I had a tough time with my crypto assets after a mishap, and I was honestly feeling pretty lost. That’s when I found WHISPERER HACKER RECOVERY. From the get go, they were super approachable and walked me through the entire recovery process step by step.What really impressed me was their level of patience. They took the time to explain things in a way I could understand, which made me feel a lot more at ease. I appreciated that they weren’t just focused on the technical side of things; they genuinely seemed to care about helping me recover my investments.In the end, I was able to recover a significant portion of my crypto, and I couldn't be happier. If you’re facing a similar situation, I’d definitely recommend giving WHISPERER HACKER RECOVERY a try. They made a stressful situation much easier to handle!For More information visit their website at; Homepage > whispershackerrecovery . c o m
WhatApp ; +44 (73 5 22, 191 25
Mailbox; info @ whispershackerrecovery. c o m
On 2/24/26 10:43, Maxime Ripard wrote:
> Hi Christian,
>
> On Fri, Feb 20, 2026 at 10:45:08AM +0100, Christian König wrote:
>> On 2/20/26 02:14, T.J. Mercier wrote:
>>> On Wed, Feb 18, 2026 at 9:15 AM Eric Chanudet <echanude(a)redhat.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi Eric,
>>>
>>>> An earlier series[1] from Maxime introduced dmem to the cma allocator in
>>>> an attempt to use it generally for dma-buf. Restart from there and apply
>>>> the charge in the narrower context of the CMA dma-buf heap instead.
>>>>
>>>> In line with introducing cgroup to the system heap[2], this behavior is
>>>> enabled based on dma_heap.mem_accounting, disabled by default.
>>>>
>>>> dmem is chosen for CMA heaps as it allows limits to be set for each
>>>> region backing each heap. The charge is only put in the dma-buf heap for
>>>> now as it guaranties it can be accounted against a userspace process
>>>> that requested the allocation.
>>>
>>> But CMA memory is system memory, and regular (non-CMA) movable
>>> allocations can occur out of these CMA areas. So this splits system
>>> memory accounting between memcg (from [2]) and dmem. If I want to put
>>> a limit on system memory use I have to adjust multiple limits (memcg +
>>> dmems) and know how to divide the total between them all.
>>>
>>> How do you envision using this combination of different controllers?
>>
>> Yeah we have this problem pretty much everywhere.
>>
>> There are both use cases where you want to account device allocations
>> to memcg and when you don't want that.
>>
>> From what I know at the moment it would be best if the administrator
>> could say for each dmem if it should account additionally to memcg or
>> not.
>>
>> Using module parameters to enable/disable it globally is just a
>> workaround as far as I can see.
>
> That's a pretty good idea! It would indeed be a solution that could
> satisfy everyone (I assume?).
I think so yeah.
From what I have seen we have three different use cases:
1. local device memory (VRAM), GTT/CMA and memcg are completely separate domains and you want to have completely separate values as limit for them.
2. local device memory (VRAM) is separate. GTT/CMA are accounted to memcg, you can still have separate values as limit so that nobody over allocates CMA (for example).
3. All three are accounted to memcg because system memory is actually used as fallback if applications over allocate device local memory.
It's debatable what should be the default, but we clearly need to handle all three use cases. Potentially even on the same system.
Regards,
Christian.
>
> Maxime
Many believe stolen crypto is untraceable due to anonymity. In reality, public blockchains like Bitcoin and Ethereum make tracing possible. Addresses are pseudonymous, but transaction patterns, clusters, and exchange points reveal flows.
Tracing identifies theft points, maps movements, clusters wallets, detects exchanges, and produces reports. Early action is key.
Cryptera Chain Signals leads with 28+ years of experience, hundreds of successes, and high ratings. They trace effectively and educate on prevention.
For tracing help, visit https://www.crypterachainsignals.com/ or email info(a)crypterachainsignals.com.
Lost USDT Recovery: Practical Steps and Expert Guidance in 2026
Losing USDT (Tether) whether through a scam, hack, or wallet error hurts because it's a stable coin meant to preserve value. In February 2026, USDT recovery is often more feasible than other tokens due to its heavy use on traceable chains like Ethereum, Tron, and BSC. Here's how to pursue lost USDT recovery.
Step 1: Identify the Loss Type
Scam/hack: funds transferred out. Wallet access loss: forgotten credentials. Mistaken send: wrong address.
Step 2: Gather Evidence
Save TXIDs, addresses, timestamps, scam proof. USDT transactions are visible on Tronscan, Etherscan, or BscScan.
Step 3: Report and Secure
Report to authorities and platforms. Move remaining assets.
Step 4: Tracing USDT Flows
USDT is ERC-20/TRC-20, making it highly traceable. Experts follow approvals, transfers, and exchange deposits.
Cryptera Chain Signals specializes in USDT recovery with 28+ years of experience, hundreds of successes, and strong reviews. They trace flows and prepare evidence for freezes.
Visit https://www.crypterachainsignals.com/ or email info(a)crypterachainsignals.com for help.
On 23/02/2026 20:09, Ekansh Gupta wrote:
> Add a DRM_QDA_MAP ioctl and supporting FastRPC plumbing to map GEM
> backed buffers into the DSP virtual address space. The new
> qda_mem_map UAPI structure allows userspace to request legacy MMAP
> style mappings or handle-based MEM_MAP mappings with attributes, and
> encodes flags, offsets and optional virtual address hints that are
> forwarded to the DSP.
>
> On the FastRPC side new method identifiers FASTRPC_RMID_INIT_MMAP
> and FASTRPC_RMID_INIT_MEM_MAP are introduced together with message
> structures for map requests and responses. The fastrpc_prepare_args
> path is extended to build the appropriate request headers, serialize
> the physical page information derived from a GEM object into a
> fastrpc_phy_page array and pack the arguments into the shared message
> buffer used by the existing invoke infrastructure.
>
> The qda_ioctl_mmap() handler dispatches mapping requests based on the
> qda_mem_map request type, reusing the generic fastrpc_invoke()
> machinery and the RPMsg transport to communicate with the DSP. This
> provides the foundation for explicit buffer mapping into the DSP
> address space for subsequent FastRPC calls, aligned with the
> traditional FastRPC user space model.
>
> Signed-off-by: Ekansh Gupta <ekansh.gupta(a)oss.qualcomm.com>
> ---
> arch/arm64/configs/defconfig | 2 +
Not relevan there. Don't stuff other subsystem code into your patches.
Especially without any reasons (your commit msg must explain WHY you are
doing things).
> drivers/accel/qda/qda_drv.c | 1 +
> drivers/accel/qda/qda_fastrpc.c | 217 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> drivers/accel/qda/qda_fastrpc.h | 64 ++++++++++++
> drivers/accel/qda/qda_ioctl.c | 24 +++++
> drivers/accel/qda/qda_ioctl.h | 13 +++
> include/uapi/drm/qda_accel.h | 44 +++++++-
> 7 files changed, 364 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
Best regards,
Krzysztof
On 23/02/2026 20:08, Ekansh Gupta wrote:
> Introduce a built-in compute context-bank (CB) bus used by the Qualcomm
> DSP accelerator (QDA) driver to represent DSP CB devices that require
> IOMMU configuration. This separates the CB bus from the QDA driver and
> allows QDA to remain a loadable module while the bus is always built-in.
>
> A new bool Kconfig symbol DRM_ACCEL_QDA_COMPUTE_BUS is added and is
> selected by the main DRM_ACCEL_QDA driver. The parent accel Makefile is
> updated to descend into the QDA directory for both built-in and module
> builds so that the CB bus is compiled into vmlinux while the driver
> remains modular.
>
> The CB bus is registered at postcore_initcall() time and is exposed to
> the IOMMU core through iommu_buses[] in the same way as the Tegra
> host1x context-bus. This enables later patches to create CB devices on
> this bus and obtain IOMMU domains for them.
>
> Signed-off-by: Ekansh Gupta <ekansh.gupta(a)oss.qualcomm.com>
> ---
> drivers/accel/Makefile | 1 +
> drivers/accel/qda/Kconfig | 5 +++++
> drivers/accel/qda/Makefile | 2 ++
> drivers/accel/qda/qda_compute_bus.c | 23 +++++++++++++++++++++++
> drivers/iommu/iommu.c | 4 ++++
> include/linux/qda_compute_bus.h | 22 ++++++++++++++++++++++
Do not combine independent work into one patch.
Also, your patch has clear patch warnings, so please review it BEFORE
you send.
Best regards,
Krzysztof
Best Crypto Scam Recovery Services in 2026: What Victims Need to Know
Crypto scams phishing, fake platforms, romance fraud, rug pullsco st billions every year. Victims often feel helpless, believing recovery is impossible. In February 2026, legitimate recovery services do exist, and choosing the right one can lead to meaningful returns. Here's what you need to know about the best crypto scam recovery services and why Cryptera Chain Signals stands out.
What Makes a Recovery Service Legitimate?
Look for transparency: no upfront fees without assessment, no requests for private keys or seed phrases, realistic expectations (no 100% guarantees), and verifiable track records (reviews, case studies). Legitimate firms focus on tracing funds, identifying exchange endpoints, and preparing evidence for freezes or law enforcement.
Common Recovery Paths
Tracing maps funds through peeling chains, bridges, DEX swaps, and mixers to exchange deposits. Freezes happen when evidence proves theft. Law enforcement seizures are common in large cases.
Top Considerations
Avoid services promising miracles or charging upfront. Cryptera Chain Signals is a trusted leader with 28+ years in digital forensics, hundreds of scam recovery successes, and a 4.28/5 rating from thousands of reviews in 2026. They offer honest assessments, detailed tracing, and education on prevention—never asking for keys or fees without evaluation.
A client who lost funds to a fake investment platform said: "They traced it to an exchange, got a freeze, and recovered 70%. Their guidance on security changed everything."
For reliable scam recovery, visit Cryptera Chain Signals at https://www.crypterachainsignals.com/ or email info(a)crypterachainsignals.com. Act fast—early action matters.
Discovering that your Bitcoin wallet has been stolen whether through phishing, malware, a compromised exchange account, or a leaked seed phrase—can feel devastating. Your Bitcoin, often viewed as digital gold, suddenly vanishes, and the irreversibility of blockchain transactions makes it seem hopeless. But in February 2026, recovery is possible in many cases, especially when you act quickly and use legitimate expertise. Here's a practical, step-by-step guide to recovering a stolen Bitcoin wallet, along with realistic expectations and prevention tips.
Step 1: Confirm the Theft and Secure What's Left
First, verify what happened. Check your wallet history on a trusted explorer like Blockchair or Blockchain.com. Look for unauthorized outgoing transactions. Immediately secure any remaining assets: move untouched Bitcoin to a new, clean wallet (preferably hardware like Ledger or Trezor). Revoke any suspicious approvals if the wallet supports it (e.g., using tools like Revoke.cash for connected dApps). Change passwords, enable 2FA (authenticator app, not SMS), and scan devices for malware.
Step 2: Document Every Detail
Gather evidence: transaction hashes (TXIDs), your wallet address, the thief's receiving addresses, timestamps, and any related scam communications (emails, chats, fake sites). Screenshots are crucial—include full transaction details showing amounts and dates. This evidence is essential for tracing and any legal action.
Step 3: Report the Theft Immediately
File a report with authorities: in the US, use the FBI's Internet Crime Complaint Center (IC3); in other countries, contact local cybercrime units. Report to the wallet provider or exchange if applicable (e.g., if keys were stolen from a hot wallet). Early reporting creates an official record and can trigger monitoring.
Step 4: Understand Bitcoin Tracing Basics
Bitcoin's UTXO model leaves clear trails. Investigators follow from your stolen transaction to downstream addresses, watching for splits (peeling), consolidations, or deposits to exchanges. Centralized exchanges are key choke points—many freeze funds if evidence proves theft.
Step 5: Seek Legitimate Professional Help
Do not pay upfront fees or share keys with unsolicited "recovery experts"—these are secondary scams. Legitimate firms assess viability first. Cryptera Chain Signals (CCS) is a trusted leader in stolen Bitcoin wallet recovery, with over 28 years of digital forensics experience, hundreds of successful cases, and a 4.28/5 rating from thousands of reviews in 2026. They specialize in real-time tracing, wallet clustering, and evidence preparation for exchange freezes or law enforcement—always with honest, no-pressure assessments and a focus on education (secure backups, multi-signature setups, phishing avoidance).
Many clients recover significant portions when funds reach traceable endpoints. A victim who lost Bitcoin to malware shared: "CCS traced it to a deposit on Binance, prepared the report, and helped secure a freeze. I got 85% back and learned how to protect my wallet forever."
Prevention for the Future
Use hardware wallets offline, enable multi-sig, never store seeds digitally, verify addresses manually, and use transaction simulators. Regular backups and alerts can prevent most losses.
If your Bitcoin wallet was stolen, act fast time is critical. Visit Cryptera Chain Signals at https://www.crypterachainsignals.com/ or email info(a)crypterachainsignals.com for a confidential consultation. Legitimate help can make a real difference.