On Fri, Jul 22, 2016 at 01:32:00AM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
On Fri, Jul 22, 2016 at 1:22 AM, Steve Muckle steve.muckle@linaro.org wrote:
On Fri, Jul 22, 2016 at 01:22:22AM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
OK, applied.
FWIW I do have a concern on this patch, I think it adds unnecessary overhead.
It isn't unnecessary. It prevents an otherwise possible kernel crash from happening.
The logic may not be unecessary, but the overhead is. The crash could be prevented in a way that doesn't require repeatedly checking a pointer that doesn't change.