Re: [PATCH] cpufreq: cpufreq-cpu0: Use devm_regulator_get_optional()

On 9 August 2013 23:38, Mark Brown broonie@kernel.org wrote:

From: Mark Brown broonie@linaro.org

Since the cpufreq-cpu0 driver is capable of coping without a software controllable regulator and would be confused by a dummy one it should use devm_regulator_get_optional() to ensure no dummy is provided.

Signed-off-by: Mark Brown broonie@linaro.org

devm_regulator_get_optional() is a new API in my tree for -next, is it OK to merge this patch via that branch?

I don't see a issue with it, by Rafael has the authority :)

Over that it would have been useful if we could have this patch as part of the series you posted for defining devm_regulator_get_optional(), and so we could have seen what's that patch is doing..