On Sun, Aug 25, 2013 at 04:37:44PM +0100, Alexander Graf wrote:
On 23.08.2013, at 21:10, Christoffer Dall wrote:
To make the code slightly cleaner to look at and make the save/restore code easier to understand, introduce this macro to set the priority of interrupts.
Signed-off-by: Christoffer Dall christoffer.dall@linaro.org
hw/intc/arm_gic.c | 6 +----- hw/intc/gic_internal.h | 6 ++++++ 2 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/hw/intc/arm_gic.c b/hw/intc/arm_gic.c index bff3f9e..a7bb528 100644 --- a/hw/intc/arm_gic.c +++ b/hw/intc/arm_gic.c @@ -444,11 +444,7 @@ static void gic_dist_writeb(void *opaque, hwaddr offset, irq = (offset - 0x400) + GIC_BASE_IRQ; if (irq >= s->num_irq) goto bad_reg;
if (irq < GIC_INTERNAL) {s->priority1[irq][cpu] = value;} else {s->priority2[irq - GIC_INTERNAL] = value;}
 } else if (offset < 0xc00) { /* Interrupt CPU Target. RAZ/WI on uniprocessor GICs, with the * annoying exception of the 11MPCore's GIC.GIC_SET_PRIORITY(irq, cpu, value);diff --git a/hw/intc/gic_internal.h b/hw/intc/gic_internal.h index 1426437..d835aa1 100644 --- a/hw/intc/gic_internal.h +++ b/hw/intc/gic_internal.h @@ -57,6 +57,12 @@ #define GIC_GET_PRIORITY(irq, cpu) (((irq) < GIC_INTERNAL) ? \ s->priority1[irq][cpu] : \ s->priority2[(irq) - GIC_INTERNAL]) +#define GIC_SET_PRIORITY(irq, cpu, val) do { \
- uint8_t *__x = ((irq) < GIC_INTERNAL) ? \
 &s->priority1[irq][cpu] : \&s->priority2[(irq) - GIC_INTERNAL]; \- *__x = val; \
 +} while (0)
Why not make this a function?
Ah, you're no fun anymore. ok.
-Christoffer