On Tue, Mar 26, 2013 at 08:10:46PM +0530, Viresh Kumar wrote:
"clock-latency" is incorrectly written as "transition-latency" in an example present in Documentation of cpufreq-cpu0. Fix it.
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar viresh.kumar@linaro.org
Acked-by: Shawn Guo shawn.guo@linaro.org
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/cpufreq/cpufreq-cpu0.txt | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/cpufreq/cpufreq-cpu0.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/cpufreq/cpufreq-cpu0.txt index 4416ccc..051f764 100644 --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/cpufreq/cpufreq-cpu0.txt +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/cpufreq/cpufreq-cpu0.txt @@ -32,7 +32,7 @@ cpus { 396000 950000 198000 850000 >;
transition-latency = <61036>; /* two CLK32 periods */
};clock-latency = <61036>; /* two CLK32 periods */
cpu@1 { -- 1.7.12.rc2.18.g61b472e