hi Yongqin,
i follow your reply to ryan3216 on Jul/1, 2013 by just press y but it has
fetch error when cloning these 4 repositories starting with people.
<project groups="common" name="people/harigopal.gollamudi/glmark2"
path="packages/apps/glmark2" remote="linaro-other"
revision="12b417ba3d264232dc3055ee68fd4069da9e167f"/><project
groups="common" name="people/harigopal.gollamudi/lava-blackbox"
path="external/lava-blackbox" remote="linaro-other"
revision="ea1a6752897f971a392df008d7060c9c9dddf354"/><project
groups="common" name="people/ragesh.radhakrishnan/libjpeg-turbo"
path="external/jpeg" remote="linaro-other"
revision="daa963ecd83f182ac7879f97cb5d85af3f1e33f0"/><project
groups="pandaboard" name="people/tomgall/piglit" path="external/piglit"
remote="linaro-other" revision="fdde825f9514c3411d4a6cec62c27a6172f6affc"/>
it showed accessed denied or repository not exported.
1. what is the purpose of these?
2. can i skip them to compile android sucessfully?
3. if yes, how to do to skip?
4. if not, how to get access ID/password?
can you help to resolve it?
thanks in advance.
Anthony
--
Best Regards,
Anthony Fu 傅錫泓
TP(M):+886-928-801-381
CN(M):+86-156-2655-9419
Hi Amit
Does this patch ("xt_qtaguid: check xt_sock socket before releasing")
need to be ported to 4.4 Android kernel and AOSP kernel?
I can see that this is part of 3.18 Linaro tree only.
https://git.linaro.org/kernel/linux-linaro-stable.git/blobdiff/6a0ebc2aaaa0…
--
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc.
The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora
Forum, a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project.
Hi, Paul, Andy
On 2 July 2016 at 03:58, John Stultz <john.stultz(a)linaro.org> wrote:
>
> Would it make more sense to have gerrit reject new refs/for/ names that
> don't correlate to a existing branch?
>
Is it possible from the server side?
Thanks,
Yongqin Liu
> On Jul 1, 2016 12:41 PM, "YongQin Liu" <yongqin.liu(a)linaro.org> wrote:
>
>> Hi, Bero, Satish
>>
>> When you submit changes on android-patchsets repository to dev-private-
>> *review*.linaro.org for review,
>> please run
>>
>> *git review*
>>
>> to submit your changes for review, we have .gitreview file in the
>> repository for using that command.
>>
>> To use "git review", git-review package needs to be installed with
>> commands like this:
>>
>> *sudo apt-get install git-review*
>>
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Yongqin Liu
>> On 1 July 2016 at 22:33, Paul Sokolovsky <systems-support(a)linaro.org>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> —Write replies above—
>>>
>>> I've removed stray branch in refs/for/ namespace. And as Andy mentions,
>>> this is second case in last week. Please remember/remind your colleages
>>> that for gerrit, dev-private-*review*.linaro.org URL should be used,
>>> and using "git review" is largely preferred to directly pushing to
>>> refs/for/*.
>>>
>>> Yongqin Liu created this request. Bero Rosenkränzer, Vishal Bhoj and
>>> Satish Patel are participating.
>>> You can reply directly to this email to add any further comments or
>>> attachments.
>>> See request details and updates for #SYS-55
>>> <https://servicedesk.linaro.org/servicedesk/customer/portal/4/SYS-55?sda_sou…>
>>> - "Can not submit changes on android-patchsets.git to
>>> dev-private-review.linaro.org for review"
>>> ------------------------------
>>>
>>> Linaro Help Center sent you this message, *powered by* JIRA Service Desk
>>> <http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira/service-desk>
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Best Regards,
>> Yongqin Liu
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------
>> #mailing list
>> linaro-android(a)lists.linaro.org <linaro-dev(a)lists.linaro.org>
>> http://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/linaro-android
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> linaro-android mailing list
>> linaro-android(a)lists.linaro.org
>> https://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/linaro-android
>>
>>
--
Best Regards,
Yongqin Liu
---------------------------------------------------------------
#mailing list
linaro-android(a)lists.linaro.org <linaro-dev(a)lists.linaro.org>
http://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/linaro-android
Hi, Bero, Satish
When you submit changes on android-patchsets repository to dev-private-
*review*.linaro.org for review,
please run
*git review*
to submit your changes for review, we have .gitreview file in the
repository for using that command.
To use "git review", git-review package needs to be installed with commands
like this:
*sudo apt-get install git-review*
Thanks,
Yongqin Liu
On 1 July 2016 at 22:33, Paul Sokolovsky <systems-support(a)linaro.org> wrote:
> —Write replies above—
>
> I've removed stray branch in refs/for/ namespace. And as Andy mentions,
> this is second case in last week. Please remember/remind your colleages
> that for gerrit, dev-private-*review*.linaro.org URL should be used, and
> using "git review" is largely preferred to directly pushing to refs/for/*.
>
> Yongqin Liu created this request. Bero Rosenkränzer, Vishal Bhoj and
> Satish Patel are participating.
> You can reply directly to this email to add any further comments or
> attachments.
> See request details and updates for #SYS-55
> <https://servicedesk.linaro.org/servicedesk/customer/portal/4/SYS-55?sda_sou…>
> - "Can not submit changes on android-patchsets.git to
> dev-private-review.linaro.org for review"
> ------------------------------
>
> Linaro Help Center sent you this message, *powered by* JIRA Service Desk
> <http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira/service-desk>
>
--
Best Regards,
Yongqin Liu
---------------------------------------------------------------
#mailing list
linaro-android(a)lists.linaro.org <linaro-dev(a)lists.linaro.org>
http://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/linaro-android
Hi John,
[ + linaro-android ML ]
I have two questions for working on AOSP Hikey:
- When use "adb shell" to execute commands, then it will return back
the execution value and error code. Usually we will get back the new
line character as "\r\n", but I found for AOSP releasing it will
only return back "\n" for new line.
So is this decided by system's booting script or decided by shell's
building? I want to change back to use "\r\n" for the format.
- Second question is related with adb's permission. On my pc I need
add "sudo" or change to root "sudo -s" for adb commands, otherwise
it will report "insufficient permission".
This is okay when I manually send adb commands, but when use python
script to execute adb commands it also need add "sudo" for add adb
related commands.
So want to check if there have more convienent method so can let
normal user to use adb command?
Thanks,
Leo Yan
Hello,
Summary: Your SSH username on https://android-review.linaro.org will
now match Linaro username (first.last) after the next login. You local
repository clones need to be updated for new username.
Detailed description:
https://android-review.linaro.org was the first Gerrit server in
Linaro, when there were no central LDAP user database yet. As a result,
there were free-form SSH usernames used, instead of the later standard
first.last as used on all the other Gerrit servers. This inconsistency
was a subject of background concern for Systems team, but of course not
something having enough priority to "fix". However, Gerrit 2.12.2
upgrade started tonight uncovered following issue: Gerrit tries to
synchronize its SSH username setting with LDAP, and fails, as Gerrits
own rules disallow changing of username. The symptom of this is error
"Authentication temporary unavailable" when a user with "old" SSH
username tries to login via browser.
While this can be classified as a Gerrit bug (and previous versions
were smart enough), we'll unlikely find any timely solution to keep
things as they are. So, it makes sense to take a chance of cleaning up
username and making this server follow standard username conventions.
Consequently:
1. All usernames which don't match "first.last" pattern are reset.
2. If you are affected, you won't be able to perform SSH operations
(like git clone/push) until you login via web interface.
3. On the next login via web interface, it will be set to LDAP's
"first.last" value.
4. You will need to update remotes of your existing git clones to new
username (or alternatively, re-clone).
5. If you already use "first.last" SSH username, you're unaffected.
The list of users affected is given below. While it seems long,
majority of enrties there are for people no longer at Linaro, or
for community accounts (which didn't work since we switched to LDAP
anyway). If you need further assistance, please open a ticket at
https://servicedesk.linaro.org/servicedesk/customer/portal/4 .
Thanks,
Paul
username:Ng
username:pfefferz
username:asac
username:james_w
username:fgiff
username:jserv
username:mabac
username:deeptik
username:cyang
username:mpoirier
username:ndec
username:mwaddel
username:mansson
username:Sachin
username:vishalbhoj
username:suapapa
username:fabo
username:pabhishek
username:cnxsoft
username:amitdanielk
username:patrikryd
username:sangwook
username:ericm
username:pundiramit
username:glandium
username:eazyigz
username:tixy
username:danilo
username:john
username:nytowl
username:tony_tu
username:Sangwook
username:StefanEkenberg
username:uichi
username:plars
username:zyga
username:ruppi
username:ebenpor
username:jhkim
username:Annamalai
username:markoncomputer
username:Claude
username:tianhongwang
username:rchand00
username:omarrmz
username:aviksil
username:nvl1109
username:a0132810
username:pelya
username:krtaylor
username:developer4563
username:yusufbu
username:dzinman
username:arussello
username:mdupuy
username:williamcharles
username:aorth
username:lanaczko
username:rmcc
username:kcrudup
username:kelvin
username:angelsl
username:unixmanlinuxboy
username:Quiter
username:sourxsunny
username:pbeeler
username:anmar
username:wucongdonglai
username:bambi
username:rperier
username:sgt
username:roalex
username:vishveshwarbhat
username:therbom
username:rajagopalvenkat
username:winner00
username:ramesh
username:abelloni
username:sparksco
username:fahadkdi
username:ryanharkin
username:axelfagerstedt
username:nocoast
username:milo
username:fcarpenter
username:hongbozhang
username:fahadk
username:pelya2
username:janjic
username:dpervushin
username:qoowater
username:cerial
username:tinojantony
username:stephaneeee
username:kishoreboddu
username:nuclearmistake
username:SanjasdfsafsffaySinghsdfasfRawat
username:donvigo
username:tinojgit
username:afarah
username:mechmetal
username:akbennett
username:c
username:sikuner
username:wasungkim
username:stevanr
username:deqiang
username:anilkumar
username:willnewton
username:codeart
username:lrabiet
username:Bintian
username:bintian
username:vishalbhoj2
username:tusharbehera
username:jbergsag
username:tgall
username:amitkhare
username:neo
username:paramanands
username:sumit
username:danielt
username:help
username:XavierHsu
username:Serban
username:Z
username:koenkooi
(127 rows)
--
Best Regards,
Paul
Linaro.org | Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: http://www.facebook.com/pages/Linarohttp://twitter.com/#!/linaroorg - http://www.linaro.org/linaro-blog
Hello,
4 months have passed since the previous Gerrit upgrade (see below for
reference), when Systems team had wanted to upgrade directly to 2.12,
but due to last-minute issues discovered in it, upgraded to 2.11.5
instead. Gerrit is at 2.12.2 now, with many issues fixed and it being
quite stable now. We also have stakeholders waiting for 2.12
functionality any day now.
So, Systems team plan to upgrade the following systems:
review.linaro.organdroid-review.linaro.orgdev-private-review.linaro.orglhg-review.linaro.org
starting end of day Friday, April 29th and throughout Saturday April
30th.
Let us know if you have questions or concerns (for example, if you need
uninterrupted Gerrit access until end of the US day on April 29).
Thanks,
Paul
Begin forwarded message:
Date: Mon, 14 Dec 2015 19:01:46 +0200
From: Paul Sokolovsky <Paul.Sokolovsky(a)linaro.org>
To: linaro-dev <linaro-dev(a)lists.linaro.org>, linaro-android
<linaro-android(a)lists.linaro.org>, "systems(a)linaro.org"
<systems(a)linaro.org> Subject: [ANN] Planning next Gerrit upgrade
Hello,
We upgraded from Gerrit 2.8 to 2.10 in the beginning of September, and
it went pretty smooth and let us overcome few annoying issues and enjoy
few new features and better integration with other apps.
Unfortunately, 3 months later, 2.10 also feels old, with 2.12 having
been released in the interim. With various Linaro groups continuing to
leverage advanced Gerrit features and integrations with other apps
(Jenkins, Bugzilla), Systems team faces various bugs and issues. None
of these issues are too grave, but they're quite convoluted and take
much time to be researched and understood. And then we find out that
it's a known issue in 2.10, which was fixed in later versions.
Jenkins' Gerrit integration already requires 2.12 for full
functionality and warns about our version being too old and some
features not supported. Which in turns brings concerns that every
time it doesn't work as expected, it may be because Gerrit plugin is
no longer tested with 2.10 and hits some issue pertaining to it.
With that in mind, Systems team would like to start planning for
next Gerrit upgrade, and move straight to the latest, 2.12.
To remind, the reason we didn't upgrade to 2.11 last time, was because
2.10 was the last version which included old-style change review
screen, and we wanted to provide smoother transition and let people to
try the new screen at their own pace. So, if you still use the old
design, please go to https://review.linaro.org/#/settings/preferences ,
and in "Change View:" dropdown, select "New Screen", and give it a
chance with the help of this doc:
https://review.linaro.org/Documentation/user-review-ui.html
And if you have any concerns regarding the upgrade, please speak up now.
Otherwise, we can do it in one of the following timeframes:
1. Upgrade in January.
2. Upgrade a bit later, but still before the Connect.
3. Discuss and plan upgrade at the Connect.
Systems team votes for the choice 1, upgrade next month (apparently, by
the end of), as that will allows us to deliver smoother Gerrit
experience to other teams, instead of firefighting older version issues.
Thanks,
Paul
Linaro.org | Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: http://www.facebook.com/pages/Linarohttp://twitter.com/#!/linaroorg - http://www.linaro.org/linaro-blog
--
Best Regards,
Paul
Linaro.org | Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: http://www.facebook.com/pages/Linarohttp://twitter.com/#!/linaroorg - http://www.linaro.org/linaro-blog
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Nick Kralevich <nnk(a)google.com>
Date: 30 March 2016 at 23:58
Subject: sepolicy directory moved
To: "seandroid-list(a)tycho.nsa.gov" <seandroid-list(a)tycho.nsa.gov>
Hi all,
If you sync AOSP, you'll find that the Android sepolicy directory has
changed locations. It was moved from external/sepolicy to
system/sepolicy. Having the directory in external/ was confusing to
other parts of Google, since this project isn't downstream of any
other project.
Sorry for the breakage this caused.
-- Nick
--
Nick Kralevich | Android Security | nnk(a)google.com | 650.214.4037
_______________________________________________
Seandroid-list mailing list
Seandroid-list(a)tycho.nsa.gov
To unsubscribe, send email to Seandroid-list-leave(a)tycho.nsa.gov.
To get help, send an email containing "help" to
Seandroid-list-request(a)tycho.nsa.gov.
--
Best Regards,
Yongqin Liu
---------------------------------------------------------------
#mailing list
linaro-android(a)lists.linaro.org <linaro-dev(a)lists.linaro.org>
http://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/linaro-android