/etnaviv/etnaviv_gem_prime.c | 6 +- drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_drm_gem.c | 2 +- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_dmabuf.c | 20 +- .../gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_execbuffer.c | 2 +- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_object.h | 6 +- .../drm/i915/gem/selftests/i915_gem_dmabuf.c | 20 +- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_evict.c | 2 +- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_ww.c | 26 ++- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_ww.h | 15 +- drivers/gpu/drm/omapdrm/omap_gem_dmabuf.c | 8 +- drivers/gpu/drm/qxl/qxl_object.c | 17 +- drivers/gpu/drm/qxl/qxl_prime.c | 4 +- drivers/gpu/drm/tegra/gem.c | 27 +-- drivers/infiniband/core/umem_dmabuf.c | 11 +- .../common/videobuf2/videobuf2-dma-contig.c | 26 +-- .../media/common/videobuf2/videobuf2-dma-sg.c | 23 +- .../common/videobuf2/videobuf2-vmalloc.c | 17 +- .../platform/nvidia/tegra-vde/dmabuf-cache.c | 12 +- drivers/misc/fastrpc.c | 12 +- drivers/xen/gntdev-dmabuf.c | 14 +- include/drm/drm_gem.h | 3 + include/linux/dma-buf.h | 49 ++--- 32 files changed, 347 insertions(+), 257 deletions(-) -- 2.36.1

2 years, 12 months

[BUG] most: usb: Found a bug at the probe time

by Zheyu Ma

Hello, I found a bug in the most usb driver. When the driver fails at mdev->conf = kcalloc(num_endpoints, sizeof(*mdev->conf), GFP_KERNEL); I got the following warning message: [ 15.406256] kobject: '(null)' (ffff8881068f8000): is not initialized, yet kobject_put() is being called. [ 15.406986] WARNING: CPU: 3 PID: 396 at lib/kobject.c:720 kobject_put+0x6e/0x1c0 [ 15.410120] RIP: 0010:kobject_put+0x6e/0x1c0 [ 15.410470] Code: 01 75 29 4c 89 f8 48 c1 e8 03 80 3c 28 00 74 08 4c 89 ff e8 14 2e 73 ff 49 8b 37 48 c7 c7 c0 fc de 85 4c 89 fa e8 e2 61 21 ff <0f> 0b 49 8d 5f 38 48 89 df be 04 00 00 00 e8 df 2e 73 ff b8 ff ff [ 15.416529] Call Trace: [ 15.416896] hdm_probe+0xf3d/0x1090 [most_usb] Since I'm not familiar with the driver, I ask for your help to solve the warning. regards, Zheyu Ma

3 years

[PATCH v2] i2c: imx: fix typo in comment

by Flavio Suligoi

to provid --> to provide Signed-off-by: Flavio Suligoi <f.suligoi(a)asem.it> --- v2: - fix typo in subject drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-imx.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-imx.c b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-imx.c index e9e2db68b9fb..78fb1a4274a6 100644 --- a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-imx.c +++ b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-imx.c @@ -66,7 +66,7 @@ /* IMX I2C registers: * the I2C register offset is different between SoCs, - * to provid support for all these chips, split the + * to provide support for all these chips, split the * register offset into a fixed base address and a * variable shift value, then the full register offset * will be calculated by -- 2.25.1

3 years

[PATCH v1] 2c: imx: fix typo in comment

by Flavio Suligoi

to provid --> to provide Signed-off-by: Flavio Suligoi <f.suligoi(a)asem.it> --- drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-imx.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-imx.c b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-imx.c index e9e2db68b9fb..78fb1a4274a6 100644 --- a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-imx.c +++ b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-imx.c @@ -66,7 +66,7 @@ /* IMX I2C registers: * the I2C register offset is different between SoCs, - * to provid support for all these chips, split the + * to provide support for all these chips, split the * register offset into a fixed base address and a * variable shift value, then the full register offset * will be calculated by -- 2.25.1

3 years

Mail Security Alert

by IT HelpDesk Support

3 years

[PATCH 00/21] Fix performance regressions with TLB and add GuC support

by Mauro Carvalho Chehab

TLB invalidation is a slow operation. It should not be doing lightly, as it causes performance regressions, like this: [178.821002] i915 0000:00:02.0: [drm] *ERROR* rcs0 TLB invalidation did not complete in 4ms! This series contain 1) some patches that makes TLB invalidation to happen only on active, non-wedged engines, doing cache invalidation in batch and only when GT objects are exposed to userspace: drm/i915/gt: Ignore TLB invalidations on idle engines drm/i915/gt: Only invalidate TLBs exposed to user manipulation drm/i915/gt: Skip TLB invalidations once wedged drm/i915/gt: Batch TLB invalidations drm/i915/gt: Move TLB invalidation to its own file 2) It fixes two bugs, being the first a workaround: drm/i915/gt: Invalidate TLB of the OA unit at TLB invalidations drm/i915: Invalidate the TLBs on each GT drm/i915/guc: Introduce TLB_INVALIDATION_ALL action 3) It adds GuC support. Besides providing TLB invalidation on some additional hardware, this should also help serializing GuC operations with TLB invalidation: drm/i915/guc: Introduce TLB_INVALIDATION_ALL action drm/i915/guc: Define CTB based TLB invalidation routines drm/i915: Add platform macro for selective tlb flush drm/i915: Define GuC Based TLB invalidation routines drm/i915: Add generic interface for tlb invalidation for XeHP drm/i915: Use selective tlb invalidations where supported 4) It adds the corresponding kernel-doc markups for the kAPI used for TLB invalidation. While I could have split this into smaller pieces, I'm opting to send them altogether, in order for CI trybot to better verify what issues will be closed with this series. --- Chris Wilson (7): drm/i915/gt: Ignore TLB invalidations on idle engines drm/i915/gt: Invalidate TLB of the OA unit at TLB invalidations drm/i915/gt: Only invalidate TLBs exposed to user manipulation drm/i915/gt: Skip TLB invalidations once wedged drm/i915/gt: Batch TLB invalidations drm/i915/gt: Move TLB invalidation to its own file drm/i915: Invalidate the TLBs on each GT Mauro Carvalho Chehab (8): drm/i915/gt: document with_intel_gt_pm_if_awake() drm/i915/gt: describe the new tlb parameter at i915_vma_resource drm/i915/guc: use kernel-doc for enum intel_guc_tlb_inval_mode drm/i915/guc: document the TLB invalidation struct members drm/i915: document tlb field at struct drm_i915_gem_object drm/i915/gt: document TLB cache invalidation functions drm/i915/guc: describe enum intel_guc_tlb_invalidation_type drm/i915/guc: document TLB cache invalidation functions Piotr Piórkowski (1): drm/i915/guc: Introduce TLB_INVALIDATION_ALL action Prathap Kumar Valsan (5): drm/i915/guc: Define CTB based TLB invalidation routines drm/i915: Add platform macro for selective tlb flush drm/i915: Define GuC Based TLB invalidation routines drm/i915: Add generic interface for tlb invalidation for XeHP drm/i915: Use selective tlb invalidations where supported drivers/gpu/drm/i915/Makefile | 1 + .../gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_object_types.h | 6 +- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_pages.c | 28 +- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_engine.h | 1 + drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_gt.c | 125 +------- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_gt.h | 2 - .../gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_gt_buffer_pool.h | 3 +- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_gt_defines.h | 11 + drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_gt_pm.h | 10 + drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_gt_regs.h | 8 + drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_gt_types.h | 22 +- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_ppgtt.c | 8 +- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_tlb.c | 295 ++++++++++++++++++ drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_tlb.h | 30 ++ .../gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/abi/guc_actions_abi.h | 54 ++++ drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc.c | 232 ++++++++++++++ drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc.h | 36 +++ drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_ct.c | 24 +- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_fwif.h | 9 + .../gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_submission.c | 91 +++++- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h | 4 +- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_pci.c | 1 + drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_vma.c | 46 ++- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_vma.h | 2 + drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_vma_resource.c | 9 +- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_vma_resource.h | 6 +- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_device_info.h | 1 + 27 files changed, 910 insertions(+), 155 deletions(-) create mode 100644 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_gt_defines.h create mode 100644 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_tlb.c create mode 100644 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_tlb.h -- 2.36.1

3 years

[PATCH 0/4] Add Toshiba Visconti DNN image processing accelerator driver

by Yuji Ishikawa

This series is the DNN image processing accelerator driver for Toshiba's ARM SoC, Visconti[0]. This provides DT binding documentation, device driver, MAINTAINER files. The second patch "soc: visconti: Add Toshiba Visconti image processing accelerator common source" and the fourth patch "MAINTAINERS: ..." are the same as the ones in the preceding post for affine driver. Best regards, Yuji [0]: https://toshiba.semicon-storage.com/ap-en/semiconductor/product/image-recog… Yuji Ishikawa (4): dt-bindings: soc: visconti: Add Toshiba Visconti DNN image processing accelerator bindings soc: visconti: Add Toshiba Visconti image processing accelerator common source soc: visconti: Add Toshiba Visconti DNN image processing accelerator MAINTAINERS: Add entries for Toshiba Visconti DNN image processing accelerator .../soc/visconti/toshiba,visconti-dnn.yaml | 54 ++ MAINTAINERS | 2 + drivers/soc/Kconfig | 1 + drivers/soc/Makefile | 1 + drivers/soc/visconti/Kconfig | 7 + drivers/soc/visconti/Makefile | 8 + drivers/soc/visconti/dnn/Makefile | 6 + drivers/soc/visconti/dnn/dnn.c | 533 ++++++++++++++++++ drivers/soc/visconti/dnn/hwd_dnn.c | 183 ++++++ drivers/soc/visconti/dnn/hwd_dnn.h | 68 +++ drivers/soc/visconti/dnn/hwd_dnn_reg.h | 228 ++++++++ drivers/soc/visconti/ipa_common.c | 55 ++ drivers/soc/visconti/ipa_common.h | 18 + drivers/soc/visconti/uapi/dnn.h | 77 +++ drivers/soc/visconti/uapi/ipa.h | 88 +++ 15 files changed, 1329 insertions(+) create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/soc/visconti/toshiba,visconti-dnn.yaml create mode 100644 drivers/soc/visconti/Kconfig create mode 100644 drivers/soc/visconti/Makefile create mode 100644 drivers/soc/visconti/dnn/Makefile create mode 100644 drivers/soc/visconti/dnn/dnn.c create mode 100644 drivers/soc/visconti/dnn/hwd_dnn.c create mode 100644 drivers/soc/visconti/dnn/hwd_dnn.h create mode 100644 drivers/soc/visconti/dnn/hwd_dnn_reg.h create mode 100644 drivers/soc/visconti/ipa_common.c create mode 100644 drivers/soc/visconti/ipa_common.h create mode 100644 drivers/soc/visconti/uapi/dnn.h create mode 100644 drivers/soc/visconti/uapi/ipa.h -- 2.17.1

3 years

Jump to page:

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

Linaro-mm-sig