File Validity: 10/09/2015
Company : http://lists.linaro.org
File Format: PDF
Internal Name: Remit File
Legal Copyright: Adobe. All rights reserved.
Original Filename: Last month remit.pdf
********** Confidentiality Notice **********.
This e-mail and any file(s) transmitted with it, is intended for the exclusive use by the person(s) mentioned above as recipient(s).
This e-mail may contain confidential information and/or information protected by intellectual property rights or other rights. If you
are not the intended recipient of this e-mail, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution, copying, or action taken
in relation to the contents of and attachments to this e-mail is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this
e-mail in error, please notify the sender and delete the original and any copies of this e-mail and any printouts immediately from
your system and destroy all copies of it.
Hi Arnd,
As you asked for flashbench results, here's some:
Transcend µSDcard 2GB :
flashbench -a /dev/mmcblk1
align 536870912 pre 3.24ms on 3.8ms post 2.67ms diff 845µs
align 268435456 pre 3.05ms on 3.6ms post 2.53ms diff 814µs
align 134217728 pre 3.11ms on 3.65ms post 2.56ms diff 814µs
align 67108864 pre 3.07ms on 3.65ms post 2.52ms diff 854µs
align 33554432 pre 3.08ms on 3.63ms post 2.49ms diff 851µs
align 16777216 pre 3.09ms on 3.59ms post 2.58ms diff 756µs
align 8388608 pre 3.25ms on 3.82ms post 2.68ms diff 850µs
align 4194304 pre 2.93ms on 3.5ms post 2.52ms diff 772µs
align 2097152 pre 2.96ms on 3.51ms post 2.49ms diff 788µs
align 1048576 pre 2.45ms on 2.5ms post 2.47ms diff 37.6µs
align 524288 pre 2.46ms on 2.47ms post 2.5ms diff -7440ns
align 262144 pre 2.45ms on 2.47ms post 2.51ms diff -13815n
align 131072 pre 2.45ms on 2.47ms post 2.49ms diff 2.15µs
align 65536 pre 2.45ms on 2.47ms post 2.49ms diff -1188ns
align 32768 pre 2.45ms on 2.46ms post 2.5ms diff -15476n
Seems to be a 2MiB eraseblock
Kingston µSD-HC card 4GB:
flashbench -a /dev/mmcblk1
align 1073741824 pre 1.76ms on 2.09ms post 1.86ms diff 280µs
align 536870912 pre 1.75ms on 2.09ms post 1.88ms diff 274µs
align 268435456 pre 1.76ms on 2.1ms post 1.88ms diff 279µs
align 134217728 pre 1.75ms on 2.1ms post 1.89ms diff 275µs
align 67108864 pre 1.75ms on 2.11ms post 1.9ms diff 282µs
align 33554432 pre 1.74ms on 2.09ms post 1.91ms diff 269µs
align 16777216 pre 1.92ms on 2.26ms post 1.88ms diff 362µs
align 8388608 pre 1.76ms on 2.1ms post 1.87ms diff 280µs
align 4194304 pre 1.75ms on 2.09ms post 1.88ms diff 268µs
align 2097152 pre 1.72ms on 1.91ms post 1.88ms diff 110µs
align 1048576 pre 1.85ms on 2.02ms post 1.85ms diff 171µs
align 524288 pre 1.72ms on 1.88ms post 1.85ms diff 98.5µs
align 262144 pre 1.72ms on 1.91ms post 1.88ms diff 108µs
align 131072 pre 1.73ms on 1.9ms post 1.87ms diff 96.3µs
align 65536 pre 1.72ms on 1.9ms post 1.86ms diff 105µs
align 32768 pre 1.72ms on 1.88ms post 1.85ms diff 89.5µs
Seems to be a standard 4MiB eraseblock.
Emmc 32GB:
./flashbench -a /dev/mmcblk0
align 8589934592 pre 467µs on 470µs post 470µs diff 1.25µs
align 4294967296 pre 470µs on 469µs post 466µs diff 976ns
align 2147483648 pre 472µs on 473µs post 476µs diff -1154ns
align 1073741824 pre 479µs on 487µs post 483µs diff 5.83µs
align 536870912 pre 474µs on 480µs post 481µs diff 2.9µs
align 268435456 pre 490µs on 497µs post 486µs diff 8.85µs
align 134217728 pre 485µs on 485µs post 486µs diff -145ns
align 67108864 pre 491µs on 493µs post 480µs diff 7.05µs
align 33554432 pre 495µs on 490µs post 495µs diff -4414ns
align 16777216 pre 491µs on 496µs post 495µs diff 2.32µs
align 8388608 pre 500µs on 504µs post 491µs diff 8.27µs
align 4194304 pre 475µs on 492µs post 497µs diff 6.63µs
align 2097152 pre 478µs on 477µs post 481µs diff -1896ns
align 1048576 pre 481µs on 488µs post 488µs diff 3.58µs
align 524288 pre 489µs on 489µs post 484µs diff 2.3µs
align 262144 pre 487µs on 485µs post 479µs diff 1.92µs
align 131072 pre 477µs on 477µs post 486µs diff -4437ns
align 65536 pre 484µs on 487µs post 481µs diff 4.52µs
align 32768 pre 485µs on 478µs post 484µs diff -6095ns
I didn't see a pattern on this one.
regards,
Richard
Hi!
I am unsubscribing this mailing list due to what seems to excessive spam
originating from China.
In case you still want to reply to any of my posts, i.e. regarding my
little shell script to automate analysis of cards and sticks a bit, using
flashbench, then please CC me.
This basically appears to be pretty quiet and unmaintained anyway.
Thanks,
--
Martin 'Helios' Steigerwald - http://www.Lichtvoll.de
GPG: 03B0 0D6C 0040 0710 4AFA B82F 991B EAAC A599 84C7
Spam detection software, running on the system "ip-10-142-244-252.ec2.internal",
has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original
message has been attached to this so you can view it or label
similar future email. If you have any questions, see
@@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details.
Content preview: My team and I reviewed your site. There are positive elements
but we also found some items that should be updated. We made a concept for
your review. May I send it to you? There is no obligation or commitment.
[...]
Content analysis details: (10.4 points, 5.0 required)
pts rule name description
---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
3.6 RCVD_IN_PBL RBL: Received via a relay in Spamhaus PBL
[115.221.55.202 listed in zen.spamhaus.org]
2.7 RCVD_IN_PSBL RBL: Received via a relay in PSBL
[115.221.55.202 listed in psbl.surriel.com]
1.3 RCVD_IN_RP_RNBL RBL: Relay in RNBL,
https://senderscore.org/blacklistlookup/
[115.221.55.202 listed in bl.score.senderscore.com]
0.0 RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_L3 RBL: Low reputation (-3)
[115.221.55.202 listed in bl.mailspike.net]
0.1 MISSING_MID Missing Message-Id: header
1.4 MISSING_DATE Missing Date: header
1.3 RDNS_NONE Delivered to internal network by a host with no rDNS
0.0 RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_BL Mailspike blacklisted
Spam detection software, running on the system "ip-10-142-244-252.ec2.internal",
has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original
message has been attached to this so you can view it or label
similar future email. If you have any questions, see
@@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details.
Content preview: Ëæ×ÅÆóÒµ¹ÜÀíˮƽµÄ²»¶ÏÌáÉý£¬¶ÔÐÐÕþ¹ÜÀíµÄרҵËØÖÊÒªÇóÒ²Ô½À´Ô½¸ß£¬ËûÃÇÔÚ¹¤×÷Öг£Óöµ½ÒÔÏÂÎÊÌ⣬²»Çå³þÐÐÕþ
¹ÜÀíÔÚÆóÒµÖеļÛÖµ£¬²»Ã÷Îú×Ô¼ºµÄ¹¤×÷Ö°ÔðÓë½ÇÉ«¶¨Î»£¬»òÕß²»ÖªµÀÈçºÎÈ¥¹ÜÀíÍŶӡ£ÖîÈç´ËÀàµÄÎÊÌ⣬¶¼ÊÇÿ¸ö
ÐÐÕþ¹ÜÀíÈËÔ±¶¼ÒªÃæ¶ÔµÄ£¬ÈçºÎ°ÑÎÕÕýȷ˼·ºÍ·½Ïò¡¢ÕÒµ½×îÊʵ±·½·¨£¬Ñ¸ËÙÌáÉý×ÔÉíÖ°ÒµËØÑø¡¢ÓÐЧ¿ØÖÆÐÐÕþ³É±¾£¬
¸üºÃµÄ´ï³ÉÆóÒµ¹ÜÀíµÄÄ¿µÄ¡£ [...]
Content analysis details: (16.5 points, 5.0 required)
pts rule name description
---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
0.0 URIBL_BLOCKED ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to URIBL was blocked.
See
http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/DnsBlocklists#dnsbl-block
for more information.
[URIs: qq.com]
2.7 RCVD_IN_PSBL RBL: Received via a relay in PSBL
[27.20.6.28 listed in psbl.surriel.com]
1.6 RCVD_IN_BRBL_LASTEXT RBL: No description available.
[27.20.6.28 listed in bb.barracudacentral.org]
0.6 RCVD_IN_SORBS_WEB RBL: SORBS: sender is an abusable web server
[27.20.6.28 listed in dnsbl.sorbs.net]
3.6 RCVD_IN_PBL RBL: Received via a relay in Spamhaus PBL
[27.20.6.28 listed in zen.spamhaus.org]
0.7 RCVD_IN_XBL RBL: Received via a relay in Spamhaus XBL
0.1 MISSING_MID Missing Message-Id: header
1.3 RDNS_NONE Delivered to internal network by a host with no rDNS
2.8 FORGED_MUA_OUTLOOK Forged mail pretending to be from MS Outlook
3.1 DOS_OE_TO_MX Delivered direct to MX with OE headers
