On Friday, May 31, 2013 11:58:49 AM Hanjun Guo wrote:
On 2013-5-31 6:25, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 03:57:58PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
On Thursday, May 30, 2013 10:29:54 AM Hanjun Guo wrote:
On 2013-5-29 19:07, Martin Mokrejs wrote:
Hanjun Guo wrote:
On 2013-5-29 7:30, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > On Thursday, May 23, 2013 08:44:26 PM Hanjun Guo wrote: >> In acpi_processor_add(), get_cpu_device() will return NULL sometimes, >> although the chances are small, I think it should be fixed. >> >> Signed-off-by: Hanjun Guo hanjun.guo@linaro.org > > This patch isn't necessary any more after the changes queued up for 3.11 > in the acpi-hotplug branch of the linux-pm.git tree.
Ok, I noticed your patch set, just drop my patch.
But shouldn't this go to stable at least? I checked linux-3.9.4 and it applies fine. Whether this is relevant for other stable series I will leave up to somebody else. ;)
Hi Rafeal,
What's your opinion on Martin's suggestion?
Well, this is kind of hard to say. We generally don't apply patches to -stable that don't have mainline counterparts.
Greg, I wonder what your opinion is?
We do not apply patches to -stable that are not in Linus's tree, unless there is no problem in Linus's tree due to a major rewrite of the code, and it has been confirmed that the same problem isn't there.
Hi Rafael,
I found that the problem is still there in your acpi-hotplug tree, sorry for I didn't noticed early. I made a patch for this again, I hope it will make sense to you.
The patch is attached, based on your acpi-hotplug tree.
OK, thanks!
Rafael