On 08/12/2015 04:35 PM, Timur Tabi wrote:
On Thu, Aug 6, 2015 at 3:59 PM, Al Stone al.stone@linaro.org wrote:
while (ms->num_types != 0) {if (ms->major_version == major &&ms->minor_version == minor &&ms->madt_version == madt->header.revision)break;ms++;}if (!ms) {Shouldn't this be
if (!ms->num_types) {
instead?
Argh. Yes, it should. It will always be false, otherwise. Will fix for next version. Thanks for catching that.