linaro-kernel

linaro-kernel@lists.linaro.org

10095 discussions

master build: 0 failures 0 warnings (v4.12-rc6-81-g8d829b9bb878)

by Build bot for Mark Brown

Tree/Branch: master Git describe: v4.12-rc6-81-g8d829b9bb878 Commit: 8d829b9bb8 Merge branch 'for-linus' of git://git.kernel.dk/linux-block Build Time: 0 min 27 sec Passed: 7 / 7 (100.00 %) Failed: 0 / 7 ( 0.00 %) Errors: 0 Warnings: 0 Section Mismatches: 0 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- defconfigs with issues (other than build errors): ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- =============================================================================== Detailed per-defconfig build reports below: ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Passed with no errors, warnings or mismatches: arm-multi_v5_defconfig arm-multi_v7_defconfig x86_64-defconfig arm-allmodconfig arm-allnoconfig x86_64-allnoconfig arm-multi_v4t_defconfig close failed in file object destructor: sys.excepthook is missing lost sys.stderr

8 years, 3 months

master build: 0 failures 0 warnings (v4.12-rc6-74-g48b6bbef9a17)

by Build bot for Mark Brown

Tree/Branch: master Git describe: v4.12-rc6-74-g48b6bbef9a17 Commit: 48b6bbef9a Merge git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/davem/net Build Time: 0 min 12 sec Passed: 7 / 7 (100.00 %) Failed: 0 / 7 ( 0.00 %) Errors: 0 Warnings: 0 Section Mismatches: 0 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- defconfigs with issues (other than build errors): ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- =============================================================================== Detailed per-defconfig build reports below: ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Passed with no errors, warnings or mismatches: arm-multi_v5_defconfig arm-multi_v7_defconfig x86_64-defconfig arm-allmodconfig arm-allnoconfig x86_64-allnoconfig arm-multi_v4t_defconfig close failed in file object destructor: sys.excepthook is missing lost sys.stderr

8 years, 3 months

master build: 1 failures 0 warnings (v4.12-rc6-20-gbd726c90b6b8)

by Build bot for Mark Brown

Tree/Branch: master Git describe: v4.12-rc6-20-gbd726c90b6b8 Commit: bd726c90b6 Allow stack to grow up to address space limit Build Time: 0 min 10 sec Passed: 6 / 7 ( 85.71 %) Failed: 1 / 7 ( 14.29 %) Errors: 1 Warnings: 0 Section Mismatches: 0 Failed defconfigs: arm-allmodconfig Errors: arm-allmodconfig ERROR: "__aeabi_uldivmod" [fs/ufs/ufs.ko] undefined! ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- defconfigs with issues (other than build errors): ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Errors summary: 1 1 ERROR: "__aeabi_uldivmod" [fs/ufs/ufs.ko] undefined! =============================================================================== Detailed per-defconfig build reports below: ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- arm-allmodconfig : FAIL, 1 errors, 0 warnings, 0 section mismatches Errors: ERROR: "__aeabi_uldivmod" [fs/ufs/ufs.ko] undefined! ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Passed with no errors, warnings or mismatches: arm-multi_v5_defconfig arm-multi_v7_defconfig x86_64-defconfig arm-allnoconfig x86_64-allnoconfig arm-multi_v4t_defconfig close failed in file object destructor: sys.excepthook is missing lost sys.stderr

8 years, 3 months

Re: [PATCH 00/51] rtc: stop using rtc deprecated functions

by Alexandre Belloni

On 20/06/2017 at 22:15:36 +0100, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote: > On Tue, Jun 20, 2017 at 05:07:46PM +0200, Benjamin Gaignard wrote: > > 2017-06-20 15:48 GMT+02:00 Alexandre Belloni > > <alexandre.belloni(a)free-electrons.com>: > > >> Yes, that's argument against changing rtc _drivers_ for hardware that > > >> can not do better than 32bit. For generic code (such as 44/51 sysfs, > > >> 51/51 suspend test), the change still makes sense. > > > > What I had in mind when writing those patches was to remove the limitations > > coming from those functions usage, even more since they been marked has > > deprecated. > > I'd say that they should not be marked as deprecated. They're entirely > appropriate for use with hardware that only supports a 32-bit > representation of time. > > It's entirely reasonable to fix the ones that use other representations > that exceed that, but for those which do not, we need to keep using the > 32-bit versions. Doing so actually gives us _more_ flexibility in the > future. > > Consider that at the moment, we define the 32-bit RTC representation to > start at a well known epoch. We _could_ decide that when it wraps to > 0x80000000 seconds, we'll define the lower 0x40000000 seconds to mean > dates in the future - and keep rolling that forward each time we cross > another 0x40000000 seconds. Unless someone invents a real time machine, > we shouldn't need to set a modern RTC back to 1970. > I agree with that but not the android guys. They seem to mandate an RTC that can store time from 01/01/1970. I don't know much more than that because they never cared to explain why that was actually necessary (apart from a laconic "this will result in a bad user experience") I think tglx had a plan for offsetting the time at some point so 32-bit platform can pass 2038 properly. My opinion is that as long as userspace is not ready to handle those dates, it doesn't really matter because it is quite unlikely that anything will be able to continue running anyway. -- Alexandre Belloni, Free Electrons Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering http://free-electrons.com

8 years, 3 months

next-20170620 build: 1 failures 3 warnings (next-20170620)

by Build bot for Mark Brown

Tree/Branch: next-20170620 Git describe: next-20170620 Commit: ac1d73c21f Add linux-next specific files for 20170620 Build Time: 0 min 10 sec Passed: 6 / 7 ( 85.71 %) Failed: 1 / 7 ( 14.29 %) Errors: 1 Warnings: 3 Section Mismatches: 0 Failed defconfigs: arm-allmodconfig Errors: arm-allmodconfig ERROR: "__aeabi_uldivmod" [fs/ufs/ufs.ko] undefined! ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- defconfigs with issues (other than build errors): 2 warnings 0 mismatches : arm-allmodconfig 1 warnings 0 mismatches : x86_64-defconfig ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Errors summary: 1 1 ERROR: "__aeabi_uldivmod" [fs/ufs/ufs.ko] undefined! Warnings Summary: 3 1 ../drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c:1551:12: warning: 'rate_to_index' defined but not used [-Wunused-function] 1 ../drivers/gpu/drm/arm/hdlcd_crtc.c:264:6: warning: unused variable 'src_x' [-Wunused-variable] 1 ../drivers/gpu/drm/arm/hdlcd_crtc.c:264:13: warning: unused variable 'src_y' [-Wunused-variable] =============================================================================== Detailed per-defconfig build reports below: ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- arm-allmodconfig : FAIL, 1 errors, 2 warnings, 0 section mismatches Errors: ERROR: "__aeabi_uldivmod" [fs/ufs/ufs.ko] undefined! Warnings: ../drivers/gpu/drm/arm/hdlcd_crtc.c:264:13: warning: unused variable 'src_y' [-Wunused-variable] ../drivers/gpu/drm/arm/hdlcd_crtc.c:264:6: warning: unused variable 'src_x' [-Wunused-variable] ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- x86_64-defconfig : PASS, 0 errors, 1 warnings, 0 section mismatches Warnings: ../drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c:1551:12: warning: 'rate_to_index' defined but not used [-Wunused-function] ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Passed with no errors, warnings or mismatches: x86_64-allnoconfig arm-multi_v7_defconfig arm-allnoconfig arm-multi_v4t_defconfig arm-multi_v5_defconfig

8 years, 3 months

master build: 1 failures 0 warnings (v4.12-rc6-18-g9705596d08ac)

by Build bot for Mark Brown

Tree/Branch: master Git describe: v4.12-rc6-18-g9705596d08ac Commit: 9705596d08 Merge tag 'clk-fixes-for-linus' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/clk/linux Build Time: 0 min 10 sec Passed: 6 / 7 ( 85.71 %) Failed: 1 / 7 ( 14.29 %) Errors: 1 Warnings: 0 Section Mismatches: 0 Failed defconfigs: arm-allmodconfig Errors: arm-allmodconfig ERROR: "__aeabi_uldivmod" [fs/ufs/ufs.ko] undefined! ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- defconfigs with issues (other than build errors): ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Errors summary: 1 1 ERROR: "__aeabi_uldivmod" [fs/ufs/ufs.ko] undefined! =============================================================================== Detailed per-defconfig build reports below: ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- arm-allmodconfig : FAIL, 1 errors, 0 warnings, 0 section mismatches Errors: ERROR: "__aeabi_uldivmod" [fs/ufs/ufs.ko] undefined! ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Passed with no errors, warnings or mismatches: arm-multi_v5_defconfig arm-multi_v7_defconfig x86_64-defconfig arm-allnoconfig x86_64-allnoconfig arm-multi_v4t_defconfig close failed in file object destructor: sys.excepthook is missing lost sys.stderr

8 years, 3 months

v4.12-rc6 build: 1 failures 0 warnings (v4.12-rc6)

by Build bot for Mark Brown

Tree/Branch: v4.12-rc6 Git describe: v4.12-rc6 Commit: 41f1830f5a Linux 4.12-rc6 Build Time: 0 min 10 sec Passed: 6 / 7 ( 85.71 %) Failed: 1 / 7 ( 14.29 %) Errors: 1 Warnings: 0 Section Mismatches: 0 Failed defconfigs: arm-allmodconfig Errors: arm-allmodconfig ERROR: "__aeabi_uldivmod" [fs/ufs/ufs.ko] undefined! ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- defconfigs with issues (other than build errors): ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Errors summary: 1 1 ERROR: "__aeabi_uldivmod" [fs/ufs/ufs.ko] undefined! =============================================================================== Detailed per-defconfig build reports below: ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- arm-allmodconfig : FAIL, 1 errors, 0 warnings, 0 section mismatches Errors: ERROR: "__aeabi_uldivmod" [fs/ufs/ufs.ko] undefined! ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Passed with no errors, warnings or mismatches: arm-multi_v5_defconfig arm-multi_v7_defconfig x86_64-defconfig arm-allnoconfig x86_64-allnoconfig arm-multi_v4t_defconfig close failed in file object destructor: sys.excepthook is missing lost sys.stderr

8 years, 3 months

master build: 1 failures 0 warnings (v4.12-rc5-284-g1132d5e7b644)

by Build bot for Mark Brown

Tree/Branch: master Git describe: v4.12-rc5-284-g1132d5e7b644 Commit: 1132d5e7b6 Merge tag 'armsoc-fixes' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/arm/arm-soc Build Time: 0 min 10 sec Passed: 6 / 7 ( 85.71 %) Failed: 1 / 7 ( 14.29 %) Errors: 1 Warnings: 0 Section Mismatches: 0 Failed defconfigs: arm-allmodconfig Errors: arm-allmodconfig ERROR: "__aeabi_uldivmod" [fs/ufs/ufs.ko] undefined! ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- defconfigs with issues (other than build errors): ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Errors summary: 1 1 ERROR: "__aeabi_uldivmod" [fs/ufs/ufs.ko] undefined! =============================================================================== Detailed per-defconfig build reports below: ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- arm-allmodconfig : FAIL, 1 errors, 0 warnings, 0 section mismatches Errors: ERROR: "__aeabi_uldivmod" [fs/ufs/ufs.ko] undefined! ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Passed with no errors, warnings or mismatches: arm-multi_v5_defconfig arm-multi_v7_defconfig x86_64-defconfig arm-allnoconfig x86_64-allnoconfig arm-multi_v4t_defconfig

8 years, 3 months

next-20170619 build: 1 failures 3 warnings (next-20170619)

by Build bot for Mark Brown

Tree/Branch: next-20170619 Git describe: next-20170619 Commit: f08ca51b89 Add linux-next specific files for 20170619 Build Time: 0 min 15 sec Passed: 6 / 7 ( 85.71 %) Failed: 1 / 7 ( 14.29 %) Errors: 1 Warnings: 3 Section Mismatches: 0 Failed defconfigs: arm-allmodconfig Errors: arm-allmodconfig ERROR: "__aeabi_uldivmod" [fs/ufs/ufs.ko] undefined! ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- defconfigs with issues (other than build errors): 2 warnings 0 mismatches : arm-allmodconfig 1 warnings 0 mismatches : x86_64-defconfig ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Errors summary: 1 1 ERROR: "__aeabi_uldivmod" [fs/ufs/ufs.ko] undefined! Warnings Summary: 3 1 ../drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c:1551:12: warning: 'rate_to_index' defined but not used [-Wunused-function] 1 ../drivers/gpu/drm/arm/hdlcd_crtc.c:264:6: warning: unused variable 'src_x' [-Wunused-variable] 1 ../drivers/gpu/drm/arm/hdlcd_crtc.c:264:13: warning: unused variable 'src_y' [-Wunused-variable] =============================================================================== Detailed per-defconfig build reports below: ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- arm-allmodconfig : FAIL, 1 errors, 2 warnings, 0 section mismatches Errors: ERROR: "__aeabi_uldivmod" [fs/ufs/ufs.ko] undefined! Warnings: ../drivers/gpu/drm/arm/hdlcd_crtc.c:264:13: warning: unused variable 'src_y' [-Wunused-variable] ../drivers/gpu/drm/arm/hdlcd_crtc.c:264:6: warning: unused variable 'src_x' [-Wunused-variable] ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- x86_64-defconfig : PASS, 0 errors, 1 warnings, 0 section mismatches Warnings: ../drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c:1551:12: warning: 'rate_to_index' defined but not used [-Wunused-function] ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Passed with no errors, warnings or mismatches: x86_64-allnoconfig arm-multi_v7_defconfig arm-allnoconfig arm-multi_v4t_defconfig arm-multi_v5_defconfig close failed in file object destructor: sys.excepthook is missing lost sys.stderr

8 years, 3 months

[PATCH 0/3] rtc: make st-lpc robust against y2038/2106 bug

by Benjamin Gaignard

On 32bits platforms "struct timeval" or "time_t" are using u32 to code the date, this cause tools like "date" or "hwclock" failed even before setting the RTC device if the date is superior to year 2038 (or 2106). To avoid this problem I add two RTC tests files which directly use RTC ioctl to set and read RTC time and alarm values. rtctest_setdate allow to set any date/time given in the command line. rtctest-2038 perform a basic test by writing 1-1-2200 in RTC time and alarm and checking that the read back values are correct. Finally that had allowed me to test and fix rtc-st-lpc driver. Benjamin Gaignard (3): tools: timer: add rtctest_setdate tools: timer: add test to check y2038/2106 bug rtc: st-lpc: make it robust against y2038/2106 bug drivers/rtc/rtc-st-lpc.c | 19 ++-- tools/testing/selftests/timers/Makefile | 4 +- tools/testing/selftests/timers/rtctest-2038.c | 135 +++++++++++++++++++++++ tools/testing/selftests/timers/rtctest_setdate.c | 86 +++++++++++++++ 4 files changed, 232 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-) create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/timers/rtctest-2038.c create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/timers/rtctest_setdate.c -- 1.9.1

8 years, 3 months

Jump to page:

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

linaro-kernel