linaro-dev January 2011

linaro-dev@lists.linaro.org

81 participants
84 discussions

Notes & Actions: Linaro Developer Platform Weekly Status Meeting 1/26

by Tom Gall

Enclosed you'll find a link to the agenda, notes and actions from the Linaro Developer Platforms Weekly Status meeting held on January 26th in #linaro-meeting on irc.freenode.net at 15:00 UTC. https://wiki.linaro.org/Platform/Foundations/2011-01-26 Actions from the meeting where as follows: * wookey rewarded for great work on omxil components FTBFS by also helping get the ffmpeg-dist component building * slangasek to get tgall_foo his uboot env settings for a BB Regards, Tom (tgall_foo) Developer Platforms Team "We want great men who, when fortune frowns will not be discouraged." - Colonel Henry Knox w) tom.gall att linaro.org w) tom_gall att vnet.ibm.com h) tom_gall att mac.com

15 years

Hudson bzr branches

by Loïc Minier

Hey I'd like to propose moving our Hudson stuff to Launchpad hosted branches. This would be useful to: * share our stuff, perhaps in common repos across hudson instances (see below) * have everybody follow best practices of keeping as much as possible under a VCS * help move/factor hudson instances (e.g. factor two instances in one, move from home server or cloud to Linaro/Canonical IS datacenter) I see two ways to approach this problem: * each team owns a hudson instance, and stores its config and scripts in the team's namespace; this doesn't encourage factoring instances together though * we create a virtual team of people caring for hudson stuff, e.g. ~linaro-hudson-hackers, and we put branches below that We will need to keep the hudson configs private because they might hold private data like hudson's secret key or the userdb, perhaps with some private bzr branches? or can we move to openid and avoid storing the other secret keys already? The branch with build script would of course be public. We could have some cron committing each config (changed from the web UI) hourly, and pushing it to LP, and a cron pulling the latest version of the scripts hourly (or a special hudson job which does either). For scripts, we'd have to agree on some conventions such as namespaces for Android build scripts (e.g. android-list-changes), hudson job definitions (e.g. job-build-u-boot, or job-build-android). Two things which might slow us down if we want to proceed: * Hudson might get renamed due to the situation with Oracle * getting private branches * we need some kind of Launchpad accounts for the hudson instances to commit stuff Paul, James, Michael Hudson, (Alexander?), and anybody, what are your thoughts? Cheers, -- Loïc Minier

15 years

[RFC] C-state map for i.MX51

by Yong Shen

Hi there, I am trying to implement cpuidle driver for imx51, and for better understanding how various c-state map to ARM soc, I would like to get some comments. First of all, we basically have 3 major state for imx51, which are defined in specification of the soc. Like: RUN - Core is active, clocks are on, the peripheral modules required are active. SW can close clocks of modules that are not in use. In addition CCM can enable power gating for the modules described above. WAIT - Core is disabled and clock gated, bus clocks to peripherals can be on as required. PG [power gating] and SRPG[state retention PG] can be applied to Cortex_A8 and the different blocks as described on the section above. STOP - Core is disabled, peripherals are disabled, bus clocks are off, PLLs off. PG and SRPG can be applied to Cortex_A8 and the different blocks as described on the section above. Naturely, I think the maping can be: RUN - c0 WAIT - c1 STOP - c2 Or, if possible, some extra states can be assert into each c-state to get c3, c4.... Since other SOCs, like omap or samsung's chip, already have cpuidle driver, I would like to especially compare imx51 with those. thanks Yong

15 years

Re: [PATCH 0/5] mmc: add double buffering for mmc block requests

by Per Forlin

On 18 January 2011 03:35, Jaehoon Chung <jh80.chung(a)samsung.com> wrote: > Hi Per.. > > it is interesting approach..so > we want to test your double buffering in our environment(Samsung SoC). > > Did you test with SDHCI? So far I have only tested on mmci for board u5500 and u8500. I happily test on a different board if I can get hold of one. > If you tested with SDHCI, i want to know how much increase the performance. > > Thanks, > Jaehoon Chung

15 years

Re: Linaro Image Tools 0.4.2 released

by Loïc Minier

On Sat, Jan 29, 2011, Loïc Minier wrote: > Backports to Ubuntu 10.04 and Ubuntu 10.10 will be provided shortly. A backport to Ubuntu 10.04 willl take longer to prepare, but a backport to Ubuntu 10.10 is now available in ppa:linaro-maintainers/tools. -- Loïc Minier

15 years

Booting Versatile Express Made Easy

by Pawel Moll

Hi Folks, I believe that every Versatile Express board user would agree that booting Linux kernel on it is "slightly" more complex than on, say, Beagle... I wrote a short text describing how do I do this: https://wiki.linaro.org/PawelMoll/BootingVEMadeEasy The interesting bit may be lack of U-boot in my flow. In future the VE Boot Monitor will be able to boot the kernel on its own, but it is effectively possible already, with a few tricks. So the only case one would have to use U-boot is to download kernel over network. Anyway, any feedback appreciated, especially if all thing is absolutely pointless. Don't hesitate to use the Wiki "Edit" button :-) Additionally I think that using similar technique, it would be possible to prepare a U-boot-less MMC card automatically booting kernel. Let me know if anyone is interested - it could be potentially useful for the media-create script? Cheers! Paweł

15 years

Notes & Actions: Linaro Graphics Working Group - Jan 26, 2011

by Alexandros Frantzis

Hi, notes and actions from our Wednesday graphics working group call are available on the wiki: + https://wiki.linaro.org/WorkingGroups/Middleware/Graphics/Notes/2011-01-26 Details about when and where of this meeting can be found here: + https://wiki.linaro.org/WorkingGroups/Middleware/Graphics#Weekly%20Public%2… Thanks, -- - Alexandros

15 years

Hang or crash at init with linaro-2.6.37

by john stultz

Hey Nicolas, In working on my 2.6.37 based merge tree of the linaro and android kernels, I've been seeing a crash or hang at init time on my beagleboard xm. I reproduced it with your linaro-2.6.37 tree, and I managed to bisect it down to the following commit: ff8ea0c44f666883ef1e5545c33f858557b02043 ARM: 6384/1: Remove the domain switching on ARMv6k/v7 CPUs Reverting this patch allows the linaro-2.6.37 kernel to boot on a linaro disk image, and also allows my dev/linaro.android branch to boot using an android disk image. Is anyone else seeing this issue? thanks -john

15 years

Re: more Samsung patches for 3.6.37

by Nicolas Pitre

On Thu, 27 Jan 2011, Thomas Abraham wrote: > On 27 January 2011 19:35, Angus Ainslie <angus.ainslie(a)linaro.org> wrote: > > Hi Thomas, > > > > Thanks for pointing out that mailing list. Can you have a quick look a the > > included patch and tell me if you've seen these upstream for the v310. I > > found a similar one for the v210 but not the v310. > > > > The patch is untested as I haven't received my hardware yet. > > Hi Angus, > > pdma patch was submitted. The link to the patch is > http://www.spinics.net/lists/arm-kernel/msg108006.html > > I have not seen any patch to change IRQ_EINT(5) trigger level. > > defconfig for s5pv310 was deliberately avoided by the maintainer > because of linus being unhappy with too many defconfigs. So for > s5pv310, the s5pv210_defconfig is used. As I'd prefer to use patches in the Linaro kernel tree which are as close as possible to upstream including proper authorship attributions, could you direct me to a git repo where I could find them? Alternatively, can you resend them to me? Extracting patches from mailing list archives is not practical. Nicolas

15 years

Minutes & actions: Toolchain Working Group meetings of Jan 24&26, 2011

by Mounir Bsaibes

Greetings, Enclosed you'll find a link to the agenda, minutes and actions from the Linaro toolchain working group weekly meetings of Jan 24 & 26, 2011. https://wiki.linaro.org/WorkingGroups/ToolChain/Meetings/2011-01-24<https://wiki.linaro.org/WorkingGroups/ToolChain/Meetings/2010-11-24> https://wiki.linaro.org/WorkingGroups/ToolChain/Meetings/2011-01-26 == Summary == * Michael made a presentation on GCC, ARM, and Linaro at linux.conf.au * Benchmarks report for Google is complete * Planning is underway for getting the string routines into Ubuntu for feature freeze * QEMU PBX A9 evaluation is mostly complete. * libffi/hardfp changes are mostly complete and upstream Regards, Mounir

15 years

← Newer
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
Older →

2026

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

linaro-dev January 2011