22 Jul
2014
22 Jul
'14
5:15 p.m.
On Tue, Jul 22, 2014 at 05:41:31PM +0100, Sudeep Holla wrote:
On 22/07/14 17:32, Catalin Marinas wrote:
Actually, after 049d595a4db3b3a, should arm64 select PM_OPP directly?
It could be selected by drivers using the OPP library instead. I don't think core arm64 will ever need to use that directly. Mostly it's used by cpufreq/devfreq drivers.
Previously PM_OPP depended on ARCH_HAS_OPP which was unnecessary and is removed in the above mentioned commit IIUC.
Right, it's been converted to a normal utility library - there's no reason for it to be either user visible and there's nothing architecture specific about it either.