On Thu, Oct 15, 2015 at 11:25:55AM -0700, Stephen Boyd wrote:
On 10/15, Viresh Kumar wrote:
On 14-10-15, 11:51, Stephen Boyd wrote:
On 10/09, Viresh Kumar wrote:
+struct dentry *debugfs_create_xlong(const char *name, umode_t mode,
struct dentry *parent, unsigned long *value)+{
- return debugfs_create_file(name, mode, parent, value, &fops_xlong);
Were you going to refresh this on my debugfs_create_mode() patches? Otherwise the patch looks fine to me.
I thought you need to refresh your set as I posted this before you have :)
:)
Well this patch is creating xlong without any read-only/write-only ops, so it has the same potential problems as what the debugfs_create_mode() series was fixing. I'm fine either way though.
Viresh, please rebase your patch on top of Stephen's series, it should make your patch much smaller. I've applied his series to my tree now.
thanks,
greg k-h