Re: [PATCH 5/5] cpufreq: Get rid of ->governor_enabled and its lock

On 03-02-16, 11:05, Juri Lelli wrote:

It should be easy to rebase that set (or a part of it) on top of your and/or Rafael changes. I realize that there are multiple sets of changes under discussion; so, please tell me how do you, and Rafael, want to proceed about this.

Yeah, please wait for a bit for Rafael to apply both the series (if they pass the litmus test) to PM tree :)

But, I guess any other governor that will bypass cpufreq_governor.c, it will also have to implement such checks. I was just proposing to state this somewhere, so that we don't forget.

We can surely add a comment for that.

But I would like to review the state after these patches are applied, as we may be able to guarantee that from cpufreq-core instead.