Because get_cpu_frequency() has returned a valid frequency, it means that the cpufreq policy is surely valid and so no point checking that again with is_cpufreq_valid(). Get rid of the routine as well as there are no more users.
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar viresh.kumar@linaro.org --- drivers/thermal/cpu_cooling.c | 20 +------------------- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 19 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/thermal/cpu_cooling.c b/drivers/thermal/cpu_cooling.c index 8ca0380..41aa7d5 100644 --- a/drivers/thermal/cpu_cooling.c +++ b/drivers/thermal/cpu_cooling.c @@ -111,23 +111,6 @@ static void release_idr(struct idr *idr, int id)
/* Below code defines functions to be used for cpufreq as cooling device */
-/** - * is_cpufreq_valid - function to check frequency transitioning capability. - * @cpu: cpu for which check is needed. - * - * This function will check the current state of the system if - * it is capable of changing the frequency for a given @cpu. - * - * Return: 0 if the system is not currently capable of changing - * the frequency of given cpu. !0 in case the frequency is changeable. - */ -static int is_cpufreq_valid(int cpu) -{ - struct cpufreq_policy policy; - - return !cpufreq_get_policy(&policy, cpu); -} - enum cpufreq_cooling_property { GET_LEVEL, GET_FREQ, @@ -302,8 +285,7 @@ static int cpufreq_apply_cooling(struct cpufreq_cooling_device *cpufreq_device, cpufreq_device->cpufreq_val = clip_freq; notify_device = cpufreq_device;
- if (is_cpufreq_valid(cpu)) - cpufreq_update_policy(cpu); + cpufreq_update_policy(cpu);
notify_device = NOTIFY_INVALID;