10 Jul
2014
10 Jul
'14
11:20 a.m.
On 10 July 2014 16:45, Srivatsa S. Bhat srivatsa@mit.edu wrote:
Looks good to me. But I think it would be better to move the invocation of kobject_move() to update_policy_cpu() itself, so that update_policy_cpu() will do all the work involved in updating the policy->cpu, as its name suggests.
Its called from remove path as well ..